Hamas responded to a US ceasefire proposal by saying it is prepared to release 10 living Israeli hostages and 18 dead hostages in exchange for a number of Palestinian prisoners, while requesting some amendments to the plan. The group repeated its demands for a permanent truce, a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and guarantees for the continuous flow of humanitarian aid. None of these are in the deal on the table. It was neither an explicit rejection nor a clear acceptance of the US terms, which Washington says Israel has accepted. Hamas said it had submitted its response to the US draft proposed by Steve Witkoff, US President Donald Trump's special envoy for the Middle East. In a statement, Witkoff said: "I received the Hamas response to the United States' proposal. It is totally unacceptable and only takes us backward. Hamas should accept the framework proposal we put forward as the basis for proximity talks, which we can begin immediately this coming week. "That is the only way we can close a 60-day ceasefire deal in the coming days." A statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said: "While Israel has agreed to the updated Witkoff outline for the release of our hostages, Hamas continues to adhere to its refusal." Hamas, a proscribed terror group in the US, UK and EU, said it was insisting on a "permanent ceasefire" and "complete withdrawal" of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip. The group demanded a sustained flow of aid for Palestinians living in the enclave, and said it would release 10 living hostages and the bodies of 18 dead hostages in exchange for "an agreed upon number" of Palestinian prisoners in Israel. But Hamas now finds itself in the most complex and difficult position it has faced since the war began. Under intense pressure from 2.2 million people living in the worst conditions in their history and from the mediators, the movement is unable to accept an American proposal that is, by all accounts, less generous than previous offers it has rejected multiple times, the most recent being in March. At that time, senior Hamas official and head negotiator Khalil al-Hayya stated unequivocally that the movement would not agree to partial deals that fail to secure a complete and permanent end to the war. Yet, Hamas also finds itself unable to reject the latest US offer outright, fully aware that Israel is preparing to escalate its ground offensive in Gaza. The movement lacks the military capacity to prevent or even seriously resist such an assault. Caught between these two realities, Hamas, in effect, responded to the US proposal not with an answer - but with an entirely new counterproposal. The full details of the US plan have not been made public and are unconfirmed, but these key points are reportedly included: The terms on offer were the ones Israel could accept - the White House made sure of that by getting Israel's approval before passing the proposal to Hamas. It is unlikely that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be willing to negotiate the changes Hamas wants. He is under pressure to bring the hostages home and has said he is willing to accept a temporary ceasefire to do so. But the Israeli government has always insisted on the right to return to hostilities, despite Hamas's core demand for guarantees that the temporary truce be a path to ending the war. Netanyahu has said the war will end when Hamas "lays down its arms, is no longer in government [and] its leaders are exiled from the Gaza Strip". Defence Minister Israel Katz was more blunt this week. "The Hamas murderers will now be forced to choose: accept the terms of the 'Witkoff Deal' for the release of the hostages - or be annihilated," he said. Earlier on Saturday, the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry said 60 people were killed and another 284 injured in the past 24-hours in Israeli strikes. That does not include numbers from hospitals located in the North Gaza Strip Governorate because of the difficulty of accessing the area, it adds. Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza in response to Hamas's cross-border attack on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. At least 54,381 people have been killed in Gaza since then, including 4,117 since Israel resumed its offensive on 18 March, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.
Hamas makes hostage pledge but demands changes to US Gaza ceasefire plan
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Hamas Offers Hostage Release Amid Demands for Changes to US Ceasefire Proposal"
Bbc News
7.0
TruthLens AI Summary
Hamas has responded to a ceasefire proposal from the United States, indicating its willingness to release ten living Israeli hostages along with the bodies of eighteen deceased hostages. In exchange, Hamas is demanding the release of a number of Palestinian prisoners, while also insisting on amendments to the current US plan. The militant group has reiterated its call for a permanent truce, the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, and the assurance of ongoing humanitarian aid to the region. While the response from Hamas does not explicitly reject or accept the US terms, it reflects the group's complex position as it grapples with intense pressure from both the international community and the dire humanitarian situation on the ground in Gaza. The US proposal, which has reportedly received Israel's approval, is viewed by Hamas as less favorable than previous offers it has turned down in the past, including one from March of this year.
The situation remains precarious as Hamas finds itself unable to outright reject the US proposal, particularly with Israel poised to escalate its military operations in Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has indicated that while Israel is open to a temporary ceasefire to facilitate the return of hostages, he remains firm on the conditions for ending the conflict. Netanyahu has emphasized that the war will conclude only when Hamas disarms and ceases its governance in Gaza. The ongoing violence has resulted in significant casualties, with reports indicating that over 60 individuals were killed in a recent 24-hour period due to Israeli airstrikes. Since the onset of the conflict following Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, the humanitarian toll has been catastrophic, with thousands of fatalities in Gaza, underscoring the urgent need for a resolution to the ongoing hostilities.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The recent article highlights a significant moment in the ongoing conflict involving Hamas and Israel, particularly in the context of a proposed U.S. ceasefire. It reveals the complexities of the negotiations, with Hamas making a conditional offer to release hostages while asserting demands that are not included in the U.S. proposal. The situation reflects a broader narrative of desperation and strategic maneuvering in a highly volatile environment.
Hamas's Stance and Demands
Hamas's response to the U.S. ceasefire proposal is a critical aspect of the article. The group is willing to release Israeli hostages but simultaneously demands a permanent truce, a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, and a steady flow of humanitarian aid. These conditions indicate Hamas's attempt to negotiate from a position of strength, despite the dire situation faced by Palestinians in Gaza. Their insistence on a complete withdrawal suggests a long-term strategy rather than a temporary solution to the immediate crisis.
U.S. and Israeli Response
The article presents the U.S. and Israeli reactions to Hamas's proposal, illustrating a divide in perspectives. The U.S. envoy, Steve Witkoff, dismissed Hamas's conditions as unacceptable, which reveals the challenging dynamics of the negotiations. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's acknowledgment of the proposed outline indicates a willingness to engage, albeit with reservations about Hamas's refusal. This highlights differing priorities and the complexities of international diplomacy in the region.
Public Perception and Media Influence
The article aims to shape public perception by framing Hamas's response as a mixture of desperation and tactical negotiation. By emphasizing their demands for humanitarian aid and a ceasefire, it may evoke sympathy for the Palestinian plight while also portraying Hamas as a group unwilling to compromise. The language used can influence how readers perceive the legitimacy of the demands and the overall conflict.
Potential Consequences
The ongoing negotiations and public responses could have significant implications for the region. A failure to reach an agreement might exacerbate tensions, leading to further violence. Conversely, a successful negotiation could pave the way for a temporary ceasefire, impacting the humanitarian situation in Gaza. The article indirectly suggests that the outcomes of these discussions will influence not only the immediate conflict but also broader geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East.
Target Audience
This article appears to be aimed at a broad audience, including policymakers, analysts, and the general public interested in Middle Eastern affairs. By presenting the complexities of the negotiations, it seeks to engage readers who are concerned about humanitarian issues and international diplomacy.
Economic and Market Implications
In terms of economic impact, developments in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can influence global markets, particularly in sectors related to defense and humanitarian aid. Investors may react to changes in the conflict's status, affecting stocks linked to these industries.
Geopolitical Context
This situation is part of a larger geopolitical landscape, with implications for U.S. foreign policy and relations with other Middle Eastern countries. The article reflects ongoing tensions and the stakes involved in the negotiations, which are critical to understanding current global power dynamics.
AI Influence on Reporting
While it is not explicitly stated, the style and structure of the article could suggest the use of AI in drafting or organizing the content. AI models could assist in presenting data-driven insights or in structuring the narrative to maintain reader engagement. The framing of Hamas's response and the emphasis on their demands could have been influenced by AI algorithms designed to highlight specific narratives.
The article’s reliability is moderate, as it presents factual information but also reflects the biases inherent in reporting on such a contentious issue. The presentation of Hamas's demands alongside U.S. and Israeli responses creates a narrative that may lead readers to draw specific conclusions about the conflict and the parties involved.