Trump pick for workplace safety agency sparks fears heat protections will be derailed

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Concerns Rise Over Heat Safety Protections Following Trump's OSHA Nominee David Keeling"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

As the United States braces for another potentially record-breaking hot summer, concerns are mounting regarding the nomination of David Keeling to lead the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Keeling, who previously held executive roles at major companies like United Parcel Service (UPS) and Amazon, has a controversial background concerning workplace safety, particularly in relation to heat exposure. Under his leadership, there are fears that OSHA may abandon efforts to establish the nation’s first federal labor protections against extreme heat, despite ongoing pressure from organized labor and advocates for worker safety. The Biden administration had initiated the development of a federal heat standard, which aimed to provide essential protections such as access to water, shade, breaks, and training, potentially benefiting around 36 million workers. However, corporate interests have actively pushed against these rules, raising doubts about whether Keeling will support meaningful heat protections or instead facilitate their dilution.

Keeling's tenure at UPS and Amazon was marked by significant scrutiny, as both companies have faced numerous OSHA citations for safety violations related to heat exposure, including substantial financial penalties. Investigations revealed that during Keeling's time in leadership roles, a considerable number of workers were hospitalized due to heat-related incidents, and several fatalities occurred, raising alarms among safety advocates. Critics argue that Keeling’s past associations with these corporations could lead to conflicts of interest that might bias OSHA's regulatory approach. As federal health experts have long called for a national heat standard, the potential postponement or weakening of such a rule under Keeling’s administration poses a significant risk to worker safety amid increasing summer temperatures driven by climate change. The upcoming public hearing on the federal heat standard will be a critical moment for stakeholders to voice their concerns, as Keeling's confirmation hearing remains pending, leaving many workers anxious about the future of heat safety regulations under his leadership.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights significant concerns regarding the implications of Donald Trump’s nomination of David Keeling to lead the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). With the U.S. facing potentially extreme heat this summer, fears arise that essential labor protections against heat exposure may be compromised under Keeling's leadership.

Concerns Over Worker Safety Protections

The nomination has raised alarm among labor advocates who believe that Keeling’s past affiliations with major corporations like UPS and Amazon, both of which have faced scrutiny over worker safety, might lead to a rollback of necessary heat protections. The article emphasizes that OSHA had previously moved towards establishing federal standards to protect workers from extreme heat, a significant development after years of advocacy.

Corporate Influence on Policy

The corporate pushback against these heat protections is evident, as major companies lobby against regulations that would increase their operational costs. The article suggests that Keeling may align with corporate interests, potentially undermining the progress made in worker safety standards. This relationship raises questions about the effectiveness of OSHA under his leadership in truly advocating for worker rights against corporate pressures.

Public Sentiment and Worker Experiences

The fears articulated by workers, such as the UPS driver who experienced heat exhaustion, reflect a broader sentiment among laborers who are concerned about their safety. The article captures the anxiety among workers who feel that their health and well-being are at risk if regulations are weakened. This personal narrative adds an emotional layer to the overall argument against the nomination.

Potential Political and Economic Impact

Should OSHA’s focus shift away from enforcing heat safety regulations, the implications could extend beyond worker safety to political ramifications, igniting protests or activism from labor groups. The article indicates that such changes could foster greater tension between labor and corporate entities, possibly affecting economic dynamics as public opinion shifts in response to worker safety issues.

Connections to Broader Trends

This news piece connects to wider discussions on labor rights and corporate accountability, particularly in the context of climate change and extreme weather events. The urgency of the situation is underscored by the approaching summer, which is expected to be hotter than usual, making the establishment of effective heat protection standards more critical than ever.

Reliability and Trustworthiness of the Information

The article appears to be well-researched, drawing on specific examples of worker experiences and corporate behaviors. However, it does exhibit a bias towards labor advocacy, which might influence the presentation of facts. While the concerns raised are valid, the framing of Keeling’s nomination could be viewed as alarmist, impacting the overall perceived reliability of the report.

In conclusion, while the article presents credible concerns, it also reflects a particular narrative that may influence public opinion against corporate interests in favor of labor safety. The underlying motivation of the article seems to be to galvanize public support for stronger worker protections amidst growing corporate influence over regulatory bodies.

Unanalyzed Article Content

As the US prepares for what could be anotherrecord-breaking hot summer, Donald Trump and his pick to lead the nation’s workplace safety agency are expected to derail the creation of the nation’s first-ever federal labor protections from extreme heat.

Trump in February nominated David Keeling to lead the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Osha). Keeling formerly served as an executive at the United Parcel Service (UPS) and Amazon – both of which have faced citations from Osha for worker injuries and deaths amid heat exposure. The companies deny the deaths were heat-related.

Under Keeling, Osha is expected to thwart heat protections. After years of pressure from organized labor, the agency in 2021 began working to create a federal heat standard, and last year rolled out adraft ruleaimed at requiring access to water, shade, breaks and training which the Biden administration estimated would protect 36 million workers.

But corporations have pushed to gut the rules, and there are concerns among safety advocates and some workers that Keeling could help them do so.

Seth Pacic, a UPS delivery driver and union steward in Dallas, Texas, who has experiencedheat exhaustionon the job, said he feared “any meaningful policy to combat heat injuries will be put on hold while he holds the position”.

Keeling served as vice-president of global health and safety at UPS from 2018 to 2021, and as director of road and transportation safety at Amazon from 2021 to 2023. Both companies havefacedbacklashfor heat-related workplace incidents.

Arecent review of federal recordsby investigative outlet the Lever found that during Keeling’s tenure, Osha fined the two companies a combined $2m for more than three hundred workplace safety citations, including for heat-related incidents.

In the past decade, more than170 UPS workershave been hospitalized due to heat exposure, including more than 50 during Keeling’s tenure. And atAmazonandUPS, at least seven workers died after extreme heat exposure in recent years with at least three of those deaths occurring when Keeling was at the companies.Both companiesdeniedany of the deaths were both heat-related and job-related.

“These are companies that are known to be not that great when it comes to dealing with extreme heat,” said Juley Fulcher, a worker health and safety advocate at consumer advocacy non-profit Public Citizen.

Reached for comment, Courtney Parella, spokesperson for the Department of Labor, Osha’s parent agency, said: “Osha’s mission to protect workers’ health and safety remains a clear priority for this administration. David Keeling was nominated to advance that mission and engage stakeholders thoughtfully on policy and rulemaking decisions.”

Both UPS and Amazon defended their heat policies.Amazon has said its practicesmeet state and federal requirements and, in some cases, go beyond them. UPS has said it has comprehensive training and protocols tosupport employeeswhich it is continuously working to improve.

“At UPS, we focus on safety every day and always look for ways to improve. Over the past five years, we’ve invested more than 33m hours and nearly $2bn on safety training,” said Becca Hunnicutt, spokesperson for UPS. “We report all recordable injuries to Osha and train our employees to seek immediate treatment if they recognize or report any signs or symptoms of heat stress.”

She added that the company supplies materials including water, ice and electrolytes to employees and has partnered with various firms to train them on heat safety and provide them with cooling fabrics.

Sam Stephenson, Amazon spokesperson, said: “We take the health and safety of our employees incredibly seriously … For example, all of our fulfillment centers have climate-controlled systems that are monitored throughout the day; all of our Amazon branded delivery vehicles have air conditioning; and we’ve invested $59m to insulate our vans to help reduce the internal temperatures for our delivery partners.”

He said the recent Lever reporting “oversimplifies complex issues and provides broad generalizations in an effort to purposefully mislead its readers”.

“The fact is, Amazon has not been cited for any heat-related deaths,” he said. “Safety is our top priority across all our operations and any implication, stated or otherwise, is false.” Though Osha didciteAmazon forheat-related conditions, he said the company has appealed.

In previous statements both UPS and Amazon have defended their heat policies.Amazon has said its practicesmeet state and federal requirements and, in some cases, go beyond them. UPS has said it has comprehensive training and protocols tosupport employeeswhich it is continuously working to improve.

Keeling said he was unable to comment for the piece until he is confirmed by the Senate.In a 2021 op-ed, he wrote that he began his work at UPS in 1985 as a package handler – a role which showed him the importance of “safety and wellness”, as well as “sleep and hydration”. That experience informed his work as a safety executive, he wrote, encouraging him to “seek out the input and perspective of frontline employees”.

The Teamsters union, which represents UPS employees and some Amazon workers, endorsed Keeling’s nomination overdissentfrom some members of the rank and file.

Federal health and safety experts first recommended Osha create a national heat standardmore than 50 years ago. In the intervening years, US summers have warmedsignificantlydue to the climate crisis.

Sign up toHeadlines US

Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning

after newsletter promotion

The Department of Labor estimates that more than 400 US workers died from heat-related causes between 2011 and 2021. Many experts believe that to be a vast understatement; Public Citizenestimatesthe true number is up to 2,000 a year, with an additional 170,000 heat-related injuries and illnesses annually.

A federal heat standard, experts say, could drastically decrease those numbers. But Osha is under no obligation to finalize the rule under Trump.

“They could put it on a shelf and say, we’re just not going to do anything with this,” said Fulcher.

Recent cuts to regulatory staff at Osha could make it difficult for the agency to finalize a rule “even if they wanted to,” said Jordan Barab, former deputy assistant secretary of labor at Osha from 2009 to 2017. But if it musters up the ability to work on the rule, the agency could gut it, Barab said.

Corporations, including UPS, have spent millions lobbyingagainstthe standard. In public comments to Osha on the 2024 draft rule, many companies contested provisions that would mandate breaks for workers, trigger certain protections when the temperature crosses80F and 90F, and require that new and returning workers face limited heat exposure.

A weakened final rule could also exempt certain workers and workplaces, Barab said.

Osha will host apublic hearingon the federal heat standard next month.

Keeling’s confirmation hearing has yet to be scheduled. During Trump’s first term, the Senate never brought his nominee for OSHA head up for a vote.

If given the opportunity, Senators should press the nominee on potential “favoritism” toward UPS and Amazon, said Fulcher.

“There’s always a potential question about conflict when someone is regulating companies where they worked,” she said. “And these are two huge, massive companies that employ hundreds of thousands of people and are going to certainly be the subject of a lot of complaints.”

Senators should ask Keeling questions “with workers in mind”, said Antoine Andrews, who has worked at UPS in Brooklyn, New York, for 29 years.

“I hope they think of the hardworking people getting up every day to support themselves and their loved ones and keep the country running,” said Andrews, who also serves as a union steward.

“We need people who are going to protect workers from the crisis of heat,” Andrews said. “But Keeling? We’re afraid he will be biased in the other direction.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian