At age 14 he was an impoverished factory worker. On Wednesday, he became the leader of one of Asia’s most powerful economies, a US ally and cultural juggernaut. But after sweeping to a decisive victory over conservative rival Kim Moon-soo on Tuesday, Lee Jae-myung faces a daunting task. South Korea remains deeply divided, Lee’s predecessor having declared martial law in a short-lived power grab in December, leaving many voters anxious about the state of their democracy. Six months of ensuing political turmoil entrenched existing rifts, with protests – both for and against former President Yook Suk Yeol and his People Power Party – filling the streets of the capital Seoul. Choppy international conditions have compounded domestic uncertainty. US President Donald Trump’s global tariffs have hit South Korea’s trade-reliant economy hard, with no permanent leader at the helm to steer negotiations with Washington. Lee’s election – after a revolving door of interim leaders over the past half-year – might finally offer the country some much-needed stability, said Cho Hee-kyoung, a law professor at Hongik University in Seoul. “We didn’t even have someone who could engage with Trump on the tariff war, and for an export-driven economy, that’s a serious problem,” Cho said. And, she added, the election – which saw the highest voter turnout since 1997 – represented a stinging public rebuke to the People Power Party. “For many people, I think this election was about holding those responsible for bringing chaos to the country accountable,” she said. One voter, Kim Yong-gung, told CNN he was so happy with Lee’s victory he felt like he was flying. He had driven two hours from his home to the capital on the night of martial law, unsure if he would return safely; South Korea has had its share of bloody crackdowns in its authoritarian past before it became a democracy. “So, I called my wife and told her to tell my kids that I am going to (the National Assembly) for the sake of my grandchild,” he said. “To make a better world for their generation, we need to stop the martial law, I can’t just ignore it and sleep.” But it remains to be seen whether Lee, 60, will be able to heal the political divides – especially as he comes with his own baggage, caught up in various legal challenges, facing allegations of corruption and abuse of power. It’s not clear what will happen to his ongoing criminal trials; sitting presidents are normally immune from prosecution, but there’s disagreement on whether that applies to cases that begin before they take office. At his inauguration on Wednesday, however, Lee sought to cast himself as a bringer of unity and a fresh start to the nation of more than 50 million people. “It is time to replace hatred and confrontation with coexistence, reconciliation, and solidarity – to open an era of national happiness, of dreams and hope,” he said in a speech. “I will answer the earnest call to build a completely new nation.” From rags to riches Lee’s spectacular rise is well documented. Born in the mid-1960s, he was the fifth of seven children in a poor family from Andong, a riverside city southeast of Seoul. His father worked as a market cleaner while his mother was a fee collector at public bathrooms, according to his office and biographies that include excerpts from Lee’s own diaries. With civil war-ravaged South Korea in the early throes of a rapid industrialization that would transform it into a manufacturing powerhouse, Lee began working in factories as a teenager – from jewelry plants to refrigerator assembly lines. While working at a factory making baseball gloves, he permanently injured his left arm. In his diary, Lee would write about his envy of students he saw wearing school uniforms and those who had enough to eat. Despite his humble beginnings, he eventually passed his school exams and earned a full scholarship to study law at Chung-Ang University, one of Seoul’s top private universities. From there, Lee became a human rights lawyer, eventually entering politics in 2010 as the mayor of Seongnam city, just outside Seoul, representing the liberal Democratic Party. That led to another, more significant, stint from 2018 as governor of Gyeonggi province, the country’s most populous, which surrounds the capital. By then, he was eyeing the presidency – and left the governorship to run in the 2022 election, losing to Yoon by less than one percentage point. Lee became a lawmaker after that, surviving an assassination attempt in January 2024 when a man stabbed him in the neck during a public event in the southern city of Busan, in what his party denounced as an “act of political terror.” Later that year came Yoon’s ill-fated power grab. Lee again made headlines as one of the lawmakers who rushed to the legislature and pushed past soldiers to hold an emergency vote to lift martial law. He livestreamed himself jumping a fence to enter the building, in a viral video viewed tens of millions of times. Despite his growing popularity, Lee has been viewed with suspicion by many opponents because of his criminal trials – including over alleged bribery and charges related to a property development scandal. Separately, he was convicted of violating election law by knowingly making a false statement during a debate in the 2022 presidential campaign. The case has been sent to an appeals court. Lee denies all the charges against him. Speaking to CNN in December, he claimed he had been indicted on various charges “without any evidence or basis,” and that the allegations are politically motivated. What a Lee presidency might look like Yoon’s martial law decree had been in part fueled by his frustration over a months-long political stalemate, with Lee’s Democratic Party blocking the president from moving forward with many of his campaign promises and policies. Now, the Democratic Party controls both the parliament and the presidency – which could see “a return to normal politics,” said Celeste Arrington, Korea Foundation associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University in the US capital. “It might be easier to push through policies than it had been under impeached President Yoon,” she added. And Lee has a lot to do, right away – including addressing a sluggish economy and getting involved in the US-South Korea trade talks. “I will immediately activate an emergency economic response task force team to restore people’s livelihood and revive the economy,” he said during his inauguration speech on Wednesday. He added that he would “turn the global economic and security crisis into an opportunity to maximize our national interest,” and strengthen trilateral cooperation with the US and Japan. Arrington added that Lee clearly sees the US-South Korea alliance as the “backbone” of the country’s national security – but he will have to balance that against relations with China. The US rival is also South Korea’s largest trading partner. Yoon took a famously hard line on North Korea, and relations have plummeted. In contrast, Lee hails from a political party that has historically taken a more conciliatory approach to South Korea’s autocratic neighbor. Lee reiterated the long-standing goal of peace on the Korean Peninsula, vowing to “respond firmly to North Korea’s nuclear threats while also keeping communication channels open.” But above all, Lee emphasized the importance of rebuilding public trust, badly damaged by the martial law crisis – and punishing those responsible. “I will rebuild everything that was destroyed by the insurrection and create a society that continues to grow and develop,” he said on Wednesday. “An insurrection that uses the military’s power, to seize the people’s sovereignty, must never happen again.”
He survived an assassination attempt. Now South Korea’s new president must heal divisions and tread cautiously with Trump
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Lee Jae-myung Assumes Presidency of South Korea Amid Political Divisions and Economic Challenges"
TruthLens AI Summary
Lee Jae-myung's ascent to the presidency of South Korea marks a significant moment in the nation's political landscape, especially after he triumphed over conservative candidate Kim Moon-soo. Having emerged from a childhood of poverty, where he worked in factories from a young age, Lee's journey to the leadership of one of Asia's most powerful economies is remarkable. However, his presidency comes at a time of considerable division within South Korea. The political turmoil that followed former President Yook Suk Yeol's brief martial law declaration left many citizens apprehensive about the future of democracy in the country. Protests erupted across Seoul, reflecting the deep-seated divisions among the populace. With Lee now at the helm, there is hope that his leadership can restore stability, especially as South Korea grapples with the economic repercussions of U.S. tariffs imposed under President Trump, which have significantly impacted its trade-dependent economy. Law professor Cho Hee-kyoung noted the importance of having a permanent leader to engage in crucial economic discussions with the United States, emphasizing that Lee's election may signal a much-needed return to normalcy after months of uncertainty.
Despite the optimism surrounding his presidency, Lee faces numerous challenges, including his own legal troubles that could hinder his ability to govern effectively. His past, marked by a near-fatal assassination attempt and allegations of corruption, adds complexity to his leadership. During his inauguration, Lee expressed a desire to unify the country and move away from a culture of hatred and division. He aims to foster reconciliation and solidarity while addressing pressing issues like the sluggish economy and strained international relations, particularly with North Korea. Lee's approach contrasts with his predecessor's hardline stance, as he advocates for a more conciliatory relationship with the North while maintaining a firm response to its nuclear threats. Ultimately, his ability to rebuild public trust, which has been severely damaged by recent political crises, will be crucial for his administration's success and the stability of South Korea moving forward.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights the challenges faced by South Korea’s newly elected president, Lee Jae-myung, following a tumultuous political climate. With a backdrop of social division and the recent assassination attempt, Lee's election signifies a potential shift in the political landscape. The narrative emphasizes the urgency for stability in a country grappling with internal fractures and external pressures, particularly from the United States under President Trump.
Political Landscape and Public Sentiment
The recent elections showcased a significant voter turnout, indicating a public desire for change and accountability, especially against the backdrop of a chaotic political history. Lee's victory is portrayed as a rejection of the previous administration's actions, particularly the declared martial law. This context serves to reinforce the idea that the electorate is seeking a return to democratic norms and stability.
International Relations and Economic Implications
The article underscores the economic challenges South Korea faces due to tariffs imposed by the U.S., which have adversely affected its trade-driven economy. The mention of the absence of a stable leadership during negotiations suggests that Lee's administration is critical for revitalizing these economic discussions. Cho Hee-kyoung's comments highlight the perceived urgency for effective engagement with the U.S. to mitigate adverse economic impacts.
Societal Healing and Future Stability
Lee's task of healing societal divisions is emphasized, given the protests and unrest that have characterized recent months. The narrative suggests that his presidency could be pivotal in reconciling these divisions. The emotional accounts from voters, like Kim Yong-gung, illustrate a collective yearning for progress and stability, reflecting a society deeply affected by its past but hopeful for the future.
Media Influence and Public Perception
The framing of Lee's election as a response to previous governmental failures may influence public perception, aligning citizens' hopes with Lee's leadership. The article potentially aims to foster a sense of optimism and unity among the populace, positioning Lee as a figure capable of navigating both domestic and international challenges.
Manipulative Aspects and Reliability
While the article presents factual information regarding Lee's victory and the political climate, the tone may evoke a sense of urgency and hope, which could be seen as manipulative. This approach could lead readers to focus on the need for change rather than critically evaluating the complexities of the situation. Overall, the information appears credible, but the framing encourages a specific emotional response.
The article's emphasis on Lee's potential for stability and healing suggests that it aims to galvanize public support for his leadership. The narrative may resonate more with progressive and reform-minded segments of society, seeking a departure from past conflicts.
In terms of market impact, the article may influence investor sentiment regarding South Korean stocks, particularly those reliant on exports. The focus on international trade relationships indicates that sectors tied to U.S. economic policy could be particularly affected.
Considering global power dynamics, this article contributes to ongoing discussions about U.S.-South Korea relations, especially in light of economic negotiations. The timing of the article aligns with broader geopolitical themes, addressing the intersection of domestic politics and international trade.
In conclusion, while the article provides an informative overview of Lee Jae-myung's presidency, it subtly encourages a narrative of hope and stability that may not fully encapsulate the complexities of South Korea's political landscape.