Why in the world do people love golf? | Dave Schilling

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Trump's Affinity for Golf During His Presidency: A Reflection on Time and Politics"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article explores the peculiar affinity that former President Donald Trump has for golf, particularly during his second term in office. As he approaches the 100-day mark of his presidency, Trump has spent a significant portion of that time—40 days in total—playing golf at his personal properties. The author notes that golf is a game devoid of time constraints, where the pace is dictated by the players and the setting sun rather than a clock. This leisurely approach to the sport contrasts sharply with the pressing issues of inflation and tariffs facing the country. The piece highlights a recent golf outing where Trump played with Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley, who faced criticism for associating with the controversial figure. Barkley defended the outing, suggesting that golf transcends politics and serves as a platform for camaraderie, regardless of the players' differing political views.

The author expresses a personal ambivalence toward golf, acknowledging its appeal yet questioning its allure, particularly for someone like Trump, who devotes considerable time to the game. The article reflects on the nature of golf, which often involves frustration and a sense of futility, as players navigate the challenges of the course. The author likens Trump's presidency to a challenging round of golf, filled with unexpected obstacles and disappointments. Ultimately, the piece suggests that golf may resonate with Trump not only as a pastime but as a metaphor for his tumultuous tenure, where decisions are often fraught with difficulty, yet people continue to engage in the game—and by extension, the political landscape—despite the challenges that arise.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article explores the relationship between golf and the political landscape, particularly focusing on Donald Trump's second presidency. It intertwines the sport with notions of time and privilege, suggesting that golf serves as both a personal escape and a public spectacle for Trump. The narrative hints at a critique of Trump's frequent golfing habits, juxtaposed with significant political events, thereby painting a picture of a leader who prioritizes leisure over governance.

Public Perception and Intentions

The article aims to provoke thoughts about the priorities of political leaders, particularly Trump, by highlighting his time spent golfing. This focus on leisure in the face of pressing national issues like inflation and tariffs creates a perception of detachment from reality. The underlying message appears to be a commentary on how leisure activities, especially those associated with privilege, can overshadow serious governance responsibilities.

Concealment of Information

While the article does not explicitly conceal information, it may divert attention from more critical issues facing the country by focusing on Trump's golfing. The emphasis on golf could be seen as a distraction from the broader implications of his policies and decisions during his presidency.

Manipulation Rate

The manipulation rate in this article can be considered moderate. It utilizes the juxtaposition of leisure and leadership to evoke emotional responses regarding Trump's priorities without directly stating that he is unfit for office. The language used, particularly in the playful speculation about how the White House would have framed Trump's golf outcomes, subtly guides readers toward a critical view of his actions.

Truthfulness of Information

The article is grounded in factual events, such as Trump's golfing habits and his presidency timeline. However, it employs a subjective narrative style that can lead to biased interpretations. The facts presented are true, but the implications drawn can be seen as speculative.

Societal Implications

The message conveyed could lead to increased scrutiny of political leaders and their leisure activities amidst crises. This scrutiny could further polarize public opinion, particularly among those who view Trump favorably versus those who do not.

Target Audience

The article likely resonates more with communities that are critical of Trump or those concerned about the intersection of politics and privilege. It appeals to readers who value accountability in leadership and who may be frustrated with perceived leisure over serious governance.

Economic and Market Impact

While this article might not have direct implications on the stock market, it reflects broader sentiments that could affect investor confidence. Leaders' public images can influence market stability, particularly in sectors related to leisure and tourism.

Global Power Dynamics and Relevance

In the context of global power dynamics, the article reflects on how the behavior of leaders can influence international perceptions. It ties into current discussions about leadership behavior during crises, making it relevant to contemporary themes in politics.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

There is no clear indication that AI was used in crafting this article. However, if AI were involved, it might have influenced the tone or style to ensure engagement. The narrative techniques used, such as humor and speculation, could theoretically be enhanced by AI models that focus on audience engagement.

Manipulative Elements

The article does carry elements of manipulation by framing golf as an escape from serious political issues, potentially inciting readers to question Trump's priorities. The playful language used to describe his golfing achievements subtly suggests an underlying critique of his leadership style.

In conclusion, the article serves as a commentary on the juxtaposition of leisure and serious governance, particularly within the context of Trump's presidency. It raises questions about the responsibilities of leaders while highlighting societal perceptions of privilege and accountability.

Unanalyzed Article Content

We have already tumbled past the first 100 days of the second Trump presidency, careening down the hill with reckless abandon. One hundred days is, of course, a totally arbitrary milestone – a nice, round number that looks monumental because of the number of zeros attached.

Withinflationand loomingtariffscontinuing to hobble commerce, shouldn’t we extend this marker in kind? If you go by the rate of inflation since the final year before Donald Trump’s ascension to power, we should be looking at the first 133.25 days. Time itself is arbitrary, speeding up or slowing down based on context and personal perception. A minute can feel like an eternity if you’re stuck in traffic on Sunset Boulevard.

And there’s no pastime more connected to the elasticity of time than golf – a pastoral game where there’s no clock regulating speed, just a common sense of politeness for your fellow golfers and the slowly setting sun. It’s a game American presidents have loved for decades, but one that especially tickles the current occupant of the office. Of Trump’s first 100 days in office this go ’round,he’s spent parts of 40 of them(and 12 of 14 weekends) on one of his personal properties, offering the president a chance to indulge in his favorite sport. After his tariff announcement on 2 April, Trump was spotted hitting balls at Mar-a-Lago.

“The president won his second round matchup of the Senior Club Championship today in Jupiter, FL, and advances to the Championship Round tomorrow,” declared a White House statement. I wonder if they’d have issued the remarks if he had lost. Maybe they would have revised their words to soften the blow. “The President competed rigorously, showed grace and honor, and at one point miraculously revived a man who fainted in the blistering heat with a mere touch to his forehead.” Or maybe they would havedisputed the results of the match entirely.

Just last weekend,Trump golfed with the Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkleyat Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, ahead of the Eagles’ visit to the White House to commemorate their victory in last year’s Super Bowl. Barkley took heat for whacking balls with Trump, but he doubled down on his incredulous enthusiasm at his good fortune on X. “lol some people are really upset cause I played golfed [sic] and flew to the White House with the PRESIDENT. Maybe I just respect the office, not a hard concept to understand. Just golfed with Obama not too long ago … and look forward to finishing my round with Trump! Now ya get out my mentions with all this politics and have amazing [sic] day.”

The implication Barkley is making is that golf is inherently apolitical, that as soon as you step on the course, nothing matters but the fun of the afternoon. Maybe there’s an element of truth to that notion that golf is a great equalizer – a sport where power dynamics are flattened and participants give themselves up to the whims of the natural world.

Or not.

I don’t understand golf. I don’t love it. But I don’t hate it, either. I have played golf multiple times. I was even gifted a set of clubs by my golf-loving father when I turned 13. I have no true antipathy toward the game. I’m simply mystified by its appeal to the rich and connected and the average citizen alike.Golfcan be played at a tony country club or a ratty nine-hole near the freeway with a six-pack of Bud Light always at the ready. OK, maybe I understand that last bit, but I just don’t get why Trump is so enamored with this game that he’ll carve out significant chunks of time in the twilight of his life to pursue it.

Granted, golf requires patience, years of practice, and mental acuity. So does knitting. Why doesn’t Trump sit at home making a lovely blanket for his wife to curl up with on the couch during The White Lotus? He could perfect the art of making gluten-free zucchini bread, then hand it out to White House staffers and ask them how much they love the carob chips he sprinkled throughout the loaf? Imagine Volodymyr Zelenskyy biting into the sweet and savory goodness of a nice slice of zucchini bread while Trump pontificates about the ceding of territory to Russia. At least Zelenskyy would have something to take home in a Tupperware container after getting shafted.

Golf is a game where futility is expected, where failure is right around the corner, and frustration is always simmering. The most exciting part of golf is hitting the ball, but the rules encourage you to hit the damn thingless,not more. Instead, most of the time during a golf game, you’re pondering, or worse yet, idly chit-chatting. The old saying goes: “golf is a good walk spoiled.” But is the walk even that good? A good walk is one where you see something unexpected, you bump into an old friend, or you have a chance to truly ruminate on the state of your life. A good walk is restorative and life-affirming. A golf course is not a pedestrian haven. It’s a zoo for people in polo shirts. You basically wander around in a circle for four hours, just to end up back where you started – a clubhouse with overpriced food and gaudy furniture.

In that sense, it might actually be the perfect game for Trump. His tenure in the White House has felt like a particularly rough round of 18 holes. Decisions, like a tiny golf ball, blown haphazardly around by the wind. Traps laid out with the explicit purpose of screwing things up for you. A journey to nowhere that ends with disappointment. And like golf, despite all the evidence to the contrary, people line up to do it all over again anyway.

Dave Schilling is a Los Angeles-based writer and humorist

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian