‘There were no warning signs’: what happens when your partner falls into the ‘manosphere’?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Increasing Concerns Over Male Radicalization in Relationships Linked to the Manosphere"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Samantha's relationship with her Swedish boyfriend initially seemed progressive and egalitarian, characterized by shared responsibilities and open communication about emotions. However, after their breakup, she discovered a troubling shift in his beliefs, which had become influenced by the manosphere—a term for online communities that promote misogynistic ideologies. During a visit to collect her belongings, he expressed newfound views that emphasized male superiority in sexuality and the impossibility of platonic friendships between men and women. This change was linked to his involvement in a men's mental health group that had connections to controversial figures like Jordan Peterson and far-right influencers. Samantha noted that despite their time together, there were no apparent warning signs of his radicalization until their relationship ended, highlighting a growing concern among women about the hidden influences of the manosphere on their partners.

The experiences shared by Samantha reflect a wider trend, as more women report discovering their partners’ alignment with misogynistic beliefs linked to figures like Andrew Tate. Research indicates that a significant portion of young men in the UK are embracing these ideologies, raising alarms for women regarding the potential radicalization of their partners. Experts like Nigel Bromage, who works with individuals leaving the far right, emphasize the urgency of addressing how these beliefs can impact families, particularly those with children. The manosphere's influence is increasingly permeating mainstream society, leading to dangerous behaviors in relationships. Women like Rachel and Debbie recount their partners’ controlling and violent actions, often exacerbated by exposure to misogynistic content online. As the conversation continues, researchers like Dr. Lisa Sugiura stress the need to consider the risks posed to women in relationships with men influenced by the manosphere, advocating for greater awareness of their experiences and the societal implications of male radicalization.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the alarming trend of men becoming engrossed in the 'manosphere', a digital space often associated with misogynistic ideologies. It shares the personal narrative of Samantha, who experiences a profound transformation in her partner's views after their breakup, which leads to the discovery of his involvement in a men’s mental health group that is steeped in controversial beliefs. This case illustrates a broader phenomenon where partners of women report similar shifts in attitudes among men influenced by extremist online content.

Societal Implications

By portraying the dangers of the manosphere, the article aims to raise awareness about the impact of online radicalization on personal relationships. The narrative suggests that these ideologies can manifest unexpectedly, even in individuals who initially appear progressive. This aligns with a growing societal concern regarding the acceptance of misogynistic beliefs among young men, especially in the context of rising support for figures like Andrew Tate. The article’s intent seems to be to alert readers, particularly women, to be vigilant about their partners' online influences.

Perception Management

The article creates a perception that the manosphere is a pervasive and dangerous influence, potentially aimed at inciting fear or concern among readers. By highlighting statistics that show a significant portion of young men subscribing to these beliefs, it underscores a sense of urgency around the issue. However, it could also be seen as an attempt to sensationalize the problem, which might lead some to dismiss it as alarmist rather than a realistic portrayal of societal trends.

Hidden Narratives

There may be underlying narratives around male mental health and the struggle for identity that are not fully explored within the article. By focusing predominantly on the negative aspects of the manosphere, it risks overlooking the genuine needs for support and community that some men seek, albeit through problematic channels. This selective emphasis could contribute to further stigmatization of the issues surrounding male mental health.

Manipulative Elements

The article carries a level of manipulativeness through its language and framing. It portrays the manosphere as a toxic environment that can corrupt even the most progressive individuals. The emotive language used, such as describing Samantha's shock and disappointment, serves to evoke sympathy and concern while potentially polarizing opinions about men who engage with such communities.

Trustworthiness and Reliability

While the article presents real experiences and statistics, its framing may lead to questions about its overall reliability. The focus on anecdotal evidence alongside selective statistical data could skew perceptions, making it crucial for readers to critically assess the information presented. The reliability is further complicated by the emotional appeal that may overshadow a balanced examination of the issue.

In summary, while the article effectively highlights a pressing issue regarding men's engagement with misogynistic beliefs online, it also raises important questions about the nuances of male mental health and the potential for manipulation in its portrayal. This narrative could incite discussions about how to address the root causes of such ideologies without alienating those who may be seeking support.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Samantha thought of her partner as the most progressive man she had ever had a relationship with. Her Swedish boyfriend seemed, to her, more feminist than many British men she had dated.

“I never had to ask him to clear up,” she says. “All our labour was shared. He had done therapy. He was happy to talk about his emotions.”

When they broke up, however, Samantha, who is in her 30s and based in Sheffield, saw a very different side to him. She recalls going to his flat to collect her belongings. “I got into a debate with him,” she says. “It became clear his beliefs had become centred around the idea that men are more sexual than women, and men and women can’t be friends.

“He said: ‘Now we are not together, I don’t need to agree with everything you say.’”

He told her he had become involved during the pandemic in what he described as a men’s mental health group. Samantha has since discovered the group was influenced by Canadian psychologistJordan Peterson, who has expressed controversial views about women, and a far-right Swedish influencer whom her ex-boyfriend had appeared with in photos on social media. “It’s that strand of the manosphere that is focused on self-help and spirituality,” she says. “The whole time we were together, there were no warning signs.”

Samantha’s experience is not an isolated case. Several women told theObservertheir partners had been sucked into themanosphere– the name given to parts of the internet that circulate misogynist content – or consumed far-right material online.

With surveys reporting that an increasing number of young men are subscribing to these beliefs, the number of women finding that their partners share the misogynistic views espoused bythe likes of Andrew Tateis also on the rise. Research from anti-fascism organisation Hope Not Hate, which polled about 2,000 people across the UK aged 16 to 24, discovered that 41% of young men supportTateversus just 12% of young women.

“Numbers are growing, with wives worried about their husbands and partners becoming radicalised,” saysNigel Bromage, a reformed neo-Nazi who is now the director of Exit Hate Trust, a charity that helps people who want to leave the far right.

“Wives or partners become really worried about the impact on their family, especially those with young children, as they fear they will be influenced by extremism and racism.”

His organisation supports women whose loved ones become involved in the manosphere or thefar right, as well as the individuals themselves.

Bromage, who was involved in far-right groups for two decades, warns that the charity is seeing a “crossover” between those involved in the manosphere and the wider far right.

“Over the last few years, the rhetoric of the manosphere has increasingly leaked out of isolated forums on to mainstream platforms,” says Anki Deo, Hope Not Hate’s senior policy officer. “It has been taken up by ­influencers with a much wider audience and is no longer just a ‘dark ­corner of the internet’.”

Rachel, who is in her 30s and lives in London, met her partner on the popular dating app Hinge, and was struck by his generosity. He insisted on buying her gifts and giving her cash to spend. She thought her now ex-partner was a “normal, decent guy”. But as the relationship progressed, she began to feel uneasy as he forced more gifts on her. Four months into the relationship, she began to realise his political views were profoundly different from her own.

“I was talking about the gay community. He got aggressive with me,” Rachel recalls. “He was super homophobic – I didn’t know until then.”

A few days later, he interrupted an argument to show her a video of Tate. “I don’t think Tate fuelled him,” Rachel says. “He was always like that, but it validated his beliefs. He really liked the flashy lifestyle. He just had a lot of hatred.”

He became more controlling as the relationship unfolded, she recalls, complaining that she had male friends and a career. He argued that she shouldn’t be focused on work because it was his duty to provide for her.

The relationship ended after six months. His behaviour had escalated to the point where he raped and assaulted her, and was convicted of both offences after they broke up.

Dr Lisa Sugiura, associate professor in cybercrime and gender at the University of Portsmouth, who specialises in online misogyny, says that although there is widespread concern about men being radicalised by the manosphere, there is not enough focus on the “really concerning” risk these individuals pose to their female partners.

Commonly held views in the manosphere, says Sugiura, include being anti-feminist, thinking that misandry is equivalent to misogyny and believing society is systemically sexist against men. “They want to go back to this time where women had no rights in society at all and were completely owned by their father and then their husband.”

Debbie, who is in her 50s, says her ex-husband’s “mask started to slip” after they moved in together. “When I got a good job and started earning more money, passed my driving test and became more independent, that was when he started watching far-right and misogynistic content online,” she says.

Her husband was an avid fan of a YouTuber known for his misogynistic and Islamophobic views, and also consumed content from Christian militia groups, Debbie says.

“He put crucifixes all over the back of his van. The reason I knew what content he was viewing was because he would proudly talk about it in front of our kids.”

She says he told her that he hated feminists and the women’s liberation movement. Debbie also says he was violent towards her.

Roisin, from Belfast, says that after she broke up with her partner, he began subscribing to increasingly extreme views. She shares a daughter with him and says he has shown her manosphere videos and told her that she can’t leave the house in certain clothes.

“He has made derogatory remarks about other races and cultures in front of her,” Roisin adds. “And said: ‘If you ever got pregnant, I wouldn’t allow you to get an abortion.’”

Sugiura says that female partners of men sucked into the manosphere are being neglected by society. “I don’t think anybody is thinking about the impact on them. There is concern for these people who are being indoctrinated or radicalised by these harmful ideologies, but what is the risk to those in relationships with them?

“We need to ensure their voices and experiences are not forgotten.”

Names have been changed to protect identities

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian