Who are the eight new vaccine advisers appointed by Robert F Kennedy?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Appoints New Vaccine Advisers to CDC Panel, Raising Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the U.S. health secretary, has appointed eight new members to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) after dismissing all previous 17 advisers. The newly appointed panel members include individuals who have previously expressed grievances about being excluded from discussions, as well as some who have been associated with spreading misinformation regarding vaccines. Kennedy emphasized that these new appointees are dedicated to evidence-based medicine and will demand comprehensive safety and efficacy data before making recommendations about vaccines. However, the decision has raised concerns among public health experts about the credibility and independence of the advisory group, particularly given Kennedy's history as a vaccine skeptic and his controversial approach to U.S. vaccine policy. He also removed career officials responsible for vetting ACIP members, further complicating the panel's integrity and objectivity.

Among the newly appointed members, Robert W. Malone has attracted significant attention due to his past claims of being an inventor of mRNA technology and his appearances on right-wing media criticizing the Biden administration. He has been accused of promoting conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 treatments. Other appointees, such as Martin Kulldorff, have voiced opposition to vaccine mandates and have gained notoriety for their contrarian views during the pandemic. The panel also includes medical professionals with varying degrees of vaccine expertise, which has led to skepticism about their qualifications to guide national vaccine recommendations. Critics, including former advisers, warn that the new composition of ACIP could undermine trust in vaccines and public health policies, as it appears to be driven by personal beliefs rather than scientific consensus. Concerns about the implications of these appointments for vaccine safety and public health are growing among experts and advocates for evidence-based medicine.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The recent appointment of eight new vaccine advisers by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has sparked significant attention and concern within the public and medical communities. This decision comes in the wake of Kennedy dismissing all previous panel members, raising questions about the motivations behind these changes and the potential implications for vaccine policy in the United States.

Motivations Behind the Announcement

Kennedy's choice of advisers includes individuals with a history of skepticism toward vaccines, as well as those who have publicly expressed grievances about their exclusion from previous discussions. By selecting these figures, Kennedy appears to be aligning the advisory panel more closely with his own views on vaccine safety and efficacy. The move can be interpreted as an attempt to reshape the narrative surrounding vaccines in the U.S., emphasizing a demand for "definitive safety and efficacy data" before any recommendations are made.

Public Perception Goals

The article suggests that the appointment of these advisers is aimed at fostering a perception of increased scrutiny and skepticism towards established vaccine protocols. By presenting the new members as advocates for "evidence-based medicine," Kennedy may be attempting to legitimize their controversial perspectives in the eyes of the public, potentially swaying those who are already skeptical about vaccines.

Information Concealment Considerations

There is a potential concern that this shift in advisory personnel could obscure the rigorous scientific processes typically upheld by panels like the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The removal of career officials responsible for vetting ACIP members may raise alarms about the independence and objectivity of the recommendations that will follow.

Manipulative Elements of the Coverage

The article reflects a manipulative tone, particularly in the language used to describe Kennedy and his new advisers. By framing Kennedy as a "widely known vaccine skeptic" and highlighting the "high-profile figure" of Robert W. Malone, the narrative may serve to bolster the image of those opposed to mainstream vaccine science, rather than presenting a balanced view.

Comparative Analysis with Other Reports

This news piece can be linked to broader media narratives that question vaccine efficacy and safety, particularly those circulating in right-wing media outlets. The framing of vaccine discussions in such a polarized manner may serve to create a divide between pro- and anti-vaccine communities, reinforcing existing biases.

Potential Societal Impact

The changes in the advisory panel could have significant repercussions for public health policy, especially if the recommendations diverge from established scientific consensus. This may lead to increased vaccine hesitancy among certain populations, potentially endangering herd immunity levels and public health at large.

Target Audience and Support Base

Kennedy's actions and the subsequent media coverage seem to resonate more with communities that are already skeptical of government institutions and mainstream science. These groups may include individuals who prioritize personal freedom over collective health measures.

Financial Market Implications

In terms of financial markets, this news could negatively impact pharmaceutical companies involved in vaccine production, particularly if public confidence in vaccines wanes. Stocks of such companies may face volatility as a result of shifting public perceptions.

Global Power Dynamics Context

While this news primarily focuses on U.S. vaccine policy, it is part of a broader global conversation regarding public health and governmental authority. The ongoing debates about vaccine mandates and public trust in science are increasingly relevant in today's geopolitical climate.

Role of AI in News Creation

It is possible that AI tools were utilized in the composition and dissemination of this article, given the structured nature of the information presented. AI models could have influenced the tone and focus of the narrative, potentially exaggerating certain aspects to enhance engagement.

The overall reliability of the article is questionable due to its apparent bias and the potential manipulation of public sentiment surrounding vaccines. The framing of both Kennedy and his newly appointed advisers suggests an agenda that prioritizes skepticism over established scientific consensus.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US health secretary, named eight new vaccine advisers this week to a critical Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) panel afterfiring all 17 expertswho had held the roles.

New members of the panelinclude experts who complained about being sidelined, a high-profile figure who has spread misinformation and medical professionals who appear to have little vaccine expertise. Kennedy made the announcement onsocial media.

“All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense,” Kennedy said in his announcement. “They have each committed to demanding definitive safety and efficacy data before making any new vaccine recommendations.”

Formally called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the panel advises the CDC on how vaccines should be distributed. Those recommendations effectively determine the vaccines Americans can access. This week, Kennedy also removed the career officials typically tasked with vetting ACIP members and overseeing the advisory group,according to CBS News.

Kennedy is a widely known vaccine skeptic whoprofitedfrom suing vaccine manufacturers, has takenincreasingly dramaticsteps toupendUS vaccine policy.

“ACIP is widely regarded as the international gold standard for vaccine decision-making,” said Helen Chu, one of the fired advisers, at a press conference with Patty Murray, a Democratic US senator.

“We cannot replace it with a process driven by one person’s beliefs. In the absence of an independent unbiased ACIP, we can no longer trust that safe and effective vaccines will be available to us and the people around us.”

Arguably the most high profile new member, Robert W Malone catapulted to stardom during the Covid-19 pandemic, appearing across rightwing media tocriticizetheBiden administrationwhile describing himself as the inventor of mRNA technology.

Messenger RNA technology powers the most widely used Covid-19 vaccines. While Malone was involved invery earlyexperiments on the technology, researchers have said his role was limited.

Malone’s star rose quickly after appearing on the Joe Roganpodcastin 2022, where he and Rogan werecriticized for spreading misinformation. On the show, Malone promoted the idea that both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine could be possible treatments for Covid-19, but said research on the drugs was being suppressed.Ivermectinandhydroxychloroquinehave not been shown to improve outcomes from Covid-19.

“Malone has a well-documented history of promoting conspiracy theories,” said Dr Jeffrey D Klausner, an epidemiologist and infectious disease expert at the University of Southern California, who recently told theNew York Timeshe was in touch with Kennedy about his appointments.

Kulldorff is a former Harvard professor of biostatistics and an infectious disease epidemiologist originally from Sweden. He said in an essay for the rightwing publicationCity Journalthat he was fired because he refused to be vaccinated in line with the school policy.

Like Malone, he rose to prominence during the pandemic as a “Covid contrarian” who criticized the scientific consensus – views he said alienated him from his peers in the scientific community. He voiced his opposition to Covid-19 vaccine mandates and, in his essay, complained of being ignored by media and shadow-banned from Twitter.

Kulldorff co-authored theGreat Barrington Declaration, which called for limited closures instead of pandemic lockdowns before vaccines were available. The document became a touchstone for the American political right.

Prior to the pandemic, Kulldorff studied vaccine safety and infectious disease, including co-authoring papers with members of CDC staff, such as on theVaccine Safety Datalink. He was a member of the CDC’s Covid Vaccine Safety Working Group in 2020, but said later he was fired because he disagreed with the agency’s decision to pause Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine and with Covid -19 vaccine mandates. Heservedon the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) drug safety and risk management advisory committee around the same time.

He has since enjoyed support from people already within the administration, including Great Barrington Declaration co-authorDr Jay Bhattacharya, current head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), andDr Vinay Prasad, head of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which handles vaccines.

Meissner is a professor of pediatrics at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth. He previously held advisory roles at the FDA and CDC, including ACIP from 2008-2012.

In 2021, Meissner co-wrotean editorialwith Dr Marty Makary, now the head of the FDA, which criticized mask mandates for children. In April, he was listed as an external adviser to ACIP on the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) committee.

Notably, Meissneris listedin a new conflicts of interest tool launched by the health department in March. Kennedy had criticized the fired ACIP members as “plagued with persistentconflicts of interest”.

“He’s a card-carrying infectious disease person who knows the burden of these diseases, and he knows the risk and the benefit,” Dr Kathryn Edwards toldCBS News. Edwards previously served as chair of the FDA’s vaccine advisory panel.

Pebsworth is a nurse and the former consumer representative on the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee. She is also the Pacific regional director for the National Association of Catholic Nurses, according to Kennedy’s announcement.

In 2020, Pebsworth spoke at the public comment portion of an FDA advisory panel meeting on Covid-19 vaccines. There, she identified herself as the volunteer research director for the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), “and the mother of a child injured by his 15-month well-baby shots in 1998”.

The NVIC is widely viewed as ananti-vaccine advocacyorganization “whose founder Barbara Lou Fisher must be considered a key figure of the anti-vaccine movement”, according toan articlefrom 2023 on how to counter anti-vaccine misinformation.

Levi is a professor of operations management at the MIT Sloan School of Management who Kennedy described as an “expert in healthcare analytics, risk management and vaccine safety”.

In 2021, heopposedCovid-19 booster shot approval during the public comment portion of an FDA advisory committee hearing. In 2022, he wrote an article calling for EMS calls to be incorporated into vaccine safety data, arguing that cardiovascular side effects could be undercounted – an article thatlater required correction. The potential effects of Covid-19 vaccines on heart health have been a focal point of right-leaning criticism.

Last month, Levi wascriticizedfor publishing a pre-print paper – a paper without peer review – that he co-authored with Dr Joseph Ladapo, the Florida surgeon general, a vaccine skeptic. The paper alleged that people who took the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine were more likely to die than those who received the Moderna vaccine.

Kennedy described Ross as “a Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at George Washington University and Virginia Commonwealth University, with a career spanning clinical medicine, research, and public health policy”.

However, as first reported byCBS News, Ross’s name does not appear in faculty directories for either school. A spokesperson for George Washington University told the outlet that Ross did work as a clinical professor, but “has not held a faculty appointment … since 2017”.

A spokesperson for Virginia Commonwealth University described Ross as “an affiliate faculty member” at a regional hospital system in the Capitol region.

He is also listed as a partner at Havencrest Capital Management, as a board member of “multiple private healthcare companies”.

Hibbeln is a California-based psychiatrist who previously served as acting chief for the Section of Nutritional Neurosciences at the NIH. He describes himself as an expert on omega-3, a fatty acid found in seafood.

He also serves on theadvisory councilof a non-profit that advocates for Americans to eat more seafood. He practices at Barton Health, a hospital system in Lake Tahoe, California. His work influenced US public health guidelines on fish consumption during pregnancy.

Pagano is an emergency medicine physician from Los Angeles “with over 40 years of clinical experience”, and a “strong advocate for evidence-based medicine”, according to Kennedy.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian