Trade deal with US could spell end of UK’s bioethanol industry, say bosses

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Concerns Rise Over UK Bioethanol Industry's Future Amid US Trade Deal"

Trade deal with US could spell end of UK’s bioethanol industry, say bosses analysis cover image The Guardian 7.1
Image Source: https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/680ebde6cc3284dca040fd89a54fd6114ded012e/518_0_5731_4587/master/5731.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&enable=upscale&s=189529aaebe907c70533ffb777ed745d
Original Article Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/may/12/uk-us-trade-deal-bioethanol-industry-bosses
View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The British bioethanol industry faces a potential collapse due to a trade deal negotiated by Keir Starmer with the United States, according to industry leaders from ABF Sugar and Ensus, the two major companies responsible for nearly all bioethanol production in the UK. The deal proposes a significant reduction of tariffs on American ethanol, dropping from 19% to zero, which could jeopardize hundreds of jobs in regions such as north-east England and Yorkshire. Executives, including Paul Kenward of ABF Sugar and Grant Pearson of Ensus, have expressed grave concerns, labeling the agreement as an 'existential threat' to the domestic bioethanol sector. They warn that without immediate intervention from the government, the industry could disappear, leading to a reliance on imported ethanol and the loss of valuable domestic production of byproducts like carbon dioxide and high-protein animal feed, which are essential for agricultural markets.

While the trade deal has been touted as a significant achievement for other British industries, such as automotive and steel, which benefit from reduced tariffs, the implications for the bioethanol sector are dire. Starmer's government has emphasized the importance of securing jobs across various sectors, arguing that the agreement will foster greater trade opportunities in the future. However, the criticisms from bioethanol leaders highlight the risks of such concessions, particularly for farmers who rely on a stable market for wheat unsuitable for bread production. The government has acknowledged these concerns and indicated that discussions with bioethanol producers are underway to assess the deal's impact. As the situation unfolds, the future of the UK's bioethanol industry remains uncertain, with calls for urgent government action to prevent its potential demise.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights concerns from industry leaders regarding the potential collapse of the UK’s bioethanol industry due to a trade deal negotiated by Keir Starmer with the United States. The significant reduction of tariffs on American ethanol poses an existential threat to local producers, with warnings of job losses and market instability.

Industry Impact and Job Losses

The reduction of tariffs from 19% to zero for American ethanol could jeopardize the operations of major bioethanol plants in the UK, specifically in north-east England and Yorkshire. The executives from ABF Sugar and Ensus emphasize that this could lead to hundreds of job losses and a significant impact on local agriculture, particularly for wheat growers who rely on a stable market for their products. The warning about the potential closure of these plants suggests a strong reliance on domestic production for both job security and agricultural stability.

Government Response and Trade-offs

While the trade deal is framed as beneficial for various other British industries, such as automotive and steel manufacturing, the article raises questions about the balance of these benefits against the risks posed to the bioethanol sector. The statement from Starmer about the deal as a "fantastic, historic day" contrasts sharply with the grim outlook provided by industry leaders, indicating a possible disconnect between governmental priorities and industry realities.

Public Sentiment and Perception

There is an underlying narrative that seeks to evoke concern among the public regarding the sustainability of local industries and job security. By emphasizing the potential for widespread job losses and the negative impact on farmers, the article aims to generate public support for a reevaluation of trade policies. This could mobilize community action or influence political discourse around trade negotiations.

Manipulative Aspects and Hidden Agendas

The urgency conveyed in the executives’ statements may serve to manipulate public perception, framing the issue as one of immediate national interest. While the article provides factual context about the trade deal, the language used may incite fear about the loss of domestic production capabilities. The focus on job losses and economic impact could be seen as an attempt to rally support for protective measures, suggesting a potential agenda to influence trade policy toward more favorable terms for local producers.

Comparative Analysis with Other News

When compared to other reports on the trade deal, this article stands out by focusing specifically on the negative ramifications for the bioethanol industry. Other articles tend to highlight general benefits across multiple sectors without delving into the specific consequences for industries that may suffer. This divergence may signal an attempt to draw attention to overlooked sectors, prompting a broader discussion about equitable trade policies.

Societal and Economic Implications

The potential fallout from this trade deal could have far-reaching implications for the economy, labor market, and agricultural practices in the UK. If the bioethanol industry collapses, it could lead to increased dependence on imported ethanol and adversely affect local farmers, creating a ripple effect throughout the agricultural supply chain. The discourse surrounding this trade deal could influence public opinion, potentially swaying voter sentiment in future elections.

Target Audience and Community Support

This article seems to resonate particularly with agricultural communities, labor groups, and those concerned about local industry sustainability. By focusing on the direct impact on jobs and local production, it likely aims to engage readers who prioritize regional economic health and job security.

Market and Economic Impact

In the context of financial markets, the news could affect stocks related to the bioethanol industry, agriculture, and companies involved in alternative fuel production. Investors may react to the potential instability and job losses, which could lead to fluctuations in stock prices for affected companies.

Global Context and Relevance

From a global perspective, the article touches on broader themes of trade balance, domestic production versus imports, and energy independence. The concerns raised about the bioethanol industry reflect ongoing discussions about sustainability and local economies amidst globalization.

AI Influence in Reporting

While it is unclear if artificial intelligence was specifically employed in crafting this piece, the structured presentation of data and specific quotes could suggest a methodical approach to compiling the narrative. AI tools that synthesize information and analyze sentiment may have played a role in shaping the article’s tone, although this remains speculative.

In conclusion, while the article presents valid concerns regarding the bioethanol industry, it also serves to shape public perception and potentially influence trade policy discussions. The balance of benefits and losses in trade agreements is a complex issue that warrants careful consideration.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Source URL: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/may/12/uk-us-trade-deal-bioethanol-industry-bosses

The British bioethanol industry could collapse as a result of Keir Starmer’s trade deal with Donald Trump, industry bosses have said.

The bosses of ABF Sugar and Ensus, the companies behind almost all of the UK’s production capacity of bioethanol – a petrol substitute produced from agricultural products – have said hundreds of jobs in north-east England and Yorkshire could be at risk as a result of the deal.

The new US-UK trade deal includes a concession by Starmer to reduce British tariffs on American ethanol from 19% to zero. However, this could lead to the closure of the two biggest plants in the country that make the fuel, executives have said.

Paul Kenward, the chief executive of ABF Sugar, and Grant Pearson, who chairs Ensus, told The Times the deal triggered “an existential threat” for the sector.

“Without immediate action, this vital sovereign capability will be lost,” they said. “We are fast approaching the point where we need to decide whether to sign new contracts. In the current conditions, that would be irresponsible.

“Hundreds of growers will lose a dependable market for wheat that cannot be used in bread making. Instead, they’ll be forced to export it at lower prices, while facing higher costs for imported animal feed.”

They added: “Without urgent government action, the UK’s bioethanol industry will simply vanish, leaving the country dependent on imported ethanol – while also losing significant domestic production of carbon dioxide and high-protein animal feed.” Carbon dioxide and dried grains are both byproducts of bioethanol.

While Starmer agreed to lower tariffs on American ethanol, the UK-US trade agreementhas been hailed a win for British industriessuch as cars, aluminium and steel. The prime minister said it was a “fantastic, historic day” when he announced the agreements last week, claiming that the new policies could save thousands of British jobs.

The US agreed to cut the 25% tariff rate on British steel and aluminium exports to zero. American tariffs on up to 100,000 British cars will also drop to 10%, down from the 27.5% rate initially announced and UK ministershope the quota can be raised.

A government spokesperson told The Times: “This government signed a deal with the US in the national interest to secure thousands of jobs across key sectors – from the auto industry to steel – and lay the groundwork for greater trade in the future.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

“We are meeting with leaders from all sectors, including ethanol producers, to discuss the impacts of this deal.”

It is understood that senior government figures met ABF and Ensus last week.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian