Weight loss jabs may achieve less drastic results outside trials, study suggests

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Study Reveals Lower Weight Loss Outcomes with GLP-1 Drugs in Real-World Settings"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Recent research has highlighted a significant disparity between the weight loss outcomes of individuals using GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) such as semaglutide and tirzepatide in clinical trials versus their effectiveness in real-world scenarios. While clinical studies have shown that these medications can lead to a weight reduction of up to 20% over a period of 72 weeks, the latest findings indicate that patients in everyday settings are experiencing far less dramatic results. Dr. Karan Chhabra, a senior author of the study from New York University's Grossman School of Medicine, emphasized that average weight loss among patients using these drugs is considerably lower compared to those who undergo bariatric surgery. The study analyzed data from over 51,000 patients, revealing that those who had weight loss surgery achieved an average weight loss of 26.5% after two years, in stark contrast to the 5.7% weight reduction observed in patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs.

The study, which is set to be presented at the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery annual scientific meeting in 2025, underscores the need for further investigation into why the effectiveness of weight loss jabs appears diminished in real-world applications. Factors such as the cost of medication, potential side effects, and the necessity for ongoing medical support may contribute to patients not achieving the expected results. Dr. Chhabra pointed out that while bariatric surgery remains the most reliable method for significant weight loss, many individuals prefer medication due to its non-invasive nature. However, experts, including Professor Naveed Sattar from the University of Glasgow, noted that real-life adherence to medication regimens can be problematic, with many patients discontinuing use due to costs or side effects. The goal moving forward is to align patient expectations with real-world data regarding these treatments for obesity, ensuring that individuals have access to the most effective options available.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

People using weight loss jabs shed far fewer pounds in the real world than in clinical trials, researchers have found.

Jabs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro, which contain the drugs semaglutide and tirzepatide respectively, havetransformed the treatmentof obesity, withstudies suggestingthe former can help people lose up to 20% of their body weight after 72 weeks of treatment.

However, a new study suggests the drugs, known as GLP-1 RAs, may not produce such drastic weight loss in everyday settings.

“The average patient on [GLP-1 RAs] in the real world is not getting the weight loss that we see in clinical trials,” said the study’s senior author, Dr Karan Chhabra, from the Grossman school of medicine at New York University.

Researchers analysed data from 51,085 patients with a body mass index of 35 or greater and who were eligible for weight loss surgery and weight loss jabs.

The team compared the weight loss in 38,545 people prescribed semaglutide or tirzepatide by their doctor with that in 12,540 patients who underwent weight loss surgery, over a period of up to three years.

After taking into account factors such as age, body mass index and health problems of participants, the team found patients who underwent bariatric surgery had significantly greater average weight loss at all measured time points than those who received prescriptions for semaglutide or tirzepatide.

For example, after two years, people who underwent bariatric surgery had on average a 26.5% reduction in their body weight, compared with 5.7% for those prescribed GLP-1 RAs for any duration.

The study has not yet been peer reviewed and is due to be presented at the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2025 annual scientific meeting.

Chhabra said: “The most reliable way to lose 20% to 30% of your weight is to get a bariatric operation.”

He said it was not clear why the weight loss jabs had a smaller effect in the real world than in trials, but he noted that their cost and others barriers to access could mean people were unable to continue their use over the long term, while doctors’ efforts could also play a role, given how it is important that dosage is increased over time, side-effects are monitored and additional support is offered.

Chhabra said further work was needed to ensure patients who want to take such medications get the greatest effectiveness.

“Our goal is to get as many people to the right treatment [for obesity] as possible. But they need to know what to expect from the treatment that they’re choosing, and that needs to be guided by real-world data, not clinical trial data,” he said.

Prof Naveed Sattar, of the University of Glasgow, who was not involved in the work, pointed to recent follow-up studies oftrials involving tirzepatideshowing substantial weight loss over three years. But he said in real life many patients stop medicines early either because of their cost or poorly handled side-effects.

“That said, bariatric surgery done well can do well for many people and is certainly cheaper over the longer run,” he said. “The issue may be that most people likely prefer to take medicines for weight loss rather than have surgery, at least in the first instance, now that the medicines can approach weight loss levels seen with surgery.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian