Trump 100 days: Trump’s whirlwind start to his second presidency

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Trump's First 100 Days Marked by Controversial Policies and Global Disruption"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the first 100 days of Donald Trump’s second presidency, the United States has witnessed unprecedented changes and controversies that have significantly altered both domestic and foreign policies. Trump's administration has implemented drastic measures, including the militarization of immigration enforcement, which has led to law-abiding migrants being sent to foreign prisons. His administration has been characterized by a series of sweeping tariffs that have disrupted global trade, particularly affecting long-standing allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Trump's aggressive stance toward NATO and European allies, whom he has labeled as 'freeloaders,' has raised alarms about the future of US foreign relations. His administration's approach has been compared to that of former President James Monroe, as he has sought to expand US influence in the western hemisphere while retreating from traditional partnerships in Europe. Additionally, Trump’s administration has issued a record number of executive orders, including controversial moves that target immigration policies and federal workforce reductions, raising significant legal and humanitarian concerns.

The ramifications of Trump's policies are already being felt across various sectors, with tens of thousands of federal workers fired and critical programs facing cuts or reorganization. The administration's aggressive use of executive power has resulted in significant legal challenges, particularly regarding the treatment of immigrants and the dismantling of agencies like USAID. Trump's pardoning of individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection has further polarized the political landscape. Protests have erupted nationwide in response to his administration's actions, with Democratic leaders struggling to mount an effective opposition. As Trump continues to dominate media attention and reshape the political discourse, the consequences of his first 100 days are likely to resonate both domestically and internationally in the years to come, raising questions about the future of democracy and governance in the United States.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a critical overview of the first 100 days of Donald Trump’s second presidency, highlighting a series of controversial policies that have drawn significant attention and criticism domestically and internationally. By focusing on extreme actions and statements, the piece aims to shape perceptions of Trump's governance style and its implications for both the U.S. and global politics.

Purpose Behind the Article

This news piece appears to aim at raising awareness about the drastic changes in U.S. foreign policy and governance under Trump. It emphasizes the potential dangers of his administration's approach, particularly regarding international relations and domestic issues such as worker rights and civil liberties. The intent may be to galvanize public discourse and critique the administration’s trajectory.

Public Perception and Impressions

The article is likely designed to generate a sense of alarm and concern among the audience. By detailing Trump's aggressive stances towards allies and the imposition of tariffs, it portrays a picture of a president who is reshaping the U.S. role in the world in a negative way. The language used suggests that Trump's actions could lead to increased isolationism and a breakdown of international cooperation.

Omissions and Hidden Agendas

There might be elements that the article does not address, such as the potential support Trump still retains among certain voter bases or the complexities of the economic impacts of his policies. By focusing on the negative aspects, it could be argued that the narrative downplays any positive effects of his policies or the perspectives of his supporters.

Manipulative Elements

The article leans towards a critical stance, which raises the question of manipulative intent. The choice of language—using strong adjectives to describe Trump's actions—could be seen as an attempt to elicit a particular emotional response from the reader. This framing can influence public opinion and may serve to deepen political divides.

Comparison with Other Articles

When compared with other reports on Trump's presidency, this article aligns with a broader trend of critical journalism that scrutinizes his policies and rhetoric. However, it may lack balance by not providing counterarguments or highlighting any achievements that Trump supporters might cite.

Impact on Society, Economy, and Politics

The portrayal of Trump's policies could have significant ramifications. It may mobilize opposition movements and influence voter sentiment leading up to future elections. Economically, the tariffs and trade wars highlighted could create volatility in markets, affecting various sectors, including agriculture and manufacturing.

Target Audiences

This article likely resonates more with liberal and progressive audiences who are critical of Trump. It appeals to those who prioritize international cooperation and are concerned about civil liberties, suggesting a deliberate targeting of these communities.

Market Influence

The implications of Trump's tariffs and foreign policy decisions could have far-reaching consequences in global markets. Stocks related to trade-sensitive industries might experience volatility, while companies that rely on international supply chains could be particularly affected.

Geopolitical Significance

The article underscores a potential shift in global power dynamics, reflecting concerns about the U.S.'s retreat from traditional alliances. This is particularly relevant in the current global context, where geopolitical tensions are on the rise.

Artificial Intelligence Involvement

It's possible that AI tools were used in the writing process, particularly in structuring arguments or analyzing data. While the article's tone and perspective remain distinctly human, AI might have been employed to identify trends or craft certain narrative elements.

In conclusion, this article projects a clear and critical viewpoint on Trump's presidency, emphasizing the tumultuous nature of his administration’s early days. The reliability of the article hinges on its selective focus on negative consequences, suggesting a need for readers to seek out diverse perspectives for a more nuanced understanding.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Law-abiding migrants sent to foreign prisons. Sweeping tariffs disrupting global markets. Students detained for protest. Violent insurrectionists pardoned. Tens of thousands of federal workers fired. The supreme court ignored.

The first 100 days ofDonald Trump’s second term have shocked the United States and the world. On the eve of his inauguration, Trump promised the “most extraordinary first 100 days of any presidency in American history”, and what followed has been a whirlwind pace of extreme policies and actions that have reshaped the federal government and the US’s role in the world.

Let’s look at what he has achieved and destroyed.

Trump’s first 100 days has been marked by arguably the biggest shake-up inUS foreign policysince 1945. He has feuded withNatoand turned onUkraine, slapped tariffs on US allies around the globe, ignored international institutions and publicly admired dictators fromVladimir PutintoEl Salvador’s Nayib Bukele.

Trump has called European allies “freeloaders” who have relied on the US to pay for their defense and said he would not defend allies who didn’t meet a spending threshold of 2% of GDP. He has accused European allies of conspiring to “screw over” the US by forming theEuropean Union. “The west as we knew it no longer exists,” the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said.

Video-2: To view this video please download this article it in our app

As Trump has retreated from Europe, he has increasingly thrown the US’s weight around the western hemisphere. He said Canada should become the 51st state, threatened to annexGreenland, and proposed in his inaugural speech that the US “take back” thePanama canal. Some have compared his foreign policy to that of James Monroe, the former president who in 1823 declared a US sphere of influence inNorth and South America.

Trump’shaphazard imposition of tariffshas angered US allies from Europe to Asia, where longtime trade partners such asJapan,South KoreaandTaiwanhave scrambled to try to negotiate new deals to protect their economies from severe shocks.China’sXi Jinpinghas toured south-east Asia, seeking to promote Beijing as the world’s protector of rules-based trade and calling on countries to “jointly oppose unilateral bullying”.

If Trump has seemed transactional toward Europe, then his top advisers have appeared downright hostile.JD Vancemade waves in Munich when he portrayed European leaders as ideological tyrants and accused them of “running in fear of your own voters”.Muskhas backed far-right movements from the UK’s Reform to Germany’s AfD.

Trump issued more than 1,500 pardons or commutations to people convicted in connection to theJanuary 6 attackon the US Capitol.

– Trump in a February post on X, underscoring that he believes he can justify breaking the law

In March, the Trump administration ignored an order from the US district judge James Boasberg to turn around a plane headed to El Salvador containing people alleged to be gang members. It was astaggering act of defiance.

Trump and allies have threatened judges who have ruled against them. “This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!,” Trump said in an 18 March post onTruth Social. Elon Musk, a top Trump adviser, has also called for impeaching judges andsupported Republicanswho champion doing so.

Trump has used executive ordersto punishlaw firms connected to rivals or that have taken on causes averse to his administration. Several firms have settled with Trump to avoid being punished. Others have successfully sued the administration.

Trump did not wait to return to the White House before threatening China, Canada and Mexico with sweeping tariffs. These would be implemented on the first day of his second term, he declared. This was the first of many times Trump would attempt to use the threat of an economic assault to force countries to bend to his will.

For Canada and Mexico, the supposed deadline for threatened tariffs shifted from January, to February, to March. When tariffs were imposed, it was barely 48 hours before all goods covered by a previous trilateral trade deal were spared. Companies caught in the crossfire struggled to keep up.

Trump and his aides sought to bill 2 April 2025 – the day he presented sweeping tariffs on much of the world, including China – as “liberation day”. The plan lasted all of a week before it was watered down. All of the countries in the administration’s sights except China now face a blanket tariff of 10%, rather than the higher rates, after a global market sell-off and warnings of recession.

While Trump has repeatedly pulled back from the brink of all-out economic war with most countries, China is the exception. When Beijing retaliated against US tariffs, Trump hiked them further – leaving the world’s two largest economies spiraling into a tit-for-tat dispute. US tariffs on Chinese goods stand at 145%.

Amid mounting concern over the impact of Trump’s volatile trade strategy on the economy, and the risk of recession, businesses of all sizes are attempting to grab a moving target. “Nobody knows what’s coming next,” John Cochrane, an economist at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University,observedrecently.

On day one, Trump signed an executive order creating the “department of government efficiency” (Doge) – a novel initiative chaired by Elon Musk. In the weeks that followed, Doge staff, many of whom are former employees at Musk’s companies and lack government experience, embedded themselves in federal agencies large and small, directing sudden and disruptive cuts to programs and payrolls.

TheTrump administrationmoved to dramatically shrink the federal workforce, first by proposing buyouts. About 75,000 employees opted to leave, as did thousands more in the weeks that followed. But the numbers were fewer than the White House hoped, so cabinet secretaries fired tens of thousands more, while Trump approved the termination of about 25,000 employees on their probationary periods. The supreme court refused to hear a challenge to the latter firings in April.

Trump moved to dismantleUSAID, which has administered Washington’s foreign aid agenda for more than six decades, and fold it into the state department. He also directed the education secretary, Linda McMahon, to oversee the closure of her department. The offensives against these and other agencies quickly wound up in the courts.

Doge has left few corners of the federal government untouched. But reports have emerged that Musk’s initiative is grating some of Trump’s newly confirmed cabinet secretaries, who see him as unhelpfully disrupting their departments. In March, Trump reportedly stopped Musk from seeing the defense department’s secret plans for a potential war with China during his visit to the Pentagon, noting that the Tesla boss had extensive business interests in China.

Musk was a major financial supporter of Trump’s campaign to return to the presidency. But his foray into the race for aWisconsinsupreme court seat in April was not as successful. Although he spent about $20m supporting the former Republican attorney general Brad Schimel, voters instead choose the Democratic-backed Susan Crawford, preserving the 4-3 liberal majority on the state’s highest court.

Trump has been everywhere all the time, dominating the “attention economy” like no other public figure. He takes questions from reporters far more often than his predecessor Joe Biden. He posts frequently on his Truth Social platform. He has attended the Super Bowl, Ultimate Fighting Championship and other sporting events.

The White House banned the Associated Press from events in the Oval Office and Air Force One over the news agency’s refusal to obey Trump’s executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. The AP sued over access to presidential events and won a court ruling, though it was unclear if and when the White House would put it into effect.

The White House took over deciding which outlets are allowed to take part in the press pool, a group that acts as the eyes and ears of the media covering the president up close, and included more fringe outlets. Rightwing journalists also became more prominent at press briefings.

More than 1,300 Voice of America journalists, producers and assistants were placed on leave, crippling a broadcaster that was founded in 1942 to counter Nazi propaganda and operates in almost 50 languages. Grants to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia were terminated. A judge recently ordered the restoration of Voice of America’s operations, but the administration is likely to appeal.

Trump has signed 140 executive orders in his first 100 days, including 36 in his first week in office. His use of the presidential pen is unprecedented in modern US history. Below are the number of executive orders presidents signed in their first 100 days.

Trump’s day one border emergency declaration deployed 1,500 active-duty troops alongside 2,500 national guard members to thesouthern border. Framing migration as an “invasion”, the order militarized immigration enforcement and redirected defense resources to border control, raising serious legal and humanitarian concerns about the use of the military for domestic enforcement.

The reinstated “Schedule F” executive order has stripped tens of thousands of federal employees of civil service protections, allowing the administration to fire career officials deemed disloyal.

A week after the Columbia graduate and green card holderMahmoud Khalilwas detained in March, Trump signed an order called “Securing American Values” to target visa holders who have participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. The order directs immigration agencies to authorize visa revocations of demonstrators linked to organizations accused of hate speech, and detain and expedite deportations for those involved in activity the administration deems antisemitic.

Trump’s unconstitutional day one executive order aimed to end automatic citizenship for babies born on US soil to undocumented immigrants or those on temporary visas – directly challenging the 14th amendment’s guarantee that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States” are citizens. The order remains blocked by courts pending litigation.

The administration’s foreign aid freeze has halted thousands of humanitarian and development programs worldwide. The executive order targeting USAID has disrupted even life-saving health initiatives like HIV treatment in Africa, even though the administration says they have not been affected.

Video-1: To view this video please download this articlein our app

Trump has suspended all refugee resettlement into the United States, leaving tens of thousands of people in an overseas limbo. The indefinite pause on the resettlement program has made it nearly impossible for refugees fleeing war and violence to seek safe haven in the US. The order is subject to ongoing legal action.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) arrests in February outstripped not just the same period under Biden but even the figures from Trump’s first term.

TheTrump administrationused an 18th-century wartime law to deport scores ofVenezuelansto El Salvador, where they are being held in adraconian mega-prisonknown as Cecot. Trump’s use of the law faces legal challenges. Onboard one of the deportation flights was a Maryland father with protected legal status mistakenly deported in what the administration called an “administrative error”. The supreme court has ordered the US to “facilitate” his return.

In anextraordinary crackdown on free speech, the Trump administration has tracked down and detained international students involved in pro-Palestinian protests, among themMahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate and lawful permanent resident.

The Trump administration now allows immigration authorities to make arrests in schools, healthcare facilities and places of worship. But on 7 April, federal agents were denied entry to two Los Angeles area elementary schools after they alleged the children entered the US without documentation.

After a slower start than Trump’s first term, protests have erupted across the country, including in small towns in Republican areas, standing up against his overreach. Established groups have joined together with a decentralized protest movement around broad messages against oligarchy and dismantling democracy.

Elon Musk proved a potent target for the opposition, given his prominent role leading Doge as it slashed through the federal government. As Doge cut through agency after agency, people turned up outside federal offices in opposition. “TeslaTakedown” protests at local dealerships went after his publicly traded company, tanking the stock.

After a bruising electoral loss, Democratic officials struggled to find their voices as an effective resistance to an emboldened Trump, but some have found a footing.Bernie SandersandAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez launched an anti-oligarchy tour, drawing huge crowds. Some Democrats, including Congressman Al Green, disrupted a joint session of Congress.Cory Bookergave a record-breaking 25-hour speech on the Senate floor. Meanwhile, the party announced a new effort to funnel money into critical state races.

Video-3: To view this video please download this articlein our app

A strategy that worked well in the first Trump term remained a major plank of the opposition: endless lawsuits. A coalition of Democratic attorneys general have brought handfuls of suits, often successful, to stop his actions. Outside groups have filed lawsuits over his unconstitutional plans. But his administration is defying court orders in some instances, a sign that the courts alone won’t be enough to stop him.

Net approval rating

Trump’s first 100 days were largely designed to make a statement, and they achieved that goal. But it’s clear that within this time period there have been consequences to the executive orders, policy making and budget cuts that could continue to spiral out of the president’s control.The impacts will crystallize in the lives of the American public, and abroad, in the more than 1,300 days to come.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian