We hid in the bathroom as bombs fell on Kyiv. Is this Trump’s idea of peace?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Ukrainians Endure Night of Shelling as Political Tensions Rise Over Peace Negotiations"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

On April 24, 2025, as the war in Ukraine continues into its 1,156th day, the author recounts a harrowing night in Kyiv marked by relentless Russian shelling. After a supposed 'Easter ceasefire,' the reality of the situation becomes apparent when the author speaks to their father, who is en route to Kyiv. Despite the father's cheerful demeanor, the author reveals the truth about the night of terror filled with air raid sirens and explosions. The emotional weight of the experience is palpable as the author describes the chaos of the night, characterized by the sounds of war and the instinctive reactions to seek shelter. The scene is made more poignant by the presence of the author's partner and their pet chihuahua, illustrating the personal toll of the conflict. The author reflects on the psychological impact of the shelling, using sounds of explosions as a means of communication in their friends' group chat, highlighting the normalization of violence in their daily lives.

Amidst this backdrop of violence, the author grapples with political developments, specifically Donald Trump's assertions that negotiating peace with Vladimir Putin is easier than with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The author critiques the proposed peace agreements that seem to prioritize the interests of powerful men while subjecting Ukraine to potential humiliation and punishment. The narrative underscores a sense of betrayal, questioning the effectiveness of international agreements like the 1994 Budapest memorandum, which promised to protect Ukraine's sovereignty. The author expresses a profound sense of despair as they contemplate the ongoing violence and the possibility of continued atrocities against civilians, driven by a lack of global intervention. As the night gives way to morning, the author reunites with their father at the train station, where a soldier plays the piano, embodying resilience in the face of adversity. The story concludes with a reflection on freedom and will, symbolized by a newly installed sculpture, offering a glimmer of hope amid the devastation of war.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article captures a harrowing personal experience during an ongoing conflict in Ukraine, specifically highlighting the psychological and physical toll of living under constant threat of bombardment. The narrative intertwines personal trauma with broader political commentary, specifically referencing Donald Trump and his stance on peace.

Emotional Impact and Collective Trauma

Through vivid descriptions of air raids and the immediate dangers faced by civilians, the piece evokes a strong emotional response. The writer’s personal account of hiding in the bathroom with loved ones and a pet illustrates the fear and disorientation that accompany such experiences. This narrative technique serves to humanize the conflict, making the abstract notion of war tangible and relatable to readers.

Political Commentary

The mention of Donald Trump at the end hints at a critical perspective on his views regarding peace negotiations. By juxtaposing a personal crisis with political commentary, the article suggests a disconnect between the lived realities of those in conflict zones and the narratives pushed by political figures. This could be interpreted as a call to scrutinize the effectiveness and sincerity of political leaders' approaches to such conflicts.

Perception Management

The article aims to shape public perception regarding the seriousness of the situation in Ukraine. By detailing the chaos and fear experienced during bombings, it seeks to elicit sympathy and support for those affected. The emotional weight of the narrative could encourage readers to reflect on the consequences of political decisions made far from the battlefield.

Potential Omissions

While the article effectively conveys the horrors of war, it may downplay some aspects of the geopolitical context or the complexity of the conflict. By focusing primarily on personal experiences, there is a risk of oversimplifying the broader issues at play or not addressing the multifaceted nature of international relations involved in the crisis.

Manipulative Elements

There is a degree of emotional manipulation within the narrative, as the vivid descriptions are designed to provoke a visceral reaction from the audience. This might lead to a biased interpretation of the political situation, painting a stark picture that aligns with a specific viewpoint on peace and conflict resolution.

Comparative Context

When contrasted with other news reports on the conflict, this article stands out due to its personal narrative style. Many reports may focus more on statistics, military movements, or diplomatic negotiations, while this piece emphasizes individual experiences. This stylistic choice positions the article within a genre that advocates for humanitarian considerations over political analysis.

Implications for Society and Politics

The distressing portrayal of life in a war zone may galvanize public opinion, potentially influencing political action or humanitarian support. As the article highlights the immediate dangers faced by civilians, it may prompt readers to advocate for more decisive actions from their governments regarding the conflict in Ukraine.

Target Audience

The narrative likely resonates more with readers who are sympathetic to humanitarian causes and those who oppose political figures perceived as disconnected from the realities of war. This demographic may include activists, human rights advocates, and individuals concerned with global peace initiatives.

Economic and Market Reactions

While the article itself may not directly impact stock markets, it contributes to the overall narrative surrounding geopolitical stability, which can influence market perceptions. Industries related to defense and humanitarian aid may experience fluctuations based on public sentiment and political actions stemming from such reporting.

Geopolitical Relevance

The article touches upon current geopolitical dynamics, particularly the interplay between military actions and political rhetoric. Given the ongoing conflict and the global implications of the war in Ukraine, it maintains relevance in discussions about international relations and security.

Use of AI in Writing

There is no clear evidence that AI was used in the writing process, as the narrative demonstrates a strong personal voice and emotional depth typical of human storytelling. However, AI models could assist in data analysis or fact-checking within the broader context of reporting.

This analysis reveals the article's focus on human experiences within warfare, while also critiquing the political landscape surrounding these events. The emotional tone and personal anecdotes serve to engage readers, highlighting the urgent need for compassion and action in response to the ongoing crisis.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Day 1,156 of the invasion; 24 April 2025. Thirty hours after the end ofRussia’s fake “Easter ceasefire”. It is 6.21am: feeling anxious, I call my father. He is travelling by train from the western part of Ukraine to Kyiv, due to arrive in 40 minutes. He picks up the phone, and from his cheerful tone I gather that he has not yet heard the news. I ask if the train is running late. My father says everything is fine, he can already spot familiar places in the Kyiv region. He wants to know why I doubt the arrival time. I tell him that sadly Russia has been shelling the country all night long. In Kyiv, I say, we have lived through one of the worst nights. “I’m jumping in a taxi,” I add. “I’ll see you soon.”

Those who survive shelling often imitate the sounds of explosions when they talk about the experience. I instantly think of this when an early morning roll call of “how are you?” starts in the friends’ group chat. Whoosh. Whiz. Boom. Bang. The only thing I can write is the sounds of what came flying at us the during the night. Like a child learning to talk. Or a person who has lost the ability to speak.

The air-raid siren in Kyiv began at 12.36am. And from then until morning, my consciousness was being torn apart by the flapping of the wings of doves of peace. The piercing whistle ofsomething Russian-North Koreanflying over our house – then the explosion. The threatening rattle of Russian-IranianShahed dronesabove us – and the explosion. Machine-gun bursts and the noisy activity of our air defence. Two explosions make our house jump, set off the sickening screeching of the car alarms and shatter the balcony windowpane. Explosions, and then the screaming starts outside.

We hide in the bathroom – myself, my partner, Dasha, and our old chihuahua. There’s an explosion. The dog jumps up and tries to run, but Dasha catches him in a desperate leap. I ask her if she is OK, and she can only nod. She lacks words.

I check the news and the main story is Donald Trump saying that it is easier for him to negotiate with Vladimir Putin than with Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The world’s media present their versions of what the so-called “peace agreement” could look like. The details vary, but one thing remains constant – they all look likehumiliation for Ukraine. In a deal between two macho men who ignore everyone’s interests except their own, it seems Ukraine should pay a terrible price for daring to survive and fight.

The terms of this peace agreement look more like punishment; an attempt to drownUkrainein postwar reconstruction and a future without any guarantees of peace. With no clear mechanisms in place to implement the terms, it looks more like an attempt to bring Ukraine to heel. Is it just easier for everyone to pretend that the 1994 Budapest memorandum never existed? This accord committed the US, Russia and the UK to guaranteeing Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity in exchange for the surrendering of nuclear weapons.

We have found ourselves instead in a Trumpian world that deals not in facts, but in variants of different narratives, waiting to see which one will be picked and validated. This throwing around and testing of narratives, this attempt to shock and wow, is a world built on the logic of wrestling, which is so dear to Trump’s heart. Mr President, by the way, has been inducted into theWWE Hall of Fameand has been known to step into the ring himself. Trump’s politics are an imitation of real politics, just as wrestling is not real sport but imitates it. His politics are just as spectacular and exaggerated, a show with fictitious characters and ascribed conflicts. However, this charade shatters when it collides with the real world and real-world villainous dictators, and the lives of real people.

And while I am trying to slow down the palpitations brought on by the explosions and screams outside my home, a crystal-clear realisation strikes me: if they fail to reach an agreement on their terms, with Trump’s tacit consent and the world’s non-interference, Putin will continue to rape Ukraine and its civilian population.

And my question – why, after more than 10 years of war and more than three years of invasion, are we once again left one-on-one with a murderer? – is drowned out by more explosions. The air is filled with smoke. A black hazy blanket hangs over our neighbourhood. My country is on fire.

At 6.33am, the air-raid alert in Kyiv finally gives the all clear. I jump into a taxi to the railway station to find my father.

The first official reports start coming in. In Kyiv alone, there areat least 12 deadand 70 wounded. Russia’s combined peace strike consisted of70 missiles and 145 Shaheds. The Ukrainian defenders of the sky shot down 112 enemy air targets, and 16,000 Kyiv residents spent the night in the shelters – on subway platforms. The Russians, as is their custom, were aiming at residential buildings and civilians.

Despite the shelling of the railway infrastructure, and injuries to a conductor in Zhytomyr and a train driver in Kyiv, Ukrainian Railways once again remind us that normality is possible, and my father’s train arrives two minutes ahead of schedule.

Sign up toThis is Europe

The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment

after newsletter promotion

My father is surprised to see me wearing a bright pink hoodie. I smile through the exhaustion and say that this morning I need cheering up in any way possible. We hug. We watch the servicemen getting off the train, familiar military badges on their sleeves.

We enter the station lobby. It’s 30 minutes after one of the most brutal shellings of this war, and a soldier is playing the piano. His trunk is next to him. And he is playing his music against all odds. My father and I step on to the escalator to go up to the second floor.

I turn back to look at the pianist, then shift my gaze, and at the exit we are greeted by thesculpture Volyaby Ukrainian artist Oleksiy Say, installed just a few days ago. The sculpture is made from letters recovered from a welcome sign in the frontline village of Lyubimovka in the Kherson region. Broken and mangled letters form the word “volya”, which in Ukrainian means both “freedom” and “will”.

Freedom and will. I think these words should be enough to get us through another day. Having survived this night of peace enforcement, purely by chance.

Oleksandr Mykhed is the author of The Language of War and a member of PEN Ukraine. Translated by Maryna Gibson

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian