Wisconsin supreme court strikes down 1849 abortion ban

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Wisconsin Supreme Court Overturns 1849 Abortion Ban in 4-3 Decision"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled to strike down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban, concluding that it was superseded by more recent legislative changes regarding abortion laws. In a tightly contested 4-3 decision, the court determined that the 1849 ban, which classified the intentional destruction of an unborn child as a felony, was effectively nullified by a modern law that allows for abortions until a fetus can survive outside the womb. This ruling comes in the wake of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which had previously rendered the ban unenforceable until the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision that overturned Roe, leading some conservatives to argue that the 1849 law had been reactivated. However, Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, challenged this claim, asserting that the older ban was incompatible with the newer legislation that permits abortions until viability, typically around 21 weeks of gestation.

The case was originally brought to the courts following a ruling by Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper, who clarified that while the 1849 law outlawed feticide, it did not prohibit consensual abortions. Following this ruling, abortions have been legally performed in Wisconsin, but the Supreme Court's decision provides additional clarity and reassurance for both healthcare providers and patients regarding the legality of abortion services in the state. The court's liberal majority, bolstered by the recent election of Janet Protasiewicz, who has publicly supported abortion rights, indicates a continued trend towards upholding reproductive rights in Wisconsin. Her expected involvement in a forthcoming lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the 1849 ban suggests that the legal landscape surrounding abortion in the state will continue to evolve, reflecting broader national debates on the issue.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

TheWisconsinsupreme court’s liberal majority struck down the state’s 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb.

State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother “intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child”.

It was in effect until 1973, when the US supreme court’s landmark Roe v Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, conservatives argued that the US supreme court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it.

Wisconsin attorney general Josh Kaul, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.

Sheboygan county district attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist.

Dane county circuit judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide – which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother’s consent – but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state supreme court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin.

Urmanski asked the state supreme court to overturn Schlipper’s ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban. Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights.

Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday’s ruling. She’ll play a pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban’s constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It’s still pending.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian