UK supermarkets exploit tax loophole to produce cider at ‘pocket-money prices’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Supermarkets Utilize Tax Loophole to Sell Cheap High-Strength Cider, Raising Health Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Recent findings by Alcohol Change UK reveal that major UK supermarkets, including Tesco, Aldi, and Lidl, are taking advantage of a tax loophole to produce and sell high-strength ciders at significantly low prices. This loophole allows ciders with an alcohol by volume (ABV) between 3.5% and 8.5% to be taxed at a much lower rate than other alcoholic beverages, specifically at £9.67 per litre of alcohol compared to £21.01 for beer. Consequently, products like Tesco's Compton Orchard cider, which contains 4% ABV, are priced at just £1 per litre, matching the cost of their own-brand apple juice. In contrast, the price of apple juice has surged by 70% since 2020, while the cheapest cider has actually decreased in price by 2.4%. Similarly, a popular brand, Frosty Jack’s cider, has seen only a modest price increase of 5.3% during the same period, despite a broader inflation rate of 26% affecting consumer goods. This stark discrepancy highlights how supermarkets are able to maintain low prices for cider while other alcoholic drinks have become more expensive, leading to concerns about public health and safety.

Alcohol campaigners argue that this practice not only undermines smaller cider producers who are unable to compete with such low prices but also contributes to serious social issues. They claim that the availability of cheap, high-strength cider disproportionately affects working-class neighborhoods, leading to increased health risks, pressures on the NHS, and heightened social problems. Ash Singleton, director of research and public affairs at Alcohol Change UK, emphasized the need for government intervention to close this loophole, which he describes as allowing large corporations to profit irresponsibly while communities bear the consequences. In response, the British Retail Consortium defended supermarkets, stating that they promote responsible drinking and adhere to pricing regulations. However, the conversation around the implications of such tax policies and the responsibility of retailers continues to unfold, with calls for reforms gaining momentum.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights a significant issue regarding the production and sale of cider in UK supermarkets, focusing on how these retailers leverage a tax loophole that enables them to sell high-strength cider at low prices. This situation raises concerns about public health and social welfare, particularly as it relates to alcohol consumption in lower-income communities.

Exploitation of Tax Loopholes

Supermarkets like Tesco, Aldi, and Lidl are reportedly taking advantage of a tax system that imposes a lower tax rate on cider compared to other alcoholic beverages. This has allowed them to keep cider prices stagnant or even reduce them, while the prices of other drinks have surged. The article cites a specific example where a cider's price has barely increased despite significant inflation, emphasizing the affordability of high-alcohol cider compared to non-alcoholic beverages like apple juice.

Health and Social Implications

The article references Alcohol Change UK's concerns about the health implications of cheap cider, particularly its impact on working-class neighborhoods. The assertion is that easy access to inexpensive, high-alcohol cider contributes to various social problems, including increased pressure on healthcare services and community safety issues. By framing the issue in this manner, the article seeks to create a sense of urgency around the need for regulatory reform.

Potential Obscured Issues

While the article effectively outlines the exploitation of the tax loophole, it could be viewed as not fully addressing the broader economic factors affecting beverage pricing, such as production costs and market competition. There may be a lack of discussion around the role of consumer choice, as individuals ultimately decide what products to purchase. This omission could suggest an underlying agenda to shift blame solely to supermarkets and manufacturers, rather than addressing a multifaceted issue.

Manipulative Elements

There are elements of manipulation in the article, particularly in the language used. Phrases such as "pocket-money prices" and "irresponsible profit racket" invoke strong emotional responses and establish a clear antagonism towards supermarkets and large producers. This choice of language could be interpreted as an attempt to mobilize public sentiment against these corporations, potentially leading to calls for reform or increased regulation.

Public Perception and Community Support

The article appears to resonate more with communities concerned about public health, social justice, and consumer rights. It is likely to attract support from advocacy groups focused on alcohol-related harms and those who are critical of corporate practices in food and beverage industries. By appealing to these groups, the article aims to foster a collective response to the issues raised.

Market Impact

The implications of this article could extend to the beverage industry, particularly for companies involved in cider production. There may be increased scrutiny from consumers and regulators alike, which could affect sales and stock prices of these retailers. If public sentiment shifts towards supporting higher taxation on cider, or if new regulations are introduced, this could further impact the pricing strategies of supermarkets.

Relevance in Current Context

This article reflects ongoing discussions about public health and corporate responsibility in the context of alcohol consumption. Given the rising awareness of health issues related to alcohol, the topics discussed are likely to remain relevant in public discourse.

The reliability of the article stems from its citation of research conducted by Alcohol Change UK, a recognized organization in this field. However, its persuasive language and framing may lead to questions about objectivity. Overall, while the article presents legitimate concerns, the emotional and somewhat charged language suggests a purposeful attempt to influence public opinion.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Supermarkets such as Tesco, Aldi and Lidl are exploiting a tax loophole to produce and sell cheap cider that harms health and causes social problems, alcohol campaigners have claimed.

Over recent years, ciders – sometimes containing as much as 7.5% alcohol – have become cheaper or barely risen in price, despite the cost of beer, wine and spirits soaring, according to research byAlcoholChange UK.

Supermarkets are able to sell high-strength ciders at “pocket money prices” by taking advantage of a subsidy intended to boost apple production, Alcohol Change UK says.

It means that the cheapest ciderTescosells – Compton Orchard, which is 4% alcohol by volume (ABV) – now costs the same as the supermarket’s own-brand apple juice, at just £1 a litre. While the apple juice has risen 70% in cost since 2020, the cheapest cider costs 2.4% less now than the equivalent product then.

A 2.5-litre bottle of Frosty Jack’s cider, which is 7.5% ABV, has only increased in price by 5.3% since 2020 – from £4.89 to £5.15 – despite consumer price index inflation having been 26% over that time.

But the cost of a pint of cider bought in a pub has gone up since 2020 by an average of 15.5%, from £3.88 to £4.48, Alcohol Change UK’s research found.

Similarly, the cost of two litres of own-brand cider in bothLidland Aldi is still £1.99, even though Lidl’s own-brand vodka is 25% more expensive.

Under UK law, cider that is between 3.5% and 8.5% ABV is only taxed at £9.67 per litre of alcohol. That is just 46% of the £21.01 per litre of alcohol rate applied to beer.

Ash Singleton, Alcohol Change UK’s director of research and public affairs, said: “Big producers knock up a deadly product with just enough concentrated apple to legally call it cider – and pocket the tax breaks. Supermarkets drive the demand, stocking it high to flog at pocket-money prices.

“From unsafe streets to NHS pressure and early deaths, working-class neighbourhoods bear the brunt of this irresponsible profit racket left by the last government.”

Singleton urged ministers to “fix the system, starting by scrapping the super-strength subsidy”.

The charity has written to Ashley Dalton, the public health minister, saying the tax loophole “allows multinational companies to cash in on reliefs meant for genuine small UK-based cider makers”.

Sign up toFirst Edition

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

It said super-sized and high-strength cider was leading to early deaths. The charity said: “It is unacceptable that the alcohol industry continues to push the cost of harm on to communities and stretched NHS and police services, while cashing on tax breaks to do so.”

The British Retail Consortium, which represents supermarkets, did not respond to the disclosure that many ciders have barely risen in price while the cost of other alcoholic drinks has surged.

A spokesperson said: “Supermarkets have led the way in helping their customers drink responsibly, adopting the health department’s labelling to give customers clear information about the alcohol they sell and how that relates to recommended guidelines. Working with other partners, such as the Drinkaware Trust, this has helped deliver a fall in excessive drinking.

“Increasing duties on cider would penalise the vast majority of consumers who already drink less than the government’s recommended limits [of 14 units a week].”

Tesco said it did not sell super-strong cider. A spokesperson said: “We adhere to all UK pricing regulations on cider. Compton Orchard cider is 4% ABV, similar in strength to a regular lager, and we train our colleagues to use Think 25 and to ensure they sell all alcohol responsibly.”

Lidl,Aldiand Compton Orchard were approached for comment.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian