Fox News takes pro-war position amid MAGA media feud over Israel-Iran conflict

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Fox News Showcases Pro-War Stance Amid MAGA Media Divide Over Israel-Iran Crisis"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent discussions on Fox News surrounding the Israel-Iran conflict have highlighted a significant divide within the MAGA media landscape. Conservative radio host Clay Travis, speaking on Sean Hannity's show, openly urged President Trump to take decisive action against Iran's nuclear program, emphasizing the necessity of a strong U.S. response. This call for intervention reflects the growing tension between traditional Republican hawks, who advocate for military engagement, and MAGA isolationists, who argue for a more restrained foreign policy approach. The conflict has intensified the ongoing feud between figures like Mark Levin and Tucker Carlson, with Levin embodying the interventionist stance and Carlson advocating for isolationism. This internal strife is being played out across various media platforms, including social media and podcasts, as both sides vie for influence over Trump's foreign policy decisions.

As the situation escalates in the Middle East, the dynamics within Fox News reveal a network increasingly aligned with interventionist views, showcasing guests who support a robust military response. Levin's fiery rhetoric, which frames the conflict as a moral battle between good and evil, resonates with the network's audience, while Carlson's contrasting position has become less visible to Trump due to his preference for traditional cable news. The ongoing debate has implications for the broader MAGA movement, as differing opinions on foreign policy threaten to fracture the coalition. Notably, Trump's interactions with Levin suggest a close alignment with the pro-war narrative, further complicating the relationship between the president and the isolationist faction represented by Carlson. This rift within conservative media is indicative of the larger ideological struggles that could shape U.S. foreign policy in the coming months, as figures on both sides continue to assert their influence over the administration's decisions regarding Iran and Israel.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

As conservative radio host Clay Travis opened his mouth Tuesday night on Fox News, he was hyper-aware of the viewer-in-chief.

President Trump is “probably watching” this show, Travis said to Fox host Sean Hannity as both men urged the president to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.

“We have to do it,” Travis said, adding, “We can’t go halfway here.”

The president’s television habits once again have serious foreign policy implications as the Trump administration weighs further US involvement in Iran.

The Israel-Iran conflict has exacerbated a deep rift in MAGA media over how the US conducts itself abroad, especially when it comes to Israel. Republican hawks areclashingwith MAGA isolationists, and many of the arguments are happening on social media sites like X, as well as podcasts like Steve Bannon’s “War Room.”

But Trump’s favorite network, Fox News, isn’t making as much room for debate. Guest after guest on Fox has played to Trump’s ego — simultaneously praising the president and pushing for US intervention through his television screen. (At one point, Fox host Kayleigh McEnany, a former Trump aide, waxed poetic about him being a Churchillian “man of action.”)

On Hannity’s show Tuesday night, weekend host Mark Levin literally screamed on-air as he depicted a battle of “good versus evil” and doubted the patriotism of the isolationist camp.

Levin’s view is dominant on Fox’s air. While some guests on Fox have warned against escalation, they’ve been few and far between, and not nearly as loud or omnipresent as Levin.

Tucker Carlson’s absence is palpable. After he was fired from Fox in 2023, Carlson built himself a digital media platform with a big megaphone on X, as he proved again Tuesday night byteasing a contentious interviewwith Sen. Ted Cruz.

But Carlson and his isolationist views are no longer as visible to Trump, who has an old-school, cable-centric mentality about the media.

Levin and Carlson embody the right’s competing forces on foreign policy. Levin wants regime change in Iran; Carlson wants the US to stay out of it. Both men say they are representing the “America first” MAGA movement.

Their weeks-long feud turned especially ugly last week, after Israel launched airstrikes in Iran, which in turn pulled out of scheduled nuclear talks with the US and retaliated with a series of missile strikes.

Carlson called on Trump to “drop Israel” and “let them fight their own wars.” He branded Levin, Hannity, and Fox patriarch Rupert Murdoch as “warmongers” pushing the president to join the conflict.

Levin responded by calling Carlson an antisemite and a “maggot.” He dredged up Carlson’s past criticism of Trump and questioned the former Fox star’s allegiance to the MAGA movement.

While Levin’sname-callinghas been petty, the back-and-forth has serious impacts. Two weeks ago, when Trump and Levindined togetherat the White House, Carlson caught wind of the meeting and immediately tweeted a denunciation of Levin “hyperventilating” about Iran’s nuclear program.

Levin’s lunch with Trump is a testament to the bombastic radio and TV host’s wide influence on the right.

Contrary to Carlson’s recent claim that “nobody watched” Levin’s weekend TV show, Levin is actually one of the most popular figures on Fox’s weekend lineup and is a regular presence on Hannity’s weekday show as well.

Hannity threw shade at Carlson on Tuesday night, though not by name, when he said Iran is “the biggest existential threat to the entire western world,” and “people that can’t seem to understand that kind of puzzle me.”

Wednesday morning’s “Fox & Friends,” another one of the president’s cherished shows, also promoted an interventionist point of view. To “people who say it’s not our fight,” host Brian Kilmeade said, “you could say that, but you’re not paying attention. Since the 1980s, they have been killing Americans.”

Then, Kilmeade threw to a video clip of Levin’s pro-war arguments from the night before.

“I’m not one that wants to get involved in things. I’m not. But we have no choice! They are our enemy!” co-host Lawrence Jones said.

This foreign policy feud has torn apart other pockets of MAGA media. Far-right podcaster Candace Owensexited The Daily Wire last yearafter she called Israel’s war in Gaza a “genocide” andopenly embraced antisemitic conspiracies. The conservative media empire’s co-founder Ben Shapiro, who is adamantly pro-Israel, called Owens’ comments “disgraceful,” kicking off a battle thathas since rippled throughoutthe extremely online right.

Some Fox shows have acknowledged the divides. “On the right we have a big difference of opinion here, but unlike the left, we are not afraid to show it,” Greg Gutfeld said Tuesday afternoon on “The Five.” However, that segment was the only direct mention of Carlson on Fox in recent days, according to a closed captioning search of the network’s coverage.

Fox is clearly more comfortable in a different mode: Ridiculing the left. “MIDEAST CONFLICT DIVIDES DEMS” read one banner on “The Ingraham Angle” Tuesday night.

Carlson has seemed bemused by Fox’s handling of the unfolding conflict,telling Bannonthat his former employer is “doing what they always do — turning up the propaganda hose to full blast and trying to knock elderly Fox viewers off their feet and make them submit to a new war.”

Carlson could have been alluding to the 79-year-old president, whose Fox fixation is so well-established that CEOs and foreign leaders jockey for airtime with the hopes that Trump will see their segment.

On Monday, when a reporter asked Trump about Carlson’s comment that the president was “complicit” in Israel’s strikes on Iran, the president said he didn’t know what Carlson was saying online.

“Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen,” Trump said — a barb reflecting Carlson’s post-cable existence largely out of the president’s view.

Trump followed up later in the day,writing on Truth Social, “Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that ‘IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!’”

“I’m a little kooky. I’ll concede that,” Carlsontold The Free Pressin response.

Back to Home
Source: CNN