Once they had massed on the perimeter of Sudan’s Zamzam camp, the Rapid Support Forces began the onslaught – shelling, firing from anti-aircraft guns mounted on pickup trucks and storming into the camp chanting racial slurs as they fired on their victims.An estimated 700,000 people had sought refuge in Zamzam, Sudan’s largest displacement camp, but last weekend they were forced to seek cover and plot the best escape route. Most had fled these fighters before.Those who were able gathered any belongings that could be carried on their backs or flung on to donkeys and camels and rushed to begin the long walk to El Fasher city, 14km (8.7 miles) away, or Tawila displacement camp, 60km west of Zamzam.Mohamed, a community organiser, tells the Guardian he tried to sneak past the fighters to reach the medical centre staffed by the NGO Relief International that was hit during the early stages of the attack on 11 April,when nine staff were killed, including one of his friends.“They were barbaric, inhumane. They were chanting as they killed people in their homes. It is behaviour you wouldn’t even find in the wilderness,” he says, adding that the fighters, who claimed to be seeking Sudanese government fighters hiding in the camp, attacked people in their homes or in their cars as they tried to escape.“I ran into an RSF vehicle – the fighters were shouting racist slurs and started firing at us. I was shot in my right leg, then someone who was hiding in one of the homes dragged me inside.”View image in fullscreenPeople who fled the Zamzam camp rest in a makeshift encampment in an open field near the town of Tawila in Darfur.Photograph: AFP/Getty ImagesRescuers had only salt and leaves to treat and dress his wound. They spent the next two days in hiding.The battle for Zamzam raged for three days. The RSF and its allied militias claimed they had seized control of it on 13 April. At least 400 civilians, including women and children,had been killedin Zamzam and nearby Um Kadada by 15 April, according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, although it says it has not had access to assess the real scale of the damage.For most people this is not the first time they have escaped from the RSF. The camp grew in size during the current civil war, as people fled other parts of Darfur taken by the RSF, a collection of militia who follow the former warlordMohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti. But the camp has existed since the 2000s, before the war. The longer-term inhabitants fled similar violence by the RSF in its prior form asthe Janjaweed militias.Another Zamzam resident says he was in his house when the shelling started, causing a fire to break out around him. The neighbours banded together, gathered the elderly people and ran towards the north for the road to El Fasher.“The shelling was intense. People started running everywhere, to the south, east, west. The shelling was so intense and they were using all types of heavy weaponry, we couldn’t even speak to each other. We walked by foot – it was tiring and difficult. We would take breaks to sit and sometimes people just collapsed on the ground.”View image in fullscreenHundreds of thousands of people are thought to have fled in the attack on the Zamzam camp.Photograph: Courtesy of North Darfur Observatory For Human RightsThe UN estimates400,000 people had fled Zamzamby Tuesday, heading either to El Fasher or to Tawila.Medecins Sans Frontieres’ project coordinator for North Darfur, Marion Ramstein, says 10,000 people arrived in Tawila in the first 48 hours of the onslaught on Zamzam, most in an advanced state of dehydration and exhaustion.“Some children were literally dying of thirst upon arrival, after travelling for two days under a burning sun, without a single drop of water to drink,” says Ramstein, who says the hospitals are so overcrowded that children are having to share beds.A displaced person already living in Tawila says he saw thousands of families arrive in Tawila hungry, thirsty and often with injuries after the arduous journey.“Many of them came on foot. Some of those who had cars were stopped on the way and then looted [by fighters] and many of the youth were disappeared or killed,” he says. “The families here are out in the open without water.”The situation is similar in El Fasher, where the man who fled his burning home in Zamzam says most of the injured are still waiting to be treated or have been given crude first aid, such as using fire to cauterise their wounds.A doctor in El Fasher says there is an urgent need for shelter, food and water but the area’s ability to provide them is limited by a year of siege on El Fasher and its vicinity – the last major city in Darfur that the RSF does not yet control after more thantwo years of war.“Even now I can hear the rumbling of heavy artillery nearby. The RSF is always bombing somewhere in El Fasher, 24 hours,” he says. “RSF has looted all the outskirts of El Fasher, killing many people, burned a lot of villages, looted their property.”View image in fullscreenA queue for food rations in the Tawila encampment.Photograph: AFP/Getty ImagesThe siege has meant that prices in the food markets are high. According to a list of market prices distributed by the North Darfur governorate, after the attack on Zamzam the price of a kilogram of wheat rose 3,000 Sudanese pounds (£3.80) to 15,000 when bought with cash but was as high as 22,000 when bought using mobile banking, which most people rely on.Famine had already taken holdin Zamzam camp, and the latest fighting has added to the crisis.While at least half of Zamzam’s population has fled, a significant number are unable to leave. Mohamed and other campaigners accuse the RSF of holding them hostage and using them as human shields to prevent the Sudanese army from launching a counterattack.He says fighters are stopping people on the roads and choosing who they allow to pass based on skin colour.“The main goal is a full-scale mass genocide and to displace any tribe not associated with the RSF,” says Mohamed.A communications blackouthas meant that details of the aftermath of the attack and how many people have been killed and injured cannot be established but information is slowly trickling to families outside Darfur.Atrocities mount daily. Promised aid does not arrive. Why has the west turned its back on Sudan?Read moreAltahir Hashim, a UK-based Darfuri campaigner, says that only after several days did he discover that his mother and siblings were able to escape but that several of his cousins had died. Many of his friends also lost family members.View image in fullscreenA satellite image shows vehicles in Zamzam camp on 11 April.Photograph: Maxar Technologies/ReutersAccording to the Yale School of Public Health’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which uses satellite imagery to monitor violence in Sudan, fires continued to spread after the RSF took control of Zamzam, with1.7 sq km of the camp– equivalent to 24 football pitches – destroyed by fire between 11 and 16 April.“Even until now the people who are still in the camp are being killed and raped. Even those who tried to escape to the west, they brought some of the little girls back, the elderly and they are killing them. Until now there are many wounded who have not been treated,” he says.“The people [who escaped] are truly exhausted because what happened in Zamzam is a serious tragedy. They’re indescribable, things that have not happened in humanity before.” Name has been changed
‘They were chanting as they killed people in their homes’: survivors describe attack on Sudan’s Zamzam camp
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Survivors recount horrific violence during RSF attack on Sudan's Zamzam displacement camp"
TruthLens AI Summary
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) launched a brutal assault on Sudan's Zamzam displacement camp, leading to chaos and mass displacement among the approximately 700,000 residents who had sought refuge there. Reports indicate that the RSF began their attack by shelling the camp and firing from anti-aircraft guns mounted on pickup trucks. Survivors described the attackers chanting racial slurs as they targeted civilians in their homes and vehicles. Many residents, having previously fled violence in other parts of Darfur, were forced to gather essential belongings and escape towards El Fasher city or the Tawila displacement camp. Eyewitness accounts reveal harrowing experiences, including one community organizer who was shot in the leg during his attempt to reach a medical facility as the RSF claimed to be searching for government fighters hiding within the camp. The attack, which lasted for three days, resulted in at least 400 civilian deaths, according to the United Nations, although humanitarian access to assess the full scale of the destruction has been limited.
In the aftermath of the attack, the humanitarian situation has deteriorated significantly. An estimated 400,000 individuals fled Zamzam, many arriving in Tawila in desperate states of dehydration and exhaustion after enduring a grueling journey under the scorching sun. Some children arrived at medical facilities critically ill from lack of water, while others suffered from untreated injuries. The ongoing conflict has exacerbated existing shortages, with reports of skyrocketing food prices and limited shelter in both Tawila and El Fasher. Survivors of the attack have described the RSF as holding many residents hostage and using them as human shields, raising fears of further atrocities. Amidst ongoing violence and a communications blackout, the situation remains dire, with many families still unaware of the fate of their loved ones. The international community's response to the escalating crisis has been criticized, as the region faces increasing humanitarian needs amidst rampant violence and instability.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The recent article detailing the violent attack on Sudan's Zamzam camp provides a harrowing account of the conditions faced by displaced individuals in the region. This report aims to shed light on a critical humanitarian crisis while simultaneously influencing public sentiment regarding the ongoing conflict in Sudan.
Purpose of the Report
The report seeks to raise awareness about the brutality faced by civilians at the Zamzam camp, emphasizing the inhumane actions of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). By highlighting personal testimonies of survivors, the article aims to evoke empathy and spur international attention towards the humanitarian situation in Sudan. The intention appears to be to galvanize support for humanitarian aid and intervention, as well as to highlight the urgent need for protection of vulnerable populations.
Perception Creation
Through vivid descriptions of violence and the plight of individuals, the article cultivates a narrative that portrays the RSF as barbaric aggressors. This portrayal could foster a strong negative sentiment towards the RSF and generate public outcry against the Sudanese government’s failure to protect its citizens. The use of emotional language and personal stories serves to humanize the victims, making the information relatable and pressing.
Information Omission
While the article focuses on the RSF's actions, it may gloss over broader geopolitical implications or other actors involved in the conflict. There’s a possibility that the narrative simplifies the complexities of the situation, potentially omitting historical context or the roles of various factions. This could lead to a skewed understanding of the conflict dynamics in Sudan.
Manipulative Elements
The report has a high degree of emotional appeal, which can be seen as manipulative. By using graphic imagery and personal anecdotes, it aims to stir emotions and create a sense of urgency. The language employed—describing the RSF's actions as "barbaric" and "inhumane"—is charged and may influence readers’ perceptions beyond the facts presented.
Comparative Context
When analyzed alongside similar reports on humanitarian crises, this article aligns with a broader narrative of conflict and suffering in regions plagued by war. Such reports often share themes of violence against civilians and the need for humanitarian intervention, which could signify a pattern in how global media portrays crises in Africa.
Impact on Society and Politics
The exposure of such events can lead to increased pressure on governments and international organizations to respond. It may encourage diplomatic efforts or humanitarian aid initiatives aimed at alleviating the suffering of those affected. The emotional weight of the narrative could evoke grassroots movements or calls for action among the public.
Support Base
The report is likely to resonate with human rights advocates, humanitarian organizations, and individuals sensitive to issues of racial and ethnic violence. It appeals to those concerned with social justice and international humanitarian law, aiming to garner support from communities already engaged in activism against such atrocities.
Economic and Market Implications
While the direct economic impact may be limited, heightened awareness of the humanitarian crisis could affect investment perceptions in Sudan. Companies operating in conflict zones may reassess their risk exposure, and humanitarian aid organizations may see increased donations. The report may indirectly influence sectors linked to international relations or humanitarian assistance.
Geopolitical Relevance
This article fits within the ongoing discourse regarding human rights and state violence, which remains a relevant topic on the global stage. It connects with current discussions about the responsibilities of nations in protecting civilians and the international community's role in conflict resolution. The writing style, while compelling, does not indicate the use of AI. The narrative is structured around personal testimonies, which suggests a human touch in the reporting. However, if AI were to be involved, it could have influenced the selection of language to enhance emotional engagement. In conclusion, while the report serves an important purpose in highlighting the urgent humanitarian crisis in Sudan, its emotional appeal and potentially selective framing warrant critical analysis. The information presented is credible, but the overall narrative could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the complexities involved.