Trump officials cutting $1bn in NIH grants is ‘void and illegal’, judge rules

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration's NIH Grant Cuts Illegal and Discriminatory"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration's decision to cut over $1 billion in research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was 'void and illegal'. In his ruling, U.S. District Judge William Young characterized the funding cuts as unlawful acts of racial discrimination, particularly targeting research that focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as well as issues related to the LGBTQ community. Young, appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, expressed that he had never encountered a case where racial discrimination was so evident. As a result of this ruling, Judge Young ordered the reinstatement of grants that had previously been awarded to various organizations and to 16 Democratic-led states that had filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration in response to the funding cuts.

The funding cuts initiated by the Trump administration in February were part of an effort to reduce the federal budget and government size, led by presidential adviser Elon Musk and a newly created 'department of government efficiency'. These cuts were intended to eliminate 10,000 jobs from federal health agencies and were met with significant backlash from various health organizations, including the American Public Health Association and the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW). The lawsuit claimed that the NIH deviated from its established science-based review processes, opting instead for vague priorities that undermined critical research related to race, gender identity, and equity. Since Trump took office, the NIH has reportedly cut around 2,100 research grants valued at over $12 billion. NIH director Jay Bhattacharya has indicated that he is currently exploring options to restore some of the funding that was previously terminated, although the judge's ruling only addresses a portion of the grants involved in the lawsuit. Further claims will be evaluated in due course as both parties prepare to present additional evidence.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

A federal judge ruled on Monday that the Trump administration’s termination of more than $1bn in research grants at the National Institutes of Health was “void and illegal”.

US district judge William Young added that the cuts, which targeted research with a perceived connection to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), represented unlawful “racial discrimination and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community”, Reuters reported. Young, who was appointed to the bench by former president Ronald Reagan, added that he had “never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable”.

Young ordered that grants previously awarded to the organizations and 16 Democratic-led states that filed the lawsuit against the Trump administration be reinstated.

In February, the Trump administrationslashedbillions of dollars in NIH funding, in an attempt to shrink the federal government and national debt led by then presidential adviser Elon Musk and his so-called “department of government efficiency”. The move came amid efforts to cut 10,000 jobs from federal health agencies.

Sign up toThis Week in Trumpland

A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration

after newsletter promotion

In April, the American Public Health Association; the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW); and other health expertsfiled suit, saying the cuts had targeted research with any connection to race, gender identity, vaccines or equity. The legal complaint claimed that the NIH broke from its science-based review process in preference of “vague” new priorities.

According to a letter signed by dozens of NIH employees, the NIH has cut 2,100 research grantsvalued at more than $12bnsince Donald Trump took office.

During a Senate committee hearing last week, NIH director, Jay Bhattacharya, said he “didn’t take this job to terminate grants”, and was evaluating ways to restore some funding.

Young’s ruling on Monday only applies to some of the grants mentioned in the lawsuit. The federal judge will rule on further claims after both sides present additional evidence.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian