A ubiquitous, resilient and seemingly harmless plant is fueling an increase in large, fast-moving and destructive wildfires in the United States. Grass is as plentiful as sunshine, and under the right weather conditions is like gasoline for wildfires: All it takes is a spark for it to explode. Planet-warming emissions are wreaking havoc on temperature and precipitation, resulting in larger and more frequent fires. Those fires are fueling the vicious cycle of ecological destruction that are helping to make grass king. “Name an environment and there’s a grass that can survive there,” said Adam Mahood, research ecologist with the US Department of Agriculture’s research service. “Any 10-foot area that’s not paved is going to have some kind of grass on it.” Grass fires are typically less intense and shorter-lived than forest fires, but can spread exponentially faster, outrun firefighting resources and burn into the growing number of homes being built closer to fire-prone wildlands, fire experts told CNN. Over the last three decades, the number of US homes destroyed by wildfire has more than doubled as fires burn bigger and badder, a recent study found. Most of those homes were burned not by forest fires, but by fires racing through grass and shrubs. The West is most at risk, the study found, where more than two-thirds of the homes burned over the last 30 years were located. Of those, nearly 80% were burned in grass and shrub fires. One part of the equation is people are building closer to fire-prone wildlands, in the so-called wildland-urban interface. The amount of land burning in this sensitive area has grown exponentially since the 1990s. So has the number of houses. Around 44 million houses were in the interface as of 2020, an increase of 46% over the last 30 years, the same study found. Building in areas more likely to burn comes with obvious risks, but because humans are also responsible for starting most fires, it also increases the chance a fire will ignite in the first place. More than 80,000 homes are in the wildland-urban interface, in the sparsely populated parts of Kansas and Colorado that Bill King manages. The US Forest Service officer said living on the edge of nature requires an active hand to prevent destruction. Property owners “need to do their part too, because these fires – they get so big and intense and sometimes wind-driven that they could spot miles ahead even if we have a huge fuel break,” King said. ‘A perfect storm’ for fire Climate change-fueled fire is attacking the western half of the US on all fronts. “Globally, the places that burn the most are places that have intermediate precipitation,” said John Abatzoglou, a climate professor at the University of California, Merced. “It’s a little bit like Goldilocks. Not too wet, not too dry, just right, with plenty of ignition.” In America’s grassy heartland, the typically dry and often windy Plains, a series of compounding extremes across seasons are creating ideal fire fuel conditions in perennial grasses. Grass is more plentiful here than in other regions in the US, offering more continuous fuel for fires to feed off. The region is seeing more megafires like Texas’s largest fire, the Smokehouse Creek Fire, and more destructive ones like Colorado’s Marshall Fire, which burned through more than 1,000 homes in 2021. Rainy springs fuel more grass growth. Then it goes dormant, or plays dead, in the winter. Warmer winters with less snow cover, especially in the Northern Plains, expose the grass to warmer, drier spells in the late winter and early spring, according to King and Todd Lindley, a fire weather expert for the National Weather Service in Norman, Oklahoma. Grass is uniquely flammable because of its sensitivity to weather, Lindley said. Unlike in forests, it doesn’t take long spells of warm, dry weather to turn grass to tinder. Moisture can be sapped from the plant in as little as an hour and even a day after rain. Throw in a spark, strong winds and invasive shrubs that burn hotter and longer and you have a recipe for grass fire disaster. “These compound extremes, these sequences of extremes that follow one another, if you get the right sequence, it can be game on for this sort of wildfire,” Abatzoglou said. “Basically, you’re creating a perfect storm for the fire to spread there.” Grass invasion Extreme drought and years of forest neglect are creating larger and more intense fires in western forests, King said. “When I started 30 years ago, a big fire was 30,000 acres, and now that’s normal, that’s typical,” said King. “I’d have maybe one a year, one every couple of years of that size, and now we hear of 1-million-acre forest fires.” Grass exists in forest systems, too, and acts like a fuse to connect easier-to-ignite finer fuels to larger, drought-impacted tree systems, creating and spreading more intense fires. When the trees die, grass moves in. Grass recovers from fire much faster than other plants and can burn again, sometimes within a matter of months. King has seen this firsthand. “You could have green grasses coming up in a burned-grass landscape within a day or two, that’s how fast it rejuvenates,” King said.“Forest recovery could take years or generations, or never recover in our lifetime, or our generation’s.” As more vegetation in the West burns, it’s being replaced by both native and nonnative grass. In the desert, it’s creating fire where it wasn’t before, USDA’s Mahood said. The same drought-fueled fires are now becoming bigger in deserts because of annual grasses, which unlike the perennial grasses in the Plains, don’t exist year-round. These grasses take advantage of rare bursts of rain to propagate, then die, forming a carpet of fire fuel on the desert floor. Two recent fires in California’s Mojave National Preserve are perfect examples, Mahood said. Those fires took advantage of invasive red brome grass and burned hundreds of thousands of acres of Mojave Desert and over a million iconic Joshua Trees. The increasing hot and dry conditions then suppress native plant recovery. The result is more grass. The West’s stubby, iconic sagebrush is the single biggest ecosystem in the Lower 48, but half of it has been lost or degraded over the last 20 years. A roughly Delaware-sized area of sagebrush falls victim to grass, fire and other stressors each year, a USGS study found. With more grass and a complex web of climate stressors comes more fire risk now and increasingly in the future. “It may seem bad now, but this will probably not seem nearly as bad in the next decade,” Mahood said. “Think about how bad the fire season was two decades ago – now, that seems like nothing.”
A plant that’s everywhere is fueling a growing risk of wildfire disaster
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Grass Growth Linked to Increased Wildfire Risks in the United States"
TruthLens AI Summary
A common yet resilient plant, grass, is significantly contributing to the rise of large, destructive wildfires across the United States. Under certain weather conditions, grass can ignite rapidly, acting almost like gasoline in fueling wildfires. As climate change intensifies, leading to higher temperatures and erratic precipitation patterns, the frequency and intensity of these fires have escalated. Research indicates that grass fires, although typically less intense than forest fires, can spread at alarming rates, often outpacing firefighting efforts. Over the last three decades, the number of homes destroyed by wildfires has more than doubled, with a significant proportion of these losses attributed to grass and shrub fires rather than traditional forest fires. The western United States is particularly vulnerable, where two-thirds of homes affected by wildfires over the past 30 years have been situated in areas prone to grass and shrub fires. This alarming trend correlates with an increase in development within the wildland-urban interface, where the number of homes has grown by 46% since 1990, thereby exacerbating the risk of fire ignitions and the subsequent destruction of property.
The interplay of climate change and land management practices is creating a 'perfect storm' for wildfires, especially in the grassy regions of the Plains, which are experiencing a surge in megafires. Factors such as extreme drought and neglect of forest ecosystems are leading to larger and more intense fires in the West, with the frequency of fires exceeding 1 million acres becoming increasingly common. Grass acts as a catalyst in forest systems, connecting easily ignitable fuels to larger, drought-stressed trees, which results in more intense fires. As vegetation burns, grass typically recovers much more quickly than other plants, allowing it to become a recurring fuel source for future fires. This cycle is further complicated by the invasion of nonnative grasses, which adapt to arid conditions and contribute to fire risk in previously unaffected areas, such as deserts. The ongoing loss of sagebrush ecosystems and the proliferation of grass due to climate stressors indicate that the wildfire risks will only continue to escalate in the coming years, leading experts to warn that the current situation may only worsen in the future.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article examines the growing threat of wildfires in the United States, largely attributed to the ubiquitous presence of grass. It highlights the alarming increase in homes destroyed by fires that primarily spread through grass and shrubs rather than traditional forest fires. The piece connects environmental factors, such as climate change and urban development, to the rising frequency and intensity of wildfires, creating a sense of urgency around the issue.
Public Perception Manipulation
The intent behind this article seems to be raising awareness about the risks associated with grass fires, especially in light of climate change and increased human habitation near fire-prone areas. By using alarming statistics, such as the doubling of homes destroyed in the past thirty years, the article seeks to provoke concern and foster a sense of urgency among readers. This can lead to a more informed public that may advocate for changes in policy or personal behavior regarding home construction and wildfire prevention.
Potential Omissions
There is no clear indication of information being hidden; however, the focus on grass fires may downplay the complexity of wildfire causes, including the role of forest management practices or the impact of invasive species. While grass fires are a significant issue, they are part of a broader context of wildfire management that includes various factors such as climate change, forest health, and human activity.
News Authenticity
The article appears to be credible, based on the inclusion of expert quotes and references to studies. It presents scientific findings on the relationship between grass, climate change, and wildfire risk, which adds to its reliability.
Societal Implications
The narrative could influence public policy by prompting discussions on land-use planning and fire management strategies. It may also affect real estate markets, particularly in areas vulnerable to wildfires, as potential buyers become more cautious about purchasing homes in high-risk zones.
Target Audiences
The article likely resonates with environmentalists, homeowners in wildfire-prone areas, and policymakers. It aims to inform those who may be directly affected by wildfires or have a vested interest in environmental conservation.
Economic Impact
This information could impact industries related to real estate, insurance, and emergency services. As the public becomes more aware of wildfire risks, there may be shifts in property values and increased demand for fire-resistant construction materials or insurance coverage.
Geopolitical Context
While the article primarily focuses on domestic issues, it reflects broader concerns about climate change that are relevant globally. The discussion of wildfires ties into larger themes of environmental degradation and disaster preparedness that are pertinent in today's political discourse.
AI Involvement
It is not explicitly clear if AI was used in drafting this article. However, elements such as the structured presentation of data and the synthesis of expert opinions could suggest the influence of AI language models in organizing the information effectively. If AI were involved, it might have aimed to streamline the narrative to emphasize urgency and relevance, potentially shaping readers' perceptions of the wildfire crisis.
Considering all factors, the article is reliable and serves to inform the public about a critical environmental issue while possibly encouraging proactive measures.