‘We were poor, but at least we were together’: families of Nepali workers killed in Saudi Arabia wait for justice

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Nepali Families of Deceased Migrant Workers in Saudi Arabia Seek Justice Amidst Financial Hardships"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Sitaram and Binita Das, a couple from rural Nepal, faced financial hardships due to the societal expectations surrounding wedding dowries for their daughters. To alleviate this burden, Sitaram decided to seek work in Saudi Arabia, joining the ranks of many Nepali migrants attracted by the Gulf kingdom's growing demand for cheap labor. Unfortunately, the family's hopes were shattered when Sitaram died in a workplace accident just before the birth of their son, Rudke Krishna. Despite some support from colleagues and a small insurance payout from Nepal, Binita received no compensation from the Saudi authorities or her husband's employer. The only correspondence she received was a death certificate that inaccurately reported the circumstances of his death. Left to care for their six children alone in one of Nepal's poorest regions, Binita struggles to make ends meet, raising concerns about her own health and safety as she works the fields without her husband's income.

The tragic story of the Das family reflects a broader issue faced by many Nepali families who send their loved ones abroad for work. Reports indicate a troubling pattern where families are left in the dark about the deaths of their relatives, often receiving vague information and inadequate compensation. Rights groups like FairSquare and Human Rights Watch have highlighted the lack of accountability and transparency in Saudi Arabia regarding the treatment of migrant workers. Many death certificates cite 'natural causes,' a vague term that allows employers to evade responsibility for compensation. The case of Anjali Kumari Rai, a widow and cancer patient whose husband died in a workplace explosion, further exemplifies the struggles faced by families seeking justice. With little to no support from Saudi authorities, these families grapple with loss and uncertainty, embodying the harsh realities of migrant labor in the region, where promises of better lives often turn into tragic outcomes.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The news article highlights the tragic story of Sitaram Das, a Nepali migrant worker who lost his life in Saudi Arabia while seeking better economic opportunities for his family. It explores the broader implications of migrant labor in the Gulf region and raises questions about the treatment of foreign workers, particularly in light of Saudi Arabia's ambitious development plans.

Purpose of Publication

This report aims to shed light on the harsh realities faced by migrant workers, especially those from poorer backgrounds. By focusing on the personal tragedy of Das and his family, the article seeks to evoke empathy and raise awareness about the systemic issues related to labor rights in Saudi Arabia. The narrative not only humanizes the statistics surrounding migrant labor but also serves as a call to action for more accountability from both the Saudi government and the employers who hire these workers.

Public Perception

The article aims to generate a sense of injustice and urgency regarding the treatment of migrant workers. It paints a vivid picture of the emotional and financial struggles faced by families like that of Binita Das, thus fostering a collective outrage over their plight. This narrative invites readers to reflect on the ethical implications of global labor practices and the need for reform.

Information Omitted

While the article provides a strong emotional appeal, it does not delve deeply into the broader context of labor migration policies in Saudi Arabia or the economic motivations driving these workers to leave their home countries. This omission could lead to a one-dimensional understanding of the issue, focusing solely on individual tragedies rather than systemic failings.

Reliability of the Information

The article appears to be based on firsthand accounts and personal testimonies, which generally lend credibility. However, without additional data or expert opinions, it’s difficult to fully assess the accuracy of the claims regarding compensation policies and the treatment of migrant workers. The narrative's emotional weight may also influence its perceived reliability.

Societal Impacts

This report could potentially influence public sentiment toward labor rights and migrant worker protections, both in Saudi Arabia and globally. It has the capacity to foster discussions on reforms in labor laws, leading to greater advocacy for the rights of migrant workers.

Target Audience

The article primarily appeals to human rights advocates, social justice organizations, and individuals concerned with labor rights. It seeks to resonate with those who empathize with the struggles of marginalized communities and are motivated to support reforms.

Economic and Market Implications

While the article itself may not have direct implications for the stock market, it draws attention to the larger economic systems that rely on cheap labor. Companies involved in construction and hospitality in the Gulf region could face increased scrutiny and pressure for ethical labor practices, potentially affecting their operations and public image.

Geopolitical Context

The narrative fits into a larger conversation about global labor migration and the ethical responsibilities of countries that host migrant workers. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, issues of labor rights and treatment of foreign workers are likely to remain relevant in international discourse.

Role of AI in Writing

It's unlikely that AI was directly involved in the crafting of this article, as it exhibits a strong narrative style and emotional depth typical of human journalism. However, if AI were used, models focused on natural language processing might have been employed to analyze trends in migrant labor reporting or to assist with fact-checking.

There is a suggestion of manipulation in the way the article presents emotional appeals without fully addressing systemic issues. This could serve to simplify complex realities into a single narrative of victimization, potentially skewing readers' understanding of the broader economic and political factors at play.

The article's reliability hinges on its emotional storytelling, which, while powerful, may not encompass the full scope of the migrant labor issue. Thus, while it highlights significant injustices, it should be read as part of a larger discourse on labor rights and global migration.

Unanalyzed Article Content

For years, Sitaram and Binita Das had longed for a son. The couple loved their five daughters, but on the deeply conservative southern plains ofNepal, they faced having to raise large sums to pay for each of their wedding dowries.

With no way to afford such costs, they decided that Sitaram should join tens of thousands of other Nepalis going toSaudi Arabiain search of work.

The Gulf kingdom has seen arise in demand for cheap migrant labouras it seeks to rebrand itself on the world stage, in part through large construction projects including futuristic cities, luxury resorts, theme parks and the hosting of the 2034 men’s football World Cup.

Such rapid transformation is attracting global attention and, along with it, greater scrutiny of the alleged treatment of migrant workers such as Das in the country. When he left Nepal for Saudi Arabia, he knew his wife was pregnant, but not that he would never meet their baby.

In February 2024, a month before Rudke Krishna was born, Das was at work in a deep trench when, according to witnesses, the ground above him collapsed, crushing him to death.

Friends and strangers rallied round. Das’s colleagues collected some money for the family, others heard about the tragedy on social media and chipped in and Binita received compensation from an insurance scheme in Nepal which her husband had paid into. But from his company and the Saudi authorities, says Binita, there was only silence. Even his outstanding salary – a paltry £160 a month – remains unpaid, she says.

Under Saudi law, the family members of workers who die on the job should receive compensation, but Binita says all she got from the Gulf state was a bundle of documents, including a death certificate which states, apparently incorrectly, that Das fell to his death.

Binita lives with the couple’s six children and a few farm animals in one of the poorest regions of Nepal, where many houses are still made of bamboo and mud, and carts pulled by cows are more common than cars. Without her husband’s income, she toils for long hours in the fields. “Now I’m the only person who can look after them. What if something happens to me?” she says. “I’m at the mercy of God and fate.”

Versions of the Das family’s story can be heard all across Nepal’s southern belt, where almost every household sends someone abroad for work. The names change but a pattern appears to emerge: families are informed about the sudden death of a loved one by a colleague, details are often vague and contradictory, there is little or no contact from their employer, a long and often fruitless struggle for compensation follows and death certificates provide few clues as to what really happened.

In the case of Saudi Arabia, the deaths of labourers such as Das highlight the country’s failure to protect migrant workers, properly investigate their deaths and ensure their families receive fair compensation, according torights groups FairSquare and Human Rights Watch.

Evidence uncovered by FairSquare this week “suggests in practice that there is no system in place that ensures that investigations take place in cases where people die in workplace accidents”.

The lack of transparency is even more marked in cases where those deaths are classified as “natural”, by far the most common cause given on death certificates. Human rights groups and pathologists have argued that the term is meaningless, because it fails to provide an explanation for the underlying cause of death.

“What do we know? We are here, we can’t say what happened there,” says Asa Devi Sah Teli, whose husband, Kisan Teli, died in Saudi Arabia last year after collapsing while at work on a construction site. His death certificate says he died of “natural” causes. He was 41.

Employers are not required to pay compensation when deaths are classified in this way, leaving women such as Asa in desperate financial straits. She now struggles to get by with occasional farm work, for which she earns 400 rupees a day (£2.20). “I’m sure he’d still be alive if he’d stayed at home,” says Asa. “We were poor, but at least we were together.”

Sign up toGlobal Dispatch

Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team

after newsletter promotion

Saudi Arabia has claimed that its work-related fatality rateis “among the lowest globally”, but analysis of these claims by the Guardian, and separate research by FairSquare, have raised questions about their reliability.

Saudi governmentdata statesthere were as few as 93 work-related fatalities of all nationalities in 2019, but official records from Bangladesh, seen by the Guardian and based on documents provided by Saudi Arabia – appear to show there were 270 deaths by “accident” of its nationals in the country in the same year. While not all accidental deaths of Bangladeshis may have been work-related, the findings point to a gap between the claims made by the Saudi authorities and other sources.

At 24, Anjali Kumari Rai is already a mother of two boys, a cancer patient and a widow. She and her husband, Surya Nath Ray Amat, dreamed of earning enough to build a small house in the south of Nepal and send their sons to a decent school, but “fate” intervened, says Rai.

After she was diagnosed with cancer, her husband went to Saudi Arabia to earn enough to pay for her treatment. Nine months later, in May 2024, Amat’s relatives were told there was an explosion in a tank in which he was working, killing him, and allegedly two other workers.

Rai is eligible for compensation from Saudi Arabia, along with her husband’s outstanding salary and benefits, but seven months after his death she said she had heard nothing from his employer or the Saudi authorities. The only money she says she got from Saudi Arabia came from friends and colleagues in the country who donated about £525.

Amat’s mother, Neelam Devi Rai, is struggling to come to terms with what has happened. “It’s very difficult. I’ve lost hope. How can we look after his wife’s treatment and take care of the children? It’s unimaginable,” she says.

The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development in Saudi Arabia was approached for comment.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian