There’s an invader turning huge swathes of Britain into deserts – and these dead zones are spreading | George Monbiot

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Desertification in Britain: The Spread of Molinia caerulea and Its Ecological Consequences"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The phenomenon of desertification is affecting vast areas of Britain, yet it remains largely unnoticed and unaddressed. Contrary to traditional perceptions of deserts, the areas in question are not characterized by dry, sandy landscapes but are instead dominated by a single plant species known as Molinia caerulea, or purple moor-grass. Over the past five decades, this species has proliferated across significant upland regions, including parts of Wales, Dartmoor, Exmoor, and the Pennines. These Molinia-dominated landscapes, often referred to as terrestrial dead zones, are stark and lifeless, harboring fewer species than some arid deserts and presenting challenges for human access and enjoyment. The high tussocks formed by Molinia make traversing these areas difficult, effectively rendering much of the access land in England and Wales less accessible for recreational activities. The ecological implications of this monoculture are severe, as it halts natural succession processes and diminishes biodiversity, making these landscapes inhospitable for many wildlife species, including birds and insects.

The causes of this ecological crisis are multifaceted, stemming from agricultural practices such as headage payments that incentivize overgrazing and land degradation. Additionally, nitrogen deposition from farming, traffic, and industrial activities exacerbates the problem, while drainage practices further encourage the spread of Molinia by drying out peatlands. Experts suggest that the degradation of peat from drainage and burning is a primary driver of this phenomenon. Although various proposed solutions exist, including the use of herbicides and controlled grazing, these are often inadequate or counterproductive. A more promising approach involves rewetting the land and restoring peat through methods like blocking drains and planting appropriate vegetation, which could revive the affected ecosystems. However, efforts to rewild these upland areas face significant resistance from vested interests in agriculture and land management, highlighting the urgent need for government intervention and public awareness to address this growing environmental challenge.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights a significant ecological issue in Britain regarding the spread of monocultures, specifically the invasive species Molinia caerulea, or purple moor-grass. The author, George Monbiot, presents a bleak picture of the landscape, where vast areas once rich in biodiversity are now dominated by a single species, resulting in what he describes as "terrestrial dead zones."

Ecological Alarmism and Awareness

The piece aims to raise awareness about an environmental crisis that seems to be overlooked by the general public. By framing the issue as a spreading desert, Monbiot seeks to provoke a sense of urgency and concern for biodiversity loss in the UK. The use of vivid imagery, such as "grey-brown" landscapes devoid of life, is intended to elicit an emotional response from readers, prompting them to recognize the severity of the problem.

Public Perception and Responsibility

There could be a notion that the article is designed to critique the public's indifference towards environmental degradation. The author emphasizes that these "dead zones" are often in areas that are supposed to be accessible for public enjoyment, thus highlighting a disconnect between people's rights to nature and the realities of ecological loss. This might foster a collective responsibility to advocate for environmental preservation and restoration.

Potential Omissions and Underlying Issues

While the article calls attention to the ecological impact of a single invasive species, it may inadvertently divert attention from other critical environmental issues, such as climate change or industrial agriculture practices contributing to biodiversity loss. This raises questions about whether there are broader systemic factors at play that are not being fully addressed in the narrative.

Manipulative Elements and Credibility

The language used in the article is emotive, characterizing Molinia caerulea as an invader that transforms landscapes into lifeless zones. Such framing could be seen as manipulative, as it creates a dichotomy between "nature" and "invasive species," potentially oversimplifying complex ecological interactions. However, this approach can also be justified if it serves the greater goal of raising awareness.

Broader Implications and Societal Impact

The article has potential implications for environmental policy discussions, particularly regarding land management practices and conservation efforts in the UK. A heightened awareness of these issues could lead to increased public support for initiatives aimed at restoring biodiversity. Moreover, it may galvanize communities to take action, influencing local politics and conservation strategies.

Audience and Community Engagement

This type of environmental journalism typically resonates with environmentally conscious communities, including activists, conservationists, and academics. The call to action embedded within the narrative may mobilize readers who are already inclined to support ecological causes, potentially leading to grassroots movements advocating for change.

Market and Economic Considerations

While the article does not directly address economic impacts, increasing awareness of environmental degradation can influence consumer behavior and investment in sustainable practices. Businesses focused on conservation, eco-tourism, or biodiversity preservation may benefit from heightened public interest in these issues.

Global Context and Relevance

The ecological concerns raised in the article are not isolated to Britain; they reflect broader global trends of biodiversity loss and habitat degradation. This connection to global environmental challenges aligns with current discussions on sustainability and conservation, making it relevant to ongoing international dialogues.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

There is no clear evidence suggesting the use of artificial intelligence in crafting this article. However, the structured way of presenting ecological issues and the emotive language could be reflective of trends in data-driven journalism, where AI might assist in identifying impactful narratives. If AI were involved, it might have influenced the choice of language or the framing of the ecological crisis to maximize reader engagement.

In conclusion, the article serves as a critical reminder of the environmental challenges facing Britain, aiming to engage the public and inspire action. The credibility of the piece is bolstered by its focus on real ecological issues, although the emotional framing may lead to polarized perceptions among readers.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Deserts are spreading across great tracts of Britain, yet few people seem to have noticed, and fewer still appear to care. It is one of those astonishing situations I keep encountering: in which vast, systemic problems – in this case, I believe, covering thousands of square kilometres – hide in plain sight.

I realise that many people, on reading that first sentence, will suspect I’ve finally flipped. Where, pray, are those rolling sand dunes or sere stony wastes? But there are many kinds of desert, and not all of them are dry. In fact, those spreading across Britain are clustered in the wettest places. Yet they harbour fewer species than some dry deserts do, and are just as hostile to humans. Another useful term is terrestrial dead zones.

What I’m talking about are the places now dominated by a single plant species, calledMolinia caeruleaor purple moor-grass. Over the past 50 years, it has swarmed across vast upland areas: inmuch of Wales, onDartmoor,Exmoor, in the Pennines, Peak District, North York Moors, Yorkshire Dales and many parts of Scotland.Moliniawastes aredismal places, grey-brown for much of the year, in which only the wind moves. As I know from bitter experience, you can explore them all day and see scarcely a bird or even an insect.

Not that you would wish to walk there. The grass forms high tussocks through which it is almost impossible to push. As it happens, most of the places that have succumbed toMoliniamonoculture are“access land”. Much of the pittance of England and Wales in which we are allowed to walk freely has become inaccessible. In a great victory a fortnight ago, the supreme court ruled that we havea right to wild campon Dartmoor. But on many parts of the moor, you wouldn’t want to exercise it. As soon as the grass takes hold, all opportunities for enjoyment and employment cease.

Moliniachallenges the definition of an invasive species. The term is supposed to refer only to non-native organisms. But while it has always been part of our upland flora, it appears to have spread further and faster than any introduced plant in the UK, and with greater ecological consequences. It is uncontrolled by herbivores, disease or natural successional processes (transitions to other plant communities). In fact, it stops these processes in their tracks.

Given the scale of the problem, it is remarkably little studied and discussed. I cannot find even a reliable estimate of the area affected:the most recent in England is nearly 10 years old, and I can discover none for Wales or Scotland. But in the southern Cambrian Mountains alone, judging by a combination of my walks and satellite imagery, there appears to be adead zone covering roughly 300 sq km, in which little but this one species grows. Most of central Dartmoor is nowMoliniadesert, and just as disheartening and hard to traverse.

Why is this happening? It seems to be a combination of forces. One is “headage payments”: subsidies that were issued in the second half of the 20th century, which paid farmers for the number of animals they kept. They created an incentive to cram the land with as many sheep and cattle as possible. This, in combination withburning moorlandto produce fresh shoots for the livestock to eat, seems in some places to have pushed ecosystems beyond their tipping points. Even, as in parts of the Cambrians, where there have been no sheep grazing for 40 years, as there’s nothing left to eat (sheep will scarcely touchMolinia), there has been no recovery.

Another likely factor is nitrogen deposition. Nitrogen compounds rain down on Britain’s habitats at a rate of roughly29kg per hectare per year. They are produced bylivestock farming, traffic and industry. Drainage (largely for farming) alsoappears to accelerate the spread:Moliniathrives as peat dries out.

The Dartmoor ecologist and nature campaignerTony Whiteheadtells me that the degradation of peat caused by drainage, excavation, burning and grazing pressure is likely to be the primary accelerant. Burning in particular – carried out by sheep farmers on Dartmoor and Exmoor and by grouse shoots on northern English moors and in Scotland – favours the plant. While other species are destroyed,Moliniais protected by its deep roots and tussocks, which guard its buds.

Various solutions are proposed, but few are satisfactory. One approach is toblast the grass with the herbicide glyphosate. It works for a while, but leaves an even grimmer waste, likely to be colonised again byMolinia. Others propose yet more burning, and/orgrazing with cattle or ponies: temporary “solutions” that look like blood-letting to cure anaemia. Whitehead has watched what happens: the animals graze around the edges of theMolinia, eating only small amounts, while continuing to knock back other plant species.After early summer, they won’t touch the stuff, as its nutritional value declines steeply. Anew reportby the government agency Natural England states that livestock grazing is not required to protect the main habitat type – blanket mire – thatMoliniathreatens.

Rewetting the land, by blocking drains and building bunds and perhaps, as one team is attempting,planting clumps of sphagnum moss among the grass, in order to restore the peat, seems to be the only means of reviving blanket mire. It also makes the land less prone to fire. In other places, we should be encouragingthe return of trees, through planting and excluding livestock.Most of the areas overtaken byMoliniahave a temperature and moisture range that would favour temperate rainforest: a vanishingly rare, rich and complex habitat. As the trees mature, they should shade out the grass. In somewet areas, I’d like to see the return of water-tolerant species such as alder, downy birch and willow, to restoreupland carr, another rich and scarce habitat.

But anyone who wants to rewild upland ecosystemshits a wall of vested interests– mostly sheep farmers and grouse moor owners – who, like the commercial fishing sector, insist on doing the wrong thing until it destroys their own industry. Where is the urgent government programme? Where is there even official acknowledgment that we have a problem? To fix something, first you must see it.

George Monbiot is a Guardian columnist

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian