Untameable darts crowds tell us about the future of sport – and maybe society too | Jonathan Liew

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Evolution of Darts: Spectators Shape the Sport's Culture and Future"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article reflects on a pivotal moment in UK politics and culture, illustrated through the lens of the darts crowd's reaction to Boris Johnson during a late 2021 match. As fans openly mocked the Prime Minister with chants and signs, it became evident that the crowd was no longer just a passive audience but an active participant in shaping the narrative. The darts crowd, known for its wild and untameable nature, serves as a metaphor for broader societal changes. This vibrant atmosphere at events like the World Championship highlights how darts has evolved from a working-class sport to a cultural phenomenon enjoyed by a diverse audience, often resembling a middle-class festivity. The sport’s willingness to embrace the whims of its spectators has redefined its identity, placing the fans at the heart of the experience. However, this shift has also brought challenges, as the increasingly boisterous crowds have led to confrontations between players and spectators, reflecting a deeper trend of social norms being tested in the sporting arena.

As darts embraces its role as a spectacle, it mirrors a wider transformation occurring across various sports. The article draws parallels with other sports where fan engagement has shifted from passive observation to active participation, often leading to chaotic and unpredictable environments. Examples include tennis, women’s football, and golf, where audiences feel empowered to express themselves, sometimes at the expense of decorum. This change raises questions about the implications of a sport's relationship with its audience and what happens when the boundaries of acceptable behavior are pushed. The darts scene, characterized by its blend of hedonism and performance, serves as a cautionary tale about the challenges of maintaining order in an era where the crowd's voice is louder than ever. Ultimately, the article posits that the evolution of darts may be a precursor to what other sports might face as they navigate the complexities of modern fandom.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reflects on a significant moment in British politics, using an incident during a darts match as a metaphor for the shifting dynamics of public sentiment and the influence of crowds. The author draws a connection between the darts crowd's reaction to Boris Johnson and broader societal themes, suggesting that public engagement in sports can mirror political sentiment and social change.

Public Sentiment and Political Impact

The article aims to highlight the power of public opinion as expressed through sports events. The darts crowd's vocal disdain for Boris Johnson serves as a lens through which to understand the broader political climate and the potential for collective action. This reflects a growing trend where sports and entertainment are interwoven with political commentary, suggesting that public spaces can serve as platforms for dissent and change.

Concealing Underlying Issues

While the article engages with the lively nature of darts crowds, it may also overlook deeper political issues and the systemic challenges facing the UK. By focusing on the entertainment value of sports, there is a risk of diverting attention from pressing matters such as economic instability or public health. This selective focus could be seen as an attempt to distract from the complexities of the current political landscape.

Manipulative Elements

The tone of the article, while engaging and humorous, may carry manipulative undertones. By framing the darts crowd's actions as emblematic of a larger societal shift, the writer could be suggesting that such public displays are a solution to political dissatisfaction. This kind of narrative can oversimplify the complexities of political change and potentially mislead readers about the efficacy of public expressions of discontent.

Truthfulness of the Content

The article contains a mixture of factual reporting and subjective interpretation. While the events described are true, the conclusions drawn about their implications for society may be more speculative. The author's perspective shapes the narrative, which can influence how readers perceive the relationship between sports and politics.

Societal Implications

The framing of the darts crowd as a force of social change may resonate particularly with younger audiences or those disillusioned with traditional political engagement. By invoking the energy of a sporting event, the article taps into a cultural zeitgeist that values collective expression, possibly galvanizing support for more active forms of civic participation.

Economic and Political Ramifications

While the article primarily focuses on the cultural aspects of darts, the underlying political sentiments expressed could have ramifications for public policy and electoral outcomes. If the sentiments of the crowd reflect wider public opinion, political parties may need to adjust their strategies to resonate with these shifts.

Community Engagement

The article seems to appeal to communities that are passionate about sports, particularly those who engage in or observe darts. By connecting a niche sport with broader societal issues, it seeks to engage audiences who may not typically see the intersection of sports and politics.

Market Influence

Given the nature of the article, it is unlikely to have a direct impact on stock markets or financial indices. However, it could influence industries tied to sports entertainment and public events, particularly if the sentiment drives increased attendance or engagement in such activities.

Global Context

On a broader scale, the themes discussed in the article can be related to global movements where sports serve as a platform for social and political commentary. The ongoing dialogues around public engagement in various forms can reflect current global trends of activism and collective action.

The article exhibits a degree of subjectivity, as it interprets a specific event through a broader cultural and political lens. While it captures the essence of public sentiment, it also risks oversimplifying complex issues and may lead to misinterpretations of the relationship between sports and political change.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Let me tell you the moment I realised Boris Johnson was fucked. It was late 2021 and there had been some talk about parties in Downing Street during Covid, but in these febrile siloed times, when the entirety of human existence has blurred into a single personalised scrolling feed, who even knows what constitutes “the news” any more? Who knows what fragments of reality ever emerge from Westminster’s furiously spinning vortex of unintelligible jargon: prorogue, backstop, Aukus, Slapps? What is a Morgan McSweeney and what time does it start?

But then came the magical night, a few days before Christmas, when the darts crowd turned. As Florian Hempel swept to a routine first-round win against Martin Schindler (bit of an upset, to be honest, but you never write off Flo at the Palace), Alexandra Palace rocked to strains of “Boris is a cunt”. Fans held up signs reading “Work Event”, drew pictures of cheese and wine and gleefully held them up to the cameras. And you realise, with a piercing we’ve-lost-Cronkite clarity: oh wow, he’s fucked.

The wider lesson here, of course, is that you never mess with the darts crowd: a lesson all dart players inevitably learn one way or another. You cannot harness the crowd. You cannot beat the crowd. At best you may be able tomanagethe crowd.The crowd is wild and untameable, gives and takes its affection with a deliciously wanton promiscuity, and most importantly pays your wages.

And yet in recent months something definitely seems to have shifted in these loud windowless arenas: a new numinous madness brewing among the traffic cones and the pools of spilt Amstel. No sport has leaned more enthusiastically than darts into the concept of the spectator as spectacle: the costumes, the signs, the £60,000 cash prize for a nine-darter. No sport has so drastically reconfigured itself around the whims and values of its paying public. During the last world championship a third-round game between Nathan Aspinall and Andrew Gilding was actually stopped so the players could watch a fan downing an entire four-pint pitcher on the big screen.

These days darts is less a classic working class sport than a middle class cosplay of a working class sport: a mass fete of boys, bags and booze. At Ally Pally or the Premier League you are far less likely to see a bricklayer than a banker or a bunch of estate agents on a work Christmas do. This is the modern music hall, a brilliantly curated populist product that also serves as one of this country’s great contemporary cultural exports. James Bond; Adele; Paddington Bear; Stephen Bunting walking on stage to “Titanium” while 10,000 people sing along in a kind of religious ecstasy.

And yet like any form of populism, there aremoments of excess and overindulgence. Phil Taylor occasionally used to get some rough treatment, then Gerwyn Price after him. These days, however, flashpoints between players and the public have become a near-weekly occurrence at the Premier League and Euro Tour. Whistling and booing has become commonplace, endemic, largely unpoliceable. A few months ago Cameron Menzies of Scotland wasjeered and barrackedto the point where he basically had a panic attack on the Alexandra Palace stage.

Petty nationalism is clearly a factor here: English crowds save their worst for the Scots and Europeans, while German crowds are at their most hostile when an English player comes up against one of their own. After being mercilessly hounded in Munich, Luke Littler went on Instagram and announced – with a very Churchillian pomp – that he was boycotting Germany for the foreseeable future, before later rowing back.

But then perhaps this is the logical result of a sport that has increasingly sold itself as a place where social norms can happily be transgressed. The ProfessionalDartsCorporation markets itself in Europe as “the biggest party in sport”. Like Cheltenham or Aintree, the Test match or the summer football tournament, darts has been reimagined not as a routine or a ritual but as a cultural experience. Not as a part of regular life, but as a wild and hedonistic escape from it.

And in this respect darts is simply further along on a journey that most other sports are taking to varying degrees. Take selfies. Use the hashtag. Make some noise. Here comes the kiss cam! Everyone shine your phone torches. Make some more noise! But if the fan is no longer simply a passive spectator, then nor will it ever truly be possible to police the whole gamut of ways in which they might be active.

Take tennis, where the four Grand Slam crowds appear to be locked in a kind of inflationary dickhead spiral: mercilessly persecuting its designated heels, appointing itself moral arbiter on everything from line calls to humour to how long a female player can spend in the bathroom before getting booed. Meanwhile players are commercially incentivised to be visible and distinctive, to build brand, to cultivate those sweet parasocial relationships that probably will not end in a literal stalker turning up at your matches.

Or take women’s football, which sold itself on its openness and now finds itself in thrall to an increasingly sinister stan culture in which a significant minority feels entitled to unlimited player time, player photos, player signatures and player feedback. The Phoenix Open at TPC Scottsdale has become the most attended event in golf by essentially becoming outdoor darts: a fiesta of heckles, hot tempers and hurled beer cups. Snooker is currently havinga bit of a “darts” moment.

What happens when norms break down? When individualism gradually erodes the ties that bind us? What happens when thousands of people collectively cross the line? Nothing, of course. The line simply moves. The crowd, emboldened and empowered, sizes up its next meal. At the temple of mass consumerism, the customer is always right. And in this respect darts is something of a canary in the mineshaft: a salutary and perhaps cautionary tale of what can happen when a sport indulges its audience to the point where it can essentially behave how it pleases.

An increasingly common sight at the darts of late has been players standing at the front of the stage, both arms raised towards the crowd, gently trying to shush them down. It rarely works. Actually, it never works. Often it has the opposite effect: the boos and jeers reach a screeching crescendo, the sound of mass refusal. This is the darts, and we do what we want. And seen from a certain angle, the shushing-down looks like something else entirely: a kind of supplicatory worship, the humble practitioners of darts saluting their new overlords.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in ourletterssection, pleaseclick here.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian