Why is the US sleeping as autocracy approaches? | Jay Inslee

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Former Governor Jay Inslee Calls for Leadership Against Erosion of Democracy"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a recent reflection, former Washington Governor Jay Inslee highlights a troubling silence among influential leaders in America as the nation faces increasing threats to its democratic foundations under Donald Trump's presidency. Inslee draws parallels between the current political climate and historical instances of complacency that allowed autocratic regimes to rise. He emphasizes that it is not just elected officials who bear the responsibility for defending democracy, but also leaders in academia, law, and civil society. Inslee points out the inaction of college presidents and law firms, noting their failure to speak out against Trump's tactics, which echo classic authoritarian strategies aimed at undermining institutional checks and balances. The absence of a united front from these entities is particularly alarming in a moment when the rule of law is being tested and the very fabric of democracy is at risk of unraveling.

Inslee expresses his frustration over the lack of courage exhibited by major institutions, which he argues are complicit in their silence and passivity. He calls for a collective awakening among these leaders, urging them to stand up against the erosion of democratic principles that threatens not only their institutions but also the broader society. Drawing from historical lessons of civil disobedience and collective action, Inslee underscores the importance of resistance in the face of tyranny, citing past movements that successfully compelled change through persistent activism. He warns that the gradual encroachment of oppression can go unnoticed until it is too late, referencing Justice William O. Douglas's cautionary words about the subtle onset of tyranny. Inslee's message is clear: the time for complacency has passed, and it is imperative for all leaders in civil society to act decisively in defense of democracy before the twilight of oppression becomes irreversible.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a critical viewpoint on the perceived inaction of various societal leaders and institutions in the face of what the author describes as an encroaching autocracy under Donald Trump's presidency. By comparing the current political climate to historical instances of complacency, the piece aims to provoke a sense of urgency and a call to action among readers.

Critique of Leadership and Inaction

The author highlights frustrations with political leaders, as well as the silence from influential figures in academia and law. This absence of resistance is depicted as a significant factor in the deterioration of democratic principles. The reference to John F. Kennedy's work serves to illustrate a pattern of historical neglect, implying that failure to act during critical moments can lead to dire consequences.

Public Sentiment and Mobilization

By emphasizing public outrage and grief, the article seeks to galvanize collective action. The call for a "full-throated, continuous and united rebellion" indicates a desire for grassroots mobilization, suggesting that change requires more than just political rhetoric. The author’s tone is urgent, aiming to awaken a sense of responsibility among citizens and leaders alike.

Manipulation and Trustworthiness

While the article expresses a strong opinion, it may contain elements of manipulation through its emotionally charged language and framing of the current political situation as a clear dichotomy between democracy and autocracy. This framing could lead readers to feel a sense of fear and urgency, potentially clouding their judgment. The reliability of the information presented is contingent on the author's interpretations and biases, as it does not offer a balanced view of the complex political landscape.

Societal and Economic Implications

The article suggests that the current political climate could lead to long-term consequences for democracy in the United States. If the perceived autocracy continues unchecked, it may foster societal divisions and resistance movements, impacting the political and economic stability of the nation. The implications extend beyond politics, potentially affecting market confidence and investment in sectors sensitive to political stability.

Target Audience

The article seems to resonate with progressive audiences who are concerned about authoritarianism and the erosion of democratic norms. It aims to engage those who feel disillusioned with the political status quo and are seeking a framework for mobilization against perceived threats to democracy.

Impact on Financial Markets

While the article is primarily political, its themes could resonate in financial markets, particularly with companies that prioritize corporate governance and social responsibility. Businesses in sectors reliant on stable governance may find themselves scrutinized by investors who are increasingly concerned about political risks.

Global Power Dynamics

The themes discussed in the article reflect broader concerns about democratic backsliding, which could have implications for the United States' role on the global stage. The perception of the U.S. as a bastion of democracy is critical in international relations, and any shift toward autocracy could alter global alliances and influence.

The use of artificial intelligence in crafting this article seems unlikely, given its subjective nature and reliance on personal narrative. However, AI models could be used in analyzing public sentiment or generating content ideas, but the specific voice and argumentation appear to stem from human insight.

In summary, while the article raises important questions about democracy and leadership, its emotive language and one-sided narrative may reduce its overall reliability. Readers should approach it with a critical mindset, considering the broader context and potential biases at play.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When a woman asked me a couple of weeks ago why leaders were not standing up toDonald Trump, my thoughts went immediately to political leaders. When I started to answer, she corrected me and said: “No, no, I’m talking about college presidents and law firms. Where the heck are they?”

Where indeed? From all observations, most have been asleep as the US president dismantles democracy piece by jeweled piece. They are either cutting sweet little deals on their knees, or just remaining silent as the fruits of 250 years of national labor and life are strangled by Trump’s tentacles. From the cowering of major media companies to the shameful capitulation of some law firms, and oppressive silence from virtually all of them, the nation is sleepwalking into a slow but ever encroaching totalitarian state.

As the woman continued her outpouring of anger and grief, I thought of John F Kennedy’s Pulitzer prize-winning book, Why England Slept, his brilliant exposition of why a proud and resilient nation ignored Germany’s mounting threat to their democracy when it was so obvious and imminent. Kennedy recognized the centrality of moments we now face, writing: “Any system of government will work when everything is going well. It’s the system that functions in the pinches that survives.” We are now being pinched by an autocrat who eats laws for breakfast and will not be stopped by any internal restraint.

Whether our democracy survives to preserve the rule of law depends on so much more than senators and representatives. In a way, they are merely personal reflections of the public’s will. Depending exclusively on their personal commitment to the constitution is a good bet for the party now in the minority, but a sore loser for the majority party, or more accurately, the majority cult. The moment demands so much more than eloquence on the floor of the House and the Senate – it demands full-throated, continuous and united rebellion against the perverse oppression and malignant illegality of this authoritarian in the White House.

Unfortunately, we are not seeing the necessary courage, not in the east, not in the west, not in large law firms, not in boardrooms, not in school district superintendents, not in chambers of commerce. The silence is deafening.

Where was the united voice of major law firms when Trump maliciouslybegan to target several of them? They were hiding. Where are the concerted voices of college presidents as their colleagues are being hung out to dry? Do they not teach history at these colleges, where any freshman could tell you that the Trump plan is right out of every autocrat’s playbook? First you tame the press, then you tame the colleges, then you tame the law firms so that no one can even get to court, then you eventually ignore the orders of the supreme court.

We are well on our way to that final death knell of democracy, as we advance through the first three steps.

My motivation to rally for our country is not driven solely by my love for democracy. Like millions of Americans, I see my own family being jeopardized by Trump’s callousness. I have seen first-hand the power of special education teachers to raise the prospects of special needs kids in my clan. I rebel at the Musk-Trump administration’s chainsaw attackeliminating the one agencythat safeguards our kids’ access to special education investments, the US Department of Education. ToElon Musk, the department may be just a bureaucracy – to our family, it is a guardian angel.

Is this passivity and lack of resistance understandable? Of course it is. That’s why the old saw “first they come for the … then they come for you” was invented.

But we should call upon our college presidents, law firms, leaders of civil society, to get in touch with their responsibility to democracy itself, as well as their own institutions, which surely will end up on the firing line someday if Trump continues to be emboldened by his victims’ servility.

Perhaps it is too strong to refer to these organizations as collaborators. Perhaps. But this wholesale timidity and collapse must be considered rank appeasement at best, modest complicity at worst.

Kudos toHarvard University,Perkins Coieand others who have stood up, butsome of the finesthigher educational institutions in world history are now ignoring the well-trod path of autocracy in world history. Some of the best and brightest law firms in the nation are nowproviding free legal servicesto the very administration that has broken laws beyond counting the very legal codes the law firms purport to defend.

Certainly, these silent aiders and abettors can explain their individual decision making, but their cumulative damage to the very fabric of democracy calls us to heed Benjamin Franklin when he said we must “all hang together, or all hang separately”. Is it asking too much for the college presidents of the US to band together and say this choking of research funds is unacceptable? Are the law firms just too busy to all say they are not going to yield to Trump’s perverse bullying and say what any good lawyer ought to say: “We’ll see you in court”?

In fighting Trump’s assaults on democracy, I speak from experience. As the first governor to come out against his Muslim ban, one of the most vocal in speaking out against his Covid negligence, and telling him to his face to stop tweeting and start protecting our children, earning me the honor of being called a “snake”, I know standing up brings the heat. So be it.

But my more important experience is decades watching a courageous citizenry force its federal government to change course. In the 50s and 60s, the government was forced to change, thanks in large part to a woman refusing to sit in the back of the bus. In the 70s, the Vietnam war ended only because thousands marched, including myself, proving the ability of committed people, though unelected, to compel change. In the 80s it was private citizens who forced the federal government to start treating HIV patients like humans.

In each of these decades, small acts of defiance led to national change as courage rippled outwards. The benefit of having lived these decades during the American experiment is learning that leaders in civil society who resist should be exalted, joined, and followed.

Those who believe that this call to action is an overstatement of the threat understand neither the nature of the tyrant-in-chief nor the slow but inexorable nature of how democracies are lost. I witnessed Trump’s cruelty and lack of empathy as I dealt with him during the Covid pandemic, as he willfully withheld help and then consciously spread misinformation that caused so many needless deaths. Anyone who saw this up close would make the call for resistance I am making today. How can anyone not understand that the refusal to follow the law on January 6 continues in full force today? Why would it stop unless it is made to stop?

More importantly, we should listen to the late Justice William O Douglas, who said: “As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly unchanged, and it is in such twilight that we all must be most aware of change in the air – however slight – lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.” It is past time for all our leaders in civil society to wake up, stand up and speak up. We are right in calling them to do so. Hiding is no longer acceptable.

Jay Inslee served as the governor of Washington from 2013-2025

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian