Beaver activists claim they are 'doing God's work'

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Activists Undertake Covert Beaver Releases Amid Legal Controversy in the UK"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the shadows of legality, a group of activists in the UK has taken it upon themselves to release beavers into the wild, claiming their actions are a form of 'God's work' aimed at restoring ecological balance. Operating covertly, members of this underground network, like Ben, who spoke anonymously, are willing to face potential arrest and substantial fines by conducting unlicensed releases. Despite the existence of a legal framework for reintroducing beavers, the activists argue that the bureaucratic nature of the process hinders urgent ecological restoration efforts. Ben emphasizes the positive effects beavers can have on their environment, such as reducing flooding and improving water quality, asserting that their presence is beneficial rather than detrimental. However, the National Farmers Union (NFU) has expressed serious concerns, warning that unlicensed releases could lead to significant agricultural damage, including flooding and destruction of crops. NFU spokesperson Poppy Sherborne described such actions as irresponsible, highlighting the absence of a proper process to evaluate the risks associated with these releases and the lack of support for farmers who may be affected by them.

The beaver population in England, once extinct due to overhunting, is experiencing a resurgence, with estimates suggesting that there are now between 600 to 1,000 beavers in the wild, primarily through unregulated means. The legal status of beavers has changed over the years, with recent protections recognizing them as a species that cannot be captured or harmed. Despite the risks associated with illegal releases, some activists, like Marie, remain passionate about their cause, believing that coexistence and management strategies can mitigate potential conflicts with farmers. The discourse around beaver reintroduction reflects a broader tension between conservation efforts and agricultural interests, with calls for a more streamlined licensing process to facilitate legal rewilding initiatives. As the debate continues, the need for a balanced approach to coexistence with wildlife becomes increasingly pressing, underscoring the complexities of rewilding in a modern agricultural context.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Under cover of darkness, a nocturnal creature emerges from a crate and takes its first tentative steps into a new life in the wild. "It is just essentially God's work. We're undoing the damage of hundreds of years ago and bringing back these extraordinary animals," claimed Ben, who spoke to the BBC on the condition of anonymity. He is part of an underground network where members risk arrest, jail and hefty fines by carrying out covert and unlicensed releases of beavers. It isan offenceto release beavers into the wild without a licence and a spokeswoman for the National Farmers Union (NFU) said it was "irresponsible" and "really worrying". There is now a legal route in the UK for the species to be reintroduced. Despite this and the risks of acting without licences, activists whose names have been changed were unrepentant and said they were taking action themselves because the legal option was "too bureaucratic". "It feels like they're back in their proper place," Ben said. Like the nocturnal creatures at the heart of their cause, the group he belongs to operates under the cover of darkness. He said secrecy was key in everything from where other parts of the network got the animals - "we really don't need to know" - to the clandestine releases. "You don't want to be caught with a box of beavers in the boot so you have to be quite quick," Ben said. "You open the door, do it and drive away. They are instantly much happier in the water." However, the NFU said concerns over unlicensed releases included flooding, tree-gnawing and damage to land and crops. NFU countryside advisor Poppy Sherborne said illegal releases were "irresponsible". "They are really worrying because there has been no process put in place to check that release should be happening," she said. "There's no support for farmers who could be impacted by that release if it's not happened in the right way." She said the "rigorous" legal process should be followed. When challenged over his actions, Ben said:  "I'm unfamiliar with species of animals or species of wildlife, plants or animal that would be badly affected by the presence of beavers... they can reduce risk of flooding, mitigate the damage that a drought can bring. They can help to clean up water. "What's not to like about this?" Det Insp Mark Harrison, of the National Wildlife Crime Unit, which supports wildlife crime enforcement across the UK, said he loved nature and visiting rewilding locations but "it has to be done properly". He said although there had been prosecutions for illegal species release in England, none had applied to beavers. "The reason for that is because we've got no evidence," he said, describing the covert nature of releases and the fact beavers could be on site for long periods before they were spotted. "You commit an offence so there could be consequences for you but you've also got to think about the impact on the animal so there could be welfare issues," he said. "You could be reintroducing other diseases and parasites." Marie, who is also part of the network, said being part of beaver releases was "one of the most amazing things I've ever witnessed". Asked about the difficulties beavers could cause for farmers and landowners, she added: "I can understand why it is scary to some people... but there are so many ways that you can maintain control. "If the landowner wants to protect particular trees, you can make sure that beavers don't fell an individual tree. "You can control the water level even and I think beavers can actually bring benefits to farmland too." Beavers were hunted to extinction in Britain 400 years ago for their meat, furry water-resistant pelts and a substance they secrete called castoreum - used in food, medicine and perfume. For a long time, the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 regulated the release of "non-native" species, including beavers. It allowed for licensed releases of beavers - imported from countries including Germany and Norway - into enclosures, of which there are 52 in England, according to the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). But in 2013, video evidence emerged of a wild beaver with young on the River Otter, near Ottery St Mary, Devon. After public pressure, the population became central to theRiver Otter Beaver Trial, which resulted in the 15 families being givenlicensed status. Their descendants are among upwards of 600 beavers currently roaming free in England, according to Natural England; the majority through unlicensed releases or escapes. The Beaver Trust's figure is higher; its "educated estimate" is that there are 1,000 wild beavers in England, mostly in the South West, with a total of 3,500 in England, Wales and Scotland. In 2022, Eurasian beavers wererecognised as a protected speciesin England, making it illegal to capture, kill, injure or disturb them. In February 2025, a licensing schemeoverseen by Natural Englandwas introduced - without which it isstill illegal to introduce or move beavers. Natural England is now considering about 50 expressions of interest. Applicants will have to demonstrate clear benefits and where risks can be "avoided, mitigated or managed". Cornwall Wildlife Trust applied to release beavers on a site near Helman Tor as part of a planned £800,000 10-year project. During the two-year preparation of its application, a pair turned up at the site in what the trust believes was an unlicensed release. "We have seen this site be absolutely transformed," beaver officer Lauren Jasper said. "They've created a couple of dams. In doing so, this is holding back water and it's slowing the flow and it's created this amazing wetland area that's now brimming with wildlife." The trust said its project work would include providing advice on learning to co-exist with the species again and added it did not support unlicensed release. Other rewilding efforts - both legal and illegal - causing debate includesea eagles,lynx, wolves,elk, andeven some species of butterfly, while sightings of wild boar on Dartmoor sparked division. Devon farmer and conservationist Derek Gow said he believed they had been released by illegal rewilders. "I wouldn't imagine very many people are involved in doing this but the effect they've had, especially when it comes to beavers, has been profound," he said. Mr Gow, who is working to rewild 150 acres of his own land near Launceston, said he had also legally reintroduced species including beavers, dormice, 25,000 water voles and glow-worms. He said biodiversity in England was at "rock bottom" and the licensing system was fraught with "complex and medieval rules" and an obligation to "pay for the next 10 years". "What they are trying to do is shut the stable door long after the horse, the horse's grandmother and the horses' relatives have crossed the mountain range to emerge free on the other side," he said. Defra said unlicensed releases could "reduce the likelihood of success of beaver reintroductions". It said detailed and comprehensive licensing applications were important to "achieve a measured pace of reintroduction and prioritise areas where beavers can thrive without causing significant conflicts with people, agriculture and infrastructure". But rewilder Ben, who said the licensing process was a step in the right direction, said he thought there "may well be a requirement" to continue releasing the anmals illegally. "We are in a national emergency of climate and biodiversity loss," he said, adding rewilding beavers was being treated as "yet another bureaucratic exercise". "It's not good enough for beavers, and it's not good enough for the people of this country," he said. Det Insp Harrison said "coexistence" was needed and a lot of wildlife crime issues were "because we don't know how to live with these animals anymore". He said: "It brings about a lot of conflict and usually it's human-human conflict because of an animal." Follow BBC Cornwall onX,FacebookandInstagram. Follow BBC Devon onX,FacebookandInstagram. Send your story ideas tospotlight@bbc.co.uk.

Back to Home
Source: Bbc News