Want to see where Trump’s tariffs are leading US business? Look at Georgia

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Georgia Reflects Mixed Economic Impact of Trump's Tariffs on Local Industries"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Georgia is emerging as a significant indicator of the economic effects stemming from Donald Trump’s tariffs, particularly given its substantial $900 billion economy, which positions it between Taiwan and Switzerland in terms of GDP. The state's diverse industries, ranging from hospitality to industrial manufacturing, are experiencing varied impacts. For instance, wine distributors like Carson Demmond are facing uncertainty, with delays in shipments from Europe due to fluctuating tariffs. Demmond has halted new orders following the imposition of high tariffs, only to reconsider her strategy when tariffs were temporarily paused. This uncertainty has led to a backlog of orders in European warehouses, reflecting a broader disruption in supply chains influenced by tariff-related anxieties. The unpredictability surrounding tariffs has caused significant logistical challenges, complicating the planning processes for businesses that rely on timely imports, such as wine distributors who typically expect a streamlined six to eight-week turnaround from order to delivery.

The situation in Georgia is further complicated by the volatile nature of the political climate and the ongoing legal debates surrounding the tariffs. Recent court rulings have created a seesaw effect, causing uncertainty for businesses that depend on stable market conditions. While Georgia’s ports, particularly Savannah, have not yet experienced the significant slowdowns seen on the West Coast, there are concerns that as shipping volumes remain strong, they may decline in the future due to shifting trade patterns and the impacts of tariffs. The film industry, a major economic driver in Georgia, also faces challenges as discussions about potential tariffs on foreign films have stirred confusion among industry leaders. They argue that such measures might not effectively boost domestic production but rather complicate an already intricate market. Overall, the mixed responses across various sectors in Georgia illustrate the complex interplay of tariffs, market dynamics, and the unpredictable nature of current economic policies, highlighting both the challenges and opportunities that arise in this evolving landscape.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the economic impact of Donald Trump's tariffs, particularly in Georgia, which is characterized as a bellwether state. It illustrates the mixed consequences of these tariffs on various industries, highlighting both the struggles faced by the hospitality sector and the potential benefits for certain manufacturing sectors. The narrative revolves around the experiences of a local wine distributor, Carson Demmond, emphasizing the uncertainty and risks that businesses encounter in the wake of tariff changes.

Economic Implications of Tariffs

The analysis reveals a microcosm of how national policies can ripple through local economies. The hospitality industry is depicted as facing significant challenges, while industrial manufacturing presents a contrasting perspective. This juxtaposition serves to illustrate the varying impacts of tariffs across sectors, suggesting that while some may thrive, others could face existential threats. The underlying message may be that tariffs are a double-edged sword, benefiting certain industries while jeopardizing others.

Public Sentiment and Political Context

Given that Georgia is a politically pivotal state, the article hints at the potential implications of these economic challenges on upcoming elections. The mention of Republican margins being thin suggests that the economic fallout from tariffs could sway voter sentiment, making it a critical issue for political candidates. The choice to spotlight a Republican-leaning state may also aim to create a dialogue within the party about the consequences of such policies.

Perception Management

There appears to be an effort to convey a nuanced view of the tariffs, avoiding a simplistic narrative of either complete success or failure. By presenting real-life examples, such as Demmond's precarious situation, the article aims to resonate with readers and evoke empathy. However, it may also obscure broader issues by focusing on individual anecdotes.

Market and Global Dynamics

The article touches on the broader economic landscape, suggesting that these tariffs not only affect local businesses but could also have implications for global trade dynamics. The shipping challenges faced by Demmond hint at a larger issue of supply chain disruptions, which could have significant ramifications for various markets. This could affect stock prices of companies reliant on imports and exports, especially in the beverage and manufacturing sectors.

Audience Appeal

The content seems tailored to audiences concerned with economic policy, small business owners, and politically active individuals in Georgia. By focusing on a state that has recently played a crucial role in national elections, it may aim to engage those who are politically aware and economically involved.

Manipulative Elements

The article does not overtly manipulate facts, but it does guide the reader toward a particular understanding of tariffs' impacts. The emotional weight of personal stories may lead readers to form a specific viewpoint on the issue, potentially skewing their perception of the broader economic consequences. The language used is evocative, aiming to elicit concern and urgency regarding the economic situation.

In conclusion, while the article provides valuable insights into the effects of tariffs on Georgia's economy, it does so through a lens that may emphasize certain narratives over others. The reliability of the information presented seems sound, grounded in personal accounts and current economic conditions, but the framing may lead to a selective perception of the impacts of tariffs.

Unanalyzed Article Content

If you want a bellwether to measure the broad impact ofDonald Trump’s tariffson the economy, look south, toGeorgia. The political swing state has a $900bn economy – somewhere between the GDPs of Taiwan and Switzerland.

The hospitality industry is facing an existential crisis. Wine merchants wonder aloud if they will survive the year. But others, like those in industrial manufacturing, will carefully argue that well-positioned businesses will profit. Some say they’re insulated from international competition by the nature of their industry. Others, like the movie industry, are simply confused by the proposals that have been raised, and are looking for entirely different answers. So far, it’s a mixed bag.

In a state Donald Trump won by two points and with yet another pivotal US Senate race in a year, Republican margins are thinner than those of the retailers with their business on the line here.

Carson Demmond, a wine distributor inGeorgia, finds herself looking at seaborne cargo notices for her wine shipments from France with the nervousness of a sports gambler watching football games. She’s betting on her orders of French champagne and bordeaux getting to a port in Savannah before tariffs restart.

It’s a risk. Demmond put a hold on orders after Donald Trump enacted sky-high tariffs on European goods last month. When he paused the tariffs days later, Demmond began to assess what she might chance on restarting some purchases.

But her wine isn’t showing up on a ship in France yet, she said.

“I don’t see them booked on ships yet, and normally they would already be booked, and I would already have sail dates,” she said. “I see a lot of my orders now collecting in consolidation warehouses in Europe, which says to me that there’s something wrong.”

Demmond suspects that shipping is suffering from a bullwhip-like effect from uncertainty around tariffs and the economy: so many buyers are trying to get ahead of tariffs that there aren’t enough shipping containers to go around to meet the short-term demand.

“It means that as strategic as I’m trying to be with regards to timing my orders so I don’t get hit with lots of tariff bills at the same time, I feel like now all of that is out of my control,” Demmond said. “I never want to face a situation where I have too many orders that all sail and land at the same time, and then getting hit with really large tariff bills in one fell swoop.”

US courts, meanwhile, are vacillating on the legality of Trump’s tariffs. The stock market rallied this week after the US court of international trade (CIT)ruledthat Trump’s use of extraordinary powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) exceeded his authority. Less than a day later, an appellate court lifted the lower court’s block on the tariffs while the case plays out.

Unpredictability is driving volatility, and volatility is poisonous to businesses built for stable markets and stable prices.

Georgia’s ports have not yet witnessed the massive slowdown occurring on the west coast. Shipping at the port of Los Angeles isdown by a thirdas buyers cancel orders from China. But Savannah – the third-busiest port in the United States behind the Los Angeles area and New York/New Jersey ports – just came off its busiest month.

“We’re still watching how this goes,” said Tom Boyd, chief communications officer for Georgia’s ports authority. “We still are having 30 to 32 vessels a week. Most everybody has been front loading to avoid any supply chain disruptions. Volumes are strong, but we expect volumes to decrease.”

Savannah’s port sees more ships from the Indian subcontinent, Vietnam and Europe than from China, because it’s a few days shorter from India through the Suez Canal than across the Pacific, he said.

Demmond, who runs the wine distributor Rive Gauche, watches the reports up and down the eastern seaboard carefully because many of the ships from Europe dock in New Jersey before coming south, she said. About 60% of her business is in French wine. Shipping volumes are making logistical planning difficult, she said. Amazon has hired away warehouse workers, which slows down unloading and can leave her wine on a ship for longer periods.

She likened the logistical disruption today to the effects of Covid-19 shutdowns.

“There’s going to be a crazy ripple effect through multiple industries,” Demmond said. “In normal times, I could count on approximately eight weeks from the time I send my purchase order to the winery for them to prepare it, to the time that it arrives at port. Now, you know, I have no idea, because everything is different and unpredictable. I have a hard time quoting arrival times to people.”

Demmond is a wine merchant, not a political economist. Predicting the course of trade negotiations has become a business hazard. She and other Georgia wine distributors met with the representative Hank Johnson last month to describe the effect of a 200% tariff on European wine imports on their business.

Many restaurants derive half of their revenue or more from alcohol sales. If the cost of spirits triples, many people will change their dining habits. Domestic supply can’t make up the difference, she said. A decision to expand a domestic winery made today wouldn’t produce a bottle of wine for three to five years. By then, Congress or a new president may have rescinded the tariffs, blowing up the investment.

If it were just European liquor, a conservative might dismiss the disruption as something affecting well-heeled wine snobs. But the problem has wide applicability, Demmond said.

“There are no American coffee growers. There are no coffee farms here,” she said. “That’s an impossibility. All you’re doing is increasing prices. You’re not helping create jobs by taxing that stuff. Some of it is impossible to re-shore.”

Georgia calls itself the Peach state, but California has long eclipsed Georgia’s peach production. Instead, the most widely exported Georgia peach has been the one moviegoers see at the end of the credits: Georgia had $2.6bn in film and television production in 2023.

Georgia’s tax incentive program is among the most aggressive in the US and the reason Georgia has become a rival to Hollywood. It’s an economic development strategy that has unusually bipartisan support in a state famously split down the middle politically. Studios have invested billions in Georgia over the last 10 years.

Between Disney’s Marvel movies like The Avengers, Tyler Perry’s studios in Atlanta and Netflix productions like Stranger Things, Georgia has overtaken Hollywood as a center for cinematic production. In any given year, studios spend $2-$4bn making movies in Georgia, according to figures from the Georgia Film Office.

But the tax-incentive-chasing film industry is fickle. Acres of shiny new studio space springing up across the state have not prevented the movie business from slowing down a bit over the last couple of years. With the release of Thunderbolts*, for the first time in more than a decade no Marvel movies are slated for production in Georgia. Disney has shifted to studios in England and Australia.

So when Donald Trumpsaidhe wanted a 100% tariff on foreign-produced films, Georgia Entertainment CEO Randy Davidson did a double take.

“It kind of took people by surprise,” Davidson said. “You know, on the one hand, you have people that have been struggling with their jobs here already, thinking initially that was going to be like a quick-fix answer to get production back here. … And then there was the other side: how is politicizing movies into the tariff discussion beneficial? Because it doesn’t make sense.”

Trump’s tariff talk emerged after a meeting at the White House with actor Jon Voight and independent film producer Steven Paul. Voight proposed to support the domestic film industry with federaltax creditsand international cooperative production agreements, not with a tariff, said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, Sag-Aftra’s chief negotiator and national executive director.

“You know, we haven’t had a federal tax incentive in the United States,” Crabtree-Ireland said. “It’s quite common in a lot of major production centers around the world now, and I think it’s definitely time for us to have that conversation.”

Films are largely a digital service today. Setting aside the logistical difficulty of assessing a tariff on intellectual property, doing so would violateAmericanlaw.

Crabtree-Ireland suggested that Trump’s rhetoric might be an aggressive negotiating ploy, starting out with an extreme stand that moves a compromise point to a more favorable position. But a workable plan would have more nuance, Crabtree-Ireland said: “Which is what I think ultimately would be under consideration.”

Crabtree-Ireland said he wouldn’t expect a federal tax incentive to supplant state tax credits. But any international agreement to level the incentive playing field would have to address it.

“What Georgia can hope for is that this topic does not get entangled in a charged-up political atmosphere where it will have a shot to be an actual bipartisan effort and initiative that would actually be good for the country,” Davidson said.

As Georgia companies try to manage inventory before a tariff deadline, warehouse space is only one issue. Capital is another.

“Most companies can’t afford to get two years’ worth of inventory to manage their business while we figure out what’s going to happen, right? So, they’re going to buy a little time, but not a lot,” said Carl Campbell, an executive director for business recruitment at the Dalton chamber of commerce.

Not that there’s a warehouse to be rented in Dalton right now. The north Georgia mill town of about 34,000 in far-right representativeMarjorie Taylor Greene’s district is a longstanding center of the carpet-and-flooring industry in the US. But it has had competition for warehouse and industrial space in recent years from solar panel manufacturers, spurred by state tax incentives, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and federal incentives for the semiconductor industry.

“Everything’s full, you know.” Campbell said. “We’ve got companies that are going to grow manufacturing capacity. They’re currently deciding where to do it, and so the tariffs may swing it to the US. Sometimes that’s swinging that our way. Sometimes it’s making that decision happen sooner rather than later, and sometimes it makes it not happen at all.”

Campbell notes that both Democrats and Republicans can lay claim to Dalton’s industrial successes. Qcells, a solar panel manufacturer owned by the Korean conglomerate Hanwha, is an example, he said.

“When Trump was in office the first time, he implemented tariffs on goods from China,” Campbell said. “They suddenly got very,veryserious about doing panel production and assembly in the US. And they had to do that quickly and as fast as possible.” The same tariff regime began imposing costs on imported flooring from Asia, which boosted Dalton’s flooring manufacturers.

Three years later, the Inflation Reduction Act – enacted under Joe Biden – addedincentivesfor clean energy manufacturing, and Georgia’s two Democratic senators, Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, worked to make sure some of the benefit landed in Georgia. About$23bnhas been invested in clean energy production in the state since the act passed. Qcells used those incentives to expand in 2023, and employs more than 2,000 people today.

“Tariffs are sometimes a tale of winners and losers. And so, yeah, we won a little bit on that,” Campbell said. “And of course, some of our companies got hurt, and they lost a little bit on that.”

The problem, again, is uncertainty, he said.

“It can create an opportunity for folks like me and companies like ours, yeah, but it can also crush business plans – if you’re reliant on foreign goods and suddenly you just took a 25% hit on your cost. It’s made some people sit on their hands and not move forward on some efforts that we were thinking would happen soon. It’s made some other folks, you know, escalate plans and have to do them faster.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian