Xiao Chen turned up at the US Consulate in Shanghai on Thursday morning, hours after Washington announced that it would"aggressively" revoke the visas of Chinese students. The 22-year-old had a visa appointment: she was headed to Michigan in the autumn to study communications. After a "pleasant" conversation, she was told her application had been rejected. She was not given a reason. "I feel like a drifting duckweed tossed in wind and storm," she said, using a common Chinese expression used to describe feeling both uncertain and helpless. She had been hopeful because she already had the acceptance letter. And she thought she had narrowly escaped the bombshells in recent days. First, Donald Trump's administration moved to endHarvard University's ability to enrol international students, a move that has since been blocked in court. And then it said it hadstoppedvisa appointmentsfor all foreign students. But now, Chen is ready for plan B. "If I can't get the visa eventually, I'll probably take a gap year. Then I'll wait to see if things will get better next year." A valid visa may still not be enough, she adds, because students with visas could be "stopped at the airport and deported". "It's bad for every Chinese student. The only difference is how bad." It has been a bleak week for international students in the US - and perhaps even harder for the 280,000 or so Chinese students who would have noticed that their country has been singled out. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused Harvard of "co-ordinating with the Chinese Communist Party". Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the move against Chinese students in the US would include "those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields". That could hit a wide swathe of them given membership of the Communist Party is common among officials, entrepreneurs, business people and even artists and celebrities in China. Beijing has called it a "politically motivated and discriminatory action", and its foreign ministry has lodged a formal protest. There was a time when China sent the highest number of foreign students to American campuses. But those numbers slipped as the relationship between the two countries soured. A more powerful and increasingly assertive Beijing is now clashing with Washington for supremacy in just about everything, from trade to tech. Trump's first term had already spelled trouble for Chinese students. He signed an order in 2020 barring Chinese students and researchers with ties to Beijing's military from obtaining US visas. That order remained in place during President Joe Biden's term. Washington never clarified what constitutes "ties" to the military, so many students had theirvisas revokedor were turned away at US borders, sometimes without a proper explanation. One of them, who did not wish to be named, said his visa was cancelled by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) when he landed in Boston in August 2023. He had been accepted into a post-doctoral program at Harvard University. He was going to study regenerative medicine with a focus on breast cancer, and had done his master's degree from a military-affiliated research institution in China. He said he was not a member of the Communist Party and his research had nothing to do with the military. "They asked me what the relationship was between my research and China's defence affairs," he told the BBC then. "I said, how could breast cancer have anything to do with national defence? If you know, please tell me." He believes he never stood a chance because the officials had already made up their minds. He recalled one of them asking: "Did Xi Jinping buy your suitcase for you?" What was surprising, or even shocking then, slowly turned normal as more and more Chinese students struggled to secure visas or admissions to study science and technology in US universities. Mr Cao, a psychology major whose research involves neuroscience, has spent the past school year applying for PhD programs in the US. He had graduated from top-tier universities - credentials that could send him to an Ivy League school. But of the more than 10 universities he applied to, only one extended an offer. Trump's cuts to biomedical research didn't help, but the mistrust surrounding Chinese researchers was also a factor. Allegations and rumours of espionage, especially in sensitive subjects, have loomed over Chinese nationals at US universities in recent years, even derailing some careers. "One of the professors even told me, 'We rarely give offers to Chinese students these days, so I cannot give you an interview," Mr Cao told the BBC in February. "I feel like I am just a grain of sand under the wheel of time. There is nothing I can do." For those who did graduate from US colleges, returning home to China has not been easy either. They used to be lauded as a bridge to the rest of the world. Now, they find that their once-coveted degrees don't draw the same reaction. Chen Jian, who did not want to use his real name, said he quickly realised that his undergraduate degree from a US college had become an obstacle. When he first came back in 2020, he interned at a state-owned bank and asked a supervisor if there was a chance to stay on. The supervisor didn't say it outright, but Chen got the message: "Employees should have local degrees. People like me (with overseas degrees) won't even get a response." He later realised that "there really weren't any colleagues with overseas undergraduate background in the department". He went back to the US and did his master's at Johns Hopkins University, and now works at Chinese tech giant Baidu. But despite the degree from a prestigious American university, Mr Chen does not feel he has an edge because of the stiff competition from graduates in China. What also has not helped is the suspicion around foreign graduates. Beijing has ramped up warnings of foreign spies, telling civilians to be on the lookout for suspicious figures. In April, prominent Chinese businesswoman Dong Mingzhu told shareholders in a closed-door meeting that her company, home appliance maker Gree Electric, will "never" recruit Chinese people educated overseas "because among them are spies". "I don't know who is and who isn't," Ms Dong said, in comments that were leaked and went viral online. Days later, the CIA released promotional videos encouraging Chinese officials dissatisfied with the government to become spies and provide classified information. "Your destiny is in your own hands," the video said. The suspicion of foreigners as the US and China pull further away from each other is a surprising turn for many Chinese people who remember growing up in a very different country. Zhang Ni, who also did not want to use her real name, says she was "very shocked" by Ms Dong's remarks. The 24-year-old is a recent journalism graduate from Columbia University in New York. She says she "doesn't care about working at Gree", but what surprised her was the shift in attitudes. That so many Chinese companies "don't like anything that might be associated with the international" is a huge contrast from what Ms Zhang grew up with - a childhood "filled with [conversations centred on] the Olympics and World Expo". "Whenever we saw foreigners, my mom would push me to go talk to them to practice my English," she says. That willingness to exchange ideas and learn from the outside world appears to be waning in China, according to many. And America, once a place that drew so many young Chinese people, is no longer that welcoming. Looking back, Ms Zhang can't help but recall a joke her friend made at a farewell dinner before she left for the US. Then a flippant comment, it now sums up the fear in both Washington and Beijing: "Don't become a spy." Additional reporting by Kelly Ng
Chinese students find themselves caught in the US-China crossfire - again
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Chinese Students Face Increased Visa Challenges Amid US-China Tensions"
TruthLens AI Summary
Xiao Chen, a 22-year-old Chinese student, faced a setback at the US Consulate in Shanghai when her visa application was rejected just hours after the US announced plans to aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students. Chen, who had been accepted to study communications in Michigan, expressed feelings of uncertainty and helplessness, likening her situation to 'drifting duckweed.' Her hopes were already shaken by recent announcements from the Trump administration, including a decision that impacted Harvard University's ability to enroll international students, which has since been blocked by the courts. With the US government halting visa appointments for foreign students, Chen is contemplating taking a gap year if her visa is not granted, highlighting the precarious nature of the situation for many Chinese students. The atmosphere has become increasingly hostile, with comments from US officials suggesting a focus on students with ties to the Chinese Communist Party, which could affect a large number of applicants given the commonality of such affiliations in China. Beijing has condemned these actions as politically motivated and discriminatory, further straining the relationship between the two countries.
The challenges do not end with visa applications. For many Chinese students who do manage to secure admissions at US universities, the broader context of mistrust and allegations of espionage complicates their academic pursuits. Mr. Cao, a psychology major, found that despite his qualifications, only one out of over ten applications yielded an offer, as universities increasingly hesitate to admit Chinese students. This trend reflects a growing apprehension surrounding Chinese researchers, particularly in sensitive fields, which has led to a chilling effect on academic collaborations. Graduates returning to China have also faced difficulties, as their overseas degrees no longer guarantee job prospects, with some companies openly expressing distrust towards foreign-educated candidates. The shift in attitudes towards international education and cross-border exchanges marks a notable change from previous years, when China actively encouraged engagement with the global community. As the geopolitical landscape shifts, the future for Chinese students in the US appears increasingly uncertain, raising concerns about the long-term implications for academic and cultural exchange between the two nations.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article sheds light on the increasing tensions between the US and China, particularly focusing on the implications for Chinese students seeking education in the United States. The narrative centers around the personal experiences of Xiao Chen, a prospective student whose visa application was unexpectedly rejected, reflecting a broader trend affecting thousands of her peers.
Underlying Motives
The publication appears aimed at highlighting the vulnerabilities faced by Chinese students amid escalating geopolitical tensions. By focusing on individual stories, the piece invites readers to empathize with the challenges these students encounter, thus fostering a sense of urgency and concern regarding the impact of political decisions on personal lives. This approach may seek to influence public sentiment against the backdrop of increasing nationalism and political scrutiny.
Public Perception
The article likely aims to evoke feelings of sympathy and solidarity towards Chinese students, portraying them as victims of a larger political game. By framing the narrative through personal anecdotes, it encourages a nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in international education amidst strained diplomatic relations.
Possible Omissions
While the story emphasizes the difficulties faced by Chinese students, it may underplay the broader context of national security concerns that influence such visa policies. There is a lack of detailed exploration regarding the US government's rationale behind these measures, which could lead to a more balanced discussion.
Manipulative Elements
The language used in the article, combined with the personal account of a student, can be seen as manipulative to an extent. By depicting Xiao's rejection in a dramatic light, it engenders a specific emotional response that aligns with the narrative of victimhood. The characterization of government officials' statements creates an "us versus them" mentality, potentially alienating certain groups.
Factual Accuracy
The article is likely grounded in factual events—the rejection of student visas and the US government's policies concerning Chinese students. However, the interpretation and emphasis on individual experiences may skew the overall understanding of the situation.
Societal Implications
This coverage could incite further discussions around immigration policies, national security, and international relations, especially within academic circles. It may also mobilize support for Chinese students, potentially leading to protests or calls for policy changes.
Target Audience
The narrative is likely to resonate with educational institutions, human rights advocates, and the general public who may have concerns about the impact of political decisions on education. It may also reach communities sympathetic to international students and those opposed to discriminatory policies.
Economic and Market Impact
The impact on education sectors, particularly institutions reliant on international student enrollment, could be significant. Stocks in educational institutions that benefit from foreign tuition may experience volatility based on the ongoing visa situation. Companies involved in international student services may also feel the repercussions of these policy changes.
Geopolitical Context
In the broader context of US-China relations, this article underscores the complexities of global diplomacy and the ways in which domestic policies can reverberate internationally. It reflects ongoing tensions that could affect trade relations, technological collaboration, and cultural exchanges.
Artificial Intelligence Influence
There is a possibility that AI tools were employed in crafting the article, particularly in data gathering or language processing. However, the emotional tone and personal narrative suggest a human touch in the writing, aimed at connecting with the reader on a personal level.
In conclusion, the article is a compelling narrative that underscores the challenges faced by Chinese students due to geopolitical tensions. While it presents a factual basis, the framing and emotional appeal may introduce elements of manipulation.