Trump tariffs deal hammer blow to some Australian businesses but others seize ‘enormous’ chance

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Trump Tariffs Impact Australian Businesses Differently Amid Trade Uncertainty"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent implementation of tariffs by the Trump administration has had a significant impact on Australian businesses, particularly those exporting goods to the United States. Sydney businessman Robert Jarmyn, who runs a skincare company named Blaq, faced a staggering increase in costs when he received an invoice that included a $125,000 charge labeled as a 'Trump tariff' for a shipment of skincare products from China. This sudden financial burden has forced Jarmyn to halt exports to the US, as he fears that the retail price of his products would skyrocket from $29 to nearly $80 due to the tariffs, making them unaffordable for American consumers. Blaq is among approximately 12,000 Australian businesses affected by the tariffs, which impose a 10% duty on Australian-made goods and a staggering 145% on products manufactured in China. The uncertainty surrounding these tariffs has left many Australian exporters grappling with how to adapt, with some companies closing down, others exploring new markets, and a few managing to capitalize on the chaos created by the tariff regime.

Despite the initial shockwaves that sent the Australian share market down by nearly $200 billion, analysts suggest that the direct economic impact of the tariffs on Australia may be limited. Only about 4% of Australia’s goods exports by value are directed to the US, which indicates that while certain sectors, particularly manufacturing and beef farming, may face challenges, the overall economy is not expected to suffer significantly in the short term. Businesses like Tyrrell’s Wines are reassessing their priorities in the US market, while others, such as Clean and Pure, are finding new opportunities as larger competitors struggle with the new tariffs. The turmoil in trade relations, particularly between the US and China, has raised concerns about global economic confidence, with the International Monetary Fund warning of potential repercussions on global growth. As Australian businesses navigate this new landscape, many are left to ponder their next steps in the face of uncertainty, with some, like Jarmyn, contemplating major pivots in their operations if tariffs remain high.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the significant impact of Donald Trump's new tariff regime on Australian businesses, particularly those reliant on Chinese manufacturing. It presents a dual perspective, showcasing how some businesses are adversely affected while others are finding unexpected opportunities amidst the turmoil.

Economic Consequences for Businesses

The case of Robert Jarmyn's skincare company, Blaq, exemplifies the immediate financial strain caused by the tariffs, which have made exporting to the U.S. prohibitively expensive. The article underscores the anxiety among Australian exporters regarding the potential long-term effects of these tariffs, reflecting a broader concern within the business community about economic stability and profitability.

Market Reactions and Investor Sentiment

The initial reaction from investors was one of panic, leading to a substantial drop in the Australian share market. However, the recovery of nearly $200 billion in value suggests that the market is recalibrating its expectations regarding the direct impact of tariffs. This recovery indicates a growing understanding that while some sectors will struggle, others may adapt or thrive in the changing landscape.

Diverse Outcomes for Different Sectors

While Blaq faces a significant tariff burden, other Australian sectors, such as wine exports, have a different narrative. The article illustrates how businesses like Tyrrell's Wines have shifted their strategies, hinting at the resilience and adaptability of certain sectors. This contrast reveals a nuanced economic picture, suggesting that not all businesses will suffer equally from the tariffs.

Public Sentiment and Perception

The article aims to invoke a sense of urgency and concern among readers about the potential economic repercussions of the tariffs on local businesses. By detailing personal stories and dramatic financial impacts, it seeks to create empathy and awareness of the broader implications for the Australian economy.

Potential Manipulative Elements

The language used in the article, particularly in expressing the distress experienced by affected business owners, could be seen as emotionally charged, which may lead to a manipulation of public sentiment. This emotional appeal might be intended to garner support for businesses facing hardships and to prompt discussions around trade policies.

Trustworthiness of the Information

The article appears to be grounded in real experiences and factual data regarding tariffs and their economic implications. However, the emotional framing and focus on individual stories might lead to a somewhat biased interpretation of the overall situation. It is essential for readers to consider multiple perspectives and data sources for a well-rounded understanding of the issue.

Socioeconomic Implications

The article raises concerns about the potential for increased costs and decreased sales in the U.S. market, which could have broader implications for the Australian economy. The mention of varying impacts on different sectors suggests that policymakers may need to consider targeted support measures for those most affected.

Target Audience

This news piece appears to cater to business owners, investors, and policymakers, particularly those in industries that rely on exports to the U.S. It aims to raise awareness of the challenges faced by specific sectors while also highlighting opportunities for others, thus appealing to a diverse audience.

Impact on Financial Markets

The news about tariffs is crucial for investors, especially those with stakes in businesses directly affected by the changes. It could influence stock prices and trading strategies, particularly in sectors like skincare and wine, as stakeholders assess the long-term viability of their investments in light of tariff implications.

Geopolitical Context

The article touches on broader themes of international trade relations and the shifting dynamics between the U.S. and its trading partners. The ongoing changes in trade policy could signal larger trends in global economic power, making this issue relevant in current discussions about economic diplomacy and international relations.

The analysis suggests that while the article presents legitimate concerns faced by Australian businesses due to new tariffs, it is important to recognize the diversity of outcomes and the potential for resilience among different sectors.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Sydney businessman Robert Jarmyn had a $250,000 shipment of skincare products en route to the US from China when Donald Trump declared hisnew tariffs regimeat the start of April.

When he received the invoice for that shipment, it had an additional cost whacked on top: $125,000, simply labelled “Trump tariff”.

“It was pretty devastating, the blood pressure went up,” Jarmyn says. “It was like, ‘Well, what do we do now?’”

Higher levies on products coming from China have forced Jarmyn’s skincare business, Blaq, to pause exports. “I just haven’t put anything on the water since,” he says.

About 2 million American customers buy his products but current tariffs would send the retail price of a Blaq face mask from $29 to nearly $80. “No one would buy that,” Jarmyn laments.

Blaq is one of about 12,000 Australian businesses that sell to the US. Those selling Australian-made goods now have to pay duties of 10%, while companies relying on Chinese manufacturing, like Blaq, face a whopping 145% tariff.

A month on from Trump’s “liberation day” announcement, Australian exporters are trying to work out how to stay afloat. Some are closing, others are finding new export markets, and some are profiting from the chaos. Many are holding their breath, in anticipation of more trade changes.

Tariff uncertainty, sparking fears of higher costs and lower US sales, threwlocal businesses and investors into a spin. The share market shed nearly $200bn in value in less than a week, as the benchmark S&P/ASX 200 slid 8%.

Those losses have since been recovered, helped by a growing realisation that the direct impact of the tariffs on local companies would be limited.

While the US is the primary market for Jarmyn’s Blaq, American customers are just one of many for companies like Tyrrell’s Wines.

The company’s general manager, Bruce Tyrrell, sold tens of thousands of cases annually to the US in the 1990s, but that’s fallen to less than 3,000.

“You never move away from the US, but it’s probably not going to be number one priority,” the fourth-generation winemaker says.

Americans bought $24bn worth of Australian goods in 2024, less than India and South Korea, while Japan bought triple that figure and China seven times as much,Australian Bureau of Statisticsdata shows.

According to a Westpacanalysis, the tariffs may barely even touch firms selling agricultural or mining goods to the US, though manufacturers and beef farmers are more vulnerable.

Despite the market frenzy, the tariff regime isn’t expected to deal direct damage to Australia’s economy in the short term, Stephen Smith, partner at Deloitte Access Economics, says.

“That might appear counter-intuitive … [but] only around 4% of Australia’s goods exports by value flow to the US, meaning the direct impact of the 10% tariff applied to Australia is likely to be immaterial,” Smith wrote in a recent note.

The bigger risk for local businesses from the collapse of an 80-year global consensus and an ongoing trade war between the US and China is crumbling confidence around the world – “a cause for deep concern,” Smith added.

Trump first threatened tariffs as high as 49% around the world thendeferred those until after June, leaving most countries on the 10% rate. Uncertainty over future tariff rates hasshaken market faith in the USand will threaten global growth, the International Monetary Fundhas warned.

Tyrrell, who started selling to Americans when Richard Nixon was president, says he will now be focusing on new Asian markets.

“[Trump] could stand up tomorrow and say, ‘No imported wine, we’ve banned the lot,’” he says.

Sign up toAfternoon Update: Election 2025

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

The IMF in Aprilslashed its forecastsfor economic growth in Australia, the US andaround the world. Data at the end of April showedAmerica’s economyhad already shrunk in the months before broad tariffs were even announced, triggering fears of a US recession.

While many businesses across the world are struggling to adapt to the chaos, West Australian businessman Mark Chapman says he’s “struggling to see a downside”.

Chapman’s skincare company Clean and Pure had stopped selling its lip balms and sunscreens to the US after the pandemic. But it is hurrying its products back into the US as tariffs disrupt bigger competitors like Nivea and Burt’s Bees.

“It’s exciting, because the big, dominant corporations are scrambling, and while they scramble and move at the speed of a glacier, we get in there,” he says.

In June, Chapman’s colleagues will be in Texas setting up a Clean and Pure warehouse. They’ll be joining fellow Australian Andrew Coppin, the co-founder of tech company Farmbot, who is counting his lucky stars he moved to Fort Worth last year to set up a factory for his growing American customer base.

“It was sort of fortuitous that we did that, and it was cheaper to build some things locally,” Coppin says. “The potential here is enormous.”

Blaq has also been trying to start making its skin creams and masks in the US, but nearly 20 American manufacturers have refused to take them on, either because it’s outside their ability or because the tariffs on China make it prohibitively expensive.

Without new producers outside China or new markets outside the US, Jarmyn’s best hope isTrump’s suggestionthe mega-tariff on China may drop.

“There’s no way in the world it could viably stay at that level,” Jarmyn says.

But if it does, he’ll have a decision to make in June.

Unlike Clean and Pure’s Chapman, he won’t be looking to level up his US business, but to pull the plug altogether.

“I’m hoping something happens by the end of June. If it doesn’t, then it does mean that I really do have to make a pivot pretty quickly.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian