Gkolomeev set his 'world record' time in a behind-closed-doors time trial in North Carolina in February The Enhanced Games - a controversial new event which promotes banned performance-enhancing drugs - says one of its athletes has beaten a long-standing world record. Organisers said Greece's Kristian Gkolomeev swam 20.89 seconds in a 50m freestyle time trial in the US in February, 0.02 seconds quicker than the world record set by Brazil's Cesar Cielo in 2009. Gkolomeev, who finished fifth at the 2024 Olympics in 21.59, began taking banned substances after signing up for the Enhanced Games in January. At a glitzy launch in Las Vegas on Wednesday, the Enhanced Games announced the city as the host of its inaugural event from 21-24 May 2026. The Enhanced Games are planned to be an annual competition, initially comprising short-distance swimming, sprinting and weightlifting, where participants will use drugs banned from elite sport. It has been criticised for endangering athletes' health and undermining fair play. However, it has also attracted heavyweight backing from a venture capital fund headed up by Donald Trump Jr, the US president's son, and billionaire entrepreneur Peter Thiel. For his 'world record' in North Carolina, USA, 31-year-old Gkolomeev was wearing a full-length polyurethane 'supersuit', which wasbanned from competitionby swimming authorities a few weeks after Cielo set the world record in one. However, in another attempt in April, Gkolomeev swam 21.03 in textile 'jammer' shorts, which comply with current World Aquatic regulations. That time is 0.01secs faster than anyone has gone without the aid of 'supersuits', beating a mark set by American nine-time Olympic champion Caeleb Dressel. The Enhanced Games say the two times are legitimate, with Gkolomeev's swims recorded using the same timing equipment deployed at the Olympics, staged at a certified pool which has hosted the past four US Open events, and overseen by experienced officials. Neither mark will be recognised by World Aquatics. "The Enhanced Games are not a sporting competition built on universal values like honesty, fairness and equity: they are a circus, built on shortcuts," read a statement from swimming's world governing body. "The enduring power of athletes to serve as role models for children and adults alike relies on their talent, hard work, respect and friendship. That's what we see in our champions and in our competitions, and that's what we'll continue to showcase." Gkolomeev received a $1m prize for beating a world record time, an incentive that the Enhanced Games have used to lure athletes since being was founded by Australian entrepreneur and lawyer Aron D'Souza in 2023. "The Enhanced Games gave me the resources and the team to unlock a new level of performance - and now the whole world can see what's possible," said Gkolomeev, whose previous 50m freestyle best was 21.44, winning silver behind Britain's Ben Proud at the European Championships in Edinburgh in 2018. He added that his body shape changed considerably between doping for two weeks in advance of beating Cielo's record in Feburary and then going quicker than Dressel in textile shorts in April. "On the second attempt I was on a full two-month cycle," he added. "I had an extra 10lbs of lean muscle â we did a pretty good job with my coach in that short amount of time to get used by my new strength and weight in the water. It was a very good result." The Enhanced Games did not reveal what substances he had taken, citing personal confidentiality and concern that others would follow Gkolomeev's regime unsupervised. It said they were prescribed "medically and legally". Organisers say they allow participants to take only "medically prescribable and legally approved" substances under clinical supervision, and that they are confident they will comply with the Drug Enforcement Administration laws in the US. Ukraine's Andrii Govorov, the 33-year-old 50m butterfly world record holder, and 21-year-old Bulgarian Josif Miladinov, a European 100m butterfly silver medallist, have also signed up. Govorov announced his retirement from Olympic sport this week. "This choice wasn't easy," hewrote on Instagram.,external "I spent a long time reflecting - putting everything I care about on the scale. Competing in Los Angeles [in 2028] was my dream. But life had other plans." The recruitment of Gkolomeev, Govorov and Miladinov is a coup for the Enhanced Games after critics claimed it would struggle to convince established names, still in their prime, to cross the divide. Australian former world champion James Magnussen, 34, came out of retirement to join the Enhanced Games in 2024, but his attempt to beat the 50m freestyle world record fell well short, recording a best time of 22.73. The Enhanced Games have aspirations to have a 100-strong roster of participants in next year's event. Organisers will build a four-lane 50m pool, a six-lane sprint track and a weightlifting venue at Resorts World in Las Vegas. The project also plans to market "performance and longevity enhancements" to the general public this summer. The Enhanced Games have been roundly criticised by senior figures in anti-doping and sports administration. Travis Tygart, chief executive of the US Anti-Doping Agency, called it a"clown show",externaland the World Anti-Doping Agency described it as a"dangerous and irresponsible project".,external Speaking in November, Brent J Nowicki, the executive director of World Aquatics, said it was"a farce, and an extremely dangerous one",external, adding that those who took part should be banned from sport for life. Jane Rumble, chief executive of UK Anti-Doping (Ukad), told BBC Sport: "We are really, really concerned by this concept. "It flies in the face of everything Ukad stands for and it flies in the face of fair play. "Any sporting event which permits performance-enhancing drugs is ultimately unsafe - unhealthy for athletes. It is not good for their wellbeing. "There are also much broader societal implications. It is well documented that steroid use has been linked to domestic violence and aggression in the nighttime economy." A Ukadsurvey,externalpublished this week said 85% of UK teenagers supported banning athletes caught taking prohibited drugs. Rumble said Ukad is unaware of any British athletes being approached by the Enhanced Games, but is planning for the possibility. "We have clearly thought through that scenario," she said. "There is the possibility of bans from sport for athletes taking part. If you are recently retired but still affiliated to a sports body, we could well be looking at taking action." Jim McVeigh, professor of substance use and associated behaviours at Manchester Metropolitan University, said organisers' assurances about athletes' safety were "ignorant or deliberately misleading". "They are focusing on the power sports - sprinting, lifting and swimming - and, for those events, athletes will take anabolic agents," he told BBC Sport. "Athletes won't use just in the weeks before. If it is $1m, those people are going to be training now. Are organisers looking out for them? Have they started their supervision? "In the last 10 years we have really improved our understanding of the long-term effects of steroid abuse as a population of steroid users who started in 1990s have got to a certain age. "There are the effects on the cardiovascular system, but the big turn-up has been the impact it has on the brain. Many people will never return to normal hormonal production and function. "We know people in the Enhanced Games are going to be taking high doses because they know everyone else is free to." Enhanced Games officials say that by bringing the use of performance-enhancing drugs into the open and under the guidance of doctors, their event will be safer than conventional sport. They point to astudy,externalof the 2011 World Athletics Championships where athletes' responses to an anonymised survey suggested almost 44% had taken a banned substance in the previous year. Asurvey,externalof athletes in the UK in 2022 indicated that about 13% of athletes knowingly doped. Kristian Gkolomeev won the European 50m freestyle title in June Gkolomeev was born in the Bulgarian city of Velingrad in 1993. His father, Tzvetan Golomeev, represented Bulgaria at the Olympics in Moscow in 1980 and Seoul in 1988. Gkolomeev's mother died of medical complications shortly after his birth, and the family moved to Greece when he was young. He began swimming aged five, won junior medals at world and European level and raced at London 2012 as a teenager, finishing 31st fastest in the 100m freestyle. After the Games, Gkolomeev was recruited to the University of Alabama by former British Olympic coaches Dennis Pursley and Jonty Skinner, where he studied human performance exercise science alongside his swimming. He won two collegiate titles before beginning his professional career. In addition to fifth-place finishes at Tokyo 2020 and Paris 2024, he won a world silver medal in the 50m freestyle in Gwangju in 2019 and the European title in Belgrade in 2024.
Enhanced Games swimmer 'breaks world record'
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Kristian Gkolomeev Claims Controversial 'World Record' in Enhanced Games Time Trial"
TruthLens AI Summary
In February, Greek swimmer Kristian Gkolomeev reportedly set a new 'world record' during a private time trial in North Carolina, clocking a time of 20.89 seconds in the 50m freestyle. This performance surpassed the previous record of 20.91 seconds established by Brazil's Cesar Cielo in 2009. Gkolomeev's achievement comes in the wake of his participation in the Enhanced Games, a controversial new sporting event that promotes the use of banned performance-enhancing drugs. After signing up for the Enhanced Games in January, Gkolomeev began using prohibited substances, which he attributed to a significant increase in his physical capabilities. The Enhanced Games, planned to be held annually, aim to create a platform for athletes to compete under the influence of these substances in a controlled environment, although this initiative has faced severe criticism from various sports organizations and anti-doping authorities for its potential risks to athlete health and the integrity of sportsmanship.
Despite the criticisms, Gkolomeev's record-setting swim was conducted in a pool that met Olympic standards, under the supervision of experienced officials, and with the same timing equipment used at official competitions. However, the legitimacy of the record is disputed as it will not be recognized by World Aquatics, which condemned the Enhanced Games as a 'circus built on shortcuts' that undermines the values of honesty and fairness in sports. Gkolomeev, who received a $1 million prize for his achievement, claimed that the Enhanced Games provided him with the necessary resources to enhance his performance. The event's organizers assert that they only permit substances that are prescribed legally and medically, although concerns about the long-term health implications of such drug use remain prevalent among critics, including anti-doping officials and health experts. As the Enhanced Games prepare for their inaugural event in Las Vegas in May 2026, they continue to attract attention for their unconventional approach to performance enhancement in sports, raising ethical questions about the future of competitive athletics.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The report about Kristian Gkolomeev's alleged world record in swimming raises numerous questions about the implications of the Enhanced Games and the ethical considerations surrounding performance-enhancing drugs in sports. The announcement is positioned within a larger context of controversy and debate regarding athletes' health and fair competition, drawing attention to the complexities of modern sports.
Motives Behind the Announcement
The Enhanced Games aims to challenge traditional views on performance-enhancing substances, promoting a space where athletes can freely use banned drugs. This initiative appears to seek legitimacy and acceptance, aiming to reshape narratives around doping in sports. By highlighting Gkolomeev's record, the organizers may intend to provoke discussions about the nature of sportsmanship and the evolving landscape of athletic competition.
Public Perception and Implications
The article likely aims to stir a mix of awe and skepticism among readers. On one hand, it presents a sensational achievement; on the other, it raises ethical concerns about health risks and the integrity of sports. The juxtaposition of Gkolomeev's record against historical standards may create a divide among audiences, with some supporting the innovative approach of the Enhanced Games and others condemning it for promoting doping.
Potential Concealment of Issues
While celebrating Gkolomeev's achievement, the article may gloss over the broader implications of endorsing performance-enhancing drugs. It neglects to address the potential health risks associated with doping, the pressure it places on athletes, and the impact on young aspiring swimmers who may view such actions as acceptable. By focusing on the sensationalism of breaking a world record, the article risks diverting attention from these critical concerns.
Manipulative Aspects of the Narrative
The framing of Gkolomeev's achievement as a world record could be seen as manipulative, especially considering the context of the Enhanced Games. By emphasizing this record, the article might be attempting to position the use of banned substances as a legitimate pathway to success, thereby normalizing and perhaps glamorizing doping in competitive sports. This use of language and focus could influence public perception, potentially swaying opinions in favor of the Enhanced Games.
Legitimacy of the Claims
The claim about Gkolomeev's world record is based on specific conditions and equipment, which could challenge its recognition in the broader swimming community. While the times recorded were achieved under regulated conditions, the acceptance of such achievements remains contentious. The narrative suggests a legitimacy that may not be universally acknowledged, particularly among traditionalists in the sport.
Connections to Broader Trends
The Enhanced Games and its backing by notable figures like Donald Trump Jr. and Peter Thiel may reflect a trend toward embracing unconventional approaches in sports and business. This connection raises questions about the motivations behind such endorsements and the potential for these events to influence public policy and funding in future athletic endeavors.
Societal Impact and Future Scenarios
The promotion of the Enhanced Games could foster a culture that normalizes doping, potentially leading to a decline in athlete health and increased regulatory scrutiny. This shift may also impact public trust in sports, challenging the integrity of competitions and affecting viewership and sponsorship in traditional events. Should this trend continue, it could reshape the future of competitive sports.
Target Audience of the Enhanced Games
The Enhanced Games may appeal to segments of the population that favor innovation and challenge traditional norms, potentially attracting individuals who value performance over conventional ethics in sports. This audience may include a younger demographic interested in alternative sports narratives and cultural shifts regarding competition.
Economic and Market Implications
Investors and stakeholders within the sports industry may closely monitor developments from the Enhanced Games, especially concerning sponsorship and marketability. The acceptance of doping could influence stock prices for companies associated with traditional sports, shifting investment toward entities that align with this new paradigm.
Geopolitical Context
The promotion of the Enhanced Games could have implications for international sports relations, particularly in countries with strict anti-doping laws. The acceptance of performance-enhancing drugs may challenge existing norms and policies, potentially leading to international debates on regulation and athlete safety.
The potential use of AI in crafting this narrative is plausible, particularly in analyzing trends or framing arguments. AI models might influence how achievements are presented, emphasizing certain aspects to generate engagement. However, without explicit evidence or acknowledgment of AI involvement in this specific article, it remains speculative.
Considering the implications and the controversial nature of the Enhanced Games, the report presents a complex interplay of achievement and ethical considerations. The sensational framing raises questions about the legitimacy of the accomplishments it celebrates, underscoring the need for critical engagement with the narratives surrounding doping in sports.