‘We are privileged’: liberal Afrikaners reject Trump’s ‘white genocide’ claims

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Afrikaners Respond to Trump's Refugee Offer Amid Claims of 'White Genocide'"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent comments and actions of former President Donald Trump regarding South African Afrikaners have elicited a mixed response within the community. While some view Trump's offer of refugee status in the United States as a lifeline, many liberal Afrikaners are angry over being depicted as victims of a so-called 'white genocide.' This narrative, coming 31 years after the end of apartheid, is seen as a distortion of history by those who recognize the privileges enjoyed by white South Africans. Trump’s executive order, which claims that Afrikaners are facing 'unjust racial discrimination,' has led to the establishment of a refugee program specifically for white South Africans, sparking outrage among South Africans of all backgrounds, who feel that this focus on white suffering undermines the complexities of racial dynamics in the country. Lindie Koorts, a history lecturer, expressed that the portrayal of Afrikaners as victims is particularly painful for progressives who strive to bridge divides within the nation while embracing their identities.

In the midst of these tensions, various perspectives emerge from the Afrikaner community. Some, like Emile Myburgh, reflect on their upbringing during apartheid with a sense of nostalgia for a time when they believed in their cultural superiority. However, Myburgh and others like him argue that their culture is not under threat, as they continue to celebrate Afrikaans culture through various events. Young Afrikaners, such as Zahria van Niekerk, emphasize the vibrancy of the Afrikaans language and its continued use within their families, countering claims of cultural erosion. Meanwhile, initiatives like Betereinders aim to foster dialogue and connection between Afrikaners and Black South Africans, showcasing a desire for unity rather than victimhood. Schalk van Heerden, a minister involved in such efforts, highlights the privilege of being an Afrikaner and calls for a recognition of this privilege rather than embracing a victim mentality. These differing viewpoints illustrate the complex interplay of history, identity, and contemporary politics in South Africa today.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

For some white Afrikaner South Africans, Donald Trump’s offer of refugee status in the US has beenseen as a godsend. For others, it has provoked anger and frustration that they are being falsely portrayed as victims of a “white genocide”, 31 years after their community’s own oppressive minority rule ended.

In February, Trumpsigned an executive orderclaiming Afrikaners, who make upabout 4%of South Africa’s population, or about 2.5 million people, were victims of “unjust racial discrimination”. The order cut aid to the country and established a refugee programme for white South Africans. The first grouparrived in May.

Afrikaners, descendants of Dutch colonisers and French Huguenot refugees who came toSouth Africain the late 17th century, implemented apartheid from 1948. The regime violently repressed the black majority, while keeping white people safe and wealthy.

South Africa remains deeply unequal. White South Africans typically have 20 times the wealth of Black people, according to anarticlein the Review of Political Economy.

The spectacle of white people being flown to the US while Trump blocked refugees from war zones bemused and angered South Africans of all races. For some liberal Afrikaners, it felt personal.

“In terms of being singled out, for progressives it’s extremely painful,” said Lindie Koorts, a history lecturer at the University of Pretoria.

Koorts mentioned the phrase “ons is nie almal so nie” (“we are not all like that”). She said the phrase is used by progressives to reach out across South Africa’s divides without disavowing their Afrikaner or South African identities – despite it having become a cliche that conservative Afrikaners use to mock them.

Therightwing Solidarity Movement, which includes a trade union and the campaigning group AfriForum, has lobbied Trump since his first presidential term for support in helping Afrikaners stay in South Africa, to preserve what Solidarity Movement says is a culture under threat. The group argues, for instance, that a recently implemented education lawwill limit Afrikaans schooling, something the ruling African National Congress disputes.

There is not comprehensive polling data on Afrikaners’ political views. However, the Freedom Front Plus party, which is seen as representing conservative Afrikaners, received about 456,000 votes in the2024 national elections.

Emile Myburgh, a lawyer who grew up during apartheid believing that Afrikaners were God’s chosen people, said: “I remember when I was a child often hearing Afrikaners say that: ‘The one who rules the tip of Africa rules the world.’ So we’d feel very special.”

Sign up toHeadlines US

Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning

after newsletter promotion

As an atheist, Myburgh, 52, said he now felt excluded from the deeply religious community he grew up in. However, he disputed the claim that his culture was under threat, noting that he regularly attended Afrikaans book launches. “In the circles that I move in, we do celebrate Afrikaans culture,” he said.

Zahria van Niekerk, a 22-year-old fashion student, who was raised bilingually to help her get into university, disagreed that the Afrikaans language, of whom the majority of speakers are now non-white, was threatened. “My whole family speaks Afrikaans … As long as I can speak it with my family, I’m not really concerned.”

In May, Trumpambushed South Africa’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, in the Oval Office with claims that white farmers were being murdered for their race. However, Emil van Maltitz, an economics graduate and farmer’s son, disagreed.

The 21-year-old, who speaks Sesotho, Afrikaans and English, said: “Most farmers are white Afrikaners, so it can easily be interpreted as racial targeting. I just think, personally, people are very vulnerable in those areas and they don’t have a lot of help from the police.”

In the last quarter of 2024, South African policerecorded12 murders on farms, including Black-owned smallholder plots, out of almost 7,000 murders across the country.

Van Maltitz recalled young black farmers coming to his father to seek agricultural advice, saying it showed the value of South Africans working together. “I love diversity, I love being around different people,” he said.

Schalk van Heerden is a minister in the Dutch Reformed Church, the largest Afrikaans church. He joked that he was a “missionary” within the DRC, which supported the apartheid regime.

Van Heerden co-founded Betereinders in 2017 to bring about 50 to 100 Afrikaners to monthlybrais(barbecues) with up to 200 black people in townships, where most black South Africans still live. Betereinders means “better-enders” and is a pun on “bittereinders” (‘bitter-enders”), Afrikaners who refused to surrender to the British when their side lost the Boer war.

When Trump introduced the refugee scheme for Afrikaners, Beterenders put up 10 billboards around Johannesburg and Pretoria saying, “Not USA. You, SA.”

Van Heerden said: “We want to be proud about who we are … [But] we are not the big victims in this story. We are privileged, we are very grateful and we are thankful for everything we have.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian