Women of West Virginia: inform on yourself to the miscarriage police! | Arwa Mahdawi

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"West Virginia Prosecutor Advises Women to Report Miscarriages to Avoid Legal Risks"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In West Virginia, a concerning warning from Raleigh County Prosecuting Attorney Tom Truman has raised alarms about the potential legal repercussions women may face following a miscarriage. Truman suggested that women experiencing a pregnancy loss should proactively report the event to local law enforcement to avoid possible criminal charges under state laws concerning the disposal of human remains. This advice comes amid fears that some prosecutors might interpret existing legislation broadly enough to target women who have miscarried. Although abortion is largely banned in West Virginia, and miscarriages are not explicitly criminalized, the ambiguity in the law leaves room for punitive actions against women in such vulnerable situations. The notion of reporting a miscarriage to police has sparked significant debate about the intersection of reproductive rights and law enforcement involvement in personal health matters.

Experts, including Kim Mutcherson, a law professor at Rutgers, caution against involving law enforcement in instances of miscarriage, arguing that it invites unnecessary complications into women's reproductive lives. The discussion highlights the broader implications of the overturning of Roe v. Wade, which has left many women in the U.S. facing legal uncertainties surrounding pregnancy loss. Miscarriages, which affect an estimated 10% to 20% of known pregnancies, are often beyond a woman's control, and the suggestion to report them to police raises ethical questions about privacy, autonomy, and the understanding of female reproductive health among law enforcement. As this issue unfolds, it underscores the need for a clearer legal framework that protects women's rights and health in the face of potential criminalization related to pregnancy outcomes.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article raises important concerns regarding women's reproductive rights and the legal implications surrounding miscarriages in West Virginia. As it highlights the statement from Raleigh County prosecuting attorney Tom Truman, it suggests a chilling reality where women may feel compelled to report miscarriages to law enforcement due to the potential for criminal charges. This creates an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty for women experiencing pregnancy loss.

Implications of Legal Statements

Truman's comments indicate a broader legal framework that could potentially criminalize women for miscarriages through the interpretation of laws regarding fetal remains. While he personally opposes prosecuting women, the warning about other prosecutors' willingness to pursue such cases suggests a precarious legal environment. This reflects a trend in many states following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, where women are increasingly vulnerable to legal scrutiny regarding reproductive health.

Public Perception and Societal Impact

The article aims to generate awareness and provoke discussion about the implications of such legal advice. By framing the situation humorously yet seriously, it underscores the absurdity of having to report a miscarriage to the police, which can alienate and intimidate women facing already difficult circumstances. This narrative seeks to mobilize public opinion against perceived injustices and encourage solidarity among women who may feel threatened by these laws.

Connections to Broader Issues

This news piece indirectly connects to wider discussions about reproductive rights across the United States. It positions West Virginia's situation within a national context, highlighting how legal interpretations post-Roe v. Wade may have similar implications in other states. The article serves as a rallying call for advocacy groups fighting for women's rights and reproductive health.

Potential Consequences

The societal ramifications of such a legal environment could be extensive. Women may face increased anxiety and fear surrounding pregnancy, and healthcare providers might be hesitant to offer full support during pregnancy loss due to potential legal repercussions. This could lead to poorer health outcomes for women and a chilling effect on open discussions about reproductive health.

Target Audience

This article likely resonates with women's rights advocates, healthcare professionals, and individuals concerned about civil liberties. By addressing the potential dangers of criminalizing miscarriages, it seeks to engage a community that values reproductive autonomy and health rights.

Economic and Political Context

In a broader economic sense, such legal climates can impact healthcare costs and policy discussions at both state and federal levels. Companies that provide reproductive health services may also feel the repercussions of an increasingly hostile regulatory environment. The implications of this news may not directly affect stock markets but could influence sectors related to healthcare and women's services.

Geopolitical Relevance

While the article focuses on a domestic issue, it reflects a larger global trend regarding women's rights and reproductive health. The concerns raised are part of a broader political discourse that can influence international views on the United States' commitment to gender equality and human rights.

Use of AI in Article

The writing style appears to be human-generated, with no clear indicators of AI influence. However, in an age where AI models can assist in creating narratives, it's possible that AI tools were used for research or to analyze data trends regarding women's health and legal issues. Nonetheless, the emotional resonance and specific legal context suggest a human touch in the article's composition.

Assessment of Reliability

This article is credible as it references specific legal opinions and current societal issues, backed by identifiable sources. The serious implications of Truman's statements, coupled with the broader context of reproductive rights, lend weight to the concerns raised.

Unanalyzed Article Content

“911. What’s your emergency?”

“Hello, I would like to report the fact that I am having a very heavy period. Can you send a police officer over right away to collect my menstrual matter and check whether I’ve broken any laws?”

The above is not a transcript of an actual conversation in West Virginia but, the way things are headed, it could be a glimpse of what’s to come. The Raleigh county prosecuting attorney Tom Truman recently warned that women who have a pregnancy loss in West Virginiacould face criminal charges. To protect themselves, Truman said, women should call local law enforcement and report a miscarriage – which is the loss of a pregnancy before the 20th week. “Call your doctor. Call law enforcement, or 911, and just say: ‘I miscarried. I want you to know,’” Truman told theoutlet WVNS 59News.

Truman said he was personally opposed to prosecuting women who miscarry. But he warned that other prosecutors inWest Virginiahad indicated that they would be willing to file criminal charges against women who had lost a pregnancy via state laws related to the disposal of human remains. “I thought these guys were just chewing on a Dreamsicle,”Truman lamented. But, he added, West Virginia’s laws include definitions that are “pretty broad-ranging” and give law enforcement a lot of discretion to go after women who have had a pregnancy loss.

To be very clear about the law: while abortion is all but banned in West Virginia, the pregnant person themselves can’t be prosecuted for having an abortion. Miscarriages also aren’texplicitlycriminalized. However, law enforcement can get creative and use legislation that governs the handling of fetal remains to punish women. And this sort of “creativity” isn’t just confined to West Virginia: following the2022 overturningof Roe v Wade, a lot of women who experience pregnancy loss in the US have been plunged into legal limbo.

While it would appear that Truman was trying to be helpful, I should note that calling the police isn’t necessarily the best idea in a scenario where you have experienced, or suspect you’ve experienced, a miscarriage. “It’s always a mistake to invite law enforcement into your reproductive life,” Kim Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School,told CNN. “I understand the idea that caution is better than being caught up in something that you weren’t anticipating, but it is difficult for me to imagine any circumstance in which I would think it was safe for someone who miscarried to call the police.”

If you are going to call the police, you might want to quiz them on their understanding of the female reproductive system before going into any details. After all, how many of the men salivating over the prospect of locking up women for miscarriages do you think actually know what a miscarriage is? How many of them do you think understand that anestimated23m miscarriages occur every year globally and about10% to 20%of known pregnancies end in miscarriages? Again, that’sknownpregnancies: a lot of miscarriages happen before someone even realizes they’re pregnant. We don’t have the full picture of why pregnancy lossesoccur, but they are quite often due to chromosomal abnormalities. They are often, in other words, completely out of the woman’s control. And a very early miscarriage (also known as a chemical pregnancy) can be hard to distinguish from a period. Sometimes the only way to tell the difference is via medical interventions like a blood test or an ultrasound.

All that said, this does strike me as a situation where a little malicious compliance wouldn’t go amiss. I’m not saying women inWest Virginiashould call up the prosecutor’s office whenever they’re menstruating and ask to speak to someone about the size and consistency of their blood clots or inquire whether they’d like to send a police officer to examine the toilet before they flush. Nor am I saying that women in West Virginia should drop off their used sanitary items at their local police station so they can be thoroughly examined by the powers that be. But I’m notnotsaying that either!

The Biden-era guidance hadmade it clearthat hospitals in states with abortion bans cannot turn away pregnant patients who are in the midst of medical emergencies.

The Trump administration has alsolaunched an investigation into this law, which it terms “anti-Catholic”.

The 17-year-old social media influencer Sana Yousaf, whom police say was shot by a man who broke into her home, is apparently already gettingblamed for her own murder. The digital rights advocacy group Bolo Bhi told the BBC that some male internet users have been asking why Yousaf was putting up online content. Ladies, if you don’t want to be murdered, just remember that you shouldn’t express any opinions whatsoever or ever leave the house. And you certainly shouldn’t hurt a man’s fragile feelings.

“Strong jawlines and prominent chins arede rigueurin Washington,” one dermatologist told Politico. In recent years, the portion of her male clients who come in seeking better-defined jawshas more than doubled. Politico has a fascinating deep dive into jawlines, power and masculinity.

The Barstool Sports foundercalled for a missile strikeon Thunberg, who recently joined other activists sailing to Gaza on an aid ship with the aim of breakingIsrael’s blockade. Portnoy said: “I’ll jump on Greta van Thorsten or whatever that girl’s – she’s sailing there. Like whoever that fuck – and I hope they hit a fucking, like, a missile on her boat. Knock that boat down.” Portnoy’s comments come after thesenator Lindsey Graham tweeted: “Hope Greta and her friends can swim!” Neither Portnoy nor Graham will face any consequences for their comments, of course.

Sign up toThe Week in Patriarchy

Get Arwa Mahdawi’s weekly recap of the most important stories on feminism and sexism and those fighting for equality

after newsletter promotion

Please pause for a moment andtake in the factthat saying you care about kids in Gaza can now be career-ending.

I’lldrink to that!

TheBBC reports that“in 2023, Nigeria accounted for well over a quarter – 29% – of all maternal deaths worldwide”.

“You can order any kind, any size,”the actor explained.

Noooo, Steve,we can’t do that, the birth rate will plummet!

It’s been a wild week for runaway animals. In Tennessee, apet zebrawent on the lam, causing chaos on Interstate 24. Meanwhile, in the UK, a bullran loose aroundthe streets of Birmingham. “This magnificent animal seemed to be enjoying an unexpected city break,” a Birmingham councillor said in astatement, noting the bull had been moved to safety. No word yet on which Birmingham sights the bull took in, or whether it popped into any china shops.

Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian