‘Very problematic’: US apparel bosses say Trump’s tariffs will hurt Americans

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"US Apparel Industry Leaders Warn Tariffs Could Harm Businesses and Consumers"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The apparel and textiles industry in the United States is facing significant challenges due to the recent imposition of tariffs, which have been set at 145% on goods from China and 10% on imports from other countries. Initially intended to revitalize domestic manufacturing, these tariffs have raised concerns among business leaders who predict that they will instead lead to increased costs and potential business failures. Steven Borrelli, the founder of Cuts Clothing, expressed his support for President Trump's tariff strategy but called for a reconsideration of the timeline for its implementation, warning that the abrupt changes could devastate businesses. He highlighted the need for a grace period to adjust to these policies without jeopardizing employment within the sector. Other executives echoed similar sentiments, noting that the tariffs would likely not achieve their intended goals and could instead harm American consumers by driving up prices on essential clothing and footwear items.

Industry experts, including Nate Herman from the American Apparel & Footwear Association, emphasized that the tariffs are counterproductive, as they affect not only finished products but also crucial materials needed for domestic manufacturing. The higher duties imposed on imports will inevitably lead to price increases for consumers, which could exacerbate inflation. Additionally, the tariffs may hinder the growth of US manufacturing by complicating supply chains and reducing access to necessary materials. The industry is already feeling the adverse effects, with decreased consumer confidence and uncertainty about future demand. Many business leaders are concerned that the administration's broader policies, including immigration restrictions, could further undermine the workforce needed for manufacturing jobs. As the industry grapples with these challenges, there is a growing consensus that the current tariff strategy may not be the solution to revitalizing US manufacturing as intended.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The news article highlights the concerns of U.S. apparel executives regarding the impact of President Trump’s tariffs on imported goods, particularly from China. While the tariffs are framed as a strategy to bolster domestic manufacturing, many industry leaders argue that they may instead harm American businesses and consumers.

Economic Implications of Tariffs

Executives express skepticism about the tariffs achieving their intended goal of revitalizing U.S. manufacturing. The proposed steep tariffs, which could reach as high as 145%, are seen as burdensome, potentially leading to increased prices for consumers and jeopardizing the viability of many companies. This concern is echoed by Steven Borrelli, who, despite being a Trump supporter, calls for a more measured approach to these policy changes.

Challenges Faced by Domestic Producers

The article illustrates the dilemma faced by companies like Todd Shelton's, which manufacture in the U.S. but rely on overseas materials. This reliance means that the tariffs lead to higher costs, which could ultimately be passed down to consumers. This situation reflects a broader challenge within the industry, where competition is already tough and rising costs could further squeeze profit margins.

Public Perception and Political Context

The editorial tone suggests an urgency for the administration to reconsider its approach. By showcasing voices from within the industry, the article aims to foster a narrative that emphasizes the need for a balance between supporting domestic manufacturing and ensuring the survival of existing businesses. This narrative may resonate with both business owners and consumers who are wary of rising prices.

Potential Consequences on Market Dynamics

The discourse surrounding these tariffs has implications beyond the apparel sector. If tariffs result in widespread business failures, it could lead to increased unemployment and stifle economic growth. The potential for price increases may also lead to consumer backlash, influencing political sentiment against current policies.

Target Audience and Community Support

The article seems to cater to business-minded individuals and those affected by the apparel industry, including consumers who may face rising costs. It may also appeal to those who are skeptical of the Trump administration's trade policies, seeking a more balanced discussion.

Market and Global Influence

Given the interconnected nature of global trade, the article may have implications for stock markets, particularly for companies reliant on international supply chains. Key sectors to watch include retail and manufacturing, where stock performance could be affected by the ramifications of the tariffs.

Geopolitical Considerations

While the article focuses on domestic impacts, it also reflects broader geopolitical considerations. Trade policies can influence international relations and economic strategies, making this an important topic in the context of global trade dynamics.

In analyzing the article's reliability, it appears to accurately represent the perspectives of industry leaders while raising valid concerns about the broader economic implications of the tariffs. The tone suggests a nuanced critique rather than overt manipulation, although it does seek to influence public opinion regarding tariff policy.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Across the US, many executives leadingapparel and textilesbusinesses are scratching their heads.

Tariffs of 145% on goods fromChina, and tariffs of 10% on goods from much of the rest of the world, have been billed by the White House as a once-in-a-generation efffort to boost domestic manufacturing.

The size ofTrump’s tariffsare in flux. This week, the president suggested he could cut the tariffs on China“substantially”– theWall Street Journalreported the cuts could bring rates down to 50% and 65%.

But business leaders who spoke to the Guardian warned tariffs were unlikely to achieve Trump’s stated aim of bringing more manufacturing back to the US and that businesses would fail as a result of the hikes.

Steven Borrelli, founder of fashion brand Cuts Clothing, voted forDonald Trumpin 2016, 2020 and 2024. He backs the US president’s controversial plan to use sweeping tariffs on imports to boost the economy. But he also wants a rethink.

“He’s pro-business, and I don’t believe he wants to hurt American jobs,” Borelli said in an interview. “We’re onboard for this plan – just give us more time,” he added. “We just want more time with any policy changes to adjust, to not destroy our business in the meantime.”

“Every day this continues, more businesses will fail,” he warned last week in apublic pleato Trump on X, formerly Twitter, calling for a delay of up to a year. “I trust him to do the right thing,” Borelli said. “I just hope he knows he needs to do it fast.”

The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Borelli’s plea.

Entrepreneur Todd Shelton runs an eponymous fashion brand with a factory in East Rutherford, New Jersey. While the firm makes its clothes in the US, 100% of the material it uses is sourced from overseas, meaning higher duties and higher costs.

This dilemma is not unique in the industry, according to Shelton. “All competitors are exposed to it,” he said. “It will create price increases for the customer. There’s nothing that can be done about it.”

“This is truly going to be inflationary, and will do nothing to bring back jobs,” said Nate Herman, senior vice-president for policy at the American Apparel & Footwear Association. He noted tariffs had been raised across the board: not only on finished clothes from overseas, but key supplies for companies making clothes inside the US, including yarns, fabrics, buttons and zippers.

“You’re hurting the very manufacturers you’re supposedly trying to help here,” he said.

Ultimately, this will hit consumers, added Herman. “All you’re doing is hurting American families [shopping] for a necessity,” he said. “Everybody needs to wear clothes and shoes.”

Prices will “inevitably” increase if tariffs remain in place, said Lance Ruttenberg, who runs American Textile Company, a leading bedding manufacturer based in Duquesne, Pennsylvania. “Across every single industry, it’s hard to think of an industry where prices won’t need to increase.

“I don’t think this is sophisticated economics,” he added. “The price of inputs is going up. That will change the pricing dynamics of all the goods that are affected by them.”

About 30% of the supply chain of American Textile Company is in China. The new steep US tariffs on Chinese exports mean it “is not possible” for the firm to buy what it typically sources from the country, Ruttenberg said in an interview. “When that inventory runs down, we will be in no position to replenish them.”

The company was “bracing for a significant reduction in our ability to run our manufacturing facilities”, he added, unless the tariffs are scrapped or lowered. “You lose the revenue, you lose the manufacturing, and then consequently, you lose people. Eventually, it’s very problematic.”

Even before the tariffs were enforced this month, let alone reached customers in the form of price increases, companies say they were already having an impact on demand.

“We’ve certainly felt it in the form of customer confidence – just the chaos that it’s caused,” said Shelton. “That started in March. Our customers started to understand that something was happening. That led to this uncertainty.”

Few in the industry believe tariffs can swiftly revive US manufacturing, as Trump and his officials have suggested. And they fear other policies advanced by the administration will actively hinder the domestic apparel sector’s growth.

US clothing factories struggle to attract American workers. Firms put this down to a lack of vocational training for young people – something they fear is likely to get worse as Trump moves to dismantle the Department of Education.

While the industry has increasingly sought to alleviate labor shortages by hiring workers from overseas, some operators are concerned that this could be undermined by Trump’s crackdown on immigration.

“While I appreciate and love the idea of Americans at work – who wouldn’t support this? – in our particular world, we don’t believe there are any people who aspire to do the kind of jobs we now rely on from the far east,” said Ruttenberg.

“I don’t know what jobs the administration wants to bring back that have left,” he added. “But I’m pretty confident that the jobs in the textile space are not the jobs they are trying to fill. If they are, we’re in big trouble.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian