The president doesn’t control the economy, right? Every election year, that’s the reminder voters get from historians, politicos, journalists and academics of all stripes. It’s practically a cliché — voters make choices based on gas prices and grocery bills, even though those things are largely out of any one politician’s control. The political adage isn’t wrong, per se. It is, in fact, difficult for a single president to drastically improve the economy writ large. But President Donald Trump is proving that a politician can absolutely harm the economy when they lack any regard for the consequences, borne largely by the people who elected them. Tuesday marks the 100th day of Trump’s second term. In those 14 weeks, the president has unleashed an economic agenda so punishing that the only way to understand it in a historical context is not through a lens of policy but of plagues. If the Trump tariffs remain in place, the negative shocks could eclipse the the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. While Trump campaigned on a pledge to “immediately bring down prices, starting on Day One,” the White House has made scant progress on that promise beyond a broad executive order demanding federal agencies “deliver emergency price relief.” Trump’s only major economic initiative, a sweeping tariff agenda, amounts to a massive tax increase on American consumers. And it has landed the US at the lonely center of a global trade war — the sole aggressor, lobbing tax bombs at friends and foes alike. The “sell America” trade — in which global investors yank their money out of US assets like the dollar and Treasuries, worried about the country’s stability — was practically unheard of before Trump’s second term. But over the past month, it has helped wipe out trillions in market value. Despite Trump’s tariffs, the US economy remains, by some key metrics, in good shape — unemployment is low and inflation has cooled to around 2.5% this year from a pandemic-era peak of 9.1% in 2022. Of course, unemployment was low and inflation was falling under the Biden administration, too. Economists say gauging the impact of Trump’s tariffs, at least in the near term, will be difficult, in part because consumers have been shopping more to try to get ahead of price increases. That rush of spending may not last. But longer term, the chances of a recession, according to virtually every economic forecaster, are higher now than they were 100 days ago. Estimates vary between a coin flip and 70%. Prediction market Kalshi currently puts the likelihood of a US recession at 57%. Businesses are paralyzed, unsure whether to believe that Trump’s on-again, off-again tariffs will stay in place. Consumer confidence — which had held strong even under generationally high inflation during Biden’s term — is wavering. Absent from Trump’s tariff plan is anything that would immediately address the cost-of-living pain that voters overwhelmingly cited as their reason for re-electing him. Much of the public is now angry. A new CNN poll conducted by SSRS found that 59% of the country now believes Trump’s policies have worsened economic conditions, up from 51% in March. Tariffs, in particular, are not going over well. Price increases are already being felt, with 60% of US adults saying Trump’s policies have increased the cost of living in their community. Just 12% said Trump’s agenda has helped to bring prices down. The CNN polling tracks with other readings of the national mood. Consumer sentiment in April hit its fourth-lowest level on records going back to 1952, according to a closely watched University of Michigan survey. Inflation expectations reached their highest level since 1981. While that kind of polling isn’t the kind of “hard data” policymakers typically rely on, the way people feel about the economy matters, especially when it comes to prices. When people expect the economy to sour, they tend to pull back on spending, which slows economic growth. Right now, nearly 70% of Americans think it’s at least somewhat likely the US will go into a recession in the next year, according to the CNN poll. We can see that caution already playing out: Airlines are cutting flights ahead of the summer travel season as fewer people plan trips. Companies are lowering or altogether scrapping their earnings guidance, citing uncertainty around tariffs. Shipments carrying goods from China to the US are expected to fall dramatically in the coming days. According to Ryan Petersen, CEO of logistics conglomerate Flexport, ocean container bookings from China to the United States were down more than 60% industry-wide in the three weeks since the US’s 145% tariffs on Chinese imports took effect. Trump’s “Liberation Day” speech on April 2 promised a renaissance of American manufacturing that few outside the MAGA faithful believe is possible, or even preferable. But Trump offered one prediction that day that turned out to be truer than he could have imagined. “This will be an entirely different country in a short period of time,” he said. “It’ll be something, the whole world will be talking about it.”
How to trash an economic superpower in 100 days
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Analysis of Trump's Economic Policies After 100 Days in Office"
TruthLens AI Summary
As President Donald Trump marks the 100th day of his second term, his administration's economic policies have sparked significant concern among economists and the general public alike. Historically, the president's ability to influence the economy is often overstated, with voters typically attributing their economic experiences to broader trends rather than individual policies. However, Trump's recent actions, particularly his sweeping tariff agenda, have raised alarms about the potential for economic harm. These tariffs, which have been likened to a massive tax increase on American consumers, have positioned the United States at the center of a global trade war, leading to a dramatic withdrawal of foreign investment in U.S. assets. Analysts suggest that if these tariffs remain, the negative economic repercussions could rival or even exceed those of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite some positive indicators, such as low unemployment and declining inflation rates, the long-term outlook has grown increasingly bleak, with recession probabilities estimated between 50% to 70% by various forecasters, including prediction markets like Kalshi, which currently assess the likelihood at 57%.
Public sentiment is also shifting, with a recent CNN poll indicating that 59% of Americans believe Trump's policies have worsened economic conditions. This is a marked increase from 51% in March, highlighting growing discontent as price increases become more pronounced. A significant majority of Americans, approximately 60%, report that Trump's policies have elevated the cost of living in their communities, while only 12% feel that these measures have provided any relief. Consumer confidence is faltering, reflected in a notable drop in consumer sentiment to its fourth-lowest level since 1952. As expectations of a recession mount, businesses are responding by cutting back on services and adjusting earnings forecasts. The logistics sector is already feeling the impact, with a reported 60% drop in container bookings from China to the U.S. since the implementation of the new tariffs. Trump's bold claims of revitalizing American manufacturing have been met with skepticism, as many observers question the feasibility of such a transformation amid the current economic turmoil. Overall, Trump's first 100 days in economic policy have led to a climate of uncertainty, with the potential for lasting implications on the country's financial landscape.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article presents a critical view of President Donald Trump's economic policies during the initial days of his second term. It suggests that while presidents may not have direct control over economic conditions, their decisions can significantly impact the economy, often negatively when not carefully considered. The piece emphasizes the ramifications of Trump's aggressive tariff agenda and the potential for long-lasting damage to the U.S. economy.
Motivation Behind the Article
The intention appears to be to inform the public about the potential economic pitfalls of Trump's policies. By framing his actions in a negative light, the article seeks to raise awareness about the consequences of trade wars and tariffs. This could be aimed at swaying public opinion against Trump’s administration, particularly among those who are economically vulnerable.
Perceptions the Article Aims to Create
The narrative is likely designed to foster skepticism about Trump's leadership and economic strategies. By comparing his tariffs to "plagues," the article aims to create a sense of urgency and alarm regarding the state of the economy under his administration, suggesting a looming crisis.
Information Potentially Hidden from the Public
While the article highlights the negative impacts of Trump's policies, it downplays some positive indicators of the economy, such as low unemployment rates. This selective presentation may lead readers to overlook the complexity of the economic situation and the multifaceted factors influencing it.
Manipulation Rate
The article can be considered somewhat manipulative due to its language and framing. It uses dramatic comparisons and stark warnings to provoke an emotional response from readers. The use of terms like "economic superpower" and "tax bombs" suggests a deliberate effort to invoke fear and urgency.
Reliability of the Information
The article contains factual elements, such as the mention of tariffs and their economic implications. However, the interpretation of these facts may be biased. It relies heavily on a critical perspective, which could skew the overall reliability of the analysis presented.
Public Sentiment and Target Audience
This piece is likely to resonate more with those who are critical of Trump and concerned about economic inequality. It may appeal to progressive or liberal audiences who advocate for more cautious and considerate economic policies.
Impact on Markets and Stocks
The discussion of tariffs and trade wars could influence investor sentiment, potentially leading to volatility in stock markets. Companies dependent on international trade or imports could face declines, making this news particularly relevant for sectors such as manufacturing, retail, and technology.
Geopolitical Context
From a broader perspective, the article touches on the implications of U.S. trade policies on global economic stability. Given today’s interconnected world, the repercussions of a trade war could extend beyond U.S. borders, affecting international relations and economic partnerships.
Potential Use of AI in Writing
There is a possibility that AI tools were used in drafting this article, particularly in structuring arguments or analyzing data trends. AI may have influenced the tone and presentation style, emphasizing a critical narrative through word choice and phrasing.
Conclusion
In summary, the article serves as a warning about the economic consequences of current policies under Trump. While it presents some factual information, the tone and framing suggest an agenda that may not fully represent the complexities of the economic landscape. The reliability of the piece is moderate, leaning more towards a critical viewpoint rather than a balanced analysis.