Trump’s new border wall will threaten wildlife in an area where few people pass

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Trump Administration Advances Border Wall Construction Amid Wildlife Concerns in Arizona"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Trump administration is moving forward with plans to construct nearly 25 miles of a new border wall along the US-Mexico border in southern Arizona, a region recognized for its rich biodiversity and critical wildlife corridors. This section, located near Tucson, Arizona, is characterized by vast grasslands and isolated mountain ranges that serve as habitats for numerous rare species. Conservationists, including Eamon Harrity of the Sky Island Alliance, have raised concerns that the wall will disrupt the natural movements of wildlife such as bears, bobcats, and mountain lions, which currently traverse this landscape. Evidence gathered from wildlife cameras in the area highlights the significant presence of these animals, emphasizing that their migration patterns will be severely impacted once the barrier is completed. The construction of this wall is part of a broader push by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to secure the border, despite a notable decline in unauthorized crossings in recent years, which contradicts the necessity for such a project.

Critics of the border wall, including environmental advocates and lawmakers, have labeled it an unnecessary and ecologically harmful initiative. The Sierra Club's Erick Meza described the wall's impact on the San Rafael valley as catastrophic for both the environment and wildlife, as it would effectively sever critical migration routes for various species. Additionally, the plan to militarize the border further, with potential military bases and expanded federal control over public lands, raises alarm among wildlife advocates who fear increased environmental degradation. Legal challenges against these federal actions are being considered by opponents, but the difficulties of navigating federal law complicate such efforts. As climate change exacerbates drought conditions in the region, the need for wildlife to access food and water sources becomes even more pressing, making the construction of barriers counterproductive to conservation efforts. The Santa Cruz River, a vital migration corridor, is set to be walled off, further isolating wildlife populations and threatening the ecological integrity of this biodiverse region.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the controversial decision to construct a new segment of the border wall during Donald Trump's administration, particularly focusing on its implications for wildlife in a biodiverse region of Arizona. The narrative emphasizes the potential threats to various animal species due to the wall's construction in a remote area that is critical for their movement and habitat.

Impacts on Wildlife and Biodiversity

The piece highlights the ecological significance of the area surrounding Tucson, Arizona, referring to it as a "crucial wildlife corridor." By illustrating the presence of diverse species such as bears and mountain lions, the article raises awareness about the environmental repercussions of erecting a barrier in this region. The concerns presented by conservationists, such as Eamon Harrity from the Sky Island Alliance, underscore the potential disruption to animal migration patterns, posing serious threats to biodiversity.

Public Perception and Environmental Advocacy

The article aims to shape public perception against the border wall construction by framing it as a potential ecological disaster. It seeks to resonate with environmentally conscious readers and advocates by detailing the adverse effects on wildlife. The language used is evocative, aiming to elicit an emotional response regarding the protection of rare species and their habitats.

Omissions and Hidden Agendas

While the article focuses on the environmental impact, it may overlook the broader socio-political context of immigration and national security that often accompanies discussions about the border wall. There might be an intention to divert attention from the complexities of border control and immigration policies, focusing instead on wildlife preservation.

Credibility and Manipulative Elements

The article appears credible, drawing from expert opinions and documented observations of wildlife in the area. However, the selection of facts may lean toward an emotionally charged narrative, which can be seen as manipulative. The choice of language and emphasis on particular viewpoints may influence readers to adopt a specific stance against the wall, reflecting a bias in how information is presented.

Connection to Other News

This report aligns with the broader discourse on immigration policies and environmental conservation, which are often at odds with each other. Similar articles may address the challenges of balancing infrastructure development with ecological preservation, suggesting an ongoing debate in the media.

Potential Implications for Society and Politics

The publication of this article could galvanize public opinion against the border wall, potentially influencing political discourse and policy decisions. It may also inspire advocacy efforts aimed at protecting wildlife and preserving natural habitats, leading to increased public pressure on decision-makers.

Target Audience and Support

The article is likely to attract readers who are concerned about environmental issues, wildlife preservation, and the ethical implications of infrastructure projects. It resonates with communities that prioritize conservation over development, appealing to activists and environmentally conscious individuals.

Market and Economic Impact

While the article primarily focuses on ecological concerns, the implications of the border wall could extend to economic aspects, particularly in sectors related to construction and environmental conservation. Companies involved in wildlife conservation may see increased interest and funding as public awareness rises.

Global Context and Current Events

In a broader sense, the article touches on global themes of environmental conservation amidst development pressures. The ongoing debates about infrastructure and wildlife protection are relevant to contemporary discussions about climate change and biodiversity loss.

AI Influence in Reporting

It is possible that AI tools were utilized in the article's drafting process, especially in structuring and presenting data. Such technology could have influenced the tone and persuasive elements of the narrative, steering it toward an emotionally resonant argument against the wall. The framing of wildlife movement and the ecological narrative could have been enhanced through AI's capacity to analyze and synthesize information effectively.

In conclusion, while the article is grounded in factual reporting, its emphasis on emotional appeals and specific viewpoints introduces a level of bias. The credibility is supported by expert opinions, though the framing suggests an agenda aimed at mobilizing public sentiment against the border wall and promoting wildlife conservation.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Donald Trump is forging ahead with a new section of border wall that will threaten wildlife in a remote area where many rare animals – but very few people – roam.

Customs and Border Protection (CBP)has invitedprivate sector companies to bid for contracts to erect nearly 25 miles of barrier on theUS-Mexico border, across the unwalled south of Tucson, Arizona, one of themost biodiverse regionsin the US.

Here, vast rolling grasslands stretch across high desert, hemmed in to the east and west by rugged, isolated mountain ranges known assky islandsbecause they rise abruptly and spectacularly out of the arid flatness.

“This is a crucial wildlife corridor,” said Eamon Harrity, wildlife program manager for the Sky Island Alliance, a conservation non-profit, while driving along a dirt road towards the cottonwood tree-lined Santa Cruz River that flows towards Mexico.

A nearbymotion-triggered wildlife camera, one of 65 operated by the alliance just in this section of the border, where there is a lengthy gap in the barrier, captures thousands of images of wild animals, including bears, bobcats, pronghorns and mountain lions.

“Large predators and other animals move freely through this landscape,” said Harrity, as he replaced the batteries of a trail camera pointed toward the wide open-landscape that, on a map, would show the border with Mexico. Harrity assists in monitoring more than 110 cameras across a wider area for an alliance study that began in 2020 to record the effects of Trump’s barrier on cross-border movements for local wildlife.

“That [movement] won’t happen once the wall is complete,” he added of that stretch of the Arizona-Mexico border.

That completion now looks set to become a reality. “CBP is soliciting bids for construction of 24.7 miles of border barrier around International Boundary Monument 102 in the Sonoita Border Patrol Station area of responsibility,” a CBP spokesperson told the Guardian in an email, referring to the smallstone obelisks, or monuments, that have traditionally been dotted along the international line.

Outside the San Rafael valley, the stretches of border wall designed to keep people out of the US with 30ft-high steel posts spaced just four inches apart are impassable to anything larger than a jackrabbit, the speedy, long-legged hares typical of the area. Once this valley is walled, too, it will sever acritical wildlife corridorfor animals migrating between Mexico and Arizona.

Erick Meza, borderlands coordinator for the Sierra Club environmental advocacy group, said walling the valley would be “catastrophic for the environment and wildlife”.

On 27 April, the US House of Representatives homeland security committee unveiled its proposed budget,allocating $46.5bnto fund new chunks of barrier on the almost 2,000-mile US-Mexico border, wherebuilding a wallwas a focus andhighly vexedissue in the first Trump administration and isfar from complete.

The new push for more wall comes as unauthorized crossings by people migrating to the US through or from Mexico had been falling fast last year after Joe Biden tightened restrictions and have now reached historic lows. This was noted by CBP and trumpeted with inflammatory language by the Trump White House, even as the president spoke of “invasion”.

“Even when numbers were the highest, people were crossing in areas that already had a border wall,” said Meza. “San Rafael valley never saw those numbers.”

Critics are furious.

“It’s an expensive, unnecessary, and environmentally disastrous project,” said Harrity of the barrier, which can cost up to $30m per mile. “If completed, this wall will sever a continent.”

Successful legal challenges to federal actions on the border can be difficult, but opponents are intensively researching their options.

And tall metal boundaries, which not only impede animals but, when under construction and being patrolled, causehuge damageanddisruption, are not the only worry for wildlife advocates. Trump has also announced a plan to further use the military and take over vast swaths of public lands along the border.

A presidential memorandum in Aprildirected the transferof a 60ft-wide strip of federal land running along the border in California, Arizona and New Mexico, known as the Roosevelt reservation, to US military control.

That could mean new military bases and staging areas which, state actions inTexas have shown, create environmental havoc.

Myles Traphagen, borderlands director for the Wildlands Network, is concerned that large military facilities could be constructed in the region, further enhancing the human footprint of an already militarized border.

“It’s an invasion,” said Traphagen. “An invasion of our public lands.”

Mark Nevitt, an Emory University School of Law professor, said the president appeared intent on an unprecedented use of “national security language associated with executive power, [such as] ‘invasion’ and ‘under attack’, that appears to expand the military’s role in immigration enforcement”. Healso fearsthat Pentagon funds will be funneled into more wall building on land to be designated as “national defense areas”.

Noah Schramm, border policy strategist for the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, called the intended step-change in militarization “uniquely alarming” and warned that troops could be used to apprehend migrants and civilians alike for allegedly illegally entering a restricted military area

In Arizona, 63% of the border has already been sealed off and the remaining open sections are critical for wildlife, with the San Rafael valley being one of the last intact expanses of Sonoran desert grasslands in the state. The area’s rugged Huachuca and Patagonia mountains, part of the Sky Island range, serve as stepping stones across a harsh desert by offering a range of habitats, food sources and water for animals.

“The biodiversity here is incredible,” said Meza, of the Sierra Club. As well as bears, mountain lions and wolves there are subtropical species such as the wild pig-like javelina, and rare big cats – ocelots and jaguars, with natural ranges of hundreds of miles between countries in search of food, water and mates.

“This is at the heart of all these different ecosystems coming together,” Meza added.

As Harrity of the Sky Island Alliance drove his battered red pickup through the wilderness he passed a lone pronghorn, the strange, antelope-like creature that is the fastest land mammal in the Americas. The San Rafael valley was entering year three of a severe drought, he said.

“When it rains, it can look like Scotland,” he said. In dry times like now, the valley looks more like the African savanna, with rolling hills of native grasses awash in soft yellows, oranges and rusts. “A study in browns,” he added, bouncing along toward the only greenery visible – cottonwood trees lining the Santa Cruz River.

Harrity said that as theclimate crisisexacerbatesdrought inthe south-west, wildlife in the border region will need to range farther and farther seeking food and water. In 2021 a Mexican grey wolfknown as Mr Goodbarpaced 23 miles along the border wall searching for a place to cross into Mexico. After days, he finally gave up and returned to the Gila wilderness area in New Mexico.

“The last thing we should be doing right now is walling off corridors and severing connectivity,” Harrity said.

The Santa Cruz River is a vital animal migration corridor that meanders into Mexico and back to Arizona. “The river will now be walled on both legs of its journey,” said Harrity. A nearby wildlife camera recently captured a video of a mountain lion carrying its prize, a dead coyote, into Mexico.

The valley is almost devoid of people. And it lacks the telltale signs of migration in the borderlands: ripped clothes on bushes, discarded backpacks and empty water bottles. In five years, a camera by the river has never captured an image of a migrant crossing into the US, even though it’s one of the few parts of the valley with shade and water.

On a hill above the river an agent in a white and green border patrol SUV looked on.

Then in New Mexico, to the east, near the small town of Columbus, Traphagen of Wildlands Network pointed from a hilltop brightened by red-flowered ocotillo plants to the longest contiguous section of border wall in the US. Eighty miles of three-story-high posts cutting through sand dunes and volcanic hills like a giant serpent, all the way to El Paso, Texas.

As the spring wind picked up, the steel pillars began to reverberate and hum. “When the wind really gets going, it sounds likeTuvan throat singers,” said Traphagen of the central Asian singers who can produce a low vocal rumble and a high whistle-like toneat the same time.

Many of the Wildlands Network’s trail cameras are pointed toward “construction anomalies,” said Traphagen, where posts have been mistakenly placed five or six inches apart instead of the usual four. Those extra 2ins do not affect human crossing but can allow animals, such as javelina and coyotes, at least, to pass through. That subtle difference would also reduce the number of posts needed to build thehugely expensive border wall. “That’s probably $30m worth of steel there,” said Traphagen, pointing in passing to an abandoned construction staging area from the previous Trump administration containing thousands of steel pillars stacked like the kids’ building toy Lincoln Logs.

Other trail cameras are placed near open floodgates, resulting from a2023 lawsuitrequiring the border patrol to open intermittent gates in the barrier to allow larger animals to pass.

“This camera has captured over 1,000 videos, and we have never seen a person crossing through,” said Traphagen. It points along a sandy wash marked with the paw prints of rabbits, coyotes and badgers. Of the eight cameras checked during one long outing at the New Mexico border, only one had captured any evidence of migrants.

But in a 2024 study by the Wildlands Network and Sky Islands Alliance, motion-activated cameras along 100 miles of walledborder showed an 86% decrease in wildlife crossings and a 100% reduction for animals such as wolves, bears, pronghorns, and jaguars.

“The Trump administration would rather score cheap political points and a favorable Fox News headline than solve a problem. Instead of wasting taxpayers’ dollars, undermining military readiness and jeopardizing American families’ safety, Trump and [Elon]Muskshould focus on actually fixing our brokenimmigrationsystem,” said Martin Heinrich, US senator for New Mexico and a Democrat.

“New Mexicans who live on the border want actual solutions, like creating new legal pathways for immigration, investing in effective border security for law enforcement, and addressing the root causes of mass migration,” he added.

Back in the San Rafael valley, Traphagen noted that, on top of everything, parts of the original 1955 movie of the musical Oklahoma! were filmed in this beautiful spot.

“It will be a tragedy to see a pristine grassland … turned into a military zone,” he said.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian