We’re minimizing the horror of Trump’s military birthday parade | Judith Levine

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Concerns Grow Over Trump's Planned Military Parade Amidst Authoritarianism Debate"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In 2017, Donald Trump expressed a desire for a grand military parade in the United States, inspired by a two-hour Bastille Day procession he observed in France. At that time, various officials, including retired generals and Republican lawmakers, opposed the spectacle due to concerns over the costs estimated at around $92 million, the potential damage to Washington D.C.'s infrastructure, and the authoritarian imagery reminiscent of totalitarian regimes. However, as the nation prepares for a military celebration on June 14, marking both Trump's 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, the atmosphere has shifted dramatically. Many of the initial critics have become silent, and the focus has largely shifted to logistical details, costs, and the celebratory aspects of the event, rather than the implications of such a display of military power under a president who has previously praised authoritarian leaders.

The upcoming parade has raised eyebrows not only for its estimated cost, which could range from $25 million to $45 million, but also for the optics of a military show orchestrated on the president's birthday. Critics have noted that the spectacle could symbolize a troubling trend towards authoritarianism in the U.S., especially given Trump’s history of controversial remarks about the military and his tendency to view it as an extension of his personal power. While some media outlets focus on the parade's entertainment elements, such as fireworks and performances, others have mentioned the underlying concerns regarding the politicization of the military, the potential for infrastructure damage, and the broader implications of a leader who seeks to align himself closely with military displays. The event is poised to draw a large crowd of supporters, and the narrative surrounding it raises significant questions about the future of American democracy and the relationship between the military and the presidency.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article critiques the planned military parade in Washington, D.C., coinciding with Donald Trump's 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. It highlights the shift in public sentiment regarding such displays of military might, comparing the current environment to previous objections raised in 2017. The author expresses concern over the implications of normalizing such spectacles in the context of Trump's leadership style, which they argue resembles authoritarian regimes.

Analysis of Intentions

There appears to be a clear intent to highlight the dangers of militarism under a presidential administration that is perceived as increasingly authoritarian. The article aims to evoke a sense of alarm about the normalization of military displays in a democratic society, suggesting that this could lead to a new form of American fascism.

Public Perception

The piece aims to shape public perception by framing the military parade as a troubling spectacle rather than a benign celebration. By referencing totalitarian regimes, the article seeks to provoke a critical response from readers regarding the administration's approach to military display and governance.

Potential Concealments

While the article focuses on the military parade, it may divert attention from other pressing issues, such as the state of veterans' healthcare or broader political challenges. By concentrating on the parade, it could obscure deeper systemic issues facing the military and veteran communities.

Manipulative Elements

The article employs emotive language and historical references to underscore its points, which can lead to a perception of manipulation. Phrases like "ceremonial birth of a new American fascism" evoke strong emotional responses and may sway readers towards a particular viewpoint.

Trustworthiness of the Content

Although the article presents valid concerns about militarism and authoritarianism, its tone and language may compromise its objectivity. The use of hyperbolic language and historical comparisons could lead to questions about the article's overall reliability. It presents a perspective that is critical of the current administration but may lack balance due to its emotive framing.

Comparative Context

When compared to other articles discussing military parades or national celebrations, this piece stands out due to its critical tone and focus on the implications of such events. Other articles might present similar events in a more celebratory light, creating a contrast that emphasizes the author's alarmist perspective.

Societal and Economic Impacts

This article could influence public discourse around military spending and national pride, potentially leading to greater scrutiny of defense budget allocations. It may also affect political allegiances, particularly among those who align with anti-authoritarian sentiments.

Support Base and Audience

The article seems to resonate more with progressive and liberal audiences who are wary of militarism and authoritarianism. It likely seeks to unify readers who are concerned about the implications of such displays on American democracy.

Market and Economic Implications

While the article itself may not have direct implications for stock markets, the discussions around military spending and defense contracts could affect companies involved in defense, potentially impacting their stock performance based on public sentiment and political decisions.

Geopolitical Relevance

The article touches upon themes of international power dynamics and the optics of military displays, relating to current global tensions. It reflects ongoing debates about America's role and image on the world stage, particularly in light of rising authoritarianism in various countries.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

It's unlikely that artificial intelligence played a significant role in the writing of this article. However, if AI were used, it might have influenced the tone or selection of historical references to emphasize urgency and alarm.

In conclusion, while the article raises essential concerns about the implications of military parades and the state of democracy in the U.S., its emotive language and historical framing may detract from its overall credibility.

Unanalyzed Article Content

In 2017, watching a two-hour Bastille Day procession, Donald Trumptoldthe French president that we’d have one too, only better. That time, the grown-ups said no. The reasons given were costs – estimates ran to$92m–hellish logistics, and the Washington DC mayor Muriel Bowser’s worried that tanks and other armored vehicles would tear up Washington’s streets.

Someretired generalsobjected publicly to the totalitarian-adjacent optics, especially given the US president’s praise for such bad actors asSaddam HusseinandVladimir Putin. Several Republican lawmakers also expressed their distaste. “Confidence is silent, and insecurity is loud,” the Louisiana senator John Kennedy toldMSNBC. “America is the most powerful country in all of human history ... and we don’t need to show it off. We’re not North Korea. We’re not Russia, we’re not China,” he continued, “and I don’t wanna be.”

This time, as Washington prepares for a huge military shindig on 14 June, Trump’s 79th – and, oh yes, the US army’s 250th – birthday, the generals are silent. TheRepublicanshave sworn allegiance to the king. And the media are focused on the price tag, the potholes and the impending pomp; on tensions between the blue city of Washington and the red capital; and on the decimation of veterans’ healthcare, housing, and pensions while the administration throws $25m to $45m at a circus of war.

All are important parts of the story. Yet commentary is muted and the debate mischaracterized as normal political discourse. The horrific point is missed: the spectacle of a massive show of military might, before a president who behaves like a dictator and views the armed forces as his personal foot soldiers, evinces memories of the worst totalitarian regimes. History may mark 14 June 2025 as the ceremonial birth of a new American fascism.

Military Parade in Capital on Trump’s Birthday Could Cost $45 Million, Officials Say, reported theNew York Timesin mid-May.CBSalso led with the cost. TheWashingtoniandescribed in detail the street-damage-preventive measures the army is installing: metal plates under the parade route, rubber padding on the tank treads – though transportation experts warn that running, at last count, 28 Abrams tanks, 28 Bradley fighting vehicles, 28 Strykers, and four Paladins, each behemoth weighing as much as70 tonnes, could buckle the asphalt and smash power, water and telecom lines underneath.

Even theNew Republic, the president’s daily disparager, put the cost up top, tallied the ordinance, and noted that the man who “signed an executive order creating a program to ‘beautify Washington DC’” was now “plotting to transform his expensive birthday party into a demolition derby that will cause serious damage to the roads that line the nation’s capital”.

In late May, three weeks after theAssociated Pressfirst revealed the parade plan, the army promised it would pay to fix the streets. It did not commit to picking up the multimillion-dollar tab for policing and cleanup, however, which will come out of a city budget from which the House cut$1.1bnin March and didn’t get around to restoring.

Still, the partial resolution of the infrastructure problems liberated the press to get on with the fun stuff: “what to expect” on the festive day: not just planes, tanks and 6,700 soldiers, but also fireworks, football players and fitness competitions.USA Todaylinked to the free tickets page and published the parade route, plus a map of the military goodies on display, including robots and night-vision goggles. It called the event an “unofficial birthday party”.ABC Newsran a feature on Doc Holliday, the dog who will join the parade in a mule-drawn cart.

Tucked into some stories was a sentence or two indicating controversy, such as this fromReuters: “Critics have called a parade an authoritarian display of power that is wasteful, especially as Trump slashes costs throughout the federal government.”

“The plans have drawn some criticism from Democrats,” saidCBS.

The Hillwrote: “Democrats and critics have questioned both the cost of the parade and whether it politicizes the military, which has traditionally been nonpartisan. The fact that the parade falls on Trump’s birthday has only fueled criticism from Democrats who view it as a way for the president to celebrate himself.”

Over at Fox, they were telling the critics to get over themselves. “The Democratic party, they’ve chosen to be an outrage machine at a time when there is outrage fatigue in this country,”scoffed Kayleigh McEnany, Trump’s former press secretary and current Fox News host. “People are fed up with the ‘authoritarianism coup’ language.”

It’s true. Only one party is complaining. But what is striking about their complaints is the relative dearth of authoritarian coup language. “The egotist-in-chief wants taxpayers to foot the bill for a military parade on his birthday,” saidSteve Cohen, a US representative from Tennessee, in a statement. As if the president were moved by mere narcissism.

ReportedForbeson 15 May: “There has been no formal pushback to the proposal.”

Trump likes hulking lethal toys, but he hasn’t always been partial to the people who run them. There was thefighthe picked with a couple of Muslim Gold Star parents during his first campaign; thecommentson a 2018 European trip that fallen soldiers are “losers” and “suckers”; the undisguisedqueasinessabout seeing or being seen with wounded veterans; the Pentagon session where he called his top officers“a bunch of dopes and babies”.

But he is warming to the role of commander in chief. In hiscommencement speechat West Point, between bloviations on Nato, drag shows, golf and trophy wives, he boasted about the unprecedented $1.1tn military budget. “You’ll become officers in the greatest and most powerful army the world has ever known,” he said. “And I know because I rebuilt that army, and I rebuilt the military ... like nobody has ever rebuilt it before.”

Also breaking from script onMemorial Dayat Arlington Cemetery, he suggested that the parade, on top of nabbing the World Cup and the Olympics, was divinely ordained. “Look what I have, I have everything,” he cried. “Amazing the way things work out. God did that.”

If he is to ease from commander of the armed forces to commander of everything, he will need more than God on his side. He’ll need to own the military. Forty-five million bucks is a good starting bid.

Stalin’s 50th birthday celebration, in 1929, is considered the kickoff of his cult of personality. Hitler’s 50th birthday military parade, in April 1939, was organized by the propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels for maximum grandeur, including a motorcade of 50 white limousines. Five months later, Germany invaded Poland.

Kim Jong-unchanged Loyalty Oath Day from 1 January to his birthday, 8 January. This February, the Republican US representative Claudia Tenney of New York introduced abillto designate Trump’s birthday as a national holiday. It hasn’t gone anywhere – yet.

The pieces are lining up like a phalanx of soldiers. The website of America250, the non-profit fundraising and marketing arm of the Semiquincentennial Commission, is an advertisement for Trump. Its description of the “grand military parade” refers to him in the second sentence andproclaimsthat under his “leadership, the U.S. Army has been restored to strength and readiness”.

At the parade, the crowd of200,000parade spectators will be dominated by Maga idol worshippers. Trump will watch the extravaganza from a reviewing stand, just likeXi Jinping and Putindid recently at Red Square. The army’s Golden Knights parachute team will land on the Eclipse and hand the president a flag. Officials say there are “no plans” to sing Happy Birthday, but there arerumorsthe army will also give Trump a birthday gift.

Let’s call 14 June what it promises to be: the ceremonial birth of the US’s 21st-century fascist regime.

Judith Levine is a Brooklyn journalist and essayist, a contributing writer to the Intercept and the author of five books. Her Substack, Today in Fascism, is atjudithlevine.substack.com

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian