In case you hadn’t noticed, things have not been going well for the west.In just three months,Donald Trumphas started trade wars, crippled Nato, dismantled USAID and humiliated an invaded democracy while praising its aggressor, among other things. We still have 45 months to go. Through his antics, the US president is normalizing, even encouraging, intense selfishness and disregard for others. The clearest example is USAID: if the richest, most powerful country in the world thinks it’s a waste to give a tiny fraction of its income to the poorest, worst off people in the world, you must be a real sucker if you care for others.This comes on top of a longer trend of declining western happiness and disconnection. In 2012, the United States ranked 11th in theWorld Happiness Report. This year, it was 24th. In 2023, one in four Americans reported eating all their meals alone. That figure has risen 53% in just two decades.These short- and long-term trends are no coincidence.New researchshows that unhappy people vote for populists, those who promise to rip the system apart. Importantly, it also finds that trust explains which type of populists unhappy people support: low-trust people vote for far-right parties, whereas high-trust people go far left. Therefore, we should see Trumpism as both a symptom of a lower-trust, lower-happiness society and a cause of further misery and mistrust.Fighting back doesn’t have to mean shouting louder. Another option is gracious, determined decencyBut what should you do if you don’t like the way the world is going? Is there anything you can do?The obvious answer is to rage, doomscroll and hope for the next election. But the obvious answer is no longer an option once we realize the antidote to Trump is to build a happier, higher trust society. Drawing on my dual experience as a moral philosopher and happiness researcher, I’d like to suggest some alternative ways you can fight back.Trumpism is built on pettiness and self-interest, so resisting means embodying the opposite virtues. To paraphrase a much better president: do not ask what the world can do for your happiness – ask what you can do for the happiness of the world. You commit yourself to making the biggest difference you can – even when others do not.It starts internally. Epictetus, the Stoic philosopher born a Roman slave, wrote: “We cannot choose our external circumstances, but we can always choose how we respond to them.” That idea, now a pillar of modern psychotherapy, is especially relevant in moments like this. Trump and co want to make you feel helpless and furious. Keeping your composure and finding joy are acts of resistance.It continues locally. Make an effort to build social connections where you live. Research shows when we share meals with others, volunteer or strike up friendly conversations with strangers, we’re not just making ourselves and others happier. We’re rebuilding the social fabric that authoritarian politics tears apart and reducing the distrust that fuels politicians like Trump. Higher trust and happiness make us less susceptible to the politics of fear and resentment; the data backs this up.Some good news is that our perceptions of mistrust are misplaced. There have been global studies in which researchers drop wallets to see what percentage is returned. A40-country studyfound actual wallet return rates are abouttwice as highas people expected. In the US, two-thirds were returned – against the view that one-third would be. Simply recognizing we can trust others more than we thought is a helpful step forward. You could join a localAction for Happinessgroup.Recent researcheven shows prosocial activity is reliably linked to fewer “deaths of despair”. Your kindness could save lives.skip past newsletter promotionSign up toFighting BackFree newsletterBig thinkers on what we can do to protect civil liberties and fundamental freedoms in a Trump presidency. From our opinion desk.Enter your email addressSign upPrivacy Notice:Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see ourPrivacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the GooglePrivacy PolicyandTerms of Serviceapply.after newsletter promotionTrump was ‘the candidate of peace’. Now he’s fanning the flames of war | Mohamad BazziRead moreAt the national level, we need to see politicians taking social connection – not just the economy – more seriously. If it seems fluffy or unimportant, look at where ignoring them has got us: he’s in the Oval Office. Academics are starting to assess policies by their “bang for buck” at improving wellbeing: economists at the London School of Economics published a first,milestone review in 2024. Policy nerds should take notice.It ends globally. My colleagues and I at theHappier Lives Instituterecently published the first global analysis of how much happiness different charities produce per dollar. We found a striking result. The most effective charities – often tackling issues such as depression or malnutrition in low-income countries – have about 150 times the impact of the average rich-country charity. If someone gave $150,000 to charity, you’d consider them a hero. It turns out you can do as much good by giving $1,000 – if you follow the evidence and pick wisely. Giving 1% of your income to these organizations is a quiet act of moral clarity in a noisy, self-interested world.Fighting back doesn’t have to mean shouting louder. Another option is gracious, determined decency. Choose kindness over cruelty, generosity over selfishness, and evidence over bluster. Today, these quiet choices are acts of radical courage – ones that help build a better tomorrow. They might even make you happier, too.What’s giving me hopeTrumpism is the symptom of a less happy, less trusting society. But we are far from powerless to change this. There are several ways we can each make a difference – starting with our own minds and local communities and finishing with helping others around the world. What gives me hope is realizing we have the potential to understand what’s going wrong in our society and do our part to improve it.Michael Plant is the founder & research director of the Happier Lives Institute. He is a Global Happiness Researcher and Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of Oxford’s Wellbeing Research Centre, which publishes the annual World Happiness Report
Trump is creating a selfish, miserable world. Here’s what we can do | Michael Plant
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Addressing the Societal Impact of Trumpism: A Call for Connection and Kindness"
TruthLens AI Summary
The article discusses the troubling state of Western society under the influence of Donald Trump's presidency, highlighting the normalization of selfishness and disregard for others as significant societal issues. In just three months, Trump has initiated trade wars, weakened NATO, dismantled USAID, and shown support for authoritarian regimes, which has contributed to a broader trend of declining happiness and increased disconnection among populations. The United States, which ranked 11th in the World Happiness Report in 2012, has fallen to 24th place, with one in four Americans reporting they eat all their meals alone—a statistic that has risen dramatically over the past two decades. This decline in happiness correlates with a shift in political support, where unhappy individuals are more likely to gravitate towards populist leaders like Trump, driven by a lack of trust and a yearning for systemic change. The article posits that Trumpism is both a symptom of a society grappling with diminished happiness and trust, and a catalyst for further societal turmoil.
To counteract the negativity and divisiveness promoted by Trumpism, the article suggests that individuals can take proactive steps to foster a more connected and trusting society. This begins with personal reflection and choosing to respond to external circumstances with resilience and positivity, as emphasized by Stoic philosophy. Building local social connections through shared meals, volunteering, and engaging with others can help repair the social fabric that authoritarian politics often tears apart. The findings of global studies on trust indicate that perceptions of societal mistrust are often exaggerated, with actual rates of goodwill being significantly higher than anticipated. Furthermore, at a national level, there is a call for policymakers to prioritize social connection as a crucial component of well-being. The article concludes with a hopeful message that individual and collective efforts can lead to a happier and more trusting society, countering the pervasive negativity of the current political climate.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article presents a critical perspective on Donald Trump's presidency, emphasizing the negative impacts of his policies and behaviors on society. It suggests that his actions are fostering a culture of selfishness and misery, which in turn affects the overall happiness and trust within society. The author connects these trends to the rise of populism and argues for the need to build a more compassionate and happier society as a countermeasure to the current political climate.
Purpose Behind the Publication
This piece aims to raise awareness about the detrimental effects of Trump's leadership on societal values and individual happiness. It seeks to mobilize readers to consider their role in countering what the author perceives as a toxic political environment. By highlighting the consequences of Trump's actions, the article encourages a collective response towards fostering a more equitable and caring society.
Public Perception Intended
The article is likely designed to resonate with those who are disillusioned with current political dynamics, particularly individuals who value community, altruism, and social responsibility. It aims to generate a sense of urgency and a call to action among readers who may feel marginalized or unhappy by the prevailing political attitudes.
Concealment of Information
While the article focuses on criticizing Trump and his policies, it may not delve deeply into the complexities of the political landscape or alternative viewpoints. This selective emphasis could obscure the nuances of broader political discussions, particularly those that might challenge the author's perspective.
Manipulative Elements
The article can be seen as somewhat manipulative due to its emotive language and the framing of Trumpism as a direct cause of societal decline. By linking happiness and trust to political beliefs, it simplifies complex sociopolitical dynamics and may lead readers to a predetermined conclusion without exploring other factors.
Truthfulness of the Content
The claims made in the article are supported by statistics and research, particularly regarding happiness and political behaviors. However, the interpretation of these facts is subjective and reflects the author's viewpoint, which could limit the perceived objectivity of the information presented.
Societal Message
The overarching message suggests that the current political climate under Trump is detrimental to society and that a more compassionate approach is necessary. This call for decency and higher trust aims to inspire a shift in collective values toward more altruistic behaviors.
Connection to Other News
This article fits into a broader narrative concerning the critique of populism and the examination of societal happiness in relation to political leadership. It shares thematic similarities with other pieces that explore the implications of leadership styles on public well-being.
Media Image and Reputation
The publication likely seeks to establish itself as a platform for progressive thought, appealing to readers who are concerned about social justice and community welfare. This positioning may strengthen its reputation among liberal audiences.
Potential Societal Impact
The article could influence public opinion and voter behavior, particularly among those who feel disenchanted with current leadership. It may also contribute to a broader movement advocating for political change and societal improvement.
Target Audience
This piece likely resonates with progressive and liberal communities who are inclined to support social justice and humanitarian efforts. It may appeal specifically to individuals who are dissatisfied with the status quo and are seeking alternatives to populist rhetoric.
Market Implications
While the article itself may not directly influence stock markets, the sentiments expressed could impact investor confidence in sectors perceived as vulnerable under Trump’s policies. Industries related to social services, healthcare, and international relations may be particularly affected.
Global Power Dynamics
The article addresses themes relevant to global governance and the perception of American leadership on the world stage. It suggests that the current trajectory under Trump could weaken international alliances and exacerbate global social issues.
AI Influence in Writing
It is unlikely that AI was directly used in crafting this article, as it reflects a specific moral viewpoint and personal insights from the author. However, AI could have been utilized in data gathering or analysis of happiness statistics, influencing how the arguments were shaped.
Conclusion on Reliability
Overall, while the article presents factual data and credible concerns, its clear bias towards a specific political stance raises questions about its objectivity. Readers should consider the author's perspective and the broader context when evaluating the reliability of the claims made.