Good morning. Last week, Downing Street was bracing for a painful rebellion of up to 50 MPs on the welfare reform bill that comes before the House of Commons next week. A couple of days later, government whip Vicky Foxcroft resigned, andthe government insistedit was not a sign of serious trouble, referring to the rebels as “a handful”.
On Monday, an amendment that would put the bill on pause was published with the support of 108 MPs. And by last night, that number had risen to more than 120 – comfortably enough to create the most humbling day of Keir Starmer’s premiership, and throw the future of the government’s flagship welfare reforms into chaos.
The extent of the rebellion appears to have taken No 10 by surprise – but after Starmer dismissed the criticisms yesterday as mere “noises off” and made the dubious claim that his party is “pretty united” on the issue,he now appears ready to offer concessions. Today’s newsletter, with the Guardian’s deputy political editorJessica Elgot, explains how the government was caught out – and what it might do to head off a significant political crisis. Here are the headlines.
Nato| Leaders of the 32 Nato countrieshave committed to investing5% of GDP on defence by 2035. Donald Trump, who had complained that other nations were not paying their fair share, praised the move, adding: “Nato is going to become very strong with us”.
Iran| Senior White House officials claimed yesterday that“new intelligence” supported the claimthat the US attack on Iran’s nuclear programme was a complete success despite a previous leaked intelligence assessment suggesting it was set back by only a few months. Donald Trump had earlier acknowledged that the intelligence was “inconclusive”.
Fertility| The proportion of women giving birth after fertility treatment in the UKhas increased by more than a third in a decade, with the equivalent of one child in every classroom now born as a result of IVF, figures show. The number of women freezing their eggs also increased sharply, with cycles up from 4,700 in 2022 to 6,900 in 2023.
West Bank| Dozens of Israeli settlers haveattacked a Palestinian West Bank town, sparking a confrontation that ended with Israeli forces killing three Palestinians.
Eurostar| Denis Villeneuvewill direct the next James Bond film, Amazon MGM Studios has announced. The Dune and Arrival director’s appointment comes as the search continues for the actor who will replace Daniel Craig in the role.
The government says that the benefit cuts set out in the bill it hopes to pass next week are essential for two reasons: to save money and make the growth in welfare spending sustainable; and to tackle economic inactivity and help people get back into work. To people with disabilities and their families and advocates, the bill amounts to something quite different – a brutal assault on some of the most vulnerable people in the country that betrays the very values that Labour is supposed to stand for. To read more about the detail of the bill, seethis First Editionfrom March.
Some sort of rebellion has been priced in for a long time – but the number of rebels, and their strategy of tabling an amendment that allows them to get a sense of their own strength, have caught the government on the back foot. Here’s what you need to know.
How has the rebellion grown?
The crucial miscalculation appears to have been that the rebellion would be small and slow-growing enough that the government would be able to lean heavily on those putting their heads above the parapet, and that dark warnings of losing the whip or worse would be enough to keep the numbers manageable. Instead, there has been what you might call a Spartacus effect.
“They didn’t take it seriously,” Jessica Elgot said. “But there’s a tipping point where it becomes embarrassing for MPs to be on the other side of it” – and where those threats begin to look hollow, because nobody would seriously believe that 120 MPs would face losing the whip. So far, only one MP has backed down.
Inthis analysis piece, Pippa Crerar writes: “The scale of the rebellion appears to have taken No 10 by surprise, not least because much of the planning took place below the radar, and through separate groups of MPs coming together. Even some of the rebels were shocked at the numbers.”
The rebels could have just voted against the bill on Tuesday. But by publishing an amendment which would effectively kill it, they have given MPs the opportunity to sign up publicly and to see the strength in numbers that they have – hugely fortifying in the face of government pressure.
“If they hadn’t done that, a lot of MPs might have worried that they’d be walking through the no lobby more or less on their own,” Jessica said. “With so many on board, you now have others feeling left out, and getting emails from their constituents asking why they haven’t signed.”
Who are the MPs who are ready to rebel?
One measure of the danger for the government is how far the rebellion extends beyond those on the left who would be expected to oppose most cuts that the government might propose. It was tabled by 11 select committee chairs, including Meg Hillier, the influential chair of the Treasury committee; many of them were handpicked for safe seats; there are several who were selected as “mission champions” last year, a sign that they were viewed as loyal and on the rise.
“Most of them don’t want to do this,” Jessica said. “They feel like they have really tried to make the case privately, over lots of meetings and letters to ministers, or cornering them when they see them in Westminster. A lot of them struggle with the incoherence of the message they’re being asked to put out – that this is about getting more people back into work, when the vast majority of cuts are to personal independence payments [Pip], which are an in-work benefit.”
Inthis piece from April, Jessica notes that almost 200 Labour MPs have a majority that is smaller than the number of recipients of Pip in their constituencies – and many who fit that description are among the rebels. Similarly,this Financial Times analysis(£) from yesterday finds that 2.5% of the population in Labour constituencies in England and Wales will be affected by the proposed reforms – against 1.6% in other seats.
Many MPs are also hearing from their constituents, in their inboxes or at their surgeries, about their fears of the impact that the changes will have on them. “It doesn’t seem like a self-interested calculation, by and large,” said Jessica. “This isn’t why they got into politics – they are genuinely worried about the impact. A lot of them have worked in charities or social justice organisations or unions before becoming MPs – they are really knowledgable about the issue. And the more experienced MPs have to deal with it in their constituencies all the time.”
Will the government make concessions?
The government is extremely reluctant to abandon the bill, not least because it would blow a £5bn hole in Rachel Reeves’ budget. Yesterday, Angela Rayner – standing in for Keir Starmer at prime minister’s questions –told MPs: “We will go ahead on Tuesday.”
But the government is almost bound to insist that it will go ahead until it concludes that it has no option to do otherwise, and there is still a serious chance that the bill will be pulled. With many ministers now concluding that there is almost no chance of it passing, Keir Starmer appears ready to make concessions. Changes under consideration include relaxing the new restrictions on who will qualify for Pip.
Up until now, Downing Street appears to have been divided on the right way forward, with one source saying: “There is a camp for pulling it, a camp for concession and a small but insane camp for ploughing on.” Reeves is understood to be particularly opposed to pulling the vote.
The rebels have not been impressed by what they say have been veiled threats of deselections – denied by No 10 – and dark warnings that a defeat could bring the government down, which seems very unlikely indeed. “MPs just don’t buy it,” Jessica said.
In the last couple of days, the tactics have changed: Liz Kendall spent most of Tuesday in individual meetings with would-be rebels, while other senior ministers including Rayner and the health secretary, Wes Streeting, were on the phone to others. Amid reporting inthe Financial Times(£) andthe Times(£) of a backlash against the prime minister’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney for his role in pushing a hardline approach, he has also been speaking to senior rebels.
“It’s the carrot rather than the stick,” Jessica said. “They’re hearing that they’ve always been seen as reasonable, that they’re respected, that this will help the government to spend on their priorities.”
Is there a serious risk of the government losing?
The 120 who have signed the amendment so far could still rise, with at least 170 MPs having expressed concerns, and the possibility that those in government jobs will wait until the last possible moment to resign in case the bill is delayed in the meantime. If opposition parties also vote for the amendment, even the current number would be enough to overturn the government’s hefty 156-seat majority.
While the Conservatives would love to inflict a humiliating defeat onLabour, there are risks for them in doing so: they have repeatedly cast themselves as the party of stricter limits on welfare, and so voting against for nakedly political reasons could easily backfire.
In what looks like an attempt to pave the way for that option, Kemi Badenoch has said that the Tories will back the government if they are given three concessions: commitments “to reduce the welfare budget, to get people into work and not to have tax rises.”
Sign up toFirst Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Those are difficult commitments for Starmer to make, even if he was prepared to accept the optics of being “saved” by Badenoch. “Welfare spending still goes up even with these changes, so they would have to make the bill much tougher,” Jessica said. “It’s also possible for the Tories to abstain – and on the current numbers, that would still mean that the government would lose.”
A young, charismatic, democratic socialist caused a political earthquake by winning New York City’s Democratic mayoral primary – energising young voters in a way not seen since Obama. So how canZohran Mamdanikeep up the momentum?Bhaskar Sunkara breaks it down.AlexNeedham, acting head of newsletters
When they’re managed properly,crowdsare generally very safe – and when things go wrong, the people in them are often blamed when the truth is that the organisers are at fault. Ahead of Glastonbury, Dan Hancox – author of a superb book on the subject –explains the right way to do it, and why the joy of a mass gathering is still worth the effort.Archie
In a little more than a week,Oasiswill play their first gig in almost 16 years since breaking up after a fist fight. To mark the moment, Rachel Aroesti asked five photographers for their eyebrow-raising anecdotes aboutthe times they shot Noel and Liam Gallagher.Alex
Nobody can quite agree on how to define it – but,Linda Kinstler writes, “there is a growing sense in the field thatinternational criminal lawis a failed project”. Her long read is an urgent and lucid review of a system that ultimately reflects a much broader geopolitical crisis.Archie
It used to be regarded as virtuous – but these daysfruit juice’s health-giving reputation is on a par with that of lager and lime. Should we even be drinking it – and how much is too much? A thirsty Rachel Dixonsorts the pulp from the pith.Alex
Football| Liverpool’s Harvey Elliottscored a second-half doubleto put England past the Netherlands and into Saturday’s UEFA Under 21 Championship final. Lee Carsley’s side will face Germany, who beat France 2-0 in the tournament’s other semi-final.
Tennis| Emma Raducanu says she needs to get her “head in the game” before Wimbledon starts on Mondayafter falling just shortof a comeback against the Australian teenager Maya Joint at Eastbourne.
Cricket| The Sussex head coach, Paul Farbrace, sayshe would not pick Jofra Archer for the second Testagainst India, warning that one match after four years out of first-class cricket may not be enough preparation. Farbrace said that Archer had looked in “great rhythm” and bowled “very nicely” in his return.
TheGuardianleads with “No 10 preparing concessions on welfare reform to stem rebellion”. TheTelegraphsimilarly reports “Starmer set to back down on benefits”, while theihas “Starmer ready to retreat on benefit cuts to end rebellion”. TheTimessays “Rebel MPs want ‘regime change’”.
TheFinancial Timeshas “Nato allies pledge to meet Trump’s demand for defence spending bump”. TheMirrorleads with “Weight loss jabs: new fear”. TheDaily Maillaunches a new campaign, under the headline “Stop Labour’s betrayal of our SAS heroes”. TheSunclaims that security sources have warned that Russia is pushing migrants to the UK to overwhelm border defences, with the headline “From Russia with shove”.
Afraid of Israel, angry at the regime: Iranians on 12 days of war
The analystEllie Geranmayehand voices from inside Irantalk about their experiences of the last 12 days and what it will mean for the future of the regime
A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad
Wearing a bright yellow shirt so he’d be visible to drivers, teenager Marcus Skeet (pictured above) set off on an extraordinary mission: torun the length of Britain, from Land’s End to John o’Groats, a distance of roughly 790 miles.
It wasn’t as if Skeet, 17, hadn’t dealt with challenging things before. He has experienced type 2 diabetes, depression, anxiety and obsessive compulsive disorder, and he became a young carer after his father was diagnosed with dementia. Skeet got into running by doing just a mile a day at first – and hated every minute. But he soon found that it helped his mental health, and he wanted to help others. He’s done that partly through this epic 58-day run, which has raised £157,000 and counting for the charity Mind.Finishing the racehasbeen an adjustment, but Skeet is already planning his next challenge. “I’m not going to do anything crazy for a while. I obviously want to do America, things like that,” he said. When asked by the Guardian’s Sam Wollaston what that means, he responded: “Run across, left to right or right to left, 4,000 miles, why not?”
And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow.
Quick crossword
Cryptic crossword
Wordiply