When a deal to buy Caitlin Bigelow’s San Francisco condo fell through last month, she felt relief, rather than disappointment. Bigelow was working with a Realtor she trusted from Compass who had suggested she first list her home as a “Compass Private Exclusive.” That meant her home wouldn’t immediately be publicly advertised on home-search websites like Zillow or Redfin. Instead, the listing would be announced internally at Compass, one of America’s largest real estate brokerages, meaning only buyers represented by other Compass agents knew the home was for sale. Bigelow had received two offers from this method — including one for $2.1 million, which was $95,000 over her list price. It was the “magic number” she had in mind, and she quickly accepted. At first, she was thrilled. But after having time to think, she began to feel a sense of unease. “Only two people had seen (the home) and we seemed to be hitting our magic number already,” Bigelow told CNN. “The longer I sat with that, the more I felt like, well, if two people saw it and we hit the number, what if 50 people saw it?” Bigelow’s question gets at the heart of a dispute roiling the residential real estate industry. After a landmark settlement last year by the industry’s powerful trade association, the National Association of Realtors, the battle over private and exclusive listings has become the latest fight about the way homes are bought and sold in America. What is a private listing? There are legitimate reasons why someone might list their home out of the public eye, Summer Goralik, a real estate compliance consultant, told CNN. For example, celebrities and other public figures may not want to advertise their home’s address or photos. But with US homebuyer demand significantly outstripping supply over the last few years, private listings across the market could mean only select buyers get first dibs on in-demand homes. Although Compass is not the only brokerage that lists homes off-market, the practice has become a signature part of how its agents market home listings. And it has prompted backlash: Other leaders in the residential real estate industry argue the practice is exclusionary and threatens to further chip away at consumer trust in real estate agents. “If a portion of inventory is removed and only shown to a small group of people, by definition, that’s an exclusionary behavior that’s going to hurt others,” said Leo Pareja, the CEO of eXp Realty, another one of America’s largest real estate brokerages. He said his company only handles private transactions when it’s required in special situations: “Fewer than 1,000 transactions for us last year were private exclusives out of 350,000.” Critics also say the private listing strategy unfairly pushes home sellers to make deals with buyers represented by other Compass agents, resulting in the brokerage collecting a commission from both sides of the transaction. Compass has denied the accusation that it pushes sellers into private transactions. Instead, the company said many sellers choose to list their homes privately before sharing their homes more widely on the multiple listing service (MLS), which is a database that agents from all companies use to share home listings with each other. Most MLS listings are automatically picked up by homebuying websites like Zillow and Redfin. “Home sellers deserve choice in how their home is marketed,” a Compass spokesperson wrote to CNN in a statement. “They should be able to choose the best strategy for selling their homes, whether that means starting with marketing privately or publicly before listing in the MLS or listing on the MLS from day one.” Compass often employs its “3-phased marketing strategy” for home sellers. It begins with a private listing to “test” a home’s sales price. Then, during the “coming soon” phase, listings are showcased on Compass’ website to generate buyer interest before they “officially” hit the market. The final phase is to “go live on all platforms,” meaning sellers list their home online for all real estate agents and home shoppers. As of mid-February, approximately 35% of all Compass’ listings were listed as “Compass Private Exclusive” or “Compass Coming Soon,” CEO Robert Reffkin said on Compass’ most recent earnings call. Compass said 94% of its private listings last year ultimately sold on the public market. “If this plan to market off the MLS is literally driven by client need, then 100% that should be the journey,” Goralik said. “But on the flip side, if it’s not driven by the seller, and the listing pitch is about why your property needs to be off the MLS before that discussion even comes up… that just dirties the water all the way through.” An increasingly fragmented housing market where buyers can only find certain homes for sale depending on their agent hurts both buyers and sellers, Goralik told CNN. “Then that wasn’t the seller’s choice. That wasn’t even directed by the seller,” she added. “I just think that’s going backwards. That’s not moving toward the future.” CEOs trade barbs Last week, Ryan Schneider, CEO of Anywhere Real Estate, which includes real estate companies such as Coldwell Banker, Century 21 and Sotheby’s International Realty, weighed in on the dispute on his company’s earnings call last week. “Anywhere Real Estate is aggressively advocating for transparency and the broad and public distribution of nearly all listings because we believe it is best for buyers to see all the inventory, and most critically, it helps sellers get the highest price for their home,” he said on Tuesday. In April, though, Corcoran, another subsidiary of Anywhere Real Estate, rolled out Corcoran Reserve, a private listing network for sellers who want to prioritize “greater privacy and discretion.” “We are advocating for the broad distribution of listings in almost all cases, and we don’t believe that this self-serving debate has the best interests of the consumer at heart,” Anywhere Real Estate said in a statement to CNN a few weeks after Corcoran Reserve was launched. Douglas Elliman, a separate brokerage, plans to roll out its own private listing network, though the company told CNN that it is just one of multiple selling strategies for home sellers. Pareja has been vocal in his opposition of private listings. “If I were being a pure capitalist, I would be on the other side of the argument, because I would be able to hoard inventory…. But I’m not. Instead, I’m saying, ‘Hey guys, this is not good for the consumer,’” he told CNN. Compass pushes back Last month, Zillow and Redfin — two of the most popular platforms for home sale searches — announced new rules that complicate Compass’ strategy. While it doesn’t directly prohibit private listings, Zillow said that a home listing that is marketed to consumers must be published to Zillow within one day, or it won’t be published at all. Beginning in late May, “coming soon” listings that are advertised on other real estate websites will need to be published on Zillow within 24 hours. Redfin announced a similar policy shortly afterward. Reffkin has defended the strategy of keeping listings off platforms like Zillow and Redfin to start. Both sites publicly show price cut history and how many days homes sit on the market — two data points the Compass CEO has argued hurt a home’s sales price. “Compass has achieved everything it has without banning homeowners who don’t give us their listings,” one of Reffkin’s recent social media posts read. “Why can’t Zillow and Redfin do that same?” Compass has pushed back on the notion that its private listings are designed to increase the chance that the brokerage would collect the commission on both sides of a home transaction; rather, they say they are following the rules set by NAR. In 2020, NAR implemented a rule for its 1.5 million members that requires agents to put a listing on the MLS within one day after marketing it, meaning that Compass agents had not been allowed to broadcast private listings to other brokerages without triggering the one-day rule. In March, NAR amended its rule, now allowing sellers to list their homes in more private ways, including the option to delay the public marketing of homes on the MLS. “This new listing option is simply another choice for consumers who want greater control over how and where their property is marketed,” a statement from NAR said. On Thursday, Reffkin announced a new plan to share Compass’ private listings with other brokerages while still following NAR’s rules: Agents from all brokerages can now come into any Compass office and view the brokerage’s private listings on a one-on-one basis in a physical book, Reffkin said. Bigelow, the seller in San Francisco, said she didn’t feel pushed by her Compass Realtor into the decision to privately list her home. Her Realtor told her it would be a good way to test out listing her home above $2 million, since there were very few comparable homes in the area that had sold at that price. She agreed with the strategy. Plus, her agent told her that Compass private listings are blasted out to all Compass agents, which could improve her home’s visibility. But, in hindsight, she now believes accepting an offer before her home’s listing was available to the public was a mistake. After her condo’s initial “private” buyer fell through, Bigelow worked with the same Compass Realtor to list her home on the MLS and Zillow. Six days and around 60 showings later, Bigelow had multiple offers and ultimately netted $100,000 more than she would have received had the initial private offer gone through. “I think that the off-market exclusive ultimately is bad for people and good for Compass,” Bigelow said. However, if she could do it all again, Bigelow said she would still begin her home sales process by listing privately. “I would still publish off-market, because then all the Compass agents get notified about it. I just wouldn’t accept any offers during that period,” she said.
America’s largest real estate brokerages are fighting over private listings
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Debate Intensifies Over Private Listings in U.S. Real Estate Market"
TruthLens AI Summary
Caitlin Bigelow, a San Francisco condo owner, experienced a unique approach to selling her property when her Realtor suggested listing it as a 'Compass Private Exclusive.' This method allowed her home to remain off public real estate websites, such as Zillow or Redfin, and be marketed exclusively to buyers represented by Compass agents. Initially, Bigelow received two offers, including one exceeding her asking price, which she accepted. However, after reflecting on the limited exposure her property received, she began to question whether a wider audience might have generated even better offers. This situation highlights a growing debate in the real estate industry regarding the practice of private listings, particularly following a settlement involving the National Association of Realtors (NAR) that has reignited discussions about transparency and access in the housing market.
The controversy surrounding private listings has drawn criticism from various real estate leaders, who argue that such practices limit opportunities for consumers and can erode trust in real estate professionals. Advocates for transparency emphasize that buyers should have access to all available listings, which could lead to better pricing outcomes for sellers. In contrast, companies like Compass defend their strategies, asserting that private listings cater to sellers’ preferences for discretion and control over their marketing approach. The latest developments include new policies from Zillow and Redfin that require listings marketed to consumers to be published within a day, challenging the private listing methods. As the market evolves, the balance between privacy and transparency in real estate remains a contentious issue, with implications for both buyers and sellers alike. Bigelow, reflecting on her experience, ultimately concluded that while private listings may benefit brokerages like Compass, they might not serve the best interests of sellers in the long run, leading her to reconsider her approach to home selling in the future.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article provides an insight into the ongoing dispute in the American real estate industry regarding private listings, as highlighted by the case of Caitlin Bigelow and her experience with Compass. By focusing on the dynamics between traditional public listings and the emerging trend of private exclusives, the piece raises questions about market access and fairness.
Implications of Private Listings
The mention of private listings illustrates a significant shift in how properties are marketed in a competitive real estate environment. The article suggests that private listings could limit access to sought-after homes to a select group of buyers, raising concerns about transparency and equity in the market. The fact that some buyers may be excluded from opportunities creates a narrative of privilege that could foster discontent among those outside this closed network.
Public Perception and Trust Issues
The article seems to aim for a critical view of the practice of private listings, suggesting that while they may serve legitimate purposes, they could also lead to an uneven playing field. This perspective could resonate with the general public, who may view such practices as elitist. By providing a personal anecdote, the article humanizes the issue, emphasizing the emotional aspect of real estate transactions in addition to the financial implications.
Potential Hidden Agendas
While the article does not explicitly state any hidden motives, the focus on the implications of private listings might suggest an underlying agenda to advocate for more transparency in the real estate market. This could be a response to the broader conversation about consumer rights and fair competition, particularly following the settlement involving the National Association of Realtors.
Manipulative Elements and Authenticity
The narrative presented leans toward a critical stance regarding the practice of private listings, which could be seen as somewhat manipulative if it oversimplifies the complexities involved. The emotional appeal of Bigelow's story may evoke sympathy, but it could also serve to push a particular viewpoint against private listings without fully exploring potential benefits.
Comparative Context
When juxtaposed with other recent articles on real estate trends, this piece aligns with a growing discourse on ethical practices in the industry. The emphasis on private listings reflects a larger trend of scrutiny and reform within real estate, particularly as market dynamics evolve.
Economic and Social Impact
The implications of this article could extend beyond individual buyers and sellers, potentially influencing broader market trends and policies. As public sentiment shifts, there might be increased pressure on real estate firms and associations to reassess their practices. This could lead to reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and accessibility in the housing market.
Target Audience
The article likely appeals to a diverse audience, including homebuyers, real estate professionals, and policymakers. By addressing the concerns of average consumers while also touching upon industry practices, it seeks to engage a wide range of stakeholders in the conversation.
Stock Market Relevance
For investors, particularly those involved in real estate stocks or brokerage firms, this article highlights a critical area of concern that may impact market valuations. Companies like Compass that engage in private listings could face scrutiny, potentially affecting their stock performance as public perception shifts.
Geopolitical Considerations
While the article primarily focuses on a domestic issue, the implications of housing market practices can resonate on a global scale, especially in urban centers facing similar challenges. It reflects broader themes of inequality, access, and market regulation, which are increasingly relevant in today’s socio-economic climate.
AI Influence in the Article
There is no clear evidence of AI usage in writing this article, but certain phrases and the structured presentation could suggest the influence of AI tools in organizing information. However, the emotional narrative indicates a human touch, likely aiming to engage readers on a personal level.
Ultimately, the article appears to be a reliable reflection of current debates within the real estate market. While it presents a critical view of private listings, it is grounded in real experiences, making it a valuable contribution to ongoing discussions about market practices.