The radio crackled, but the order barked into it was clear: Capture the commander and kill the others. The chilling exchange was part of a series of radio transmissions between Russian forces that Ukrainian officials say provide further evidence that Russian superiors are ordering soldiers to execute surrendering Ukrainian troops in violation of international law. The radio communications intercepted by Ukraine, which were obtained by CNN from a Ukrainian intelligence official, appear to correspond in time with drone footage of a suspected execution by Russian soldiers in Ukraine’s eastern Zaporizhzhia region last November. The footage shows six soldiers lying face down on the ground, with at least two being shot at point blank range and another being marched away. Those deaths are under investigation by Ukrainian prosecutors, who shared a screenshot of the drone video on social media after the incident. A Ukrainian official familiar with the investigation said that the same radio intercepts CNN had obtained were being examined as part of the inquiry into the killings. CNN has not been able to independently authenticate the radio traffic, or confirm the communications were directly linked to the drone footage, but a forensic expert who analyzed the audio files said they did not appear to have been manipulated. A leading United Nations investigator and a Western intelligence official told CNN the radio transmissions and drone footage were consistent with other instances of Russian forces allegedly executing surrendering Ukrainian troops. Morris Tidball-Binz, the UN’s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, said the radio transmissions and drone footage suggest the killing of surrendered soldiers by Russian forces, as has been reported by the UN. Tidball-Binz, who has investigated similar suspected executions, called such incidents “grave breaches” of international law, adding that he believes this conduct could only be authorized by the highest authorities in Russia. They “would not happen with such numbers and frequency without orders – or at the very least consent – from (the) highest military commanders, which in Russia means the Presidency,” he said. The Russian Ministry of Defense has not responded to CNN’s request for comment on the allegations. Russian officials have previously denied that Russian troops have committed war crimes and insisted that Russia treats prisoners of war in accordance with international law. The alleged executions of prisoners of war, among other widespread charges that Russian military forces are responsible for war crimes in Ukraine, could complicate efforts by US President Donald Trump to bring a swift conclusion to the war. Trump has sought to end the fighting with an erratic approach that has often seen him side with Russian President Vladimir Putin and saw his administration briefly interrupt a State Department initiative to track alleged war crimes by Moscow. A Western intelligence official told CNN he had reviewed the audio intercept files and “found them to be authentic, credible, and consistent with previously documented brutal executions. It is clear the soldier receives an order to execute the Ukrainian soldiers who have surrendered.” The official said he was examining similar material from other cases, which “strengthen the evidence of a directive from Russian commanding officers to kill Ukrainian soldiers who have surrendered or are in the process of surrendering.” The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) told CNN that Russian soldiers in the “Storm unit” of the 394th Motorized Rifle Regiment (127th Motorized Rifle Division), of the 5th Combined Arms Army, were involved in the November attack. The SBU said it had linked the same “Storm unit” to another suspected execution in the same area – the beheading of a captured Ukrainian soldier – and that it had charged in absentia Russian commanders from the unit who it said were responsible. The Ukrainian Prosecutor General’s office said it has, as of May 5, opened 75 criminal investigations into the suspected executions of 268 Ukrainian prisoners of war. It said the number of alleged executions of Ukrainian prisoners of war has been rising, with eight cases involving 57 soldiers in 2022, eight cases involving 11 soldiers in 2023, 39 cases with 149 soldiers in 2024, and 20 cases so far this year, with 51 soldiers. Yurii Bielousov, head of the war crimes department at the Ukrainian prosecutor general’s office, said the rise was attributable to “instructions being given by top leaders of the Russian Federation, both political and military. We didn’t yet see a written order, but we had several examples of oral orders.” Bielousov noted that Putin had said in March that Ukrainian soldiers captured in Russia’s Kursk region should be treated as terrorists. “Everyone knows how Putin treats people who they call terrorists. So, it’s almost a synonym for us to execute,” he said. Bohdan Okhrimenko, head of the secretariat at Ukraine’s Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War, said another possible explanation for the killings was that the Russian military wanted to avoid the logistical issues of capturing and managing prisoners. “It complicates military logistics, from their point of view. The Russian command made a simple decision… to shoot captured prisoners.” ‘Take the commander captive and kill everyone else’ The radio transmissions intercepted by Ukraine appear to capture a Russian commander, whose name and rank has not been established by CNN, talking to frontline troops. In the recordings, two Russians are referred to by their callsigns, “Arta” and “Beliy.” The Ukrainian intelligence official shared a transcript of the radio transmissions, which noted they were intercepted at 12:05 p.m. local time, when the Ukrainian position was stormed, and continued until 12:31 p.m., when apparent fears over a Ukrainian drone arriving causes the Russian commander to order a retreat. CNN could not independently verify the time the transmissions were intercepted. The Russian commander can be heard ordering the killings on six separate occasions. According to the transcript of the intercepted transmissions, the commander’s first order was given at 12:22 p.m. “Ask who is the commander. Who is the commander? Ask. Take the commander captive and kill everyone else,” he can be heard saying. Four minutes later, he repeats the order twice. “You do it. Take the commander captive, fk off the others.” “That’s it. Take the senior, get rid the fk of the others!” The commander frequently demands updates from his combat unit, who struggle to reply. “Someone, btch, answer, are the fkers surrendering or not?” The soldier referred to by the callsign “Arta,” who appears to be the main interlocutor, says they have not found a Ukrainian commander, only a “senior.” The drone footage obtained by CNN only covers from 12:27 p.m. to 12:30 p.m., according to the time codes on the video, but there does appear to be a clear connection between commands captured in the transmissions and what happens on the ground in the drone footage. At 12:28 p.m., the order is given on the radio a sixth time, and a soldier wearing a mask and a dark green uniform consistent with the Russian military can be seen emerging from the foliage, moving towards the captives. “Get the fk out! Take the senior, get rid of the others, fk!” the commander said. One Ukrainian soldier is visible in the grainy footage apparently gesturing to the Russians. Moments later, the masked soldier shoots him in the head. The voice of the Russian commander captured on the transmissions then asks if the killing is complete. “Did you take them down? A question. Did you take them down? A question.” “Arta! Arta! I’m Beliy, roger that!” “We killed the f*king others.” In the footage, another Ukrainian, presumably the commander who was motionless until that point, stands up, removes his body armor and is led away. The Russian commander radios his concern as a drone is seen rising over the smoke from an explosion. A retreat is then ordered. The footage is consistent with satellite imagery of the village of Novodarivka reviewed by CNN and the Center for Information Resilience, a nonprofit that documents potential human rights violations. Images taken by Maxar Technologies in October 2024 show fields with similar vegetation, tree lines and craters to those visible in the drone video. Robert Maher, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Montana State University, who specializes in forensic audio analysis, examined the radio chatter for CNN. The audio recordings of the transmissions, which were sent to CNN in dozens of separate files, all appeared to be consistent, according to Maher. He said that he saw “no signs they were not authentic.” The killing of surrendering Ukrainian troops is alleged by Ukrainian officials and international experts to be part of an orchestrated Russian policy. The incident appears to be one of the first times that intercepted radio transmissions have been linked to drone footage of a suspected execution. CNN first reported on the alleged policy last September, detailing a video that showed an apparent execution by Russian troops of three surrendering Ukrainians near the embattled city of Pokrovsk in eastern Ukraine last August. Ukrainian officials claim the alleged executions are fueled by Russia’s cultural hatred of their opponents but are also meant for psychological impact. Okhrimenko said Russian soldiers had posted videos of the beheading and castration of Ukrainian troops to affect morale. “Violence breeds violence,” he said, adding that Ukraine had increased training of its personnel to be sure Russian prisoners were held safely for later exchanges.
Exclusive: Intercepted radio chatter and drone footage appear to capture Russian orders to kill surrendering Ukrainian troops
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Intercepted Communications Suggest Russian Forces Ordered Executions of Surrendering Ukrainian Soldiers"
TruthLens AI Summary
The implications of these findings could significantly complicate diplomatic efforts regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Allegations of Russian war crimes, including the execution of prisoners of war, have been a recurring theme throughout the conflict, raising concerns over the treatment of captured soldiers. The Ukrainian Prosecutor General's office has opened multiple investigations into these suspected executions, revealing a troubling increase in such incidents over the past years. Experts suggest that these actions may stem from directives issued by high-ranking Russian officials, as well as a desire to simplify military logistics by eliminating the need to manage prisoners. The intercepted communications depict a Russian commander instructing his troops to kill surrendering soldiers, reinforcing the notion that these acts may be part of a systematic approach rather than isolated incidents. As the investigation continues, the global community remains watchful, and the potential for further accountability and legal ramifications looms over the conduct of Russian forces in the Ukraine conflict.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The report highlights a serious allegation against Russian forces, suggesting that they have issued orders to execute surrendering Ukrainian troops. Through intercepted radio communications and drone footage, a chilling narrative of potential war crimes emerges, drawing attention to the violation of international law. It is crucial to analyze the implications and motivations behind such reporting.
Intent Behind the Publication
This report aims to shed light on alleged atrocities committed during the conflict, particularly focusing on the treatment of captured soldiers. By presenting evidence of military orders to execute surrendering troops, the article seeks to reinforce the narrative of Russian aggression and disregard for international norms. This can serve to galvanize international condemnation and support for Ukraine in its defense efforts.
Public Perception
The narrative being constructed here is one of moral outrage. The report seeks to create a sense of urgency and empathy toward Ukrainian soldiers, portraying them as victims of heinous acts. This type of coverage may influence public opinion, leading to increased support for Ukraine among global audiences.
Potential Concealments
While the report emphasizes clear evidence against Russian forces, it may also divert attention from other facets of the conflict or political issues within Ukraine and the broader geopolitical landscape. By focusing on specific incidents of alleged war crimes, there may be less scrutiny on Ukrainian military actions or the complexities of the war itself.
Manipulative Elements
The report presents a high manipulation potential due to its emotive language and the framing of events. By using words such as "chilling" and "grave breaches," the article evokes a strong emotional response. The lack of independent verification of the evidence mentioned could also be seen as a way to shape public perception without presenting a fully balanced view.
Validity of Information
The credibility of the report hinges on the authenticity of the intercepted communications and the drone footage. While experts suggest that the audio files appear unmanipulated, the inability to independently confirm these findings raises questions about the overall reliability of the claims made. The mention of ongoing investigations adds a layer of caution regarding the conclusions drawn in the article.
Comparative Analysis with Other Reports
This report aligns with a broader trend in media coverage that seeks to document alleged war crimes in Ukraine, reflecting a coordinated effort to highlight human rights violations. Such reports often cross-reference each other, creating a comprehensive narrative about the conflict's humanitarian impact.
Impact on Society, Economy, and Politics
The implications of such reporting could be significant, potentially affecting international policy decisions, humanitarian aid discussions, and military support for Ukraine. Public outcry arising from these allegations may compel governments to take more definitive stances or actions against Russia.
Support from Specific Communities
The article is likely to resonate more with communities that advocate for human rights, international law, and military accountability. Activists, humanitarian organizations, and those sympathetic to Ukraine's plight may find this report compelling and use it to mobilize support.
Economic and Market Effects
While the article may not directly influence stock markets, it could have implications for companies involved in defense or humanitarian aid sectors. Increased media focus on military actions may lead to fluctuations in stocks related to defense contractors or humanitarian organizations responding to the crisis.
Geopolitical Significance
In the context of global power dynamics, the report reinforces narratives about Russia's actions and the West's response. This could influence diplomatic relations and future negotiations related to the conflict, as well as broader international relations.
AI Involvement in Writing
There is a possibility that AI tools may have been used to generate certain segments of the report, particularly in analyzing data or synthesizing information. However, the human element in investigative journalism remains crucial for context and interpretation.
Manipulative Language and Targeting
The language employed in the article is designed to provoke a strong emotional reaction, which can be seen as a manipulation tactic. By framing the situation in stark terms, the report directs attention toward Russian actions while potentially overshadowing other narrative threads in the conflict.
In summary, this report presents a serious allegation against Russian forces that, while compelling, requires cautious interpretation due to the complexities of conflict reporting and potential biases involved. The overall reliability of the claims remains contingent on further verification and context.