Donald Trumpearly on ThursdaycondemnedtheFederal Reservechair,Jerome Powell, for not lowering US interest rates, and expressed a wish for him to be gone from his role.The US president lambasted Powell as “always too late and wrong” in a post on his Truth Social platform. Trump noted that the European Central Bank (ECB) was poised on Thursday to lower interest rates again, without mentioning that the body has been responding to the chaos caused by Trump’sinitiatives on tariffs.Addressing reporters later in the day, Trump claimed Powell would resign if he asked him to. Powell himself has said that he would not resign if asked to do so by the president.Trump has been pressuring Powell to cutUS interest ratesfor months, even though the central bank is independent of the administration in setting monetary policy and the White House typically does not publicly lobby the Federal Reserve.Fed chair says Trump tariffs could make inflation worse as US stocks slide furtherRead moreThe ECB had been expected to cut interest rates for the seventh time this year in order to prop up economic growth,and thendid sonot long before US markets were due to open. Powell enraged Trump on Wednesday nightby warningthat the president’s sweeping tariffs could raise inflation. That would make the Fed even more hesitant to cut interest rates.Christine Lagarde, the ECB president, in explaining the reasons why it has – unlike the Fed – cut interest rates, said “the economic outlook is clouded by exceptional uncertainty” because of Trump’s tariffs, which constitute a negative demand shock.Lagarde was speaking aftercutting the ECB’s main deposit rate by 25 basis pointsto 2.25%.Europe had been preparing another interest rate cut following the global financial turmoil caused by Trump’s tariffs push, in which he has gone back and forth on whether, when and how deeply to tax imports from other countries, and on which countries, since he returned to the White House for a second term.Heretreatedsharply earlier this month from his decision to impose tariffs worldwide, pausing most of the charges for 90 days, although most notably not on China, aftermarkets plungedand US government bonds – traditionally seen as one of the world’s safest financial assets – had suffered a dramatic sell-off. Wall Street chiefs and other experts also forecast aheightenedlikelihood of recession. Economists polled by Reuters on Thursday put US recession odds at 45%.After insisting for days that he would hold firm on his aggressive trade strategy,unveiledin full on 2 April, which he dubbed “liberation day”, Trumpannouncedon 9 April that all countries that had not retaliated against US tariffs would receive a reprieve – and only face a blanket US tariff of 10% – until July.Powell on Wednesday said theUS economywas well-positioned but added that Trump’s tariffs were likely to cause “at least a temporary rise in inflation. The inflationary effects could also be more persistent.”He indicated that the prospect of sweeping tariffs on virtually every trade partner could put the Fed in the unenviable position of having to choose between tackling inflation and unemployment.TheWorld Trade Organization, meanwhile, warned that Trump’s tariffswould sendinternational trade into reverse this year, depressing global economic growth.The International Monetary Fund (IMF) managing director, Kristalina Georgieva, said the global outlook was also weakening in the face of the Trump tariff onslaught, adding central banks like the Federal Reserve needed to remain agile and credible.“Resilience is being tested again – by the reboot of the global trading system,” she said.Trump also said as part of his Truth Social post at daybreak on Thursday that “Powell’s termination cannot come fast enough”. He dubbed him, further in the post, “Too Late” and put forward the argument that prices were coming down, from oil toeggs.Trump nominated Powell to become Fed chair during his first term in the White House, in 2018, and Joe Biden renominated him during his term in the White House, in 2022. The US Senate confirms the chair and the US president cannot terminate the head of theFederal Reservebefore the end of their four-year fixed stints. Powell is in place until next spring.The US central bank has held interest rates steady at 4.25% to 4.5% since the start of this year.Trump said in his post: “The ECB is expected to cut interest rates for the 7th time, and yet, “Too Late”Jerome Powellof the Fed, who is always TOO LATE AND WRONG, yesterday issued a report which was another, and typical, complete “mess!” Oil prices are down, groceries (even eggs!) are down, and the USA is getting RICH ON TARIFFS. Too Late should have lowered Interest Rates, like the ECB, long ago, but he should certainly lower them now. Powell’s termination cannot come fast enough!”The New York Fed president, John Williams, spoke to Fox Business on TV on Thursday and backed up Powell’s wariness on rates.“I don’t see any need to change the setting of the Fed funds rate any time soon … It’s really about collecting information, understanding better what’s happening in the economy during the rest of this year, understanding kind of how the uncertainty plays out,” Williams said.Meanwhile, Politico, citing unnamed sources, reported after Trump’s post that the treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, had been cautioning White House officials against any attempt to fire Powell, for which there is no tested mechanism, saying it would risk destabilizing financial markets.And there was a fresh alarm bell sounded on the risk of stagflation, in which high inflation combines with high unemployment amid stagnant economic growth.“A sudden crystallization of the threat to Fed independence would both intensify market stress and shift it in more of a stagflationary direction with a sharp increase in tail risk,” Krishna Guha, vice-chair of an arm of the financial advisory firm Evercore ISI, said in a note.Reuters contributed reporting
Trump says Fed chair would resign if asked and condemns him over interest rates
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Trump Criticizes Fed Chair Powell Over Interest Rates and Calls for Resignation"
TruthLens AI Summary
On Thursday, former President Donald Trump criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell for not lowering U.S. interest rates, expressing a desire for his resignation. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump labeled Powell as 'always too late and wrong,' while highlighting that the European Central Bank (ECB) was set to cut interest rates for the seventh time that year. He did not acknowledge that the ECB's rate cuts were a response to the economic turmoil caused by his own tariff policies. During a press conference later that day, Trump claimed that Powell would resign if asked, a statement that contradicts Powell's own assertion that he would not step down under presidential pressure. Trump's ongoing pressure on Powell to reduce interest rates is notable, especially given the Federal Reserve's independence from the administration in setting monetary policy, a norm that typically discourages public lobbying from the White House.
The backdrop of Trump's comments includes a turbulent economic landscape where Powell has warned that Trump's tariffs could exacerbate inflation, thus making the Fed hesitant to lower interest rates. Trump’s tariffs have created significant uncertainty in the global economy, prompting the ECB to act while the Fed maintains its rates between 4.25% and 4.5%. Powell indicated that while the U.S. economy is well-positioned, the tariffs could lead to a temporary rise in inflation, complicating the Fed's decisions regarding interest rates. As markets reacted to Trump's fluctuating trade policies, experts warned of a potential recession, with economists estimating a 45% chance of a downturn. Trump's comments about Powell's performance and his calls for rate reductions reflect a broader concern regarding economic stability and the potential for stagflation, characterized by high inflation coupled with high unemployment. The situation has led to discussions among financial experts about the risks associated with undermining the Fed's independence, emphasizing the delicate balance required to manage both inflation and employment effectively.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article provides insight into former President Donald Trump's criticisms of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell regarding interest rates. Trump has expressed dissatisfaction with Powell's decisions, indicating a desire for his resignation, while Powell maintains his independence from presidential influence. This situation reflects ongoing tensions between Trump's administration and the Federal Reserve, particularly in the context of economic policies and their impacts.
Intention Behind the Publication
The article appears to aim at highlighting the discord between Trump and Powell, framing it as a significant issue in U.S. economic policy. By emphasizing Trump's call for Powell's resignation and his criticism of the Federal Reserve's actions, the piece seeks to create a narrative of leadership conflict that could resonate with readers concerned about economic stability.
Public Perception
This news might foster a perception of instability within U.S. economic governance. Readers may interpret Trump's remarks as indicative of a broader conflict within the administration regarding monetary policy, potentially leading to worries about future economic decisions.
Potential Omissions
While the article focuses on Trump's criticisms and the implications for the Federal Reserve, it may downplay the role of economic fundamentals and the complexities surrounding interest rate decisions. The dynamic between U.S. tariffs and inflation, for instance, is mentioned but not explored in depth, which could lead to an incomplete understanding of the economic context.
Manipulative Elements
The article exhibits a moderate level of manipulative potential, particularly in its framing of Trump's comments as authoritative while simultaneously presenting Powell's position as defiant. The language used suggests a binary view of the conflict—Trump as the proactive leader versus Powell as the resistant bureaucrat—which simplifies a more complex issue.
Factual Accuracy
The claims made in the article seem to align with the facts available, namely Trump's public statements and Powell's established independence regarding monetary policy. However, the selective emphasis on certain statements over others could skew the reader's understanding.
Narrative Creation
This piece constructs a narrative that positions Trump as a populist figure challenging the established economic order represented by Powell. This aligns with Trump's broader political persona, appealing to his base, which values direct and assertive leadership.
Broader Implications
The article's content could influence public sentiment toward economic policy, potentially affecting stock market behavior and investor confidence. Should Trump's criticisms intensify, it might lead to volatility in financial markets, particularly in sectors sensitive to interest rate changes.
Target Audience
The article likely seeks to engage readers who are politically active and interested in economic policy. It may resonate particularly well with audiences critical of the Federal Reserve or supportive of Trump's economic agenda.
Market Reactions
In the wake of such announcements, financial markets may react negatively, especially in sectors reliant on low-interest rates. Stocks linked to consumer spending and housing could be particularly affected by any perceived instability in economic policy stemming from these comments.
Geopolitical Context
While the article focuses primarily on domestic economic policy, it indirectly touches upon global economic dynamics, particularly through references to the European Central Bank. This context may resonate with broader discussions on international trade and economic strategies.
Use of AI in Composition
There is no clear indication that AI was used in crafting this article, as it maintains a consistent journalistic style. However, if AI were involved, it might have influenced the selection of quotes or structured the arguments for clarity. The potential use of algorithms to analyze public sentiment or trending topics could shape the narrative direction. In summary, while the article presents facts about Trump's views on the Federal Reserve, it also constructs a narrative that may sway public opinion and market sentiment, reflecting the ongoing complexities of U.S. economic policy.