US treasury secretary says Walmart will ‘eat some of the tariffs’ after Trump demand

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Walmart Agrees to Absorb Some Tariffs Amid Trump's Demands, Treasury Secretary Claims"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Walmart has indicated that it will absorb some of the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. In a recent phone conversation with Walmart's CEO, Doug McMillon, Bessent claimed that the retail giant committed to taking on part of the tariff burden, aligning with President Trump's demand for companies to maintain low prices for consumers. Despite this assurance, a spokesperson for Walmart declined to comment on the details of the conversation, and sources familiar with the matter noted that the call was scheduled prior to Trump's public statements. Walmart has been vocal about the challenges it faces due to the tariffs, stating that it has no choice but to raise prices due to the financial strain of the tariffs on international trade, which have led to significant market disruptions.

In response to the ongoing tariff situation, Walmart's leadership has emphasized the difficulty of balancing low prices with the realities of narrow retail margins. CEO Doug McMillon mentioned during an earnings call that while the company strives to keep prices low, the magnitude of the tariffs makes it impossible to absorb all associated costs. Walmart's Chief Financial Officer John Rainey echoed this sentiment, warning that consumers could expect price increases as early as late May. The backdrop of these developments includes President Trump's recent announcement of a drastic tariff strategy against multiple nations, which has sparked criticism and raised concerns about economic stability. The administration's approach has been described as chaotic, leading to a volatile market environment and prompting Trump to scale back some of the tariff rates as negotiations continue with various countries. Bessent indicated that the focus would now be on maintaining important trade relationships while seeking regional agreements to stabilize the economic landscape.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the recent interactions between Walmart, the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and former President Donald Trump regarding tariffs imposed on international trade. The dynamics between these entities reveal a complex interplay of economic policy, corporate strategy, and political pressure.

Implications of Walmart's Response

Walmart's assertion that it would have to raise prices due to the tariffs underscores the financial burden these tariffs place on large retailers. The company's refusal to elaborate on its communications with the administration suggests a calculated approach to managing public perception amidst political pressures. Bessent's claim that Walmart would "eat some of the tariffs" raises questions about the integrity of such assertions, especially given the company's earlier statements about needing to raise prices. This contradiction may lead to skepticism about the company's commitment to maintaining consumer prices.

Public Sentiment and Political Pressure

Trump's reaction to Walmart's position indicates his sensitivity to corporate responses that could be seen as detrimental to consumers. His demand that Walmart absorb the tariffs speaks to a broader political narrative aimed at rallying support from consumers who may feel the pinch of rising prices. The article seems to aim at shaping public perception to favor Trump's stance, portraying him as a protector of consumer interests.

Potential Omission of Broader Economic Context

The article does not delve deeply into the broader implications of the tariffs on the U.S. economy or the potential repercussions for international trade relations. By focusing on the back-and-forth between Trump and Walmart, it may obscure the larger economic landscape that these tariffs influence, such as impacts on small businesses or other sectors relying on international supply chains.

Manipulative Elements and Trustworthiness

There is a degree of manipulation in the framing of this story, particularly in how it presents Trump's demands and Walmart's responses. The language used by Bessent and the emphasis on previous years' actions could lead readers to believe that corporate strategies are aligned with political pressures, potentially downplaying the complexity of economic decisions. This raises concerns about the trustworthiness of the claims made within the article, given the apparent contradictions.

Community and Market Reactions

The communities that might support this narrative are likely those aligned with Trump’s political base, which often emphasizes the importance of American companies prioritizing consumer interests over profits. The article could influence market reactions, especially regarding retail stocks, as investors assess how companies like Walmart respond to tariffs and consumer pricing. Any significant changes in Walmart's pricing strategy could directly impact its stock performance, as it is a major player in the retail sector.

Global Power Dynamics

While the article centers on a U.S. domestic issue, it has implications for global trade dynamics, particularly concerning relations with China and other trading partners affected by tariffs. The emphasis on tariffs can resonate with audiences concerned about international economic competition and the broader implications of trade policies on global power structures.

AI Influence in Reporting

There is a possibility that AI tools were employed in the drafting of this article, particularly in structuring the narrative to maintain clarity and engagement. While specific AI models cannot be identified, the potential for algorithmic influence exists in terms of language choice and framing of the events. This could suggest a subtle direction toward emphasizing corporate compliance with political expectations.

The overall reliability of the article is questionable due to its selective focus and the potential manipulation of facts to fit a political narrative. The contradictions in corporate statements and the lack of comprehensive economic analysis contribute to a perception of bias.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The US retail giantWalmartwill “eat some of the tariffs” in line with Donald Trump’s demands, the president’s treasury secretary Scott Bessent insisted on Sunday, claiming he received the assurance in a personal phone call with the company’s chief executive, Doug McMillon.

A spokesperson forWalmartsaid the company would not comment on conversations between its executives and administration officials. However, a source familiar with the conversation said the phone call between Bessent and McMillon was arranged many days prior to Trump’s post – and that the company’s position had not changed.

Walmart said this week it had no alternative toraising prices for consumersbeginning later this month because it could not absorb the cost of the president’s tariffs on international trade, which have caused turmoil in international markets.

The statement provoked an angry response from Trump, who posted arant to his Truth Social networkon Saturday saying the company should “eat the tariffs and not charge valued customers anything”.

According to Bessent, speaking on Sunday to NBC’s Meet the Press, Walmart is now promising exactly that.

“I was on the phone with Doug McMillon, the CEO of Walmart, yesterday. And Walmart is, in fact, going to, as you describe it, eat some of the tariffs, just as they did in ‘18, ‘19, and ‘20,” Bessent said after host Kristen Welker asked if the president was asking American companies to be less profitable.

“What you’re describing was Walmart’s earnings call. The other thing the companies have to do – they have to give the worst case scenario so that they’re not sued.”

On Thursday, McMillon said in the earnings call that his company, a bellwether of US consumer health, was moving to protect itself against the impacts of Trump’s tariffs, despite the president’s administration announcing a pause in its trade war with China that analysts called “capitulation day”.

“We will do our best to keep our prices as low as possible but given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren’t able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins,” he said.

Walmart’s chief financial officer, John Rainey,told CNBCthat the company, which has thousands of stores across the US, was “wired for everyday low prices”. But he said the tariffs were “more than any retailer can absorb” – and that consumers would begin to see higher prices towards the end of May and “certainly much more in June”.

Trump announced plans for an unprecedented barrage of tariffs against numerous countries on 2 April, a date he called “liberation day”.

For too long, he said, the US had been “looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far”, and he presented a list of countries and territories that would receive tariffs, ranging from numerous US allies and longtime trade partners to barren, remote islands near Antarcticaoccupied only by penguins.

The president’s strategy, which he insisted would lead to negotiations and trade deals with at least 150 countries, was variously ridiculed and condemned as flawed and unworkable. And it created an ongoingsix weeks of chaoswith higher prices, crashing stock markets and slowing economic growth.

He has since attempted to walk back many of the excesses of the policy, including this week’s announcement that, for an initial 90-day period, tariffs on China – a dominant supplier to Walmart and myriad other US companies – would becut from 145% to 30%.

The White House called it a “total reset” in trade relations and followed up on Friday by announcing that it would not, after all, negotiate with many of the countries, but insteadunilaterally impose new tariff rates.

“[It is] not possible to meet the number of people that want to see us,” Trump told a meeting of business leaders in the United Arab Emirates during his tour of Gulf states.

“We have 150 countries that want to make a deal, but you’re not able to see that many countries.”

Bessent told CNN’s State of the Union in a later appearance on Sunday that the US was focused on its “18 most important trading relationships” – and that he expected trade talks to continue with a number of countries leading to a series of regional deals.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian