As the continuing India-Pakistan crisis takes a dangerous turn, nations around the world are urging calm. The initial thinking was that after India launched air strikes, and with Pakistan claiming to have shot down several Indian jets - a claim Delhi has not confirmed - both sides could claim "victory" and de-escalate. But there's a danger that any protracted tit-for-tat attacks could lead them to a far more damaging prospect. During past conflicts, such as in 2019 and 2016, it was the United States and a few other global powers that put pressure on Delhi and Islamabad to bring the situation under control and de-escalate. Now passions are running high and the nationalist rhetoric has reached a crescendo on both sides. The neighbours are closer to war than in recent decades. “The World community is keeping quiet; that’s dangerous,” Ayesha Siddiqa, a Pakistani academic who is a senior fellow at King’s College London. “Though the flare up has been happening for decades, this is the first time the two countries find themselves in a conflict without anyone monitoring them or forcefully telling them to stop,” she said. Unless Washington gets more involved, Islamabad and Delhi may continue with their accusations and counter-accusations. Although US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been telling the senior leaders of India and Pakistan to de-escalate, the message from other American leaders is different. US Vice-President JD Vance has said that a potential war between India and Pakistan would be "none of our business" during an interview with Fox News. "We want this thing to de-escalate as quickly as possible. We can't control these countries, though," Vance said. Vance was on a visit to India whenthe militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians, took place. US President Donald Trump had earlier called rising tension between India and Pakistan a "shame". During previous India-Pakistan skirmishes, for example in 2019, tension was defused quickly after India carried out what it called “surgical strikes” on what it called terrorist camps inside Pakistan. One Indian military jet was shot down in the aftermath of the crisis andthe pilot was captured by Pakistan. He was released two days later after reported intervention from Washington and other world powers. But the intensity of the current conflict is different and passions are running high on both sides. While the Trump administration’s priorities are more about tariffs, China and Ukraine-Russia, it may require a concerted attempt by the international community to lower tension between the two nuclear-armed rivals. The other world power which has a stake in South Asia is China. Beijing has close economic and military ties with Islamabad. It has invested more than $50bn (£37.5bn) in Pakistan as parts of its China-Pakistan Economic Corridor to boost trade. China also has unresolved border issues with Indiaand the two countries recently had a border clash in the Himalayan region 2020. Despite the tension, China is the second largest trading partner of India. "If the US is uninterested [in resolving India-Pakistan tension] then other permanent members of the UN Security Council – P5 - should get involved. It is their responsibility as well," Shen Dingli, a Shanghai-based international affairs expert tells the BBC. As India accuses Pakistan of supporting the Kashmiri separatist rebels, who carried out the deadly attack on tourists last month, the Chinese academic says "the P-5 members can launch a credible investigation into the incident", to address India's concerns. Gulf states like Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which have close ties to both the countries, could step up their mediation efforts. Saudi Arabian Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Adel Al-Jubeir arrived in Delhi on 7 May in what was seen as a surprise visit amid the backdrop of a spike in tensions between India and Pakistan. “A good meeting with Adel Al-Jubeir," Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said, adding that his counterpart “shared India’s perspective on firmly countering terrorism”. The Saudi minister arrived in Islamabad on Friday for talks with Pakistan's leaders. There are an estimated 2.6 million Pakistanis living and working in the Gulf Kingdom. Riyadh has considerable influence in Pakistan. Saudi Arabia has loaned billions of dollars to Pakistan to bail out the country during economic crises over the years. One way out of the current crisis could be a situation where both sides can claim victory to satisfy their audience. Delhi says the missile strikes on suspected militant hideouts inside Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir were part of a commitment to hold “accountable” those responsible for the last month’s attack in Pahalgam. “India has already said it has achieved its objectives. Now, the ball is in Pakistan’s court. If they wish to retaliate then that would elicit a strong response from India,” retired Indian Lt Gen D S Hooda said. For Pakistan, especially for its powerful military, it would want to show its people that it can stand up against India and teach it a lesson once again by downing five of the Indian air force jets during a dog fight. India has not acknowledged the loss of any of its fighter jets in the current skirmish. But according to Pakistani academic Siddiqa, how the current crisis ends depends on what India’s stated objectives are. “India’s goal posts keep changing day by day – from punishing Pakistan to attaining something more,” she said.
How can India and Pakistan find a way to de-escalate?
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"International Community Urges De-Escalation Amid Heightened India-Pakistan Tensions"
TruthLens AI Summary
The ongoing crisis between India and Pakistan has escalated to alarming levels, prompting calls for calm from the international community. Following India's air strikes and Pakistan's claims of shooting down Indian jets, both nations initially seemed poised to claim 'victory' and de-escalate tensions. However, the potential for a prolonged cycle of retaliation poses a serious risk, as evidenced by historical conflicts in 2016 and 2019, where external pressures from global powers, particularly the United States, played a crucial role in diffusing the situation. Currently, both countries are engaged in heated nationalist rhetoric, with a lack of external monitoring exacerbating the risk of conflict. Ayesha Siddiqa, a Pakistani academic, notes that this is the first time the two countries are embroiled in conflict without significant international oversight, raising concerns about the potential for war in this volatile region. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has urged de-escalation, yet contrasting sentiments from other US officials indicate a more hands-off approach, with Vice-President JD Vance suggesting that the situation is beyond American control. This complex dynamic underscores the urgent need for international intervention to prevent further escalation.
China, as a significant player in South Asia with deep economic ties to Pakistan, complicates the situation further. With over $50 billion invested in Pakistan through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, China has a vested interest in regional stability, especially given its own border tensions with India. Experts like Shen Dingli advocate for a more active role by the permanent members of the UN Security Council in mediating the conflict, particularly as accusations fly between India and Pakistan regarding terrorism and military aggression. Additionally, Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which maintain close relations with both nations, could enhance their mediation efforts. Recent diplomatic engagements, including Saudi Arabia's surprise visit to India during rising tensions, highlight the potential for regional players to facilitate dialogue. For a resolution, both nations may need to navigate a path that allows them to claim victory, thereby satisfying domestic audiences while avoiding further escalation. The evolving objectives of India, particularly regarding its response to perceived threats from Pakistan, will be pivotal in shaping the conflict's trajectory and potential resolution.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article presents a critical overview of the escalating tensions between India and Pakistan, highlighting the international community's concerns and the lack of effective intervention. The framing of the situation suggests an urgent need for de-escalation, while also revealing the complexities surrounding the geopolitical dynamics of the region.
International Response and Involvement
The article underscores the absence of significant global intervention, particularly from the United States, which has historically played a role in mediating conflicts between India and Pakistan. The mention of differing messages from U.S. officials, with some promoting de-escalation and others adopting a more detached stance, reflects the inconsistency in international diplomacy. This inconsistency may lead to a perception that the crisis is being neglected, which can exacerbate tensions further.
Nationalism and Rhetoric
The text points out the rising nationalist sentiments in both countries, which can fuel the conflict. By emphasizing the heightened rhetoric, the article suggests that public opinion may be swaying leaders toward more aggressive postures, complicating the path to peace. This could imply that the media and political narratives within both nations are contributing to a warlike atmosphere.
Potential Consequences
The fear of a protracted conflict is palpable in the article, indicating that continued skirmishes could spiral into a larger war. The historical context provided, referencing previous conflicts, serves to underscore the potential for escalation. The analysis hints that without intervention, both countries may continue their cycle of accusations, leading to serious consequences for regional stability.
Perception and Manipulation
The narrative aims to create a sense of urgency around the need for international oversight and intervention. By framing the crisis as a potential catastrophe without external monitoring, the article may seek to mobilize public opinion for more proactive diplomatic measures. The usage of language that evokes emotions linked to nationalism and conflict can also be interpreted as a form of manipulation, steering public sentiment toward a call for action.
Trustworthiness and Reliability
In assessing the reliability of the article, it provides a balanced overview of the situation, referencing credible sources and historical context. However, the emotional framing and the call for intervention could suggest an underlying agenda to push for a specific diplomatic approach. Overall, while the article contains factual elements, its emphasis on certain aspects of the conflict may lead to a biased interpretation of events.
The insights gained from this analysis highlight the complexities of the India-Pakistan relationship and the role of international players in mitigating conflict. The implications of such tensions extend beyond regional issues, influencing global political and economic dynamics.