Synthetic chemicals called phthalates, found in consumer products such as food storage containers, shampoo, makeup, perfume and children’s toys, may have contributed to more than 10% of all global mortality from heart disease in 2018 among men and women ages 55 through 64, a new study found. “Phthalates contribute to inflammation and systemic inflammation in the coronary arteries, which can accelerate existing disease and lead to acute events including mortality,” said senior author Dr. Leonardo Trasande, a professor of pediatrics and population health at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine. He also is director of NYU Langone’s Division of Environmental Pediatrics and Center for the Investigation of Environmental Hazards. “Phthalates are known to disrupt testosterone,” Trasande said, adding that in men, “low testosterone is a predictor of adult cardiovascular disease.” Phthalates have been linked in earlier studies with reproductive problems, such as genital malformations and undescended testes in baby boys and lower sperm counts and testosterone levels in adult males. Studies have also linked phthalates to asthma, childhood obesity and cancer. “The new study underscores the potentially enormous health and economic burden of DEHP exposure, which aligns with existing concerns about its risks,” said David Andrews, acting chief science officer at the Environmental Working Group, a consumer organization that monitors exposure to phthalates and other chemicals in plastics, in an email. He was not involved with the study. The American Chemistry Council, which represents industry, declined to comment on the study but told CNN via email that the organization’s High Phthalates Panel is dedicated to promoting the benefits of high phthalates such as DINP and DIDP. Phthalates exposure and risk Often called “everywhere chemicals” because they are so common, phthalates are added to consumer products such as PVC plumbing pipes, vinyl flooring, rain- and stain-resistant products, medical tubing, garden hoses and some children’s toys to make the plastic more flexible and harder to break. Other common exposures come from the use of phthalates in food packaging, detergents, clothing, furniture and automotive plastics. Phthalates are also added to personal care items such as shampoo, soap, hair spray and cosmetics to make fragrances last longer. People are exposed when they breathe contaminated air or eat or drink foods that come into contact with the plastic, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A global study The new study, published Tuesday in the journal eBiomedicine, examined the impact of one phthalate — Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or DEHP — on global deaths across 200 countries and territories. Researchers analyzed health and environmental data from dozens of population surveys, which included urine samples containing chemical breakdown products left by DEHP, which is known to be connected to cardiovascular disease, Trasande said. Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate has also been linked to birth defects, cancer and reproductive harm for men, according to California’s Proposition 65, a law that requires companies to place warning labels on products notifying consumers about chemicals’ possible health effects. Researchers compared the exposure with death statistics collected by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, a US research group that gathers global medical information. The analysis found exposure to DEHP contributed to 368,764 deaths in 2018 among men and women ages 55 through 64 globally. Africa accounted for 30% of the deaths from heart disease linked to DEHP, while East Asia and the Middle East accounted for 25% of the mortality, the study found. The research is believed to be the first global estimate of any health outcome from exposure to the DEHP, said lead study author Sara Hyman, an associate research scientist at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. “By highlighting the connection between phthalates and a leading cause of death across the world, our findings add to the vast body of evidence that these chemicals present a tremendous danger to human health,” Hyman said in a statement. A limitation of the research, however, stems from the use of hazard ratios the US to estimate population-attributable deaths in other countries, EWG’s Andrews said. “While the authors acknowledge this limitation, it assumes that the relationship between DEHP exposure and cardiovascular disease is consistent globally,” he said in an email. “This may not hold true given significant differences in both exposure levels and access to CVD detection and treatment across countries.” An earlier phthalates study analyzed US data Previous research by Trasande and his team measured the urine concentration of phthalates in more than 5,000 adults in the United States and compared those levels with the risk of early death over an average of 10 years. In that study, the researchers found phthalates may contribute to some 91,000 to 107,000 premature deaths a year among Americans ages 55 to 64. People with the highest levels of phthalates had a greater risk of death from any cause, especially cardiovascular mortality, according to the study. The results held even after researchers controlled for preexisting heart disease, diabetes, cancer and other common conditions, poor eating habits, physical activity and body mass, and levels of other known hormone disruptors such as bisphenol A or BPA. Researchers estimated those deaths could cost the United States about $40 billion to $47 billion each year in lost economic productivity. How to limit your exposure It is possible to minimize your exposure to phthalates and other endocrine disruptors, experts say. “Avoid plastics as much as you can. Reducing your use of ultraprocessed foods can reduce the levels of the chemical exposures you come in contact with,” Trasande said. “Never put plastic containers in the microwave or dishwasher, where the heat can break down the linings so they might be absorbed more readily.” Here are other tips to reduce exposure: · Use unscented lotions and laundry detergents. · Use cleaning supplies without scents. · Use glass, stainless steel, ceramic or wood to hold and store foods. · Buy fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables instead of canned and processed versions. · Encourage frequent handwashing to remove chemicals from hands. · Avoid air fresheners and all plastics labeled as No. 3, No. 6 and No. 7.
Chemicals in household plastic products linked to heart disease deaths, study says
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Study Links Phthalates in Household Products to Increased Heart Disease Mortality"
TruthLens AI Summary
A recent study published in the journal eBiomedicine has revealed a concerning link between synthetic chemicals known as phthalates and heart disease mortality, attributing over 10% of global heart disease deaths in 2018 to these substances among individuals aged 55 to 64. Phthalates, commonly found in household items such as food storage containers, personal care products, and children's toys, contribute to inflammation in coronary arteries, which can exacerbate existing cardiovascular conditions. Dr. Leonardo Trasande, a senior author of the study and a professor at New York University, emphasized the role of phthalates in disrupting testosterone levels, particularly in men, where lower testosterone has been identified as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Previous research has already linked phthalates to various reproductive issues and other health complications, including asthma and obesity, underscoring their potential health risks and economic burdens associated with exposure.
The study's findings indicate that exposure to Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a specific type of phthalate, was responsible for approximately 368,764 deaths globally in 2018 among the specified age group. The research highlighted that Africa accounted for a significant portion of these deaths, with 30% occurring there, while East Asia and the Middle East represented 25%. This research is considered the first global estimate connecting DEHP exposure to health outcomes, and researchers utilized health data from various global surveys to support their analysis. Despite the implications of the findings, there are limitations regarding the generalization of results across different countries due to variations in exposure levels and health care access. Previous studies in the United States have also indicated that high phthalate levels correlate with increased mortality risks, particularly from cardiovascular diseases, leading to substantial economic losses. To mitigate exposure, experts recommend reducing plastic use, avoiding processed foods, and opting for alternative materials for food storage and personal care products.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights a concerning link between phthalates, ubiquitous synthetic chemicals found in various household items, and increased mortality from heart disease. By presenting findings from a recent study, it emphasizes the potential health risks posed by everyday plastic products, particularly for a specific demographic, namely men and women aged 55 to 64. The implications of this research could lead to heightened public awareness and calls for stricter regulations regarding chemical exposures.
Public Perception and Health Concerns
The aim of the article appears to be raising awareness regarding the health risks associated with phthalates. By citing a significant percentage of heart disease mortality linked to these chemicals, it seeks to create a sense of urgency among the public. This could potentially influence consumer behavior, prompting individuals to seek alternatives to plastic products and advocate for policy changes.
Potential Omissions
While the article presents compelling evidence about the dangers of phthalates, it does not delve deeply into the context of regulatory measures or the ongoing debates around chemical safety. There may be an intention to spotlight the dangers without addressing counterarguments or industry positions that emphasize the benefits of certain phthalates in manufacturing.
Manipulative Elements
The article employs a language that leans towards alarmism, focusing on the detrimental effects of phthalates without adequately exploring the complexities of chemical regulation and the potential benefits of these substances in product longevity. This could be interpreted as a manipulative approach, steering public sentiment against the use of certain plastics.
Trustworthiness of the Report
The study cited is rooted in academic research, lending credibility to the claims made. However, the manner of presenting the findings could be seen as sensationalist. The article does not provide a comprehensive view of the existing body of research, which is essential for readers to make informed judgments about the risks associated with phthalates.
Societal and Economic Implications
The implications of this article extend beyond health, potentially influencing economic behaviors such as consumer purchasing decisions and stock market reactions. Companies involved in the production of phthalate-containing products may face scrutiny, leading to decreased sales or a shift in market dynamics.
Target Audience
The narrative is likely to resonate with health-conscious consumers, environmental advocates, and those concerned about public health. By focusing on the risks associated with common household products, the article appeals to individuals who prioritize safety and well-being, particularly parents and older adults.
Market Reactions and Financial Impact
Financially, this article could impact companies that produce plastic goods, especially those with significant phthalate content. Investors may react to negative publicity surrounding these products, leading to fluctuations in stock prices for relevant companies.
Geopolitical Context
This topic aligns with ongoing global discussions about chemical safety and environmental health, making it pertinent in today’s agenda. The findings could influence regulatory frameworks in various countries, particularly as public awareness grows.
AI Influence in Article Composition
While it’s uncertain if artificial intelligence directly influenced the writing of this article, the structured presentation of data and quotes suggests a sophisticated understanding of narrative construction. AI models could assist in organizing information and highlighting key findings, though the emotional tone and persuasive elements likely stem from human editorial choices.
Conclusion on Manipulation
There are aspects of manipulation present, primarily through the language used and the emphasis on negative outcomes without a balanced view. The focus is on invoking concern rather than fostering a nuanced discussion about phthalates.
Overall, the report is grounded in legitimate research, but the presentation may distort the complexity of the issue. The article's intent is to inform and provoke action regarding phthalate exposure, albeit through a lens that may induce anxiety rather than informed discourse.