A look at the ‘less lethal’ weapons authorities used to crack down on Los Angeles protests

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Los Angeles Authorities Deploy Less Lethal Weapons Amid Immigration Protests"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In response to escalating protests against federal immigration raids in Los Angeles, law enforcement authorities, including the LAPD, deployed a variety of 'less lethal' munitions to manage the situation. Over the weekend, protests intensified, with demonstrators engaging in violent actions such as setting vehicles on fire and throwing objects at police officers. The LAPD's Central Division issued warnings about the use of less lethal munitions, which are designed to incapacitate individuals while minimizing the risk of serious injury or death. Despite their designation, these weapons can still cause significant harm, and CNN has documented their use, including flash-bangs, tear gas, rubber bullets, and bean bag rounds, during the confrontations. LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell condemned the violence, which he characterized as “disgusting,” and noted that a Molotov cocktail had been thrown at officers during the protests. The unrest was further fueled by President Donald Trump's controversial deployment of 2,000 National Guard members to the area, a move criticized by Democratic leaders as unnecessary and provocative.

The equipment used by law enforcement in these situations includes blunt-force weapons like batons and rubber bullets, as well as chemical irritants such as tear gas and pepper spray. Although labeled as 'less-than-lethal,' these munitions have been associated with serious injuries and even fatalities in previous protests. For instance, during the 2020 protests following George Floyd's death, many individuals sustained injuries from rubber bullets. On the ground, reporters observed officers using batons to strike protesters and deploying tear gas to disperse crowds. Additionally, flash-bang devices were utilized to disorient individuals in the vicinity. While these tools are intended for crowd control, their application raises ongoing concerns about the potential for excessive force and the consequences of their use in civil unrest situations.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The coverage of the protests in Los Angeles highlights the escalating tensions between demonstrators and law enforcement, particularly regarding the use of "less lethal" weapons. This article presents a vivid depiction of the unrest triggered by federal immigration raids, illustrating the authorities' response to violence with various crowd control measures.

Intent Behind the Coverage

The article appears to aim at informing the public about the tools used by law enforcement during protests. It emphasizes the potential dangers of "less lethal" munitions, suggesting that while they are designed to minimize fatalities, they can still cause significant harm. This could serve to raise awareness about the implications of such police tactics, potentially influencing public perception of law enforcement's approach to managing civil unrest.

Public Sentiment and Perception

By detailing the violent incidents during the protests and the subsequent police response, the article may evoke a sense of concern among readers regarding public safety and the state's handling of dissent. It also reflects the polarized political climate, particularly in relation to immigration issues, which could further deepen societal divisions.

Information Omission

While the article provides a detailed account of the protests and law enforcement's response, it may downplay the broader context of the protests' underlying causes, such as public sentiment towards immigration policy and community grievances. This could suggest a desire to focus more on the immediate events rather than the systemic issues at play.

Manipulative Elements

The article has a degree of manipulativeness, as it frames the police response in a way that could evoke fear or concern about the use of force against protesters. The language used to describe the violence from both sides may also skew public perception, potentially leading readers to view the situation as more chaotic and dangerous than it may actually be.

Truthfulness and Reliability

The reliability of the article is supported by direct references to documented events and statements from officials. However, the portrayal of these events can be subjective and may lead to biased interpretations. The focus on specific incidents of violence, particularly those involving law enforcement, could create an impression that the protests were predominantly violent, which may not encompass the full scope of the demonstrations.

Connection to Other News

This article connects to broader narratives in media regarding police use of force, civil rights, and immigration policies. Similar reports in various outlets could create a more extensive discourse about the implications of government actions on public protests and community responses.

Potential Societal Impact

The coverage could lead to heightened scrutiny of law enforcement tactics, potentially influencing public policy and community relations. It may also galvanize activism around police reform and immigration rights, impacting political landscapes in significant ways.

Supportive Communities

The article likely resonates with communities concerned about civil rights and police accountability, as well as those opposed to aggressive immigration policies. These groups may find validation in the portrayal of the protests and the response from authorities.

Economic and Market Implications

While the article itself may not directly impact stock markets, the underlying issues regarding immigration and law enforcement could influence sectors such as security, technology, and social services. Companies involved in law enforcement technology may experience fluctuations based on public sentiment regarding policing.

Geopolitical Context

Given the ongoing debates about immigration and civil rights in the U.S., this coverage fits into a larger narrative relevant to domestic and international observers. It underscores the tensions that can arise within a democracy when government actions clash with public dissent.

Use of AI in Reporting

There is a possibility that AI tools were utilized in the article’s composition, particularly in analyzing data from protests and summarizing events. AI could have influenced how information was structured, potentially highlighting certain aspects of the protests while downplaying others. This could result in a narrative that aligns with specific editorial goals.

In summary, while the article presents factual information about the protests and law enforcement responses, its framing and focus suggest a possible bias that may impact public perception of the events.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Late Sunday, as protesters against federal immigration raids clashed with law enforcement, the Los Angeles Police Department’s Central Division sent out a warning: “Less Lethal munitions have been authorized,” officials wrote on X, ordering crowds in Downtown Los Angeles to disperse. “Less lethal munitions may cause pain and discomfort.” Over the weekend, police used a standard variety of tools to disperse crowds and quell protests that had devolved into violence: Protesters lit self-driving cars on fire. Two motorcyclists drove into a skirmish line of officers, injuring two. And LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, condemning the “disgusting” violence, alleged on Sunday evening a Molotov cocktail had been thrown at officers. Authorities responded with force. So far, CNN has documented the deployment of flash-bangs, tear gas, pepper balls, rubber bullets and bean bag rounds, as well as more traditional gear such as batons. These weapons – often described as “less lethal,” “less-than-lethal” or “non-lethal” – are those “explicitly designed and primarily employed to incapacitate … while minimizing fatalities, permanent injury to personnel, and undesired damage to property, facilities, materiel, and the environment,” according to a Department of Defense directive. Protests in Los Angeles escalated on Sunday after President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard members to the area, a move that Democratic leaders called unnecessary and inflammatory. The protests against recent immigration raids began Friday, but picked up in scale and intensity over the weekend. CNN reporters on the ground witnessed officers striking and pushing protesters, and deploying tear gas into the crowd. Meanwhile, the protests caused major disruptions on the 101 Freeway, a main artery connecting major Californian cities. Photos and videos on the ground showed cars being set on fire and protesters throwing objects onto police vehicles. That does not mean they are harmless: After the 2020 protests in response to the police killing of George Floyd, researchers found many people suffered injuries from less lethal weapons – particularly rubber bullets. Here’s a look at the equipment authorities have used: Blunt-force weapons and projectiles Authorities have used several tools that a 2025 report by the non-partisan Congressional Research Service noted for their ability to incapacitate using blunt force. Foremost among these is the baton, which the CRS report described as the oldest kinetic less lethal weapon. Also called a nightstick, the baton is essentially a club with a handle, often used for crowd control. A CNN field crew witnessed officers pushing and striking protesters with batons Sunday afternoon. Also included are blunt-force projectiles, such as rubber bullets and bean bag rounds – both of which were seen in use this weekend. These weapons are used for long-range crowd control, according to the CRS report, and are meant to cause “temporary blunt-force trauma to the skin.” Rubber bullets are larger than their lethal counterparts, and some include cores made of metal or wood. Though they are considered “less-than-lethal,” there are cases where they have been found to disable, disfigure and even kill. Lauren Tomasi, the US correspondent for CNN affiliate Nine News in Australia, was reporting on the scene Sunday when she was struck in the leg by a rubber bullet. The bullet left her sore but she was otherwise unharmed, Tomasi’s network said. Bean bag rounds are small, lead pellet-filled pouches, usually fired from a shotgun or a specialized launcher. Each pouch is typically filled with 1.4 oz of lead pellets. Chemical irritants Law enforcement agencies in Los Angeles have also turned to chemical irritant devices, which rely on chemical compounds to irritate the sinuses, lungs and skin, causing enough pain to render an individual temporarily unable to function. Tear gas is one such tool, and commonly known. Also referred to as a “riot control agent,” tear gas can cause excessive tearing, burning or blurred vision and a runny nose or a burning sensation inside the nose, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It can also cause difficulty swallowing, chest tightness, coughing, shortness of breath and a feeling of choking. Law enforcement agents usually disperse tear gas – which actually comes in a powder form – from grenades or a canister, per the CRS report. Pepper spray is similar but deployed using a hand-held canister for “close-proximity encounters.” The compressed gas, the CRS report says, propels the chemical irritant at the target, who typically does not need medical attention afterwards. Pepper balls marry the effects of a chemical irritant with the delivery of a blunt-force projectile: Pepper spray balls, according to the CRS report, rupture on impact, releasing a chemical irritant similar to those used for tear gas. CNN footage captured law enforcement using pepper balls, spray and tear gas in an attempt to disperse protesters Sunday outside the Metropolitan Detention Center. Flash-bang devices CNN has also seen the repeated use of flash-bangs, which rely on a bright flash of light to obscure a target’s vision and hearing. Flash-bangs – thrown either by hand or with a launcher – use an “explosive propellant to emit a bright flash of light … and ear-piercing sound,” the CRS report says. While their principal purpose is to help police make a “tactical entry” – disorienting barricaded suspects, for example – they are sometimes used for crowd control. CNN’s Harmeet Kaur, AJ Willingham and Sarah-Grace Mankarious contributed to this report.

Back to Home
Source: CNN