How Pope Leo dealt with years of abuse allegations in a powerful Catholic society in Peru

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Pope Leo's Role in Addressing Abuse Allegations Against Sodalitium Christianae Vitae in Peru"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The rise of Pope Leo, formerly known as Robert Prevost, is inextricably linked to the handling of abuse allegations within the Sodalitium Christianae Vitae (SCV) in Peru, a Catholic society with significant influence in the region. Prevost faced these grave accusations during his tenure as a missionary and later as bishop in Chiclayo, where he encountered a scandal that had been brewing for years. The allegations were brought to light in 2015 through the book 'Half Monks, Half Soldiers' by Pedro Salinas and journalist Paola Ugaz, which detailed horrific accounts of abuse from numerous victims. Despite the gravity of the accusations, the church's response was initially slow. Survivors reported that Prevost's eventual intervention in 2019 was pivotal in prompting the church to take action, particularly after he was appointed to a higher position in Rome, giving him greater authority to address the issues at hand.

The SCV, founded in 1971 as a lay group, was initially a response to the rise of liberation theology in Latin America and had deep ties among Peru's elite, controlling various communities and educational institutions. Allegations against the group's founder, Luis Fernando Figari, emerged as early as 2011 but remained largely unaddressed until Prevost's involvement. Reports revealed systemic abuse, including sexual assault and psychological manipulation, leading to a 2023 Vatican investigation that resulted in the expulsion of several SCV members and the resignation of Archbishop José Antonio Eguren, who had been accused of protecting the society despite knowing about the allegations. The culmination of these efforts led to the eventual suppression of the SCV by Pope Francis in April 2025. Survivors expressed renewed hope in the church's accountability, with many noting Prevost's significant role in advocating for victims and facilitating important meetings with church leaders, marking a crucial shift in the church's approach to handling abuse allegations.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the troubling history of abuse allegations within a prominent Catholic society in Peru, Sodalitium Christianae Vitae (SCV), and the role of Pope Leo, formerly Robert Prevost, in addressing these issues. It outlines the extensive impact of the scandal that has affected the Church's reputation in Latin America, especially in Peru, and examines the long-standing culture of secrecy and control within SCV. The piece also highlights the journey of victims seeking justice and the eventual response from Church authorities.

Purpose Behind the Publication

By detailing the abuse allegations and the Church's response, the article aims to raise awareness about the ongoing issues within powerful religious institutions. It seeks to inform the public about the historical context of these allegations and the systemic failures that allowed such abuses to persist. The intention behind publishing this information may be to encourage accountability and transparency within the Church, as well as to support survivors of abuse.

Perception Creation

This article may contribute to a perception of distrust towards the Catholic Church, particularly in regions where SCV has had significant influence. By publicly addressing the scandal and the allegations against prominent figures, it aims to galvanize public support for reform and greater oversight within religious institutions.

Possible Concealments

While the article focuses on the abuse allegations and responses from Church officials, it may also serve to divert attention from other pressing issues within the Church or society. By concentrating on this scandal, there could be an attempt to mitigate broader criticisms of the Church's role in various social and political issues.

Manipulation Index

The article carries a moderate level of manipulative potential, primarily through its framing of the narrative. The choice of language, which emphasizes the systemic abuse and the Church's delayed responses, could influence readers' emotions and opinions about the Church and its leadership.

Truthfulness Assessment

The information presented appears to be grounded in credible sources, including testimonies from victims and statements from involved parties. However, as with many journalistic pieces, the framing and selection of details can affect perceptions of truth. The article seems to aim for accuracy but could be influenced by the authors' perspectives.

Social Implications

The revelations in the article could lead to increased calls for accountability within the Church, potentially affecting its operations and influence in Peru and beyond. The public's reaction may spur further investigations and reforms aimed at protecting vulnerable individuals within religious institutions.

Supporter Base and Target Audience

This article is likely to resonate with communities advocating for victims' rights and those critical of institutional power dynamics, particularly in religious contexts. It appeals to individuals seeking justice and transparency, as well as those concerned about the impact of religious organizations on society.

Market Impact

While the article itself may not directly impact stock markets, it could influence public sentiment towards companies or organizations associated with the Church or SCV. Investors may reevaluate their positions based on consumer reactions to the Church's handling of abuse allegations.

Global Power Dynamics

The story reflects ongoing struggles between institutional power and individual rights, a theme that resonates globally. The Catholic Church's response to these allegations could have wider implications for its influence in socio-political matters, particularly in regions where it holds substantial sway.

Artificial Intelligence Usage

It's possible that AI tools were employed in the writing process or for data analysis, particularly in compiling victim testimonies or historical context. The narrative style suggests human oversight, but AI could have assisted in structuring the information or identifying key themes.

Manipulative Elements

The article may contain manipulative aspects through its emotional appeals and emphasis on victim narratives. This could serve to rally public support but may also create a polarized view of the Church and its representatives.

Overall, while the article provides crucial insights into a significant issue, the framing and emotional weight of the narrative suggest that readers should consider multiple perspectives and seek additional information for a comprehensive understanding.

Unanalyzed Article Content

As a missionary and bishop in Peru, the future Pope Leo came face-to-face with one of the most serious and far-reaching scandals in the church in Latin America. For years, there were allegations of abuse within the hugely influential Catholic society Sodalitium Christianae Vitae (SCV), which had deep ties to Peru’s powerful and wealthy. The scandal came to a head in 2015, the year after Leo, then known as Robert Prevost, was appointed bishop in the northern city of Chiclayo. A book written by one of the victims, Pedro Salinas, with journalist Paola Ugaz, “Half Monks, Half Soldiers,” described alleged beatings, humiliation and sexual assault in stark detail from 30 anonymous victims that enflamed the country. Several survivors in Peru, Ugaz and a Vatican source closely involved in the case told CNN that Leo’s eventual intervention – after a key meeting in 2019 and a crucial promotion in Rome – is what finally kicked the Church into taking dramatic action. A secret brotherhood When Oscar Osterling formally joined SCV in 1992, he was instructed not to tell his parents about his loyalty oath – a secrecy that appealed to the then-teenager. He would go on to spend more than two decades with SCV, only breaking out in his mid-thirties as the first allegations began to surface. Founded in 1971 in Peru as a lay group, the Sodalitium was politically driven as a fight back against the rise of liberation theology in Latin America, a radical movement which began in the 1960s and focused on supporting the poor. The society controlled several communities and ran religious schools in the southern part of the country, its members and students mostly drawn from the country’s elite. At one point, SCV had 20,000 members across South America and parts of the United States – and went on to develop strong ties with Denver and Colorado, including links with conservative Catholic media. Victims complained of abuses by founder Luis Fernando Figari to the archdiocese in Peru’s capital city Lima as early as 2011, and possibly before. Figari has always maintained his innocence with his lawyer telling CNN in January that Figari has not been convicted in a court of law for the allegations. But hearing the others’ accounts, Osterling says he realized the strangeness of his own experience; he alleges that Figari would film him and other young converts standing in their underpants in the middle of the night during a spiritual retreat. “In my case it did not escalate to a full sexual assault,” he says. He now believes he and his cohort were being groomed. Another alleged victim told CNN that he was raped by Figari at least three times in the 1970s, when he turned 17. It was “the only way to correctly see his aura,” he recalls the older man telling him. While dozens of young Peruvians have alleged they were victimized or bullied by Figari and other senior members of SVC, the topic remains taboo in ultra-Catholic Peru, and only a few have chosen to make details of their allegations public. Prevost, who lived in Peru as a missionary in the 1980s and the 1990s, would have heard about these accounts while serving as Bishop of Chiclayo starting in 2014, especially following the publication of Ugaz and Salinas’ bombshell book. Ugaz and Salinas also accused José Antonio Eguren, an archbishop in the coastal diocese of Piura – where Prevost worked as a young priest and which neighbors his diocese of Chiclayo – of protecting the SCV despite knowing about alleged abuses within it. Eguren fought back with a defamation lawsuit alleging this was untrue and harmed his honor and reputation, though he later dropped the case. According to Ugaz, who has faced a long campaign of legal actions and death threats around her reporting on the Sodalitium case, she received a message of solidarity during this time from Prevost and two other bishops. A shocking report In 2017, a probe ordered by SCV revealed stunning allegations. The group, which had already begun a series of internal disciplinary actions, found that Figari sodomized his recruits and forced them to fondle him and one another. He liked to watch them “experience pain, discomfort and fear,” and humiliated them in front of others to enhance his control over them, the report alleged. The next year, more than a dozen alleged victims of the SCV from across Peru, Brazil, Colombia and Costa Rica, held a meeting with five high ranking prelates at the Peruvian Episcopal Conference in Lima. Prevost was one of the meeting’s organizers; according to Ugaz, he acted as a “bridge” between the victims and the SCV and helped secure financial settlements. Renzo Orbegozo, another alleged SCV victim, had been trying to meet with church officials for weeks but found little traction before Prevost, he told CNN. Trying to overcome the impasse, Orbegozo started emailing Prevost and another official, the Vatican’s representative to Peru. When the meeting finally took place, Orbegozo recalls, “Prevost recognized me immediately. ‘You are the guy from the email!’ he told me.” “He wanted to know everything about our correspondence …and showed real empathy,” Orbegozo said. Osterling and Ugaz recall that the bishops they met agreed to write a letter to the Vatican, pushing to investigate the alleged crimes and asking for the personal involvement of then-Pope Francis. But higher church officials declined to move the case forward. “I remember that meeting very well,” Orbegozo, who now lives in Texas, told CNN. “Back then we had the feeling nobody was listening to us.” Ugaz, who first met Prevost in 2018 and remained in contact with him, said the stalled outcome of the meeting caused Prevost “great frustration” although she added “his character is not one to burn down the house. He accepted what had happened, made his frustration clear.” Though that meeting initially seemed to lead to little, Orbegozo and Osterling believe it was the first crack in a wall destined to crumble. “(Prevost) knew — he knew about many things — but he couldn’t act because he had people above him. So much so, that as soon as he could, he did — when they made him prefect,” says Osterling. A cascade of action Everything seemed to accelerate in early 2023 after Prevost was named prefect of the influential Dicastery of Bishops – a role that suddenly catapulted him into a much more powerful position than the archbishop next door in Piura. The job gave him a crucial role in the appointments and oversight of bishops, holding regular meetings with fellow cardinals and Pope Francis to discuss episcopal nominations. It’s hard to say exactly what happened in the halls of the Vatican after Prevost moved to Rome. But the next year, two top investigators from the Vatican were finally sent to Lima to establish what had happened within SCV – a probe that led to the expulsion of 14 members of the society, including Figari. Archbishop Eguren also resigned in April 2024 at the age of 67 – several years before the normal retirement age of 75 – without specifying the reasons. A source close to the Vatican investigation told CNN that the future Pope Leo played a crucial role in removing Eguren. “As prefect of the dicastery, (Prevost) was very efficient in evaluating the evidence and obtaining the resignation of Archbishop Eguren,” a source close to the investigation explained to CNN. Eguren has denied Prevost’s involvement in his resignation, emphasizing that he offered his resignation directly to Pope Francis. After stepping down, the archbishop also said in a statement that he rejected Ugaz and Salinas’ allegations, and had “sought to fulfil the mission entrusted to me with justice, honesty, and fidelity to the teachings of the Church, with special concern for the well-being of the poorest and most needy.” Another expelled member was Alejandro Bermúdez, founder of the Denver-based Catholic News Agency, who was found by the Vatican investigation to have committed “abuse in the exercise of the apostolate of journalism.” Bermudez, known for a combative style on social media, has countered that he was kicked out for simply “telling the truth.” More recently, he worked as a contractor with “Catholic Vote,” an organization which sought to bolster support for US President Donald Trump in the 2024 election. (The group’s president Brian Burch is President Trump’s pick to be the next US Ambassador to the Holy See.) The Sodalitium still retained powerful supporters. Following the news of the expulsions, the Archdiocese of Denver said it was “shocked and saddened” while an adviser to a former Archbishop of Denver wrote that “something is deeply wrong” with the “Rome’s latest treatment of the SCV (Sodalitium).” Nevertheless, in early 2025, then-Pope Francis went even further, taking the very rare step of suppressing the society entirely. The move was formally decreed on April 14 – just a week before Francis died. Afterwards, the SCV released a statement asking “forgiveness from the entire Church and society for the pain caused” and “forgiveness for the mistreatment and abuse committed within our community.” Prevost has been accused of mishandling abuse allegations in two other cases, in Chicago and in Chiclayo, Peru. But in the case of the SCV, Ugaz says she is certain that Prevost “took action” to help ensure the Sodalitium was dissolved. She and Salinas met with him in the Vatican in October 2024, and she says he arranged their meeting with Pope Francis two months later. After years of fighting to be heard, Osterling says he never lost his Catholic faith – but that Francis’s eventual crackdown reinvigorated it. “What we’re talking about here is just the latest chapter. I have hope now because of what happened in the last two years. Had we had this conversation two years ago, I’d have told you I had no hope in the Church. Now, it’s different,” he told CNN. As Francis’ successor, Pope Leo seems to have left little doubt about his stance on the end of SCV. A few days after his election, Leo was photographed greeting Ugaz with a broad smile, as she handed him a box of chocolates and a Peruvian scarf from the country he called home for years.

Back to Home
Source: CNN