The UN nuclear watchdog has found that Tehran is not complying with its obligations, amidreportsIsrael could be planning an attack on Iran’s nuclear sites as early as next week.
It is thought that a defiantIranmay now intensify its uranium enrichment programme in reprisal for the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) voting to find Tehran in repeated breach of its obligations to limit enrichment and to allow inspectors to visit its nuclear sites.
The move adds to a gathering and sudden sense of crisis in Iranian-US relations, including the possibility of an attack by Israel, with or without US approval.
The motion at the UN nuclear watchdog focused on Iran’s refusal since 2019 to explain activity at three nuclear sites, but also Iran’s buildup of its stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, close to weapons grade. It is the first time Iran has been found in breach of its obligations under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty in two decades.
The watchdog’s vote is a necessary precursor to European powers using their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions on Iran in the autumn. The motion was passed with 19 votes in favour, three against and 11 abstentions.
Some reports claim Israel would strike Iran alone, but in such an event Tehran would still be likely to hold the US accountable.
On Thursday the Revolutionary Guards’ commander, Hossein Salami, said Iran’s retaliation to any Israeli aggression would be “more forceful and destructive” than in past offensives, after Tehran said it had been alerted of a potential attack.
Iran’s nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, said a new enrichment site had already been built and was ready to operate when equipped with machinery.
The sense of drama intensified when the US state department said it had ordered the departure of all non-essential personnel and their dependents from its embassy in Baghdad.
Simultaneously, a US official said the defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, had authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents from countries across the region, including Bahrain and Kuwait. American soldiers in the region were not affected by this order.
Donald Trump told reporters on Wednesday: “They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we’ll see what happens. We’ve given notice to move out.”
The US precautions, foreshadowing potential Iranian reprisals on US targets in Iraq, come before a sixth round of talks between Iran and the US in Oman, in which Iran will not back down on its demand that it is entitled to enrich uranium inside its country, subject to greater IAEA inspection and lower limits on enrichment.
In what could be a preparation for an Israeli attack, but may yet be Trump loading the psychological bargaining chips before Sunday’s talks, Israel’s strategic affairs minister, Ron Dermer, and the Mossad intelligence agency head, David Barnea, will meet the US special envoy Steve Witkoff in advance of the Oman-brokered nuclear talks.
Speaking on the Pod Force One podcast on Monday, Trump said he was growing “less confident” about getting a deal with Iran. He said it was not clear whether Tehran would accept the key US demand to stop enriching uranium. “I don’t know. I did think so, and I’m getting more and more – less confident about it,” the president said. He accused Iran of slow-walking the talks.
British officials have told Gulf diplomats they do not rule out Israel acting alone. The Iranian president, Masoud Pezeshkian, has said he will not allow Iran to be bullied by the US. Iran responded to the IAEA vote by announcing it would set up a new enrichment centre in a secure undisclosed location, and that advanced sixth-generation machines would replace first-generation machines at its Fordow fuel enrichment site.
Iran regards the Trump demand not to enrich as unreasonable since other nuclear non-proliferation treaty states are allowed to do so, and the right had been accepted by the Obama and Biden administrations. It says its high and growing stocks of uranium at a purity of 60% are a considered response to the US unilateral withdrawal in 2018 from the 2015 nuclear deal signed by Barack Obama. Europe in the form of the UK, France and Germany argued there was no conceivable civil nuclear need for Iran to enrich at levels of 60%, but they have largely been excluded from the US-Iran talks, and any US or Israeli plans to bomb Iran.
Trump at the weekend held a rare collective security briefing to discuss the administration’s Iran strategy. Despite his relatively friendly references to Tehran, no compromise emerged on the central issue of whether Iran should be entitled to enrich uranium domestically subject to IAEA monitoring. The US president has said he has ordered Israel not to attack Iran until Witkoff’s talks end, opening the possibility he will declare an impasse on Sunday.
Iran says its nuclear ambitions are confined to a civil nuclear programme, but Israel claims past Iranian deceit means military action is the only certain way to remove the threat of Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb.
Israel believes that after its two military exchanges with Tehran last year Iranian air defences are uniquely vulnerable, but Iran’s preparations for a bomb are so advanced that delay would be a historic error.
David Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and International Security, said: “If you are at 60% enriched, you are 99% of the way to weapon-grade uranium, which is the ideal material for nuclear weapons. So this programme does not look like a civil programme. It looks like they are going up the ladder to get toward weapon-grade uranium while not actually making the weapon-grade uranium.”
He said Iran could get to weapons-grade uranium within a week, while a crude nuclear explosive device could be attached within months.
Albright said Israel had very good intelligence on the layout of Iran’s nuclear sites, especially the Fordow fuel enrichment plant. He said: “They know exactly how the tunnels go, where they start, how they zig and zag, where the ventilation system is, the power supplies. And without it, you don’t have to bring down the roof of the enrichment hall to put that facility out of operation for a long time and make it very hard to get into.”
It is contested whether Israel, lacking the US’s 30,000lb bunker-bustingMoab ( “mother of all bombs”), has the capability to destroy the Fordow facility due to its depth underground.