Yvette Cooper vows to ban Palestine Action under anti-terrorism laws

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Yvette Cooper proposes banning Palestine Action under anti-terrorism legislation"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a recent statement to Parliament, UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced her intention to ban the activist group Palestine Action under anti-terrorism laws, dismissing legal warnings from the group’s solicitors regarding the legality and implications of such a move. This announcement follows an incident where Palestine Action activists broke into RAF Brize Norton, prompting Cooper to assert that the group's activities pose a threat to national security. She indicated that a draft proscription order would be submitted to Parliament, which, if approved, would render it illegal to be a member of or support Palestine Action. Founded in 2020, Palestine Action aims to prevent alleged war crimes in Palestine by targeting properties linked to these actions. Despite some of its activists being acquitted in past legal proceedings, Cooper characterized the group as engaging in unacceptable criminal damage and highlighted its operations against critical national infrastructure, including defense firms involved in supporting Ukraine amidst the ongoing conflict.

The response from Palestine Action has been one of strong opposition to the proposed ban. A letter from Kellys Solicitors, representing the group, argued that the proscription would set a dangerous precedent by equating Palestine Action with terrorist organizations like Islamic State and al-Qaida. The solicitors emphasized that while some actions have resulted in property damage, the group does not advocate violence against individuals and engages in traditional forms of protest, such as marches and demonstrations. They described the proposal as an unprecedented attack on freedom of expression and assembly, warning that it undermines democratic rights and could lead to broader restrictions on protest activities. The situation has escalated further with the Metropolitan Police imposing public order restrictions on a planned demonstration supporting Palestine Action, limiting the time and place for protests in relation to the group's activities. This ongoing debate highlights the tensions between national security concerns and the rights to protest and free speech in the UK.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The UK home secretary has said she will ban Palestine Action under anti-terrorism laws, ignoring a warning from the group’s solicitors that the proposal was “unlawful, dangerous and ill thought out”.

In a statement to parliament on Monday, three days after activists from the groupbroke into RAF Brize Norton, Yvette Cooper said a draft proscription order would be laid in parliament on 30 June. If passed, it would make it illegal to be a member of, or invite support for, Palestine Action.

The group, founded in 2020, says it aims to prevent the commission of genocide and war crimes in Palestine and to expose and target property and premises connected to such crimes against humanity.

Many of its activists have been acquitted by juries in the past and a letter from Kellys Solicitors, representing Palestine Action, sent to Cooper on Monday said the group “has gathered a significant level of public support”.

But in her statement, the home secretary said: “The disgraceful attack on Brize Norton in the early hours of the morning on Friday 20 June is the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action. The UK’s defence enterprise is vital to the nation’s national security and this government will not tolerate those that put that security at risk.”

She claimed its activities had included operations against “key national infrastructure and defence firms that provide services and supplies to support Ukraine”.

The letter to Cooper from Kellys, shared exclusively with the Guardian, said there were no previous instances of direct action protest organisations being proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000, despite several others having used comparable methods to Palestine Action, and that it was a “terrifying precedent” to place it alongside groups such as Islamic State, al-Qaida or National Action.

It said: “Whilst some actions of those associated with Palestine Action have involved damage to property, activists do not advocate or intend unlawful violence against the person. A significant number of actions associated with Palestine Action have used entirely conventional campaigning methods such as marches, rallies and demos. It is an authoritarian turn and an abuse of language to label them as a ‘terrorist’ organisation …

“The proposal to proscribe Palestine Action is wholly unprecedented and constitutes an unlawful, dangerous and ill-thought-out attack on freedom of expression and assembly.”

On Sunday night, the Met police placed public order restrictions on a planned solidarity demonstration for Palestine Action, banning supporters from gathering outside parliament on Monday and restricting the protest to between 12pm and 3pm.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian