‘He gets him what he needs’: Hegseth’s new favorite adviser helped set up Signal on one of secretary’s computers at Pentagon

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Colonel Ricky Buria's Role in Secretary Hegseth's Communication Controversy Raises Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a recent controversy surrounding Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, it was revealed that he had been using the encrypted messaging app Signal to communicate about sensitive military operations, which is against Pentagon policy. This situation came to light when Colonel Ricky Buria, who has emerged as a prominent adviser in Hegseth's inner circle, sought an exception from the Defense Department’s chief information officer to allow Hegseth to continue using the app. The request raised concerns among senior Pentagon officials, particularly because it was made by a military officer rather than Hegseth's civilian chief of staff. Prior to the exposure of Hegseth's use of Signal, Buria had already facilitated the setup of an additional computer in Hegseth’s office purportedly for personal communications, highlighting a potential disregard for established protocols regarding secure communications within the Pentagon. As the inquiry into Hegseth’s use of Signal progressed, the Pentagon maintained that the Secretary had never used the app on his government computer, although the presence of the computer with Signal installed remained unexplained.

Colonel Buria, a career Marine and former aide to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, has transitioned rapidly into a significant role within Hegseth's administration, even as he submitted retirement papers to the Marine Corps. His rise is particularly notable given that he previously served in a more subdued capacity under Austin. Buria's influence appears to have grown as Hegseth has sought to consolidate his inner circle, distancing himself from other military officials and increasing his reliance on a select few, including Buria and his own wife. While Buria's new role as a senior civilian adviser raises questions about his qualifications, especially regarding political maneuvering within the Pentagon, he has begun to assert himself in discussions with senior military officers. This shift in dynamics has provoked mixed reactions among officials, some of whom question whether Buria's informal approach and lack of political experience could hinder his effectiveness in a more senior position. Despite these concerns, Buria's close relationship with Hegseth suggests he may be positioned for an even more significant role as the Secretary continues to navigate the complex landscape of defense policy and military operations.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reveals a troubling scenario regarding Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's use of the Signal messaging app to discuss sensitive military operations at the Pentagon. It raises questions about adherence to established protocols and the implications of such actions within the Department of Defense.

Policy Violations and Concerns

The article highlights that Hegseth's communication via Signal violates Pentagon policy, which prohibits the use of unauthorized platforms for discussing non-public information. This breach, coupled with the inquiry made by Colonel Ricky Buria for an exception, raises eyebrows among senior officials. The fact that a military officer made this request instead of a civilian chief of staff suggests a potential overstepping of boundaries within the military hierarchy.

Public Perception and Trust

The narrative constructed around this incident seems aimed at fostering skepticism about the integrity and accountability of high-ranking officials within the Pentagon. Such coverage could undermine public trust in military leadership, suggesting that some individuals may disregard established regulations for personal convenience. The insistence on the need for exceptions could be viewed as indicative of a culture that prioritizes individual desires over institutional integrity.

Potential Hidden Agendas

The article's focus on Hegseth and Buria could serve to distract from other pressing issues within the Pentagon or the broader political landscape. By emphasizing this particular incident, it may be an attempt to shift public attention away from more systemic problems or controversies within defense policy or military conduct.

Manipulative Nature of the Report

The report appears to have a manipulative edge, primarily through its framing of Hegseth and Buria's actions as emblematic of a larger problem within the defense establishment. The language used suggests a deliberate attempt to provoke outrage and concern among readers, potentially leading to calls for accountability or reform.

Comparison with Other Reports

This article can be contrasted with other recent reports discussing military accountability or government transparency. By connecting this incident to broader themes of governance and oversight, it may serve to bolster narratives around the need for reform in military communications and operational security.

Economic and Political Implications

The fallout from this report could have implications for defense policy and funding. If public perception shifts towards a view of the Pentagon as mismanaged or untrustworthy, it could affect budget allocations or support for defense initiatives. The stock market could react negatively to perceptions of instability within military leadership, particularly for defense contractors who rely on government contracts.

Community Support Dynamics

The story may resonate more with communities that are concerned about military accountability and governance. It could appeal to those advocating for transparency and reform within governmental institutions, while alienating supporters of Hegseth who may view this as a politically motivated attack.

Geopolitical Context

In the broader context of international relations, this incident touches on issues of military communication security and operational integrity. It reflects ongoing challenges in defense policy and could influence perceptions of U.S. military effectiveness and credibility on the global stage.

The depth of reporting and the framing of this article suggest a moderate level of reliability; however, the potential for bias in the presentation should be noted. The focus on individual actions over systemic issues may skew the reader's understanding of the complexities involved.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Last month, after news broke that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth was using Signal to discuss sensitive military operations in violation of Pentagon policy, one of his closest military aides made an unusual inquiry to the Defense Department’s chief information officer: Would they grant an exception so Hegseth could keep using Signal freely? The question came from Col. Ricky Buria, a former aide to previous Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin who has rapidly established himself as a key member of Hegseth’s inner circle, multiple people familiar with the matter told CNN. The Signal inquiry raised eyebrows among other senior Pentagon officials, who wondered whether the request was appropriate — especially from a uniformed officer, rather than Hegseth’s civilian chief of staff. Weeks earlier, before The Atlantic revealed that Hegseth had been using the app to discuss detailed military plans, Buria had pushed to get Hegseth an extra desktop computer in his office that he could use Signal on, ostensibl y for personal communications so he could more easily text friends and family from the Pentagon, the sources said. The Secretary’s office is considered a secure space, where cell phones are not typically permitted. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency recommends that highly targeted individuals use Signal, but DoD policy says Signal is “NOT authorized to access, transmit, process non-public DoD information.” It notes that requests for exceptions to that policy can be submitted to the chief information officer. It is not clear whether Hegseth was ever given an exception to use Signal freely, or if he has continued to use it for sensitive military planning in the fallout of the Signalgate episode. In a statement to CNN, Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said, “The Secretary of Defense’s use of communications systems and channels is classified. However, we can confirm that the Secretary has never used and does not currently use Signal on his government computer.” Parnell did not comment on why Hegseth had another computer set up in his office that Signal was installed on. A rapid rise in Hegseth’s inner circle Buria, a career Marine with multiple combat deployments who served as both Austin and Hegseth’s junior military assistant, has for months been straddling the line between military aide and civilian adviser, the sources said. And last week, he submitted his retirement papers to the Marine Corps, a Marine spokesperson confirmed. On Thursday morning, Buria was at the Pentagon in civilian clothing and greeted the NATO Secretary General before accompanying him, Hegseth, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Pentagon’s head of policy into a meeting room. Buria did not respond to repeated requests for comment about his increasingly influential position in Hegseth’s inner circle, including his role in helping to facilitate Hegseth’s use of Signal inside the Pentagon. Buria’s plan is to stay at the Pentagon, but as a senior civilian adviser to Hegseth, the sources said. Hegseth is even considering appointing Buria as his new chief of staff, now that his former chief of staff Joe Kasper is moving into a new role at the department, the sources added. Buria’s transition from military assistant to senior adviser was extremely unusual, particularly since he worked so closely with Austin, according to officials that served in the Biden and second Trump administration. And Hegseth moved quickly to root out other “holdover” military officials upon taking office, including former Joint Chiefs Chairman CQ Brown; former Air Force vice chairman Gen. Jim Slife; former Chief of Naval Operations Lisa Franchetti; and Jen Short, a three-star general who was appointed senior military assistant under Austin. Underscoring the trust Hegseth placed in him, Buria, not even a general officer, filled the crucial senior military assistant role on an acting basis, current and former officials said. The SMA, which is a three-star position that requires Senate confirmation, serves as both the chief military point of contact for the secretary and as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s representative to the Office of the Secretary of Defense. The sources all said that Buria’s rise appears to largely be a function of how much Hegseth has narrowed his inner circle, as he has become increasingly paranoid about leaks and concerned about being undermined. After firing two of his most senior advisers last week and accusing them of leaking, Hegseth now relies primarily on his wife Jennifer, Buria, and his lawyer for counsel, the sources said. Hegseth also likes Buria’s “yes, sir” attitude, said one defense official who has observed their interactions. “He likes that Ricky does what he asks and gets him what he needs,” the official said. Under Secretary Austin, Buria was “cool, calm, collected, never got ruffled, and had a good attitude,” a former senior Pentagon official in the Biden administration told CNN, adding that he was “very good and capable.” But he was also essentially a “body man” for Austin — carrying his bags and appearing only in the background of official photos, if at all. Under Hegseth, however, Buria has in a few short months become one of Hegseth’s most trusted advisers and friends. Buria has routine access to Hegseth’s personal and government phones, multiple people familiar with the matter told CNN, and is often seen working out with the secretary in photos posted on X. He has even started sitting at the table with foreign leaders, most recently during official meetings in Panama and with El Salvador’s defense minister at the Pentagon. He also appeared in a photo laughing with Elon Musk when he visited the Pentagon earlier this month. Buria never did anything of the sort while serving in the same role for Austin, the former senior Pentagon official said. “He would never sit in on bilats or meetings or anything like that, like he is now,” the former official said, referring to official bilateral meetings between the secretary and his counterparts. ‘An unlikely path’ Current and former officials have also raised questions about whether Buria is experienced enough to serve as Hegseth’s chief of staff — and whether the White House would accept that, given Buria’s history working under Austin and Trump’s push to root out Biden-era “holdovers” from his administration. “It’s certainly an unlikely path, to move from the military assistant to a political appointee,” said a second former senior DOD official. “I can’t think of another case.” It could be a tough adjustment, the first former senior official said. “You need someone with a political background who understands the political context, someone who can call up a four-star and yell at them for not being on message or not doing things the right way,” this person added. “I think that’s the biggest concern … do we really think [CENTCOM Commander] Erik Kurilla is going to take Ricky seriously, as a recently retired colonel?” A third former senior DOD official who served under Austin agreed, saying the chief of staff has to be comfortable holding their own against career political operators who are working at senior levels of other government agencies. As for his work with Austin, the second former senior DoD official emphasized that the military services — in Buria’s case, the Marine Corps — put forward their rising-star officers for the job of junior military assistant. The officers themselves shouldn’t be considered political, and Buria never appeared to be, this former official said. While he seemed ambitious, this person added, there was “no indication he would be interested in leaving the military service and becoming a Trump political appointee.” In fact, multiple sources told CNN that Buria was on the fast-track to becoming a general officer within the Marine Corps, which has made his decision to leave uniform all the more bewildering to those who have worked alongside him. As he has risen in Hegseth’s inner circle, Buria has gotten bolder in advising Hegseth on political and policy matters, the current defense official and a former official said. And he has sometimes ruffled feathers in the way he’s spoken to more senior military officers, including at least two combatant commanders, the sources added. “He’s gotten far too casual with them, and presents too unprofessionally,” said the current official. In a sign of his increasingly political role, Buria joined X in January, and three days ago began regularly reposting Trump, Hegseth, and Vance, as well as posts from DoD’s rapid response account criticizing the media coverage of Hegseth — including one calling NPR a “fake news propaganda machine.”

Back to Home
Source: CNN