Working from home? It’s so much nicer if you’re a man | Emma Beddington

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Gender Disparities in Home Workspaces Highlight Ongoing Inequalities"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In recent discussions about working from home dynamics, the gendered experiences of men and women have come under scrutiny. Emma Beddington references Ella Risbridger's insights into how domestic workspaces are often allocated, particularly in heterosexual couples. Risbridger highlights a common scenario where the spare room becomes a man's workspace, while the woman tends to work in less ideal conditions. This observation resonates with the experiences of many, including those documented by Australian writer Helen Garner in her diaries. Garner recounts her struggles with her ex-husband, who insists on claiming the best workspace for himself, leaving her to navigate her creative pursuits in less conducive environments. This situation reflects a broader societal issue where women's work and presence are often sidelined, reinforcing traditional gender roles within domestic spaces.

The implications of these dynamics are particularly evident in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where structural inequalities became more pronounced. Research indicates that women faced more interruptions and had less access to dedicated workspaces during lockdowns, adversely affecting their emotional well-being and professional productivity. The disparity in access to workspace mirrors historical exclusions that Virginia Woolf addressed in her seminal essay, "A Room of One's Own." Despite advancements in gender equality, the reality remains that men are more likely to have designated areas for work at home. The recent UK 2024 Skills and Employment survey revealed that 60% of men have a dedicated workspace, compared to only 40% of women. This ongoing inequality raises critical questions about the relationship between domestic space allocation and the gender pay gap, suggesting that without addressing these foundational issues, true equality in the workplace remains elusive. As Beddington notes, while some women have reclaimed their space, the fight for an equitable distribution of work environments continues, echoing Woolf's call for a room of one's own.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article explores the dynamics of gender roles within the context of remote work, particularly how they manifest in domestic settings. It highlights the disparity in workspace allocation between men and women, drawing from personal anecdotes and literary references to illustrate these points. The author expresses concern over the normalization of such gendered expectations in households, presenting a narrative that resonates with broader societal themes.

Gendered Workspace Dynamics

The piece begins with a reflection on the author's personal situation, contrasting it with anecdotes from other women, such as Ella Risbridger and Helen Garner. It reveals a pattern where men often claim more desirable workspaces at home, leaving women to adapt to less ideal conditions. This observation raises questions about the underlying gender norms that dictate these arrangements, suggesting that such behaviors may be deeply ingrained in societal expectations. The article serves to challenge these norms and encourage readers to reconsider their own domestic arrangements.

Emotional and Creative Impact

The author delves into the emotional toll that these dynamics can impose, particularly referencing Garner's diaries which articulate the pain of feeling marginalized in a shared space. The narrative emphasizes the conflict between personal creativity and the need for physical and emotional space to thrive. By sharing these experiences, the article aims to highlight the importance of equitable arrangements in shared work environments, particularly as remote work becomes more prevalent.

Cultural Commentary

Through literary references and personal anecdotes, the article provides a commentary on modern relationships and the often-unspoken tensions surrounding domestic life. It implies that such issues are not merely personal but reflect broader societal patterns that affect couples and families across various contexts. This perspective suggests a need for critical reflection on how domestic spaces are utilized and who benefits from them.

Manipulative Elements?

While the article is primarily a commentary on gender roles, it raises awareness about the subtle manipulations that can occur in domestic settings. By focusing on specific examples, it may evoke an emotional response from readers, potentially leading to a sense of obligation to address these disparities in their own lives. However, the intentions seem more focused on awareness and change rather than manipulation.

The reliability of the article is reinforced by its grounding in relatable experiences and literary references, making the observations resonate with many readers. The aim appears to be to provoke thought and encourage discussions about gender roles in the context of work-from-home arrangements.

In summary, the article aims to shine a light on the inequities in domestic workspaces that often go unchallenged, advocating for a more balanced approach to shared spaces in both personal and professional contexts.

Unanalyzed Article Content

I’m wary of gendered generalisations. They rightly raise hackles: we are unique, not defined by gender, not all men! But I was struck by one I read from Ella Risbridgerin her reviewof Jessica Stanley’s recent novel, Consider Yourself Kissed. Exploring one of its themes, Risbridger wrote: “I have long noticed that in a house with one spare room and a heterosexual couple who both work from home, the spare room is where he works – with a door that shuts and perhaps even a designated desk – and she workssomewhere else. (Always for good reasons, butalways.)”

This stopped me in my tracks. Not because it’s my experience: my husband and I are lucky enough to have an office each, and mine is bigger and objectively nicer. I get the garden view; he has the ballet of Openreach and Amazon vans. (See – not all men.) It’s not Stanley’s experience either: she uses the spare bedroom; her husband has half the living room, she toldthe Cut’s Book Gossip newsletter.

Rather, I was struck because having just read the Australian writer Helen Garner’s recently published diaries, How to End a Story, this is exactly the irreconcilable, constantly rehashed point of contention between her and her ex-husband, anonymised in the diaries as “V”.

V, also a writer, insists not only on appropriating the available room in their shared apartment for his office, but on Garner leaving while he works, her presence incompatible with his sacred need for silent isolation. Garner describes the quotidian pain of this situation (she wants to potter, play music, cook, see friends; her creativity is fuelled by these ordinary kinds of life), and the growing realisation of what it said about their relationship with shocking, powerful eloquence. V is aware of, but apparently unmoved by, her distress. They argue about it regularly.

Garner’s experience was so egregious as to be eye-poppingly enraging, but this happens more often in quieter, easier-to-overlook ways. I read and enjoyed Consider Yourself Kissed too – it’s a romance, but it also subtly builds a picture of the insidious sidelining of women’s work as expressed through domestic space. Set between 2013 and 2023, it’s particularly good on how this was amplified by Covid: the heroine’s political journalist husband sees his career go stratospheric and their spare room “somehow” becomes his study. He’s a nice man; he loves her; it just … happens.

This rang true because it is: it did just happen. Structural pay equalities meant men – habitually the higher earners – staked the more obvious primary claim on working space in locked-down homes. Research shows women experiencedmore non-work interruptions, compounded when they didn’t have a “dedicated unshared workspace” – their emotional wellbeing suffered, but so did their professional lives. “My husband locks the room from the inside when he needs to concentrate,” a participant in anIndian study on pandemic working habitsreported. “I don’t have that liberty. I have no room of my own.”

In 1929, Virginia Woolf wrote A Room of One’s Own as a riposte to the physical and economic exclusion of women from intellectual and professional spaces. In 2025, they can’t bar us from libraries, but intimate domestic spaces have proved stubbornly intractable. Back when men had inviolable studies and smoking rooms, there was an assumption that the domestic sphere was feminine, so they “needed” to escape the noise and mess of childrearing and homemaking. Now we’re ostensibly all in it together, doing conference calls in our slippers, but there are still more man caves than women’s. Because Risbridger is right: the recently releasedUK 2024 Skills and Employment surveyfound60% of men had a dedicated room for work at home and only 40% of women. We still can’t manage to meet Woolf’s prescription.

There are not-all-men exceptions and happy endings. Garner escaped, thank God, eventually; and, without spoilers, Stanley’s heroine reclaims some space. But in real life, generally, women’s work is still given less and worse space, while the gender pay gap narrows agonisingly slowly. The two are surely related. When do we get that room of our own?

Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian