The US economy is contracting faster than expected. Is it a recession? Maybe. For a variety of reasons, we can’t start bandying the R-word around just yet. But what we can do is step back, look at the data, and — in my very technical analysis — run a vibe check. The upshot: It feels like we’ve got a lot of recession energy. On Wednesday, government data showed economic growth contracting for the first time in three years. Gross domestic product, which measures all the goods and services produced in the economy, fell in the first three months of the year at an annualized rate of 0.3% — a much sharper decline than most economists predicted. It’s also a stark decline from the quarter before, when the economy expanded by 2.4%. Let’s look at in terms of purple bars (good) and yellow bars (bad). After the past couple of years with roughly 3% annualized GDP growth (look at all those purple bars above), the first-quarter contraction is a big red flag — or in this case, a yellow bar — in a vast field of red flags that have been cropping up from sea to shining sea under President Donald Trump. While Trump was quick to shrug off Wall Street’s negative reaction to the GDP contraction — he called it, nonsensically, Joe Biden’s “overhang” — it is impossible to separate the data from his radical tariff plans and the supply chain upheaval they’ve created. The data captures activity between January 1 and March 31, which includes the president’s initial tariffs against America’s two closest trading partners, Mexico and Canada, as well as the deep anxiety that was building in anticipation of his April 2 slate of “Liberation Day” tariffs. Within that time, consumer spending growth — the primary engine of the US economy — fell to a rate of 1.8%, down considerably from 4% in the prior three-month period. By that measure, it was a “moderate quarter,” wrote Justin Wolfers, economics professor at the University of Michigan, on social media Wednesday. “Not recessionary; not great.” And then there was the DOGE effect: Federal government spending went from 4% growth at the end of the Biden administration to a 5.1% contraction under Trump. That might be a good thing from a certain ideological perspective, but definitely hits the economy no matter what your politics are. Meanwhile, inflation rose at an estimated pace of 3.6% for the quarter, up from 2.4% during the fourth quarter, as measured by the Federal Reserve’s preferred gauge of price increases, the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index. (The monthly PCE report, also released Wednesday, showed prices rose 2.3% in March from a year earlier, and were mostly flat from February to March.) All of those numbers, like Trump’s 100-day polling figures, signal that Americans aren’t loving the vibe. And the vibes matter: As my colleague Matt Egan wrote this week, recessions tend to come to life when enough people expect them to. The R-word The economy is weakening, certainly. But the official definition of a recession in the United States (yes, other countries have different definitions, because economics is a squishy field) is “a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and that lasts more than a few months.” Rule of thumb: You need to have at least two quarters of back-to-back contractions in GDP to meet the standard set by the National Bureau of Economic Research, a private nonprofit organization that is the official arbiter of American recession-ology. And even with two negative quarters, there are some other factors that go into the calculation, such as how sharp the decline is, how long it lasts, and how widespread it’s felt across the economy. (My colleague Alicia Wallace has more on all that here.) Back in 2022, we actually had two consecutive quarters of contraction, but no recession. The second quarter was later revised (as they often are) when more data came in. At that time, the momentary contraction reflected an economy lurching from one crisis (Covid) to another (inflation). Consumer demand was shifting from goods — like treadmills, TVs, cookware, all the tools of our various lockdown projects — to experiences (beach vacays, overseas flights, the Eras Tour). The contraction in GDP had more to do with lagging trade data than a true slowdown in economic activity. So it’s possible the first quarter of 2025 is a blip, like the one we saw in 2022. But there are some key differences that make today a bit more worrying. The economy was so hot in 2022 that it was… too hot. GDP growth at the end of 2021 was near 7%. Unemployment was the lowest it had been in a generation and companies were expanding rapidly, adding hundreds of thousands of jobs every single month. Consumers couldn’t stop spending money, even as inflation soared as high as 9.1% in June of 2022. While the current labor market remains strong, it’s not expanding at the same feverish pace as it was then. Consumers have long blown through their pandemic savings and are beginning to pull back on expenditures like summer vacations and dinners out. And when they’re buying more appliances and electronic goods, it looks like they’re trying to get ahead of Trump’s trade war — like people stocking up on eggs, bread and milk before a hurricane, rather than stocking up for a party. The biggest difference between then and now comes down to who’s in the White House. It is difficult to overstate the real economic damage that’s already playing out in response to Trump’s tariffs and the haphazard way the White House has instituted them. That kind of volatility, which has rattled financial markets and paralyzed businesses, simply wasn’t present under any other administration in history. But we’ll have to wait to find out exactly how much economic damage Trump has caused. The second quarter’s data, from April to June, will capture the full impact of Trump’s extreme 145% tariff on China and 10% baseline tariff on the rest of the world. Bottom line: The vibes are off. And the data is getting ugly, making a recession much more likely. There will be pain that Trump can’t undo, even if he were to remove all the new tariffs he’s put in place. But how long the pain lasts depends entirely on how long the tariffs, especially on China, remain in place.
Are we in a recession? Let’s do a vibe check
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"U.S. Economic Contraction Raises Concerns About Potential Recession"
TruthLens AI Summary
The U.S. economy is showing signs of contraction, raising questions about a potential recession. Recent government data indicates that gross domestic product (GDP) fell at an annualized rate of 0.3% in the first quarter, marking the first decline in three years and contrasting sharply with the previous quarter's growth of 2.4%. This unexpected downturn is considered a significant indicator of economic trouble, especially against the backdrop of President Donald Trump's tariff policies, which have led to supply chain disruptions and heightened market anxiety. Consumer spending, a key driver of economic performance, has also slowed, with growth dropping to 1.8% from 4% in the prior period. Such shifts in consumer behavior reveal a cautious sentiment among Americans, as they begin to tighten their spending amidst rising inflation, which increased to an estimated 3.6% in the first quarter, up from 2.4% previously.
Despite these troubling indicators, it is essential to define what constitutes a recession. The official definition in the U.S. includes a significant decline in economic activity that persists over several months, typically characterized by two consecutive quarters of GDP contraction. While the first quarter's decline raises concerns, historical context suggests that not every contraction leads to a recession, as seen in 2022 when two quarters of negative growth did not result in an official recession due to revisions in economic data. However, the current economic climate is different, with less vigorous growth and dwindling consumer savings. The impact of Trump's tariffs on trade and market stability is significant, and as the second quarter approaches, the full effects of these policies will become clearer. The current economic indicators suggest a worrying trend, with many experts agreeing that the likelihood of a recession is increasing, especially if consumer confidence continues to wane and inflation remains high.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article delves into the current state of the US economy, raising the question of whether the country is experiencing a recession. It presents data indicating that economic growth is contracting at a faster rate than anticipated, which could signal troubling trends ahead. The discussion is framed in an accessible way, suggesting a need for a broader public understanding of economic conditions.
Economic Data and Its Implications
Government data reveals that GDP fell at an annualized rate of 0.3% in the first quarter of the year, contrasting sharply with the previous quarter's growth of 2.4%. This sharp decline reflects various underlying issues, including consumer spending growth dropping to 1.8%. The article emphasizes that while the data might not officially categorize the situation as a recession, the signs are concerning. The author uses visual metaphors (purple bars for good performance and yellow bars for bad) to convey the economic climate in a more relatable manner.
Political Context
The article subtly critiques the current administration, particularly President Trump, by linking the economic downturn to his tariff policies and the resultant supply chain disruptions. By suggesting that these policies may have contributed to the economic contraction, it implies a level of accountability on the part of the leadership. This approach might resonate with readers who are critical of current economic management.
Public Sentiment and Perception
The phrase "vibe check" is employed to gauge the public's feeling about the economy, suggesting that beyond the numbers, there is a prevailing sense of unease among consumers and investors. By framing the situation as a collective emotional experience, the article aims to connect with readers on a personal level, potentially influencing public sentiment regarding economic policies and leadership.
Potential Concealments
The article does not explicitly disclose any hidden agendas; however, it does hint at the possibility that the administration may be downplaying the severity of economic indicators. By focusing on consumer sentiment and public perception, the article may be steering attention away from the more complex economic variables at play, which could require deeper analysis.
Manipulative Elements
While the article is rooted in factual data, the use of emotional language and imagery raises concerns about manipulation. By invoking "recession energy," the piece plays on public fears, which could influence readers' perceptions of the economy. The language used may serve to rally support for alternative economic policies or leadership.
Reliability of the Information
The reliability of the article rests on its grounding in government data, yet the interpretation of that data is influenced by the author's perspective. The framing of the economic situation, combined with emotional language, may skew perceptions. Overall, the article is credible in its use of data, but the narrative could lead to selective interpretations.
Societal and Economic Impact
The analysis presented could have significant implications for public discourse, impacting consumer confidence and political discussions surrounding economic policy. If public sentiment aligns with the article's portrayal of economic anxiety, it could lead to a downturn in consumer spending and further economic contraction.
Target Audience
The article appears to target readers who are economically literate and politically engaged, particularly those who may be skeptical of current administration policies. It connects with individuals seeking clarity on economic conditions and their implications for the broader society.
Market Implications
The article could influence market behavior, as negative sentiment surrounding economic performance may lead to increased volatility in stock prices. Investors might react by pulling back from consumer-driven stocks or those directly affected by tariff policies, which are highlighted in the piece.
Geopolitical Context
In a broader context, the economic conditions discussed could affect international relations, particularly with trading partners impacted by tariff policies. The situation may also resonate with global economic trends, particularly in light of ongoing geopolitical tensions.
AI Influence
There is no direct evidence in the text suggesting the use of AI in its creation. However, if AI were employed, it could have assisted in analyzing data trends, generating accessible narratives, or even in language optimization to enhance reader engagement. The framing might indicate an AI influence in crafting a narrative designed to resonate emotionally with readers.
In conclusion, while the article provides a factual basis for its claims, it employs emotionally charged language and imagery that may influence public perception. The potential biases in interpretation warrant caution when assessing its overall reliability and implications.