Why do kindness influencers get criticised?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Ethical Dilemmas Facing Kindness Influencers on Social Media"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Samuel Weidenhofer, a 21-year-old from Melbourne, Australia, turned to social media as a platform to share positivity after facing significant mental health challenges during his childhood, including the loss of his aunt to suicide and experiences of bullying. He began his journey by performing simple acts of kindness, such as giving hugs and distributing flowers, and documenting these interactions on social media. Over the years, his content gained immense popularity, resulting in 1.7 million followers on Instagram. Weidenhofer's videos often feature heartwarming surprises for individuals facing hardships, showcasing his desire to inspire and uplift others through his content. Similarly, other kindness influencers like Zachery Dereniowski, who has 5.7 million followers, utilize similar tactics by filming acts of generosity that reward strangers for their kindness, emphasizing the idea that everyone has a story and that those with less often give the most. Their videos attract millions of views and are designed to resonate emotionally with audiences looking for positivity amidst a landscape filled with entertainment-driven content.

Despite their well-meaning intentions, kindness influencers face scrutiny for the performative nature of their acts. Critics, including psychotherapist Hilda Burke, argue that these videos can feel exploitative, as they often place vulnerable individuals in a position where their needs are overshadowed by the influencers' desire for engagement and profit. Burke raises concerns about the ethical implications of filming individuals in need without their consent, suggesting that it can lead to a troubling dynamic where the participant's worth is contingent upon their willingness to assist someone perceived as more fortunate. In response to these critiques, influencers like Weidenhofer defend their methods by arguing that social media amplifies their ability to help others, while others, like Dereniowski, are beginning to recognize the importance of providing long-term support and guidance to those they assist, including financial planning and job placement. This ongoing debate highlights the complex nature of kindness on social media, balancing genuine altruism with the potential for exploitation and the need for informed consent.

TruthLens AI Analysis

Analysis failed for 'Why do kindness influencers get criticised?' due to an error: Error code: 429 - {'error': {'message': 'You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, read the docs: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/error-codes/api-errors.', 'type': 'insufficient_quota', 'param': None, 'code': 'insufficient_quota'}}

Unanalyzed Article Content

Growing up, Samuel Weidenhofer struggled with his mental health after losing his aunt to suicide when he was nine, experiencing a speech impediment, and being bullied. The trauma of it all made him want to end his own life, he says. When he was 17, he says he decided to turn to social media to spread a positive message. "It started with simple things like giving people hugs in public and giving out roses and flowers and things that would make people smile," says Weidenhofer, now 21, and living in Melbourne, Australia. The difference was Weidenhofer filmed these acts and shared them across his social media accounts. The content spiralled and four years later, on Instagram alone he has amassed 1.7 million followers, where he can be seen surprising a person with a serious illness with money or a visit from a celebrity such as Jake Paul or Kristen Bell. "I hope my videos inspire someone just a little bit," he says. Kindness content creators, or influencers as they're often called, are increasing in numbers on social media. Their approaches differ but a common tactic is to secretly film someone being given money, or tickets to a gig or sports match, or perhaps a free haircut. "Kindness is cool," says Zachery Dereniowski, 31, in the bio of his Instagram account where he has 5.7 million followers. Mr Dereniowski's videos often involve him telling a stranger that he is hungry and asking for food. When the person helps him out, he rewards the person with a gift, such as a laptop, or money. "I suppose I want to really emphasise that every single person you come across has a story… and often the people who have the least give the most," says Mr Dereniowski, who lives in Windsor, near Toronto in Canada, and started the account after giving free hugs to strangers. Like many influencers, the kindness creators make money from adverts and sponsorship from the brands they work with. For example they might do a deal that involves giving away a particular brand's product. The videos of kindness content creators attract millions of views. Why are they so popular? Saoirse Cleary, creative strategy director at marketing agency MG Empower, says they incorporate many of the elements that both social media algorithms and audiences favour: strong hooks, engaging captions, heartfelt narratives, and authentic, unscripted moments. "Audiences are captivated by raw, real interactions with everyday people, offering an emotional connection from the comfort of their own screens. People increasingly seek positivity, authenticity, and emotional resonance in their online experiences, especially in spaces often saturated with entertainment-driven content." On the face of it the acts seem well meaning, so why do they attract criticism? ""While these influencers may be genuinely generous... the generosity can sometimes feel performative, as it often serves as a way to attract more views, engagement, and ultimately financial reward, rather than purely altruistic motives," says Ms Cleary. Others go further, questing whether focussing on one, usually vulnerable person, is the right way to help out. "I find the typical set up of many of the scenes quite disturbing," says Hilda Burke, a psychotherapist, accredited with the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy. She explains that the videos often involve someone being identified as "in need". They are then asked for a favour. It might be spare money for a bus fare or help with something. She argues the participant is being "lured" into valuing the needs of someone else, who appears richer, more highly than their own. Only if they do that are they rewarded. "I wonder what happens to those who don't play the game?," asks Ms Burke. The influencers defend themselves by arguing that using social media this way is an effective strategy. "I can raise more money, so I can help more people if I post it online," says Mr Weidenhofer. And how about filming people without their consent? "If you are doing a video where you're giving a hug to someone, if you tell them beforehand, it just takes away that authenticity," says Mr Weidenhofer. But he adds that these days he avoids filming people without consent as it was making him "feel weird". Sometimes large amounts of money are given to vulnerable people, which they might not be in a position to manage. Mr Dereniowski realised that this might be an issue when he raised $240,000 overnight for a father and son who were living in their car. After that, more thought goes into longer term help. "We've started setting up financial advisors. We've started getting these people jobs. We've helped allocate the funds properly to pay off their debt, their car, helping them get a home and [pay their] rent," he says. If you have been affected by any of the details in this story, you can get help and support fromthe BBC Action Line.

Back to Home
Source: Bbc News