‘We’re not here to slander Sondheim!’ Inside the master’s wild final musical, completed at last

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Stephen Sondheim's Final Musical 'Here We Are' Premieres at National Theatre"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The rehearsal room at the National Theatre is filled with a mix of excitement and nervous energy as the cast of 'Here We Are,' Stephen Sondheim's final musical, prepares for its London debut. The complexity of Sondheim's songs presents a significant challenge for performers, as noted by Jesse Tyler Ferguson, who, after witnessing the New York premiere, realized the extensive effort required to master the intricate dialogue and choreography. Director Joe Mantello emphasizes the difficulty of synchronizing the show’s elaborate elements, likening it to a physical dexterity challenge. Despite the challenges, the cast has made substantial progress in just three weeks, with Denis O’Hare delivering standout performances that continue to elicit laughter from the director. The production, which opened off-Broadway in October 2023, marks a significant collaboration between Sondheim, Mantello, and writer David Ives, and it has been particularly poignant given that Sondheim passed away during its development. The show is inspired by two surrealist films by Luis Buñuel and explores themes of absurdity within the context of affluent friends navigating bizarre scenarios during a brunch outing.

As the cast navigates the intricacies of the production, they reflect on their personal connections to Sondheim’s work. Both Jane Krakowski and Ferguson share their long-standing admiration for the composer, recalling formative experiences that shaped their careers. The characters in 'Here We Are' serve as representations of late-capitalist excess, and Mantello's direction aims to balance humor with the underlying societal critiques present in the script. The show’s music, known for its abrupt halt, sparked discussions about artistic integrity and the legacy of unfinished works. With its technical demands and innovative staging, the production has garnered attention and praise, transitioning from initial skepticism to acclaim following its New York debut. As it heads to the United Kingdom, Mantello expresses confidence that British audiences will engage deeply with the material, fostering conversations beyond the theater experience. With performances set to run until June 28, 2024, 'Here We Are' is poised to take its place among Sondheim's revered works, showcasing not just his genius but also the resilience of the creative team in bringing this ambitious project to fruition.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides an insight into the rehearsal process of "Here We Are," the final musical by Stephen Sondheim, which is significant not only as a creative work but also as a cultural event following the passing of the legendary composer. It highlights the challenges faced by the cast and the excitement surrounding the production, particularly in light of Sondheim's legacy.

Intended Impact on the Audience

The piece aims to create a sense of anticipation and admiration for the production. By showcasing the rehearsal dynamics and the challenges the actors face, it emphasizes the complexity and artistry involved in Sondheim's work. This can foster a deeper appreciation among audiences, encouraging them to view the musical not just as entertainment but as a significant artistic achievement.

Potential Concealments or Omissions

While the article focuses on the positive aspects of the rehearsal and the cast's engagement, it may downplay any potential challenges or criticisms regarding the production process or the final product. There might be underlying tensions or difficulties that are not addressed, such as the emotional weight of finishing Sondheim’s work posthumously. This could lead to an incomplete picture of the production’s environment.

Assessment of Manipulativeness

The article appears to be primarily informative and celebratory rather than manipulative. However, the choice of language that emphasizes excitement and humor can create a bias towards viewing the production in an overwhelmingly positive light. This could lead readers to overlook any legitimate concerns or criticisms about the performance or its execution.

Cultural Perception

In the broader context, the article contributes to the cultural narrative surrounding theater and musical production, particularly in how it frames Sondheim's last work. It portrays the theater community as vibrant and collaborative, potentially enhancing the public's interest in attending such performances.

Connections to Other News

There might be a connection to other news within the theatrical community, especially regarding tributes to Sondheim or discussions about the importance of his works in contemporary culture. The article serves to reinforce this ongoing dialogue about legacy and the arts.

Economic and Political Implications

The production's success could influence the local economy, particularly if it draws significant audiences to theaters in London. It may also affect discussions around arts funding and support, highlighting the value of cultural projects in society.

Target Audience

The article likely appeals to theater enthusiasts, arts advocates, and those interested in Sondheim’s contributions to music and theater. It aims to engage readers who appreciate the intricacies of performance art and the collaborative nature of theater.

Impact on Financial Markets

While this specific article might not have a direct impact on stock markets, it could contribute to the overall sentiment around the arts and entertainment sectors. Productions like this can influence ticket sales and the financial viability of theaters, which could be of interest to investors in those sectors.

Geopolitical Relevance

The article does not directly address geopolitical issues but highlights cultural production within a specific context. The arts often reflect societal trends and can play a role in shaping public sentiment, which can indirectly relate to larger political narratives.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

It is unlikely that artificial intelligence was directly involved in the writing of this article, as it conveys the nuances of human emotion and creativity inherent in theater. However, AI tools could have been used in the editorial process to optimize structure or language. The engaging and lively style suggests a human touch, reflecting the subjective nature of the theater.

The article, while largely positive and celebratory, also invites readers to reflect on the complexities of completing a work of art posthumously. It does not exhibit significant manipulative intent but rather aims to generate excitement around a revered figure's final contribution to the arts. Overall, the reliability of the article is strong due to its emphasis on firsthand accounts and experiences from rehearsals.

Unanalyzed Article Content

There’s an edge of febrile hilarity in theNational Theatrerehearsal room. The company of Here We Are, Stephen Sondheim’s final musical, are off-book and getting the first act on its feet. But hitting your cues in a show as intricate as this is tough, whoever you are.

Jane Krakowskifluffs an entrance and tries not to corpse.Martha Plimptonraises a glass a second after everyone else, and a cast-mate blows a raspberry from the sidelines. Jesse Tyler Ferguson is convinced it’s not him who is a beat off. “Do it exactly like Rory does,” suggests director Joe Mantello, andRory Kinnearresponds mock-haughtily: “That’s just ageneralnote.”

Sondheim’s songs can be notoriously tricky to perform. Ferguson, best known for his role as Mitchell in the sitcomModern Family, found the New York premiere of this work “hypnotic” when he saw it. “And now I realise they spent weeks just learning how to speak these things, and how hard that is.” Combining the verbal rhythmic patterns with the show’s ever-moving choreography is, says Mantello, like patting your head while rubbing your stomach.

The good news: after three weeks it is already very funny. Denis O’Hare – he and Tracie Bennett return from the original production – is nailing his scene. Even with 129 performances in the bank, he is still making his director laugh with fresh takes on a desperate-to-please waiter. At the back of the room, awaiting his entrance, a dead chef lies on a trolley, suitably garnished.

When Here We Are opened off-Broadway in October 2023 it was the hottest ticket in town (not unlike Mantello’s 2004 Assassins, which won a Tony). A collaboration between Sondheim, Mantello and writer David Ives, it had been in development for seven years when Sondheim died, aged 91, and was completed posthumously. Ferguson and Krakowski both remember watching from the audience feeling wildly jealous of the participants, so being asked to join the show for its London debut was a dream. “And on top of that,” says Ferguson, “it’s at the NationalTheatre, which is something everyone dreams of doing, certainly as an American. I feel very, very fancy.”

A satirical amalgam of two of Luis Buñuel’s surrealist films,The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisieand The Exterminating Angel, the show is about a group of wealthy friends who head out for brunch, only to find themselves caught up in a sequence of absurd situations. “I’ve sort of taken my lead from Buñuel, who said the only explanation is there’s no explanation,” says Mantello. When it starts to snow in the middle of the room, you don’t ask why: “It’s magical.”

The characters are symbols of late-capitalist excess – an immoral industrialist, a philandering ambassador, a celebrity plastic surgeon – but their bond of friendship is real. “The secret is, you cast really charming actors,” says Mantello. “You have such affection for these faces when they walk on stage, and maybe just as you start to run out of patience, so does the show.”

The music famously runs out before the end, early in the second half. “Sondheim makes people crazy in all kinds of interesting and different ways,” says Ives. “And social media went crazy over whether this show should even go on. Should Mozart’s Requiem not be heard because Süssmayr had to finish some of the writing? Should Lulu by Alban Berg, one of the greatest operas ever written, not go on because Berg died without finishing the third act? I don’t think so.”

It needed Mantello’s vision to stage such a technically tricky show, says Ives. “He is a genius at composition. It’s like watching a classical painting, the way they move around.” The last time he felt so fraught before an opening night, he adds, was when he wroteVenus in Fur, and that was based on a pornographic, sadomasochistic novel. “Joe and I just did not know what people were going to make of this,” he says.

Instead of opening on Broadway, they mounted the production at The Shed, a1,200-seater cultural centrein Hudson Yards. “We tried to find a space to fit the oddness of this piece.” The New York Times, which had questioned the play’s readiness to be seen, pivoted after opening night: “cool and impossibly chic”, it was “a worthy and loving farewell”.

“People realised that we weren’t there to somehow traduce a Bible or slander Sondheim,” says Ives. “We were there to show people what he had done. And behold, it was good!”

Krakowski’s long musical theatre CV includes a first meeting with “Mr Sondheim” when she was 14, playing Fredericka in a production of A Little Night Music. She still remembers the precision of his notes: “You never had to ask him a follow-up question.” Krakowski’s family adored musical theatre – her mother was a drama teacher, her father gave them Sondheim librettos to study on car trips. At 24, she was performing in the first Broadway revival of Company, terrified by the responsibility of holding the alto line. “And now,” jokes 56-year-old Krakowski, “aged 29 …”

Ferguson grew up in New Mexico watching the Tony awards and wearing out hard-to-find videotapes of Sweeney Todd and Into the Woods. He remembers missing out on the part of Jack in Into the Woodsat the Albuquerque Civic Light Opera, “and bawling, crying so hard because I really was right for the role. I still am.” Krakowski shakes her head: “Let it go, Jesse.”

The only time Ferguson met Sondheim was backstage after a production of Merrily We Roll Along starring Lin-Manuel Miranda and Sutton Foster. “At this point in my career I had met some very, very famous people, but nothing compared to this man who meant so much to me from such an early age.” Intimidated and overwhelmed, all he could say was: “Good job.” He looks at us with a hangdog expression.“Those are the only two words I ever spoke toStephen Sondheim.”

The composer’s loss still felt fresh during the New York production. “I found that very, very moving, that we actually hear the music stop,” says Krakowski, tearing up at the memory. “And David Hyde Pierce did this very subtle thing,” adds Mantello,” where he just looked up for a second, and it was like bringing him into the room. You don’t want it to get sentimental or maudlin or self-conscious, but it was just a breath to say, ‘You were here.’”

Mantello’s inventive staging – including restaurant sets that drop from the ceiling – is being faithfully recreated for the Lyttelton at the NT. The cast, meanwhile, are finding new gags. We watch as Plimpton adds a hint of dominatrix to one character – “That’s something she brought to the table,” says Mantello. And this time around, the show’s end-of-the-world undertones may hit even harder.

“Politically, we’re in a very different place,” says Ferguson, “where a lot of those fears – not for everyone, but for many people – are here. Some of it is going to make jokes funnier, and some of it is going to make stuff more poignant. There are lines that I cannot believe have been in this script for three years.” One line about Teslas has taken on an entirely new meaning.

We discuss Thomas Ostermeier’s recent production ofThe Seagull, which questioned the value of theatre and literature when you’re faced with apocalypse. “Being a closeted gay kid in Albuquerque, I went to art to heal me and fill me with purpose,” says Ferguson. “Now I’m a father with two kids, and I’m looking at the world that’s being created around them. And what I do to feel like I can protect them is take them to experience art. So if you ask me what are we even doing here – I’m surviving. You know, this is exactly where I should be right now.”

Mantello says one of the reasons he’s excited to bring the show to the UK is that he feels British audiences are more inclined to dissect shows in the aftermath. “I’m making a broad generalisation here, but the idea of the play as the beginning of a conversation – that you take it into the bar next door, that you take what you’ve just experienced and sift through it – happens less in America than you’d think.”

How long will it take for this play to become part of the Sondheim canon? “Well, it’s in the canon now,” Ives points out. “And you know, how many of his shows were actually well received? All those we think of as classics lasted a week or two. He loved to say to me, ‘It never made any money.’ And as Mantello says, it takes time for people to catch up to him. But we’re just so proud of it,so, here we are.”

Here We Are is at theNational Theatre, London, until 28 June

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian