Women deported with US citizen kids denied chance to transfer custody, says lawyer

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Deported Mothers Denied Custody Arrangements for U.S. Citizen Children, Lawyer Claims"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Two mothers recently deported to Honduras with their U.S. citizen children faced extreme isolation and a lack of communication options prior to their deportation, according to their attorney, Gracie Willis. The mothers were not allowed to contact family members or attorneys and could not arrange for alternative custody of their children before being put on a flight. This situation left the mothers, one of whom has a child with a serious illness, with no real ability to weigh the consequences of their choices regarding their children. The mothers' experiences highlight the distressing circumstances faced by many immigrant parents who must navigate the complexities of deportation while considering the welfare of their U.S. citizen children. The attorney emphasized the lack of agency granted to the mothers in these situations, stating that they were not empowered to make meaningful decisions regarding their families' futures.

The deportation of these mothers has drawn widespread criticism from civil rights groups and lawmakers who argue that the process lacked transparency and fairness. One mother, who is pregnant, was separated from her children despite their father and a designated caretaker trying to contact them. The government claimed that the mothers chose to take their children with them, but the families' lawyers dispute this assertion, highlighting the absence of communication and coordination regarding custody arrangements. A federal judge has expressed concern over the legality of the deportation process, suggesting that a U.S. citizen child was removed without proper legal procedures. As these families face the repercussions of their deportation, the broader implications for immigrant parents and their U.S. citizen children continue to raise pressing questions about the intersection of immigration policy and family rights.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The situation reported in the article highlights a serious humanitarian issue regarding the treatment of immigrant mothers who are deported alongside their U.S. citizen children. The account illustrates the emotional and physical distress these mothers face, raising significant ethical and legal questions about immigration policies and their implementation.

Isolation and Lack of Support

The article describes the complete isolation experienced by the deported mothers, who were not allowed to communicate with their legal representatives or family members. This raises concerns about the due process rights of individuals facing deportation, particularly those with U.S. citizen children. The inability to make informed decisions regarding custody and care for their children before deportation can be seen as a violation of their rights.

Health and Safety Concerns

One mother’s urgent medical needs for her child with cancer and another mother's pregnancy complications add layers of urgency to the narrative. This aspect of the story emphasizes the potential health risks involved in the deportation process, which can be exacerbated by emotional stress and inadequate care. The mention of these specific health issues appeals to the empathy of the audience, drawing attention to the severe consequences of immigration enforcement.

Broader Implications for Immigration Policy

The article touches on a larger trend where many immigrant parents face similar dilemmas. This situation highlights systemic issues within the U.S. immigration system, prompting discussions about the need for reform and more humane treatment of immigrant families. It aims to raise awareness and inspire advocacy for changes to policies that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations.

Public Sentiment and Community Support

The story likely resonates with communities advocating for immigrant rights and those concerned about social justice. The emotional weight of the mothers' stories can mobilize public opinion against current immigration practices. This narrative may attract support from activists, human rights organizations, and individuals sympathetic to the plight of immigrant families.

Potential Economic and Political Effects

The implications of such a story can extend into political and economic realms. As public sentiment shifts towards more supportive immigration policies, it can influence legislation and potentially alter the political landscape. Businesses that depend on immigrant labor may also feel the impact, as policies that lead to family separation can disrupt workforce stability.

Connections to Other Reports

This article can be connected to a broader narrative in recent news about immigration policies and their effects on families. By reflecting on similar stories, it becomes part of a larger discourse on human rights and the treatment of immigrants, suggesting a consistent pattern of concern among various media outlets.

Trustworthiness of the Report

The article appears to be credible, as it includes firsthand accounts from a lawyer representing the affected families and provides specific details about their situations. However, the emotional language used could suggest an attempt to elicit sympathy, raising questions about potential bias. While it is important to convey the human aspect of such issues, the framing may influence readers' perceptions.

In summary, the article aims to raise awareness about the challenges faced by immigrant families, particularly focusing on the isolation and health risks associated with deportation. It seeks to generate public empathy and demands for policy reform, aligning with broader advocacy movements for immigrant rights.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Two women who were deported toHondurasalongside their US citizen children were held in “complete isolation” and denied any opportunity to coordinate the care and custody of their children before being put on a flight, according to one of the lawyers representing them.

The mothers were unable to contact attorneys or loved ones, and were not allowed the option to transfer the custody of their citizen children to another parent or caregiver, said Gracie Willis, an attorney with the National Immigration Project who is representing one of the families and coordinating with the team representing the other family.

“Here we had moms held completely in isolation, being told what was happening to their children. They didn’t have an opportunity to talk this through, to weigh the pros and cons of taking or leaving their children in the US,” Willis said.

One of the mothers, who was deported with her seven-year-old and her four-year-old, both of whom are citizens, was unable to access medications and care for her youngest, who has a rare form of late-stage cancer.

Another woman, who is pregnant, was put on a plane to Honduras along with her 11-year-old and two-year-old daughters, even as the children’s father and a caretaker designated by the family were desperately trying to contact them.

“She’s in the early stages of a pregnancy and has undergone unimaginable stress,” said Willis. “So she’s trying to ensure her and that unborn child’s safety and health, while also processing and working through what they’ve all been through.”

Both families were detained at regular check-in appointments with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) in New Orleans, according to lawyers, and then taken hours away from the city and prohibited from communicating with family members.

Each year, hundreds of thousands of immigrant parents in similar situations, who have both a deportation order and US citizen children, have to choose whether to leave their kids in the US under the care of another family member or guardian, or surrender them to Child Protective Services.

“No parent would want to be in that situation,” Willis said. “And we don’t bring any judgment against any decision that a parent makes.”

But the mothers who were rushed on to deportation flights with their children last week, in high-profile cases that have drawn widespread condemnation from civil rights groups and lawmakers, were not empowered to make any real choices for their families, Willis said.

“There were no real decisions being made here, especially when those parents were not able to communicate with other available caregivers,” she added.

After lawyers for VML, the two-year-old who is identified in court documents by only her initials, filed an emergency motion to prevent the US citizen toddler’s deportation, a federal district judge raised concerns that he had a “strong suspicion that the government just deported a US citizen with no meaningful process”.

A hearing in VML’s case has been scheduled for 18 May. Meanwhile, theTrump administrationhas been claiming that the family’s cases were handled legally and with due process.

Trump’s border czar,Tom Homan, said: “The children aren’t deported. The mother chose to take the children with her.”

In an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press, the secretary of state,Marco Rubio, echoed Homan, saying: “I imagine those three US citizen children have fathers here in the United States. They can stay with their father. That’s up to their family to decide where the children go.”

The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to the Guardian’s request for comment.

Sign up toThis Week in Trumpland

A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration

after newsletter promotion

But VML’s father had been desperately trying to reach his partner and retrieve his toddler in the days leading up to the deportation, Willis said.

On 22 April, VML’s mother had been told to bring her children to her check-in with Ice, according to Willis. The father, who had brought them to the check-in appointment, began to worry that the appointment was taking longer than usual – and was later told that his partner and daughters had been detained.

When he was eventually able to speak to them, he could hear his partner and daughter crying on the phone and his call was cut off before he was able to give them a number for the family’s attorneys.

The government told him that it had removal orders for VML’s mother and her 11-year-old sister, who was not born in the US, and that their mother was choosing to also take VML to Honduras with them. They pointed to a handwritten letter, which they say was written by the mother, that reads in Spanish: “I will take my daughter ... with me to Honduras.”

But the family’s lawyers dispute that the letter proves their consent, especially given that the parents weren’t allowed to coordinate VML’s release. They had wanted the toddler to be handed over to a US citizen that the family had chosen to serve as VML’s legal custodian. “The mom was never asked what she wanted. She was told, your child will be deported with you,” Willis said.

Before their deportation, both families had been dutifully complying with Ice ordersto regularly check-in.

VML’s mother had arrived at the US southern border during the “remain in Mexico” program instituted during the first Trump administration, which forced non-Mexican asylum seekers to wait south of the border while their cases were processed.

The mother, and her now 11-year-old, had reported to an initial appointment with immigration officials but had been kidnapped in Mexico – and were unable to attend their second immigration hearing. When the mother and daughter managed to return and seek safety in the United States, immigration officials released them into the country on the condition that they regularly check-in – which they had been doing for about four years, according to Willis.

The other woman deported with her children had entered the US as an unaccompanied minor child, and had been issued deportation orders after she failed to report at a hearing that she was not aware was happening, as she never received a summons, Willis said.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian