Bumps on ancient, armored fish may have given rise to teeth in animals, study finds

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Study Links Origins of Teeth in Animals to Sensory Structures in Ancient Fish"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 9.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Recent research suggests that the sensitive inner layer of human teeth may have evolved from sensory tissues in ancient fish that lived approximately 465 million years ago. This study, published in the journal Nature, explored the evolutionary origins of teeth, proposing that they may have developed from odontodes, which are small bumps found on the exoskeletons of early armored fish. These odontodes were initially thought to be primarily protective structures, but new 3D scans of fossils reveal that they contained dentine, a tissue that carries sensory information. Dr. Yara Haridy, the lead author of the study, explained that these sensitive tissues could have allowed ancient fish to detect changes in their environment, such as pressure or temperature, thereby enhancing their ability to navigate and survive in their aquatic habitats. The study also draws parallels between odontodes in fish and sensilla, sensory organs found in modern invertebrates like crabs and shrimp, highlighting a case of evolutionary convergence where similar structures evolved independently in different animal lineages.

The research further clarified the classification of ancient creatures, revealing that what was once believed to be a vertebrate fish called Anatolepis is actually an arthropod. This discovery was made possible through advanced imaging techniques that provided a detailed view of the fossils' internal structures. The findings challenge previous assumptions about the evolution of hard tissues like dentine, suggesting that these features may have initially developed for sensory purposes rather than solely for protection or feeding. Dr. Lauren Sallan, an expert on macroevolution, remarked on the implications of these findings, indicating that the evolution of teeth and other hard structures could be more complex than previously thought. The study opens new avenues for understanding the evolutionary history of vertebrates and their sensory adaptations, inviting further exploration into the origins of teeth and the ecological interactions between ancient fish and arthropods.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents fascinating research that connects the evolution of teeth in vertebrates to ancient fishes' sensory structures. By exploring the origins of dental structures, it offers insights into evolutionary biology and the development of sensory organs across different animal groups. This kind of research not only informs our understanding of biological evolution but may also resonate with broader themes in science and education.

Purpose of the Article

The primary aim of this publication is to highlight new findings that link ancient fish features to modern vertebrate teeth. By showing how odontodes contributed to sensory perception, the study underscores the interconnectedness of evolutionary traits across species. This may enhance public interest in evolutionary biology and reinforce the importance of scientific research in understanding our biological heritage.

Public Perception and Implications

The article likely aims to foster a sense of wonder and curiosity about the natural world and the history of life on Earth. By presenting complex scientific ideas in an accessible manner, it may encourage readers to engage more deeply with topics related to evolution and biology. There is no evident indication that the article seeks to hide information; instead, it promotes transparency in scientific discovery.

Manipulative Elements

While the article does not overtly manipulate information, it does frame the research in a way that emphasizes the significance of evolutionary convergence. This framing could influence how readers perceive the relationship between different species, potentially leading to a more unified understanding of biological evolution. The language used is scientific yet approachable, aiming to educate rather than mislead.

Comparative Analysis with Other News

Compared to other articles in the science domain, this piece stands out for its focus on evolutionary convergence, a theme that is increasingly relevant in contemporary discussions about biodiversity and environmental change. This connection may resonate with ongoing discussions surrounding climate change and its impact on species adaptation.

Potential Societal Impact

The implications of this research could extend to educational initiatives that aim to improve public understanding of evolution and biodiversity. Additionally, it may inspire interest in fields such as paleontology and marine biology, potentially influencing educational policies or funding for related research.

Target Audience

This article likely appeals to academic communities, students, and anyone interested in natural history and evolution. It may attract readers from various scientific backgrounds, including biology, paleontology, and environmental science, as well as general readers with an interest in science.

Market Influence

While the research itself may not have direct implications for stock markets or economic sectors, it could bolster interest in educational institutions or organizations that focus on science education and outreach. This may indirectly influence funding or support for institutions involved in evolutionary biology research.

Global Context and Relevance

In the broader context of global discourse on biodiversity and conservation, this research contributes to understanding the evolutionary significance of sensory adaptations. As discussions about climate change and species extinction continue, insights from such studies may become increasingly pertinent.

Artificial Intelligence Involvement

It is plausible that AI tools were utilized in the analysis and presentation of the data, particularly in the 3D scanning of fossils and interpreting complex evolutionary relationships. However, the writing style and structure suggest human authorship, as the narrative conveys a sense of discovery and scientific inquiry typical of academic research.

Given the clarity of the research findings and their implications for our understanding of evolution, this article can be considered reliable. The study’s publication in a reputable journal like Nature further substantiates its credibility.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The sensitive interior of human teeth might have originated from a seemingly unlikely place: sensory tissue in fish that were swimming in Earth’s oceans 465 million years ago. While our teeth are covered in hard enamel, it’s dentine — the tooth’s inner layer responsible for carrying sensory information to the nerves — that reacts to the pressure of a hard bite, pain, or changes like extreme cold or sweetness. When trying to determine the origins of teeth, one of the many possibilities considered by researchers over the years was that teeth may have evolved from bumps on the armored exoskeletons on ancient fish. But the true purpose of the structures, called odontodes, was unclear. Now, a new study and 3D scans of fossils have yielded evidence that the external bumps contained dentine, which likely helped fish sense their surroundings. Scientists reported the findings Wednesday in the journal Nature. “Covered in these sensitive tissues, maybe when it bumped against something it could sense that pressure, or maybe it could sense when the water got too cold and it needed to swim elsewhere,” said lead study author Dr. Yara Haridy, postdoctoral researcher in the department of organismal biology and anatomy at the University of Chicago, in an email. During its analysis, the team also uncovered similarities between the odontodes and features called sensilla, which exist as sensory organs in the shells of modern animals such as crabs and shrimp, and can be found in fossilized invertebrate arthropods. The development of odontodes in fish, which are vertebrates, and sensilla in arthropods, which are invertebrates, is a prime example of evolutionary convergence — when similar features evolve independently in different animal groups, Haridy said. “These jawless fish and Aglaspidid arthropods (extinct marine arthropods) have an extremely distant shared common ancestor that likely had no hard parts at all,” Haridy said. “We know that vertebrates and arthropods evolved hard parts independently and amazingly they evolved similar sensory mechanisms integrated into their hard skeleton independently.” While arthropods have retained their sensilla, odontodes appear to be the direct precursors to teeth in animals. As the researchers compared sensilla and odontodes, they also arrived at another finding: One species, once considered to be an ancient fish, was actually an arthropod. The search for the oldest vertebrates Haridy’s original aim was to solve the mystery of the oldest vertebrate animal that exists in the fossil record. She approached museums across the country and asked whether she could scan any fossil specimens they had from the Cambrian Period, 540 million years to 485 million years ago. Then, she settled in for an all-nighter at the Argonne National Laboratory, where she used their Advanced Photon Source to capture high-resolution computer tomography, or CT, scans. “It was a night at the particle accelerator; that was fun,” Haridy said. At first glance, a fossil of a creature called Anatolepis looked like a vertebrate fish – and indeed, previous research from 1996 had identified it as one. Haridy and her colleagues noticed that there was a series of pores filled with a material that appeared to be dentine. “We were high fiving each other, like ‘oh my god, we finally did it,’” Haridy said. “That would have been the very first tooth-like structure in vertebrate tissues from the Cambrian. So, we were pretty excited when we saw the telltale signs of what looked like dentine.” To confirm their discovery, the team compared the scans with those of other ancient fossils, as well as modern crabs, snails, beetles, sharks, barnacles and even miniature suckermouth catfish that Haridy had raised herself. Those comparisons showed that Anatolepis more closely resembled arthropod fossils, including one from the Milwaukee Public Museum. And what the team thought were tubules lined with dentine were actually more similar to sensilla. But they did find dentine-containing odontodes in ancient fish like Eriptychius and Astraspis during the scans. The confusion over Anatolepis’ true nature had stemmed from the fragmentary nature of the fossils. The most complete pieces are only about 3 millimeters (0.1 inches) in size, Haridy said, which proved to be a challenge for comparative research reliant on external imaging. But the new scans she conducted enabled a 3D look at the fossils, revealing their internal anatomy. “This shows us that ‘teeth’ can also be sensory even when they’re not in the mouth,” Haridy said. “So, there’s sensitive armor in these fish. There’s sensitive armor in these arthropods. This explains the confusion with these early Cambrian animals. People thought that this was the earliest vertebrate, but it actually was an arthropod.” The cutting edge modern imaging used in the study is resolving the debate over Anatolepis, said Dr. Richard Dearden, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, the Netherlands. Dearden was not involved in the new research. “(The study authors) use cutting edge modern imaging approaches to try and settle this question, assembling an impressive swathe of comparative data to convincingly establish that Anatolepis is indeed not a vertebrate,” Dearden said in an email. Armor against the elements Armored jawless fish like Astraspis and Eriptychius and ancient arthropods like Anatolepis coexisted in the muddy shallow seas of the Ordovician period, which occurred between 485.4 million and 443.8 million years ago. Other contemporaries of these animals included large cephalopods such as giant squid, as well as huge sea scorpions. Features like odontodes and sensilla would help fish and arthropods distinguish predators from prey. “When you think about an early animal like this, swimming around with armor on it, it needs to sense the world. This was a pretty intense predatory environment and being able to sense the properties of the water around them would have been very important,” said senior study author Dr. Neil Shubin, the Robert R. Bensley Distinguished Service Professor of Organismal Biology and Anatomy at the University of Chicago, in a statement. “So, here we see that invertebrates with armor like horseshoe crabs need to sense the world too, and it just so happens they hit on the same solution.” Several modern fishes have odontodes, while sharks, skates and some catfishes are covered in small toothlets called denticles, which cause their skin to feel like sandpaper, Haridy said. Haridy studied the tissues of the catfish she raised and realized their denticles were connected to nerves much in the same way that teeth are in animals. When comparing teeth, odontodes and sensilla, they were all incredibly similar, she said. “We think that the earliest vertebrates, these big, armored fish, had very similar structures, at least morphologically. They look the same in ancient and modern arthropods, because they’re all making this mineralized layer that caps their soft tissue and helps them sense the environment,” Haridy said. It’s likely that the genes necessary to form odontodes also produced sensitive teeth in animals — including humans — later, according to the study authors. The findings support the idea that sensory structures appeared first on exoskeletons, which then provided the genetic information that could then be used to create teeth as they became a necessary part of life, the study authors noted. “Over time, fish evolved jaws, and it became advantageous to have pointy structures around and in the mouth,” Haridy said. “Little by little some fish with jaws had pointy odontodes at the edge of the mouth and then eventually some were directly in the mouth and then lost across the body. The relationship between odontodes and teeth is continuously being clarified by new fossils and modern genetics.” The new research refines the timeline for the first appearance of hard tissues and the earliest ancestors of jawed fishes by removing Anatolepis from the fish tree of life, said Dr. Lauren Sallan, assistant professor and head of the macroevolution unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan. Sallan, who was not involved in the new study, said it also raises an intriguing new hypothesis that the scalelike precursors of teeth evolved to detect prey, friends or predators in the water. “This is a real challenge to seemingly obvious assumptions that hard tissues like dentine and structures like scales and teeth evolved (primarily) for protection on the body or feeding in the throat,” Sallan said. “Instead, they may have been ‘exapted’ (subsequently modified) for these uses, much like how limbs evolved before they were used to walk on land. It’s also interesting to see the degree of convergence between early armored arthropods and fishes, and raises questions about how much ecological overlap occurred between these two groups.” Haridy wants to continue the search for fossils that could lead to the oldest vertebrate, given that researchers expect there are earlier vertebrates than Astraspis and Eriptychius. And even though they didn’t discover it through this research, they made worthwhile findings, Shubin said in an email. “We were disappointed that (Anatolepis) wasn’t a vertebrate but we were amazed by the new ideas that arose,” Shubin said. “And that took us in an entirely new direction. That’s science.”

Back to Home
Source: CNN